stars my color choices

 

stars pixelated

 

toy story 1995 summary

toy part 1

in Andy's play room, a few days before his birthday, the toy Potato Head robbed a bank, helped by Slinky Dog. cowboy Woody (Tom Hanks), the sheriff, interfered and was helped by Rex the dinosaur. they saved everyone in the bank. Woody had a pull-string for speaking. Andy carried Woody downstairs and saw ma decorating for his birthday party. he went back upstairs to get his sister Molly. Andy tossed Woody onto his bed. when Andy left the room, holding her, Woody sat up. toys gathered. 

talk talk. party guests arrived. toys rushed to the window to see the presents which the kids were bringing the little green plastic soldiers lowerd the baby monitor and hide with it in a plant they saw opening gifts a lunchbox, bed sheets a Battleship game the toys are not worried yet. before he opened the next present Rex knocked the speaker off the table so the batteries fall out. toys heard kids so went to previous places. kids enter. Woody got moved for a toy astronaut (Buzz Lightyear/Tim Allen). kids left room. Woody crawld from under the bed n welcomd Buzz to Andy's room.

The other toys climb up on the bed n ask him about the buttons and gadgets on his space suit. They were dazzled by Buzz's wings and voice recordings better Woody's pull-string-activated voice, which some criticised. dazzled by the laser, but woody corrected them it is just "a little light bulb that blinks." Buzz climbd the bedpost, shouted his line "to infinity and beyond!", and flew... down and bounced off a rubber ball, just falling, then he added a fancy loop on the car racetrack. also did a few rotations on the toy plane that hung from ceiling. lastly landing on the bed. All the toys are dazzled. Woody said "that wasn't flying, that was falling with style!" 

Andy played: Buzz shot Woody. he wore a copy of Buzz's helmet and wings. he took down woody poster and replaced it with Buzz's. same swap for sheets. Andy tooks Buzz to bed, but Woody stayed in the toy box. toys heard noises and thru window saw a kid, Sid near a doll. a brown and white dog was tied nearby and barking. Sid was laughing and lit the fuse. debris flew around.

day for victims of hate actions

 victims of hate day, now

this will describe facts and not show any hate to either side.
we often hear on the news about "arab child injured or killed by israel army" and sometimes they find the photo was from a different story misused to falsely accuse the most moral military on this pathetic planet.
what about when the israel idf "returned fire" and a child got hit? was it an act of hate? the ACT differed the purpose and aim was at those shooting the deadly explosive rockets to stop the attempts murder which is the crime called attempted murder.
often the terrorist bully children as a human shield planning to use them for protection to deter israel returned fire and if israeli would shoot accuse them... STILL not an act of hate in contrast to islamic terrorism who hate israel and zionists, so instead of negotiating with jew leaders who ARE willing to give land, they COWARDLY  attack helpless civilians hoping the civilian wont fight back, no risk!!!  like the bully hitting the smaller student so the goliath is NOT the powerful idf because the attack was on civilians the big goliath is the rocket people of hamas etc. so support for the "underdog david" is the israeli civilian target people, not the arabs who want to obey the quran that undeniably repeated to destroy deniers so use any excuse from palestine #palestine to revenge to camouflage the religious oppression toward non muslims.
this explains why israel memorial TODAY NOW specified "victims of hate" to exclude death when aiming at the murderers when hitting civilians, not an act of hating the children but  necessity in contrast to arab bus bombs and rockets targeting civilians who coincidentally do not accept muhamed.

the TRUTH about the palestine issue is only to disguise the religious obligation to destroy those who deny muhsmed.

which arab country welcomes the so called palistine refugees? not jordan nor any brother arab because the point is not poor palestinians but a camoflage for kill jews. 

my view or u.n.

 https://forums.wdwmagic.com/attachments/world-south-pole-azimuthal-equidistant-projection-map-jpg.315038/

the u.n. flag used north pole center due to uninhabited land called Antarctica. this stretched the island called Australia and the vast water... which is equally UNINHABITED  same as ant. so equally stupid to show stretched.

