note: the word geography is like "writing the world"
the focus should be on PHYSICAL real mountains and rivers and less on "naming countries and capitals" because the rivers are REAL and worse the broders change... and capitals change and were not real only name.
lesson one. if we watch the sky the 'pattern of stars" appeasrs to move together. thsi could either be because the stars are moving together or because we stand on a sphere which is spinning and facing some stars until the spin continues and we face other stars. in astronomy we will learn which but this is geography.
our sphere is named the earth. is it a sphere some people doubt this. however we bserve the moon and neighboring planets are a sphere so we should believe this is a sphere to.
our sphere called a planet is named palanet earth.
the name is bad because most of the surface is waternot earth. admittedly under the water is solids dirt and metals. based on the magnetic field there MUST be much metal inside so either name it "water or metal" but not earth... but hey it is just a name. to identify which planet.
the problem with a sphere is how to define and identify points. luckily since our sphere spins we can identify an axis which we all spin around. we name one north and one south as names.
we could beigin our stidy from the south axis or south pole and there is a vast continent there however that "south continent" is very cold so almost nobody lives there except temperary researchers so instead we will analyze the impotrtant parts from the north.
if we travel from the north towards a certain english speaking country named UK that is moving south. for lesson one we will not go to UK because they had enuf authority in deciding time zones and longitude... instead we will go south from the north axis named north pole to another english s[eaking country named canada.
the country should less important than PHYSICAL real mountains and rivers.
the continent extends across east to west around 3000 miles across. [around 4700 kilometers by 0.6 miles each]. the water north of the land needs a name to identify it.
in this generation it is frozen often many meters of thick ice over the water. why not "north" ocean arctic relates to bear but that was a bad decision. many stars are on the north so call it north.
1 north ocean.
the land to the south is a continent with the country canada. the division of canada is political and the focus should be on physical features.
a vast bay is in the north of canada named hudson bay. the hudson bay region has many cities and many territorial divisions which are for political administration. on the west side of this continent is a major river Yukon river. it is th ethird longest river in the continent. the highest peak (once named mount mckinley back when i learned geography) is the highest peak in the continent. politiicains changed its name to the "native" name "denali"
[protest: although the earlier name had been recognized by CONGRESS AND LASTED for around a hundred years who else but obama would put the pattern america last and lowest, even american leaders lose why? because obama was democratic party and mckinly was rpublican! that shows how bad obama was.] change a name and remove the honor of an american leader to put americans "lower". those natives named it for an imaginary god but mckinly was real and a leader. stupid obama... the worst democratic president in the last four decades. so wht should we call it? the majority agreed to change the name... to denali. oh well... oops! no they did not! congress had named it for the assasinated republican president but obama did "executive "order that is one! he did not get congressional approval. that is disgusting reversing the vote and teh hundred year old name judt because a democrat wants to remove republican it was only executive order.
well trump could make an executive order too... congress never approved. " president then raised another of Obama's Alaska decisions. “Wasn't the name of a big mountain in Alaska changed by executive order?” Trump asked, according to the newspaper. (Obama announced in 2015 the federal government was changing the name of Mount McKinley to Denali, the Native Alaska name for the peak.) +The president brought up the idea of changing the name back to Mount McKinley, named for a U.S. president who never visited the 49th state, and the senators quickly argued against it. "Lisa—Senator Murkowski—and I jumped over the desk. We said, 'No, no!'" said Sullivan, who was speaking at the Alaska Federation of Natives convention in Anchorage, the newspaper reported.
as a child they taught me mckinly for the assasinated president... it did not matter he was republican buit oba,ma the democrat we know what he thought."
.
moving southward away from the north pole of the spinning axis we will se the longest rivers in this continent. the "Missouri and MIssissippi" Rivers are the longest. the missouri river pours its water into the mississippi wiver which reaches the coast therefore instead of many names use the same name "mississippi" for the river and the gulf which it pours into.
similarly the continent should be named like its longest river Missouri. one name for two
the water which mississippi empties into should be named the same one name mis. gulf because of the river and also to avoid country names for shared water.
so two names missouri and missisippi name 4 each names a river and one names a continent and the other athe gulf which it puours into
another physical real feature is mount whitney near the west coast of the missouri continent.
