I enjoy the type of fiction if a story has "well thought out" surprises.
simple people say "animated pictures" are only for kids because not human actors however i say it depends only on content.
one example of well planned stories is the series "fairly odd parents" which i enjoy and recomend.
summaries of the episodes can be found- for some episodes at website imdb see link below- and other summaries at website wikia.
wikia provides both a brief summary and also a more detailed summary for episodes in the series and these summaries remind people like me what we watched.
CREDIT: usually the ideas IN THE INTRODUCTIONS which i wrote here are from the EPISODE which i watched as i understood the story in the series "fairly odd parents" as well as ideas which have been already published at wikia website without "direct word for word copy" yet idea already published there as above.
so i show them credit as i "compose" those already published ideas into brief introductions for each episode in season one
see links below to see i did not quote "sections" of summary and still the ideas here were already published there. imdb wikia
INTRODUCTIONS
Season one 1
pc 1=big problem +power mad
note: pc refers to product code i did not bother to write introductions for previous episodes called season zero i started with pc 1
pc=1 WISH Timmy=tim wished himself "older" PROBLEM needs money. HOW return to child age? ALSO wish for great video-game. problem is friends play INSIDE it and electricity problem. how will he rescue friends?
2=pc 2 [spaced out +transparents. same patter continues] wished for alien and magic brings an alien. problem its parents want him back and are angry and aliens are real danger and cannot WISH because love viki. how will he calm angry alien parents? ALSO wished for dinazor caused teacher to suspect he has fairies. problem is teacher wants to meet parents at school how will he hide secret of fairy?
3 wished for impressive clothes. problem is does not show appreciation so judged. will he lose fairies? how convince he not bad kid? ALSO wished to shrink and see bacteria. problem is fairies in viki how save them and go out before the immune destroys him?
4 wished to go to past. problem caused his father not to meet mother so never born. how will he fix his family and guarantee his own birth? ALSO problem cosmo felt insult so went to mama. how will tim re-unite his fairies?
5 tim wished his hero would replace the actor. problem is hero heard he is not real and is depressed. how will tim encourage his hero to fight the bad villains? ALSO tim wished to be pet dog of viki because she is nice to her dog but mean to him. problem is people do surgery on dogs. how will he convince tim body to switch back? [ i dont comprehend this detail viki is mean to timmy so dog mind want to flee like he did.]
6 wished the goat would be free. problem is mayor wants goat back and tim felt guilty. how will he deal with his guilt? ALSO wished everybody would look the same. problem is fairies cannot find their ward=the child they help. how will tim rejoin with his fairies?
7 wished chrstmas would repeat. problem is other celebrations are angry at it. how will timmy save santa and satisfy the other celebrations?
season 2=8
ideas already published based on episodes at
imdb site
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0235918/episodes?season=1
see my introductions are slightly different not copy sections also more details already published at
wikia site
http://fairlyoddparents.wikia.com/wiki/The_Fairly_OddParents_(season_1)
and from that page can open and read more detailed summaries so the contents which are based on the same episode SHOULD overlap and the ideas already are published there yet here the introductions appear in different style.
Wednesday, May 30, 2018
Friday, May 25, 2018
jokes
jokes
an owl landed near a mouse. the mouse trembles in fear and asks "why didn't you eat me?" the owl answered, "i already ate. now lets tell stories for an hour."--"until you are hungry? no. see you later" said the mouse. the owl answers "unless i see you first !"
three jews are driving around the block in london looking for parking near a chinese restaurant. david complains "too much time wasted driving around and around [hebrew addition edition: baruk dati said in heberew "tafsik l'hitonen" with double meaning.]
mike comforts "no problem there is no taxi meter" +inside the restaurant david complains again the problem with chinese food is in just one hour we will be hungry again the driver baruk said that reminds me of a joke- what did japanese police say after raiding the yakuza warehouse? --what asked david "i hate killing yakuza after only one hour i am hungry to do it again".--"that is funny i have another good one. the french guy wants to go to america because he could not find any job in his own country so he sneaks onto a boat called atlantic. at each port he listens if they are speaking english and finally at the third port he hears english and rejoices and climbs off the boat and swims to the beach he is so happy until he saw the sign "40 kilometers to london" get it?
an owl landed near a mouse. the mouse trembles in fear and asks "why didn't you eat me?" the owl answered, "i already ate. now lets tell stories for an hour."--"until you are hungry? no. see you later" said the mouse. the owl answers "unless i see you first !"