the way how i see the world is PEOPLE  that part should be stretched in area but uninhabited SEA and land shrunk which is accomplished in the SOUTH pole centered map that shrinks non-people sea and land. so that should be how PEOPLE see the world not sea that lacks people.

my edits to imdb some accepted kim possible

World-saving cheerleader Kim Possible can do anything! ...Except ask Josh Mankey to the school dance

1,2 an unplanned visit to camp Wannaweep n its lake

1,3 Innocent suggestions have disastrous consequences when Kim suggested to Ron to get a new haircut... and Ron inspired a billionaire to try to take over the world!

1,4 kim foiled the plot to use a minibot as a bomb and got detention 

rhyme 13 dwarves

rhyme 13 dwarves: balin dwalin thorin, bifur bofur bombur, dori nori ori, fili kili, gloin oin

by a hairy hobbit the couplet poet

"i dreamt balin and i drank gin
thorin drank poison in an inn

fili kili watched dwalin flee
all free from king, our glee will be

bifur bofur said "come here sir
"pour bombur wine then pour for her"

lady celin enjoyed her break
while i poured wine they gave her cake

after dori, will see the sea
she and nori, will pay my fee

ori and gloin each gave a coin
who got drunk? oin, who kicked my groin

how could he know i put poison
in beer i served to king thorin

murder is bad except this time
to free twelve dwarves was not a crime"

characteristics:
balin wisest,  dwalin impatient quick temper, thorin strongest
bifur bofur bombur?
dori nori ori
fili kili
gloin oin

immoral moral jack stalk

 the story of jak beanstalk is a fascinating legend. just a story... not a "fable to teach us to steal from giants" just a story. in the story he stole... just kuz kids see people driving cars on tv no danger the kid will mimic and drive. idea in family guy. 

or no giant existed so nobody stole idea in a disney version.

u.s. versions ADD stuff to justify the seeming crimes indicated even 1902 people were troubled by immoral details: in 1902 the fairy SENT him to take it like giants are animals who dont own so can steal from bears and ogres.

other versions ADD the harp was stolen by giant  in mickey mouse znd other versions so reclaim different from stealing the harp of giant. had he made it? no a human msde the harp that guant stole in at least 3 versions and similarly hen or goose in several versions. donsld wsnted to "get a refund" like regret buying a profuct and regret... dome stores omly allow if damaged but ikea and others allow regret if not damaged by buyer. ohers only if yes damaged when purchased.

in 1917 version it was a RESCUE mission to save a life. threw rock to stop a murder then murderer giant threatened him so needed to kill it and needed  to draw chase before it killed a girl. 

the attacks "western legends are immoral" complained that he crime stole and the death was caused by stealing which led to murder that would not have happened if he had not stolen... all accusing jack but what if jack was a good guy? 

as if arab legend are moral? ali baba had theives and sticky cup to steal gold coins. or aladdin stole for hunger and jasmin stole to give to kid. arabian nights. but bad westerners. dont read western legends only... holy books that say sinners deserve death is that less problematic? religions teach the actions GET influenced by holy books but legends are stories as zbove not fables to mimic nor encourage in contrast to the greater harm of bad holy books. 

in 1950 version jack was orphan kuz giant killed pa and stole hen so jack was not stealing he was reclaimed his own family hen that was how pa fief. the option of not causing murder if not tresspass was not an option AFTER giant was ALREADY involved with humans killing pa and abducted princess an element also  in 1927 version so the BIG PICTURE is more than simply crime steal. in other words the SAME action can be interpreted either as crime as accused or can be DEPENDENT  on circumstances as the proper reclaiming of his own hen as above.

the murder of giant was not caused by stealing as accused by small minded accusers who did not consider possible circumstances that redefine the action as moral if it was reclaimed jack hen or rescue princess or save girl all elements added in 1917 and 1933 and 1950 versions  kuz even then and earlier in 1902  westerners cared about morality and the SAME action of taking DEPENDENT  on circumstances. 