Tuesday, July 31, 2018
Monday, July 30, 2018
solve the hot summer
wow !! i really feel the heat of the summer now- even indoors...
i offer a solution below because - consider- my FOOLISH childhood. adults sent us to "bake" under the hot sun playing sports such as baseball under the hot sun.
that is cruelty to naive kids by making them suffer by "playing" under the hot summer sun. they should be in the shade, at least under a tree...
six years too late when my age ten i finally noticed the issue and after one inning baking under the sun in the outfield, i realized how inconsiderate even diabolicaly INCONSIDERATE the adults were for ignoring our suffering and insisting we go "out" specifically in hot summer.
so i refused to stand under the sun. the camp counselor argued with me so i compromised i would only "bat" as offense but not stand in the outfield.
even indoor basketball, if- as i saw- if it is played in a gym with no "cooling" of air-conditioning that is also cruelty to children making them suffer running around in a hot gym during the summer heat from june through august.
SOLUTION
***instead we should teach the children to avoid the heat. TO stay indoors with a fan and not run under the sun or in a hot gym.
what will they do? watch tv for one hour? what about the rest of the day?
make a schedule they can choose one hour of tv from the tv listing- SELECTING THE SHOW THAT THEY PREFER, for a limited time with no interruptions. then around that "time frame" they should read books that they choose from a library obviously be "straight" so the library time is not cancelling the tv-show they selected.
also playing table-games indoors in the shade instead of running. not ONLY playing all day also some tv... and reading. and cold ice cream!
summer camps are evil.
a joke
Teacher: "Timi, Please define the word "detail"
Timi: [confidently] "Detail a verb when i pulled off my lizards tail."
Timi: [confidently] "Detail a verb when i pulled off my lizards tail."
Friday, July 27, 2018
do-re-mi for our generation
dough the bottom of pizza
ray we shoot it from a gun
me the one who is speaking
fa the distance to the sun (so la ti)
sew attaching with some thread
la we sing instead of words
te sweet and cold when it's iced
dough- the last one is the first
note: these are the seven and repeat do.
ray we shoot it from a gun
me the one who is speaking
fa the distance to the sun (so la ti)
sew attaching with some thread
la we sing instead of words
te sweet and cold when it's iced
dough- the last one is the first
note: these are the seven and repeat do.
Wednesday, July 25, 2018
want to be a "good" parent?
some BASICS of good parenting
obviously providing the minimum needs... shelter from cold and nourishing food... also when the child is sick. giving medicine and sometimes surgery if it is necessary- BUT NOT when the kid is healthy!
so that is another reason not to circumcise a healthy baby for good parenting and certainly when we consider the dangers of any unnecessary cutting and removing of healthy stuff.
i cannot bear the thought that each day more and more kids are cut and put through trauma and risk... and that parents ignore a basic idea of good parenting (for any excuse).
++while discussing good parenting one more detail is URGENT altho not about circumcision...
the moment always comes at mealtime when the 4 year old (or 5 etc.) kid eats a few bites and says "i am done"... it is URGENT at that moment when parents usualy say "finish what is on your plate" to consider that the child is feeling the "signal" to stop eating called satisfaction... for example age 4 [younger they just want to play] a signal that i was TRAINED AND CONDITIONED TO IGNORE therefore after blurting out "finish that plateful" it is URGENT to say, when you hear yourself saying that idea, "i changed my mind eat one more bite of protein and i will save the rest so in an hour you will eat some more"- why is this URGENT? see reply
because if- day after day- the kid feels satisfied but despite that parents push them to continue eating... 2 physical results are: they will become "conditioned with habit" to ignore the message signal of satisfaction that the body sends... after all the kids stomach is smaller than my adult one... unless i make the kid STRETCH it... which is the second result of eating more when you feel "satisfied" which leads to "overeating" later and in my situation from age 20-30 noticing that i never feel "satisfied" until the stomach stretches enuf to feel "full' but the goal should not be to feel "full" but instead to feel that "i ate enough..."--!
so instead as above say "eat onemore bite of protein and i will save the rest you will eat more in an hour".
