surprised? a terror attack with a big likud

surprised? a terror attack when likud big and garunteed prime Minister 

written stardate 4704.9 after 5 cycles

news now: On Tuesday morning, November 15, 2022, a Palestinian man performed a deadly terror attack: 18-year-old Muhammed s. was stabbing and car-ramming in Ariel and on a nearby highway, killing three Jews and seriously wounding three others. note: i needed to change the order of the sentences, from nasty news websites that refused to say a "palestinian did deadly terror" they only wrote "palestinian" in the sentence of measuring the "home" of a palestinian to wrongly evoke mercy for this palestinian and his home, but not wrote by his islamic name and jihad actions aimed at deniers of his holy prophet muhamed which is the cause of islamic murdering in terrorism.

i recall in the recent israeli elections the PEOPLE around me discussed shocking issues.

while i was concerned with being liberal enough, despite my persanal criticism of homo behavior, openly published here, certainly homo behavior is a type of bad perversion and corruption based on objective nature, still being liberal was urgent to me... while the people around me had different issues which surprised me.

one issue was the terror attacks, "with that left wing government" they said of bennet who has truly been more right wing than likud.... and of lapid in atid, "many many terror attacks" undeterred by the "weak left" seen as "weak begging for peace," they said. when netanyahu was leader arabs "did not dare and would not dare" they said, to hit a jew. one exagerated "not even one terror attack" when netanyahu was leader... surprise? in the first month of netanyahu,s strong likud, the muslim "dared" to stab and misuse car to harm.... "even once" already in ariel... undetered by the strong likud and the so-called "tough" netanyahu now with a gauautee to assemble a coalition.

surprise?

the motivation is the islamic oblication to kill deniers of their holy prophet "muhamed pbuh" not caused by who is leader. so they will change the claim "less arabs will dare" during netanyahu than during bennet and lapid, but at the time of election they said "the reason to vote netanyahu is because "arabs" are stabbing us.

people around were emphsing ethnicity of family and women.

the liberal side who "RESERVED" places for women POINTED OUT the protection of equality for women in the parliament called knesset. they contrasted the anti-women of the religious jews who "did not invite" even one lady in the list of shas and yahadut both claiming to represent the jewish religion in general and as lady exclusive.

likud "earned" the votes due to its suppression of women only ONE lady in the first ten seats... the israeli public was "not outraged" by the limit of women in likud nor even "grossed out" the largest group of israeli voters PREFFERRED the party that limited women because that is "not an issue" meaning preferable.

shas with "zero women included" grew, same as yahadut which grew and likud due to its campaign of "we had enough of arabs" in the government combined with the favorable suppression of women in the eyes of israeli voters... was the largest political party supported by the largets group of voters around 22% besides the million religious who "must pbey the rabbis" to vote for exclusion of women and the now revealed "personal" gain of deri leader of shas to get the title of "vice prime minister" for his personal gain while his voters claim we need him strong for us he demands power and title for himself power over ministry of money and if not minister himself then over its minister as vice prime minister for personal glory. that does not outrage israeli voters. 

even the "liberal orthodox" who included women only 2/10 far from the population statistics probably half women and certainly near 50%.

was that an outrage to voters? that gender discrimination ATTRACTED enough israeli voters that party doubled from seven to 14 seats! the israeli voters were not outraged by the discrimination of women nor the focus on arab identity which distinguished race and ethnicity. such racism attracted voters.

the people around me spoke of the arabs doing terror and arabs stabbing "us" and arabs in the government, these ideas were isolating ethnicity, i n the bad way that bad "black lives matter" isolated based on color, to which i replied "do 100% arabs stab?" even most muslims who believe they "must kill deniers" of muhamed temporarily restrain themselves and some muslims cooperated in the liberal lapid government refusing to "deny" the jewish state when mentioning that israel is a jewish state... which infuriated other muslims.

one muslim said "you are from america you want israel to be like america" i said "no. israel cant be like america due to history" i referd to the iron age history of jew kings as well as the history of independence from BRITAIN who ruled in contrast to palestinians who had not ruled... never a local arab government with a capital in jerusalem... ever. only from a distance from egypt or turkey or syria extending their rule from afar and not even "moving" their capital city to jerusalem the "third holiest" place in islam... even the one that did move its capital not to jerusalem the "third holiest" because jerusalem was truly NEVER important to islam until they wanted to take it from jews. after the jews had it then it changed to "nearly as important to us as mecca and medina" for marketing to take it from jews.

the west bank was "taken" from "jordan" in a "defense war"  not "subjugating palestinians under israel," as liars try to fool the outsiders, those west-bank-arabs have their own arab leader... who oppresses them without any criticism for preventing elections... 

i was shocked by the emphasis of the people around me talking about arabs and the ads of likud "enough of arabs" in the governing, which ATTRACTED the israeli voters, who showed in action that they favored netanyahu's racism... as long as it also discriminated and limited women. likud wa snot like that in the past... but maybe only because then the arabs were ANYWAY excluded so no need to emphsasize it.

the financially beneficial lapid atid, despite increasing competition in building and imports... despite RESERVING spots for two women, in the top five seats, women who israeli voters would not vote for if they had primaries... that did not attarct voters... that deterd israeli voters who focusd on the identity of arabs same as the previous election likud focusd on "zzabar" meaning locally born israeli jews... to attaract the "we" which did not include new jew immigrants from france and u.s. etc. the voters liked the "we" idea identifying as a primitive herd of we for the purpose of exclusion... at the time other jews and now arabs... not only discriminating arabs, as above they exclude jews too but the issues of exclusion of women and outsiders is a stain which i protested... unsuccessfully. 

we see what most israeli voters favored... even women voters preferd excluding women from political party, and the emphasis on generalizing arabs due to some arabs stabbing jews... exclude "all arabs, preferably expel all arabs" because we dont know which one, they said, notably the same as "arabs said about jews in the past" i saw both sides were too extreme... at least jews did not put bombs on arab busses, only arabs do mass murder like that and not due to a "left wing" government perceived as weak... if so we would be "surprised" that this week an arab did mass murder 3 jews as above when likud strong... but the motivation is the religious obligation to kill the deniers of muhamed regardless of who is leader in israel.

a society that does not allow pointing out the true contents of the quran is "trolling and censoring and fascist" which those same censorers are supposedly against. will this list of facts be visible in the future? people will not even know that i protested?