a kiling is harmful evil therefore the SAME act killing is good when stopping the killer. think about That. 

warming? false faith

this year the false faith called "scientific  warming " insisted "gas trapped heat" a lie exposed EVERY night heat escaped so they clarified we meant average. we can inspect that they predict warmer.... because that allowed flexible lies we can be wrong so predict according to false faith but luckily they publish "observed weather" the method for science is observation and WITH last year so we can compare. see for yourself the averages CONSISTENTLY  less warm than last year.

i was comparing snow days but found temperature average surprise? they announce concern? when observed less warm see for yourself in pictures

the hero culture clash

 in the west we define hero  as rescuing the princess... like in jack beanstalk, giznt overpowered princess kuz giant so hero rescued saved led to freedom that is hero...

but muslim news company have a different definition in picture 

al-manar has a name undoubtedly arabic and it found a way to make provoke seem WORSE  than the coward who CRASHED a car with no risk to self,  into unarmed helpless civilians to cause terror to vilify jews for "provoking" but anything can be called provoke for people who have DIFFERENT  causes to be violent.

was the provocation a justified action? who cares if jews did it they are bad provokers you provoked me i cant be blamed for my action when i was provoked, they say but they are responsible for their harmful and cowardly action so they call the murderer praise a hero against powerful i.d.f army who were not thd victims nor targeted so called "brave" to crash a huge heavy car into unarmed helpless civilians.... no.... that is not a hero nor brave. but if resist israel that gets praised.

headline two the misleading attempt to vilify tourists....

the word game intensified as "tourists outside the mosque" are called "raiding the mosque" how dare they enter and raid... but outside neither enter nor raid they were tourists wtf!!!

hundreds yes ..... they were MANY tourists not hundreds of soldiers invading... BETWEEN  prayer times when muslims were NOT blocked but that is boring so the editor selected the few details that vilify jews sensationally the evil raiders came but we could not, after our turn ended.

well tourists are not a threat what about cops? trained and weapons? they DID raid in a mosque... but thanks to Western rules they needed conditions to enforce law violaters who were not sharing not taking turns.... and were discovered as planned a riot the muslim youth WAS USING  the moswue as a war place.... consistently with "holy" war but they had explosives and had prepared rocks to injure and kill law enforcement instead of submitting to the time limits after all iskzm prayer time was limited by islam definition not pray 24  hours. 

hurting is the opposite of saved so FAR from hero.

the REAL reason to criticised israel

 the REAL  reason to criticised israel

is in this picture 

notice if you go to bus station in a developing country you dont expect internet service even at a central one but if they HAVE one such as egged, 3 in pic, let people connect.... no... not available for anybody... notice no symbol of security only our workers have password, but no limit as if for everyone but not available even for customers despite using busses.

but besides the egged one somebody  BOTHERED  to set up a "FREE"  service.... but that would use "our" bandwidth or megabyte usage on a "metered" measured connection so better not to let people ACTUALLY  use it... even the one set up for usage gor customers free... that is the reason to criticism israel company not false accusation about oil related arabs.

this is not an issue of stingy jews the superbus one is jews... eli znd dani... some jews are not stingy... but after BOTHERED  to set up 3 let people connect and use and choose whuch of the 3 is less burdened spread the usages... that is something defined and fixable instead of false accusation about arabs. 

analyzing the jew haters at britannica

 no surprise that brits hate jews considering their occupation of jerusalem between the world wars and were targeted by israeli "freedom fighters".

but we see it more blatantly in choosing the wording instead of dry facts

for example they recently updated "jerusalem" to say it is "under israel since 1967" true but compare the wording would they say about BERLIN after prussian empire fell: "city of central Europe that since 1918, the fall of the prussian empire, has been wholly under the rule of germany"

of course they would not say that about berlin they only say that about jerusalem because JEWS differ in their jew hater opinion.