URGENT child health
if- day after day- when a 4 year old says "I am done" and feels satisfied but despite that parents push them to continue eating... 2 physical results are: they will become "conditioned with habit" to ignore the message signal of satisfaction that the body sends... after all the kids stomach is smaller than my adult one... unless i make the kid STRETCH it... which is the second result of eating more when you feel "satisfied" which leads to "overeating" later in life and in my situation from age 20-30 noticing that i never feel "satisfied" until the stomach stretches enuf to feel "full' but the goal should not be to feel "full" but instead to feel that "i ate enough..."--!
Tuesday, July 17, 2018
the accusers
what do the accusers TRULY want?
obviously gazans should not try to stab anybody... nor shoot deadly explosive rockets at israel.
think for yourself: if they would not, then no need to shoot back, therefore only the gazans deserve blame for the inevitable civilian deaths... so what do the accusers truly want when they announce a gazan died?
the complainer wants israel "not to shoot back and die easily" they want the terrorists to win... and kill the jews... until it is their turn to hear "convert to islam or die".
obviously gazans should not try to stab anybody... nor shoot deadly explosive rockets at israel.
think for yourself: if they would not, then no need to shoot back, therefore only the gazans deserve blame for the inevitable civilian deaths... so what do the accusers truly want when they announce a gazan died?
the complainer wants israel "not to shoot back and die easily" they want the terrorists to win... and kill the jews... until it is their turn to hear "convert to islam or die".
enjoying nature, a poem
enjoying nature
I love driving my car very far
hearing music for many miles
enjoying cold air conditioning
driving north on the british isles
I luv the view of trees by the road
rarely the median has flowers
but my eyes and ears are rejoicing
i can enjoy driving for hours!
In spring black birds sit on the treeetops
randomly they circle soar and fly
black on green can be easily seen
are they safe? from predators up high
my wife complains about the expense
spending too much on fuel is not smart
she should not try to "manage" my life
I should enjoy following my heart.
I love driving my car very far
hearing music for many miles
enjoying cold air conditioning
driving north on the british isles
I luv the view of trees by the road
rarely the median has flowers
but my eyes and ears are rejoicing
i can enjoy driving for hours!
In spring black birds sit on the treeetops
randomly they circle soar and fly
black on green can be easily seen
are they safe? from predators up high
my wife complains about the expense
spending too much on fuel is not smart
she should not try to "manage" my life
I should enjoy following my heart.
Tuesday, July 10, 2018
suggestion for pulling up "briefs" underpants
when i was a child i would try to stand on one foot and pull the briefs up the leg... but lost my balance here is the solution... how to prepare in just a few seconds.
a suggestion for pulling up underpants for adults and children age 5 and older
obviously in the morning awake for schoola dn need to empty the waste... next before removing pajama practice standing on each foot for 5 breaths in-out-in-out-in for each leg to train ankles. one practice unless weak muscles then 2 or 3 tries until able to stand on one foot for the 5 breaths in-out-in-out-in as above note if after 3 attempts you canot stand for these 5 breaths then this method is not for you and seek excercise to strengthen leg muscles
after 3 practices for the short time of five breaths barely 2 seconds slide off night clothing and then stand on one foot [either one no need to think about which] and pull up he underwear because having practiced 3 times you should be able to pull it up while standing on one leg just enuf time and then stand on the other one and insert leg and pull up the same method should work for short pants but long pants i suggest sit to pull up long pants.
note: can a homosexual stop using the "rear exit"? if uses the rear exit even of woman that shows they are addicted... to the rear exit... even somebody married to a woman if he prefers the rear exit it is an addiction... show her that you are not addicted. if you can?
a suggestion for pulling up underpants for adults and children age 5 and older
obviously in the morning awake for schoola dn need to empty the waste... next before removing pajama practice standing on each foot for 5 breaths in-out-in-out-in for each leg to train ankles. one practice unless weak muscles then 2 or 3 tries until able to stand on one foot for the 5 breaths in-out-in-out-in as above note if after 3 attempts you canot stand for these 5 breaths then this method is not for you and seek excercise to strengthen leg muscles
after 3 practices for the short time of five breaths barely 2 seconds slide off night clothing and then stand on one foot [either one no need to think about which] and pull up he underwear because having practiced 3 times you should be able to pull it up while standing on one leg just enuf time and then stand on the other one and insert leg and pull up the same method should work for short pants but long pants i suggest sit to pull up long pants.
note: can a homosexual stop using the "rear exit"? if uses the rear exit even of woman that shows they are addicted... to the rear exit... even somebody married to a woman if he prefers the rear exit it is an addiction... show her that you are not addicted. if you can?