three jews are driving around the block in london looking for parking near a chinese restaurant. david complains "too much time wasted driving around and around [hebrew addition edition: baruk dati said in heberew "tafsik l'hitonen" with double meaning.]
mike comforts "no problem there is no taxi meter" +inside the restaurant david complains again the problem with chinese food is in just one hour we will be hungry again the driver baruk said that reminds me of a joke- what did japanese police say after raiding the yakuza warehouse? --what asked david "i hate killing yakuza after only one hour i am hungry to do it again".--"that is funny i have another good one. the french guy wants to go to america because he could not find any job in his own country so he sneaks onto a boat called atlantic. at each port he listens if they are speaking english and finally at the third port he hears english and rejoices and climbs off the boat and swims to the beach he is so happy until he saw the sign "40 kilometers to london" get it?
Saturday, May 19, 2018
history or truth?
in this era when people say "you believe what you want and i can say whatever i want occurred" when so many "historical revisionists" try to change the stories which we have known about the past... we should ask, "was jerusalem ever a capital of a palistinian muslim government? not since the beginning of islam. yet turkey and others reveal that purely for jew hatred they want to make an embassy in jerusalem for palistininan authority to show it is the capital city like london and paris... so we ask the question above.
was there ever a government of palestine? not since the name of the land was switched to start calling it that name palestine as you must know already the romans ruled the land ever since the name was given. and see previous post later but first revision leads to other issues "i can believe the nazis did not kill any jews and tell everybody my opinion" so they say but are there records? s
to preserve the record: in the year 2002 i asked a convert to judaism what caused you to convert? t
i expected him to say some theological reason but instead his answer surprised me. he said that he had lived in germany and for many years he had not thought about the nazis but one fateful day in church somebody mentioned that the nazis killed many jews and that is against the idea in the holy bible about jews "those who curse you will be cursed" so he went to the archives and when he saw the detailed records about killing millions of jews page after page he decided that he would "add at least one jew" by converting himself to jewish to replace the millions which the nazis killed. so he converted to judaism to replace at least one. he also married and contributed some children to the jewish nation to contribute his part in replacing the millions which he read about in the german archives. that was the reason he converted to jewish.
if more people would read the archives they might also feel inspired to add themselves to the jews to replace as above.
in an era when people deny this tragedy of mass murder such testimony needs to be preserved and repeated. which leads to the question "how did the nazis kill so many people?" asked in a tone of disbelief and ridicule by the deniers.
nazis had several years to kill and burn the bodies in many locations. in contrast to nanking... the accusers claim that "in six weeks the japanese killed over one hundred thousand people" which leads to the question how do you hide that many bodies in six weeks? i do not accept the chinese propaganda despite it appearing on history dot com. we must divide the propaganda from events. and see previous post.
was there ever a government of palestine? not since the name of the land was switched to start calling it that name palestine as you must know already the romans ruled the land ever since the name was given. and see previous post later but first revision leads to other issues "i can believe the nazis did not kill any jews and tell everybody my opinion" so they say but are there records? s
to preserve the record: in the year 2002 i asked a convert to judaism what caused you to convert? t
i expected him to say some theological reason but instead his answer surprised me. he said that he had lived in germany and for many years he had not thought about the nazis but one fateful day in church somebody mentioned that the nazis killed many jews and that is against the idea in the holy bible about jews "those who curse you will be cursed" so he went to the archives and when he saw the detailed records about killing millions of jews page after page he decided that he would "add at least one jew" by converting himself to jewish to replace the millions which the nazis killed. so he converted to judaism to replace at least one. he also married and contributed some children to the jewish nation to contribute his part in replacing the millions which he read about in the german archives. that was the reason he converted to jewish.
if more people would read the archives they might also feel inspired to add themselves to the jews to replace as above.
in an era when people deny this tragedy of mass murder such testimony needs to be preserved and repeated. which leads to the question "how did the nazis kill so many people?" asked in a tone of disbelief and ridicule by the deniers.
nazis had several years to kill and burn the bodies in many locations. in contrast to nanking... the accusers claim that "in six weeks the japanese killed over one hundred thousand people" which leads to the question how do you hide that many bodies in six weeks? i do not accept the chinese propaganda despite it appearing on history dot com. we must divide the propaganda from events. and see previous post.