facts: they would not say under for germany because despite true it implied submission and enslavement and they only target jews as targets for attack not berlin.

they would never write: "Berlin, national capital, Germany = jerusalem capital of israel" mostly for fear of oil countries that are muslim but also for jew hatred jews must be VILIFIED according to the authors of britanicca.

facts jerusalem is, in their opinion "under" those villainess greedy jews "unjustly enslaving" as if it had never been ruled by the israelite DYNASTY that over a billion each christians and muslims do not yet deny. it is in their holy books.

instead someone must dare to say "jerusalem national capital israel" because that is true if not say that then religious heresy for two vast religions. the dynasty was in the WALLED jerusalem despite the temporary jordanian occupation between 1949 and 1967.

someone must dare to write despite israel p.m. concurrently angering most of the western world be straying from democracy values, which less than half the israelis are troubled by.... still "jerusalem capital and chief urban centre of israel". that continued since the historical dynasty reestablished when israel declared independence, in the part west from jordan and when jordan made a ceasefire in 1967 "reunified" as the history which replaced the extinct green line which is ONLY preserved by jew haters who decided jews are different. no other past borders of lorraine are written this way "stopping time" at the year when germany held lorraine. only jews are treated different in a way that tried to unjustly vilify them. 

instead of criticising in a constructive way which would not be jew hatred they show their biased jew hatred in the wording they choose to vilify israel even wrongly while lessening the severity of murderers by saying "the rare rocket attack" from arabs as if small... rare even once is a deadly rocket attempted murder that is severe in britain unless... the target was a jew. the end.

admittedly britanicca is better source of informattion than wikipedia but still whenever something involves jews they show they separate jews for example u.n has TWO refugee organizations unesco and unrwa why two?

unhcr for refugees and separately unrwa for the refugees related to jew borders that way the equal policies will not "benefit" the jews who must be treated with less privileges.

i condemn the u.n. for separate agencieds but at least they are open about their jew hatred so we know u.n. is not the "good duys" they faied to prevent war between soviet and u.s both in korea and in vietnam they are not the good guys.

if you have compassion aim it at the victims of hate israel.

who governs jerusalem

 did you know israeli government and laws have been and are governing jerusalem since.... the beginning of iron age and now despite interruption.

both "objective foreign religions islam and christian holy books" who do NOT gain land by the RECOGNITION still RECOGNIZED  king david in christian bible and "even in quran" despite the concealed in english translation, i checked arabic ilmlk king david was recognised as king in jerusalem in quran which was the WALLED part now called "east jerusalem" by those who ignored history and modern history too.

first the 2,600 millions of religions both quran followers and bible followers committed to holy books that preserve the history of king david as religious faith. stronger than history, defined HERESY  if deny king david. king of jerusalem then only the walled was jerusalem faith for two and half BILLION people most who openly hate israel but "too late" committed to those books as above.

according to history and holy books by billions as above: an israelite dynasty ruled jerusalem the walled part around 1000 bc before christ even according to competing religions and even the muslims who claim the land refused to edit the quran that admitted david was "king" in jerusalem a claim no other nation had its capital city in jerusalem. 

only israelite.

when ottoman or mamluk occupied jerusalem it was not their capital in contrast to king david even recognised by quran.... which should sway its billion followers but instead they censored English translation to hide the word king. luckily i have some university buddies who are muslim to teach me those sections in quran in their familiar language... at least simple nouns king etc.

those muslims famous for whining about "ending unjust occupation" had done precisely that occupied jerusalem from a distance, that interrupted the rule since king david according to quran and christian bibles. the solomon dynasty lasted A FEW CENTURIES  gasp. so the lie about walled part, not israel is even RELIGIOUS HERESY, as above, still that does not bother the catholic leaders nor muslim qadi... certainly not sway the european free thinkers as i will explain.