Sunday, July 8, 2018
america first?
Trump makes a big issue about making america his priority. is that bad?
if Brazil or britian would say "our primary concern" is protecting our interests we would all say "obviously" like "duh"... it is ridiculous to even say something so obvious. it does not even need to be said... each government MUST be responsible to its own citizens... that is precisely the crime of most corrupt governments which do not act responsibly to the needs of the citizens.
yet when trump said our policy will be "the interests and concerns" of the states... he never said "primary concern" then the news company could have said "duh" but that is not dirty enuf... they have to stretch the word nationalism... some types of nationalism ARE bad... and stretch that term to put stains on trump... for what? for doing the thing that each government MUST do...
of course many countries are angry about tarriffs... can you guess why? for THE PURPOSE OF THE INTERESTS AND CONCERNS OF THEIR OWN COUNTRY because they want to export... look at the double standard. there should be one "measure" but we see double standard and when they criticise trump for "america first" the double standard reveals the hate.
how badly do they want to export? would they lower their own tariffs on imports? AT LEAST in exchange for RECIPROCAL low... is that how they respond... no! the europen union and china RAISE the taxes called tariffs. they are angry at trump... to act in the interest of america's businesses is "bad" for them which shows how much respect trump deserves... he truly deserves respect for such actions in this circumstance.
all we need to do is compare our emotional response to other countries... what about france? would they be bad for acting for the benefit of france... are we swayed so easily? by the trump haters... because "trump" is the one doing it.
if Brazil or britian would say "our primary concern" is protecting our interests we would all say "obviously" like "duh"... it is ridiculous to even say something so obvious. it does not even need to be said... each government MUST be responsible to its own citizens... that is precisely the crime of most corrupt governments which do not act responsibly to the needs of the citizens.
yet when trump said our policy will be "the interests and concerns" of the states... he never said "primary concern" then the news company could have said "duh" but that is not dirty enuf... they have to stretch the word nationalism... some types of nationalism ARE bad... and stretch that term to put stains on trump... for what? for doing the thing that each government MUST do...
of course many countries are angry about tarriffs... can you guess why? for THE PURPOSE OF THE INTERESTS AND CONCERNS OF THEIR OWN COUNTRY because they want to export... look at the double standard. there should be one "measure" but we see double standard and when they criticise trump for "america first" the double standard reveals the hate.
how badly do they want to export? would they lower their own tariffs on imports? AT LEAST in exchange for RECIPROCAL low... is that how they respond... no! the europen union and china RAISE the taxes called tariffs. they are angry at trump... to act in the interest of america's businesses is "bad" for them which shows how much respect trump deserves... he truly deserves respect for such actions in this circumstance.
all we need to do is compare our emotional response to other countries... what about france? would they be bad for acting for the benefit of france... are we swayed so easily? by the trump haters... because "trump" is the one doing it.
jerusalem embassy
So now that the U.S. Embassy for israel is in jerusalem.... already...
The trump haters cannot accuse him of this "political" promise that he did not keep. trump was a businessman... he NEVER was a politician. period.
so... we all know that some people hate trump but i never knew to what level to what degree....
instead the trump haters REVEAL and show the hate by asking "is there any difference?" as if trump did nothing. they try to claim that trump did not change anything... he did not do ANYTHING, so... "is there any difference?" the difference is... he KEPT HIS CAMPAIGN PROMISE so that is "not nothing" we will consider several "differences" but the most obvious is "before" they were angry that he said it and NOW they are angry that he did it.
in contrast to any other president who spoke about the embassy... the truth is trump deserves greater respect than any of those presidents... and instead... the fact that they speak that way "no difference'" only shows the large degree of hatred.
we should consider the angle they chose, i mean if "it changes nothing" then obama could have made the "move" to jerusalem because "nothing changed" choosing this approach to the issue and this angle shows and reveals just how deep the hatred is... if it is not an accomplishment because nothing changed then...obama could have done it.... after all there "really is no difference"....
the "double standard" makes the hatred easier to see. another difference: obama did not move it... but trump did so that is the difference... and that is precisely the issue that the companies of many news media do not speak about but instead challenge people by asking: what is the difference? most people do not have an answer... how about "obama did not do it but trump did... the thing which obama did not do".
obviously the significance is something else which is much more important.
the fact that they chose this angle of criticism reveals just how deeply they hate trump... they cannot bear the thought that the jews are treated "equally" like paris and london... that EATS THEM UP INSIDE to the point that they say "the move is nothing"...
every other country "chose its capital city" london and paris but the jews? cannot choose their capital... that would treat jews as equals to french... jews cannot be treated equal... so they ignore that trump is treating the jews equally... the most important difference is equality.
there are many details which trump "changed" in this move the most important one is "equality" which is far more significant than "which location to apply for a visa" doing the thing which obama did not do.
treating the jews the same as the french... that is what the news company want to distract us from... asking "what is the difference anyway"... so which of these differences do you think "answers" the question... or was it a rhetorical question? hmm.
The trump haters cannot accuse him of this "political" promise that he did not keep. trump was a businessman... he NEVER was a politician. period.
so... we all know that some people hate trump but i never knew to what level to what degree....
instead the trump haters REVEAL and show the hate by asking "is there any difference?" as if trump did nothing. they try to claim that trump did not change anything... he did not do ANYTHING, so... "is there any difference?" the difference is... he KEPT HIS CAMPAIGN PROMISE so that is "not nothing" we will consider several "differences" but the most obvious is "before" they were angry that he said it and NOW they are angry that he did it.
in contrast to any other president who spoke about the embassy... the truth is trump deserves greater respect than any of those presidents... and instead... the fact that they speak that way "no difference'" only shows the large degree of hatred.
we should consider the angle they chose, i mean if "it changes nothing" then obama could have made the "move" to jerusalem because "nothing changed" choosing this approach to the issue and this angle shows and reveals just how deep the hatred is... if it is not an accomplishment because nothing changed then...obama could have done it.... after all there "really is no difference"....
the "double standard" makes the hatred easier to see. another difference: obama did not move it... but trump did so that is the difference... and that is precisely the issue that the companies of many news media do not speak about but instead challenge people by asking: what is the difference? most people do not have an answer... how about "obama did not do it but trump did... the thing which obama did not do".
obviously the significance is something else which is much more important.
the fact that they chose this angle of criticism reveals just how deeply they hate trump... they cannot bear the thought that the jews are treated "equally" like paris and london... that EATS THEM UP INSIDE to the point that they say "the move is nothing"...
every other country "chose its capital city" london and paris but the jews? cannot choose their capital... that would treat jews as equals to french... jews cannot be treated equal... so they ignore that trump is treating the jews equally... the most important difference is equality.
there are many details which trump "changed" in this move the most important one is "equality" which is far more significant than "which location to apply for a visa" doing the thing which obama did not do.
treating the jews the same as the french... that is what the news company want to distract us from... asking "what is the difference anyway"... so which of these differences do you think "answers" the question... or was it a rhetorical question? hmm.
Saturday, July 7, 2018
vietnam
vietnam
remember the protests?
Altho I am convinced that the states acted correctly by sending soldiers to battle in vietnam, many then would not agree with me. we can use that issue to test a biblical idea.
There is an idea in bible to "kill" those who oppose the "ruler" such as joshua or king see source below, that is not only bad because "not every crime deserves death as a punishment" but more importantly shows how bad the bible is... joshua 1.18 death... death? he was not even a king imagine i say "god speaks to me and said to me you all must obey moses and obey me and if you do not obey me god wants me to kill you"... cuz god said so...
that is not only "self serving" revealing my selfi serving claim in general and not just bad killing but combined self-sering murder. this shows as demonstrated by the issue above, shows how bad the book is and how bad the rabbis are for preserving such a bad book and then claiming if a non-king certainly a "king" the opposer of any whim such as first kings 2.24.