 israelite had a dynasty and capital jerusalem UNIQUE  only to israelites no other nation had a capital ruling jerusalem even egyptian mamluks and further still so called palestinians who want "their" capital in jerusalem east as if they lost the thing that they never governed.

so that is ancient history... but more importantly for faith of BILLIONS as above they know that denying "israelite was king david" was heresy so they corrupt the translation of quran and call david a "muslim" before the fast of ramadan was ever taught.

what about modern history? israelite rule was interrupted... and until TRAIN railroads, travelling was too difficult to sail... until steam trains and steam ships.

in 1949 a cease fire line with jordan gave JORDAN governance of walled city. when did so called palestinians ever govern jerusalem to claim the lie "we lost what we had" like a poor guy whining he "lost in a tragedy his Walmart franchise" that belong to other people.

in 1967 a war redrew the ceasefire line.... however jew haters ignore history and PRETEND to "freeze time" unrealistically like the british series of the "magic stopwatch" a watch that "stop" time... with the temporary "green line" a cease fire line wrongly called 1967 to deceive and hide the change that year... and currently called the 1949 line when it was first established admittedly NOT before NOR after.

before 1949 david dynasty even according to muslim holy book. but heresy does not bother people who prefer hating jews ovef their book they simply corrupt the English translation and westerners wont know.

do they freeze time 1949 because not before , in stead the walled city was israelite so denying that would be religious heresy.

so they freeze time like the kid who pushed a student who defended himself, starting the story in the middle "he hit me" hid in self defense.

they put a temporary green line on maps as if it had not changed since then. as if walled jerusalem was not israelite israel. 

the north kingdom was SAME family as israelites judah and his brothers listed in book joshua.

in 1967, egyptian tanks gathered by border threatened israel who "responded preemptively " destroyed hundreds of the newest jet warplanes. egypt had hundreds more but old or not maintained so soviets gave hundreds to replace the lost 400 warplanes.

as a european judge stephens wrote, same as France justly owns to govern land taken from germany in a defensive war same israel if not that is not how judgment works law fof everyone cant exclude jews from the rule of defense war. excluding jews from that would be diabolical discrimination. law is law wrote the european judge even for those hate able jews.

so the new cease fire line along jordan river REPLACED  the extinct green line that is only preserved by jew haters but truly extinct.

what about the claim "most countries do not recognise" east jerusalem surprise?? a concensus of jew haters was consistent??

most countries are muslim from Indonesia to morroco to the crumbled yoguslavia.

or catholic who dont give a bleep about their bible only the pope and cardinals matter despite baseless in book that EXCHANGED the authority of book.

what about germany? no jew haters there right? france was influenced by catholic and showed jew hatred before and furing nazis and hide below surface the same existing hatred.

what about brits and their commonwealth and u.s. they need OIL from muslim countries so the lack of "recognition" is FEAR OF OIL not because the israel claim is wrong but "most world does not recognise due to the need if saudi and iraqi oil from muslims who side with "family" arabs who never ghad land to lose it in 1948.

anyway we cant freeze time that is fiction like british stop watch series... after 1967 jordan made a cease fire agreement same as ANY surrender. the new cease fire line DIFFERED  from green line do stop preserved the temporary expired line.

would green line bring satisfied to arabs? it was THAT BORDER from which jordan and syria invaded that was the war situation. if that 1967 line was renewed... would that bring peace? that WAS the border STARTING a war egypt sent many tanks to border and made navy blockade.

despite this historical fact both sides of israel politics agree to give land to arabs... but only after arabs act PEACEFUL  but year after year arabs from hamas gaza and now Lebanon too snd Syria are nit acting peaceful.

those loyal to palestinian authority use cars to murder in terror attacks ONLY condemned by italy due to the italian loss killed.

israel cant reward violence and the arab side does not stop instead EVERY RAMADAN  year after year after year violence increased as people who apparently feel the need to show islsm identity show it by killing infidels who deny muhsmed obeyed quran.