***recognize it is bad.
CHRISTIANS should stop trusting rabbis about which "pre-jesus era books" to consider 'holy' or worthy to preserve. such self serving murder is NOT HOLY not godly.
luckily deuteronomy never about king, disobeying the king "deserves" death altho has the same issue of killing crimes that are not justice because even equal balanced punishment for murder... would only be appropriate "measure for measure" for somebody who kills a person's body would deserve to equaly be killed... not justice for other crimes which did not kill a person so not justly punished to kill somebody who did not kill. a person.
if i murder an animal i am not an animal so not eqial punishment. even murder has a flaw that then the judge commits that SAME ACTION which he claims deserves death for so the cycle cannot begin and no death penalty for killing and certainly not for other different crimes which did not kill a person justice must be not killing the criminal because he did not kill a person... and simialrly bad bible for cliaiming rebel against king or joshua revealed bad.
imagine in the issue of vietnam the president said " i was chosen leader and i decide to send soldiers to "nam" according to the "holy" bible hose who oppose like protesters should be killed for disobeying the ruler... showing how bad the bible is...
*** when will we recognize how bad it is and edit and relinquish that bad book.
remember the protests?
Altho I am convinced that the states acted correctly by sending soldiers to battle in vietnam, many then would not agree with me. we can use that issue to test a biblical idea.
There is an idea in bible to "kill" those who oppose the "ruler" such as joshua or king see source below, that is not only bad because "not every crime deserves death as a punishment" but more importantly shows how bad the bible is... joshua 1.18 death... death? he was not even a king imagine i say "god speaks to me and said to me you all must obey moses and obey me and if you do not obey me god wants me to kill you"... cuz god said so...
that is not only "self serving" revealing my selfi serving claim in general and not just bad killing but combined self-sering murder. this shows as demonstrated by the issue above, shows how bad the book is and how bad the rabbis are for preserving such a bad book and then claiming if a non-king certainly a "king" the opposer of any whim such as first kings 2.24.
***recognize it is bad.
CHRISTIANS should stop trusting rabbis about which "pre-jesus era books" to consider 'holy' or worthy to preserve. such self serving murder is NOT HOLY not godly.
luckily deuteronomy never about king, disobeying the king "deserves" death altho has the same issue of killing crimes that are not justice because even equal balanced punishment for murder... would only be appropriate "measure for measure" for somebody who kills a person's body would deserve to equaly be killed... not justice for other crimes which did not kill a person so not justly punished to kill somebody who did not kill. a person.
if i murder an animal i am not an animal so not eqial punishment. even murder has a flaw that then the judge commits that SAME ACTION which he claims deserves death for so the cycle cannot begin and no death penalty for killing and certainly not for other different crimes which did not kill a person justice must be not killing the criminal because he did not kill a person... and simialrly bad bible for cliaiming rebel against king or joshua revealed bad.
imagine in the issue of vietnam the president said " i was chosen leader and i decide to send soldiers to "nam" according to the "holy" bible hose who oppose like protesters should be killed for disobeying the ruler... showing how bad the bible is...
*** when will we recognize how bad it is and edit and relinquish that bad book.
Alternate Ending Lord Rings
We all know about the video series LORD OF THE RINGS. I want to offer an alternate happy ending.
in contrast to the suspense of frodo NOT throwing the ring into the lava, which is better than simply "Let's do this thing" and tossing it... as the hero... yet frodo is shown "failing at the key moment" which sucks... so a different better suspense could be: frodo and sam walk "together" to the edge of the brij and frodo hesitates... and then "teamwork" sam guides frodo's hand forward and with encouraging words they are stronger than the magic until frodo destroys the ring.
(remove the bad part greedy until golum bites his finger off... frodo failed at the critical moment in their bad story) make him a real hero with teamwork.
2 also when the lava of the magical place destroys the ring, the destruction should FIRST affect the magical "eye" first, it could flicker with suspense UNTIL... while on the sturdy tower it acts like a "super-nova" burning all the orcs and life in the fort, burnt into bones. Then contracts into a dying flame and finally a blast of shock wave which shatters the tower and surrounding structure downward each shatters into a pile (instead of the destruction of the ring causing the "tower" to crumble while eye intact?? the destruction of the ring should first weaken the magical eye and last crumble the structures with no new valley but instead crumbled piles.
around these two details is good for example "frodo and sam rest on the high part during the eruption, is good. the flying save them is good until one more thing to change similar to avengers 2011 "thor" when they crown the king decree "as king i order your families to choose "leaders for each thousand to administer you."
also need to fix a loose end... who is manager of the shire? that should be shown but is not. perhaps they establish the first ten years presidency in middle earth. why not?
in contrast to the suspense of frodo NOT throwing the ring into the lava, which is better than simply "Let's do this thing" and tossing it... as the hero... yet frodo is shown "failing at the key moment" which sucks... so a different better suspense could be: frodo and sam walk "together" to the edge of the brij and frodo hesitates... and then "teamwork" sam guides frodo's hand forward and with encouraging words they are stronger than the magic until frodo destroys the ring.
(remove the bad part greedy until golum bites his finger off... frodo failed at the critical moment in their bad story) make him a real hero with teamwork.
2 also when the lava of the magical place destroys the ring, the destruction should FIRST affect the magical "eye" first, it could flicker with suspense UNTIL... while on the sturdy tower it acts like a "super-nova" burning all the orcs and life in the fort, burnt into bones. Then contracts into a dying flame and finally a blast of shock wave which shatters the tower and surrounding structure downward each shatters into a pile (instead of the destruction of the ring causing the "tower" to crumble while eye intact?? the destruction of the ring should first weaken the magical eye and last crumble the structures with no new valley but instead crumbled piles.
around these two details is good for example "frodo and sam rest on the high part during the eruption, is good. the flying save them is good until one more thing to change similar to avengers 2011 "thor" when they crown the king decree "as king i order your families to choose "leaders for each thousand to administer you."
also need to fix a loose end... who is manager of the shire? that should be shown but is not. perhaps they establish the first ten years presidency in middle earth. why not?
Wednesday, July 4, 2018
happy independence from king
to all my fellow citizens "happy independence from king day."
what is unique about a king and kingdom? the king has control "to rule his entire life and his son" will be the next king (because he "is royal blood" as the brits say even today.) this means the king and family DO NOT NEED the people to choose them. they will stay king the whole life and the son too... does not need the people so he can ignore their opinion and even IGNORE THEIR NEEDS. that is the manner powerful humans have ALWAYS acted when they had power.
that is a reason to rejoice on 4 july the removal of the selfish human ruler "dynasty" and most importantly replacement with "temporary rulers" which are temporary consider what that means... so think of ex-presidents clinton and bush past... obama they have no power anymore... they were never "getting power" for themselves in this system. they do not make decisions anymore. bush was never "the emperor" and has no control anymore.
trump knows what the "citizens want" and that motivates him to "do the ideas and direction thecitizens want' this motivation is to get the votes in the next election. one such issue which leads to the second point for this date is "keeping invaders out." can we ignore the differnce between "invaders" and "process -followers"? ONLY MERIT BASED only. not invaders which leads to the next important point for today: control.. consider the vast army the states have now and have already built and assembled.
IT IS POSSIBLE that when mexico disagrees and says "we do not want to stop invaders crossing the border, because then they will stay in mexico" so mexican presidents want them to go... out and into the states... it is possible a possibility for the vast army of the states to TAKE CONTROL of mexico land and while controlling both sides of the border build the wall and keep the invaders out by controlling that land because the mexican leaders resist... yet.... UNITED STATES does not use power that way to enslave the mexican rulers. to push the american opinion on them that is the difference between having power but not using it to "push opinion on others" in contrast to the tyrants such as kings who use power to control others. 'despite' the power not being a bully but finding other solutions.
consider that the states has so much power and does not steal canadas "millions of square kilometers" and not control mexico just "to get its way" that is something to be proud of not misusing authority and power to control and enslave others.
obviously "weakness" is bad not being able to control others is no "nobility" and nothing to be proud of while being STRONG well that DEPENDS and being strong to control others is bad like colonialism and this draws the picture of why we should all be PROUD to be an american with the ideas of the constitution and with all our complaints "at least" i know i am free... personal lives have personal choies. I can choose which jobs to search for and end my employment in afashion that does not damage the company the system allows such personal choices.
and pride... the states has power... and does not use it to take canadas vast land and does not bully mexico "despite" the argument and does not control the people meaning personal lives can choose for ourselves. power but not enslaving others that is a true source of pride. and ALSO remembering why kings and chinese "emperors" are bad they do not need our votes and can ignore our needs and always... as humans... have ignored the people and citizens saying "i take from you and do not care." that is a king and a chinese emperor or the unreplace-able communist party.