as long as arab side is violent they csnt get rewarded with the land israeli politicians are willing to give despite history... and despite quranic heresy but jew hatred is more important wd can interpreted holy books. the end.

uncensored truth

 my father left, for ma i knocked
she was not there, their door unlocked
i entered in, and saw one bed
which slept on rug? i asked with dread.
i walked across to their shower
i heard water at 9 hour

door knob i tried, but it was locked
was she inside? if so i knocked

i stood waiting but no answer
i kicked the door saw all of her
milk factory each large enough
to balance her, missing male stuff
now i know why, i am called male
if asked last week this test i'd fail
loose cover on, the part for boy
i won't know which? this will annoy

cover the rest not the wuwu
so i can know which one is who
tight panty shape sub- navel far
almost always... know which they are
society is quite foolish
too young for milk cant distinguish
when everyone hid their wuwu
we never know just who is who.

solution end of prophecy

 the talmud b.b. 12 a and b,  said when the temple was destroyed prophecy was taken from prophets. huh? if that meant no new prophecy then the new guy wouldn't be called a prophet... that lacked prophecy.

it must refer to somebody who was prophet but taken.

who was prophet at time of destruction? jeremia and he called prophet for example 42,2.

if so the talmud seemed to refer to him who started prophesied and called prophet losing prophecy but that conflicted book that  got prophecy from god, after destruction in chapter 39 not only reading order but content order when gdalia killed after replacing zedekia and destruction if so one source seemed wrong was talmud wrong? not losing prophecy? or book  jeremia wrong to claim from god?

a solution is "that was the error of the people" who rejected his message saying not from god in chapter 42 because they believed after destruction, in 39,8 matched 52, prophet lost and they did not want to hear stay dont go egypt. still that was error as talmud clarified some prophets were wise and jeremia was wise so prophecy stopped from other prophets as rashi explained not wise just speak for god but wise did not lose "not taken from wise" so jeremia truly did get message from god as book jeremia claimed despite talmud also true that prophet lost taken from but not from wise prophet.

similarly zacaria could be prophet despite after destruction year darius if wise not only prophet messenger. still content temple of sacrifice not same god as hosea and jeremia so probably SAW something  the tricky devil angel claimed to be god to cause people violated jeremia truly not commanded sacrifice in jeremia 7 without the added word that is not translated a word in original  hebrew.

similarly when muhamed mentioned jibril gabriel in quran we can believe he saw something spiritual but due to conflicted prophecy jeremia 31 covenant in heart is the covenant must be from devil disguised to fool muhamed to lead away from god who wanted grace heart sufficed.

luckily even muhamed in earlier books wrote alnasra christian no worry in sura chapter teo 2 aya verse 62, certainty of reward even if stay christian despite wanted muslim followers still confirmed christian faith and admittedly later books he made a new law to kill deniers and make war on christian but also in quran first so if true the later message was just a trick to cause battled gods people because jibril the spiritual messenger was a disguised devil that led muhamed and millions away from god as above but still bothered to write if stay christian no worry as above.

sky castle

 did you notice? cultures very distant from each other have similar idea, despite the difficulties travelling from india to briton in 1700's

we who live in the "West" know about jack and the beanstalk the modern version he climbs "nimbly" jack be nimble as abbot and castelo version linked jack with jack same one. up the stalk to a Palace or castle in sky. this was far from the location where hindu had vimana also "high up flew" and word vimana means palace too! a palace in the sky same idea wow what could cause two distant cultures to invent SAME idea not in jew bible unless they each SAW a palace in sky that they saw and included in story of jack riding the stalk from magic bean up... like hindu vimana flying castle in sky.

in original jack the beans grew so quickly that the moment he put in ground it sprouted up and hit his face. he went up to castle in sky. giant saw a basilisk and died from fright. other versions he went up 3 times we see two witnesses  confirmed each other flying castles.

 castles.