THIS day was the start of two opposites. the happy declaration for hope and its opposite the START OF BATTLE a painful war that lasted for many years from 1776 into 1780's... and people fought suffered and died for a purpose which was so their families would "not be controlled by selfish kings" who ignore our needs. be proud and remember the details of the war like that song
so appropriate for this day [seee link below] so no need for me to write a new song about selfish kings just write the ideas and sing it. [atheists can stop before the ending but hey... most "states-ens" are christians anyway.
https://www.azlyrics.com/lyrics/leegreenwood/proudtobeanamerican.html
what is unique about a king and kingdom? the king has control "to rule his entire life and his son" will be the next king (because he "is royal blood" as the brits say even today.) this means the king and family DO NOT NEED the people to choose them. they will stay king the whole life and the son too... does not need the people so he can ignore their opinion and even IGNORE THEIR NEEDS. that is the manner powerful humans have ALWAYS acted when they had power.
that is a reason to rejoice on 4 july the removal of the selfish human ruler "dynasty" and most importantly replacement with "temporary rulers" which are temporary consider what that means... so think of ex-presidents clinton and bush past... obama they have no power anymore... they were never "getting power" for themselves in this system. they do not make decisions anymore. bush was never "the emperor" and has no control anymore.
trump knows what the "citizens want" and that motivates him to "do the ideas and direction thecitizens want' this motivation is to get the votes in the next election. one such issue which leads to the second point for this date is "keeping invaders out." can we ignore the differnce between "invaders" and "process -followers"? ONLY MERIT BASED only. not invaders which leads to the next important point for today: control.. consider the vast army the states have now and have already built and assembled.
IT IS POSSIBLE that when mexico disagrees and says "we do not want to stop invaders crossing the border, because then they will stay in mexico" so mexican presidents want them to go... out and into the states... it is possible a possibility for the vast army of the states to TAKE CONTROL of mexico land and while controlling both sides of the border build the wall and keep the invaders out by controlling that land because the mexican leaders resist... yet.... UNITED STATES does not use power that way to enslave the mexican rulers. to push the american opinion on them that is the difference between having power but not using it to "push opinion on others" in contrast to the tyrants such as kings who use power to control others. 'despite' the power not being a bully but finding other solutions.
consider that the states has so much power and does not steal canadas "millions of square kilometers" and not control mexico just "to get its way" that is something to be proud of not misusing authority and power to control and enslave others.
obviously "weakness" is bad not being able to control others is no "nobility" and nothing to be proud of while being STRONG well that DEPENDS and being strong to control others is bad like colonialism and this draws the picture of why we should all be PROUD to be an american with the ideas of the constitution and with all our complaints "at least" i know i am free... personal lives have personal choies. I can choose which jobs to search for and end my employment in afashion that does not damage the company the system allows such personal choices.
and pride... the states has power... and does not use it to take canadas vast land and does not bully mexico "despite" the argument and does not control the people meaning personal lives can choose for ourselves. power but not enslaving others that is a true source of pride. and ALSO remembering why kings and chinese "emperors" are bad they do not need our votes and can ignore our needs and always... as humans... have ignored the people and citizens saying "i take from you and do not care." that is a king and a chinese emperor or the unreplace-able communist party.
THIS day was the start of two opposites. the happy declaration for hope and its opposite the START OF BATTLE a painful war that lasted for many years from 1776 into 1780's... and people fought suffered and died for a purpose which was so their families would "not be controlled by selfish kings" who ignore our needs. be proud and remember the details of the war like that song
so appropriate for this day [seee link below] so no need for me to write a new song about selfish kings just write the ideas and sing it. [atheists can stop before the ending but hey... most "states-ens" are christians anyway.
https://www.azlyrics.com/lyrics/leegreenwood/proudtobeanamerican.html
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)