Friday, May 18, 2018
free speech?
free speech
1 why did north koreans "nuked" nagasaki?
explanation the japanese had come to korea to assist in a war yet when the war ended the japanese soldiers did not leave and instead took control of the land called korean peninsula. this made the koreans feel betrayed and angry at japanese. japanese continued to control them for many year since before year 1905 until 1945. after the soviets defeated berlin and the nazis, the soviets moved their forces to the east side near the pacific coast. when the soviets left the border near river named amur river the soviets used their own atomic bomb on hiroshima hoping to end the war however the japanese emperor refused to surrender.
now it was time for a second atomic bomb because japanese emperor had not yet surrendered. in contrast to soviet who can give orders to drop an atomic bomb on a city the generals of U.S. would not give such an order so they invited north koreans to fly and offered a choice if you want revenge you can drop the atomic bomb but if you choose not to, then we will not give any order to a US soldier to drop an atomic bomb. the north koreans wanted "pain for pain" and were not obligated by american army to act but chose to drop the atomic bomb this one made in america and different from the soviet one on hiroshima and the north koreans destroyed nagasaki. this explains the urgency for preventing nuclear weapons from north korea because we know that they want to use them.
2 why did emperor constantine install a jewish ruler in jerusalem?
explanation the romans controlled the land named judea near the jordan river for many centuries. around year 300 the emperor accepted christianity. he believed the holy books about solomon and to show his faith he appointed jews to rule in jerusalem. this dynasty lasted many centuries with jews ruling in jerusalem. until the ottoman empire spread and stole jerusalem from the hands of the jewish rulers who had ruled for around 1200 years since year 300. what about the stories of crusaders? those are the same as the adventures of robin hood. the ottomans occupied palestine as it was named then ruling from a distance the capital city not jerusalem and like bad colonialism controlled it for around 400 years until the british fought them and chased the ottomans away. then in year 1917 it was time to re-install the jewish self rule autonomy.
1 why did north koreans "nuked" nagasaki?
explanation the japanese had come to korea to assist in a war yet when the war ended the japanese soldiers did not leave and instead took control of the land called korean peninsula. this made the koreans feel betrayed and angry at japanese. japanese continued to control them for many year since before year 1905 until 1945. after the soviets defeated berlin and the nazis, the soviets moved their forces to the east side near the pacific coast. when the soviets left the border near river named amur river the soviets used their own atomic bomb on hiroshima hoping to end the war however the japanese emperor refused to surrender.
now it was time for a second atomic bomb because japanese emperor had not yet surrendered. in contrast to soviet who can give orders to drop an atomic bomb on a city the generals of U.S. would not give such an order so they invited north koreans to fly and offered a choice if you want revenge you can drop the atomic bomb but if you choose not to, then we will not give any order to a US soldier to drop an atomic bomb. the north koreans wanted "pain for pain" and were not obligated by american army to act but chose to drop the atomic bomb this one made in america and different from the soviet one on hiroshima and the north koreans destroyed nagasaki. this explains the urgency for preventing nuclear weapons from north korea because we know that they want to use them.
2 why did emperor constantine install a jewish ruler in jerusalem?
explanation the romans controlled the land named judea near the jordan river for many centuries. around year 300 the emperor accepted christianity. he believed the holy books about solomon and to show his faith he appointed jews to rule in jerusalem. this dynasty lasted many centuries with jews ruling in jerusalem. until the ottoman empire spread and stole jerusalem from the hands of the jewish rulers who had ruled for around 1200 years since year 300. what about the stories of crusaders? those are the same as the adventures of robin hood. the ottomans occupied palestine as it was named then ruling from a distance the capital city not jerusalem and like bad colonialism controlled it for around 400 years until the british fought them and chased the ottomans away. then in year 1917 it was time to re-install the jewish self rule autonomy.
Wednesday, May 16, 2018
the author of "acts" and how to fix the title.
in the book called "new testament" only one part has a title which starts with the letter "a" it is called acts but should have a more accurate title because "acts" just describes the contents. considering that part is the second letter to theo. it should be called title second theo but who wrote it? t
oral tradition teaches luke wrote it and that generates many problems. firstly luke is only mentioned by name in col. 4.14 and never once is that name written in this section nor in the gospel of luke. in contrast to paul, we never find "i luke am writing". g .
because we know that luke wrote it, therefore it should not even be in the group of holy books because only "apostolic" parts were decided to include and luke was not one of the apostles. this part and the part named "luke" [first letter to theo.] should not be included.
it should suffice to summarize the contents of the epistle instead of including the entire section and every word. this second letter to theo. called "acts" should be titled 2 theopilus and rejected as above.
summary
this letter describes the "spread" of the idea of the new covenant beyond jerusalem throughout the land then named "israel". l
one 1 "to theophilus. jesus went up in a cloud" and tells that followers of jesus organized in jerusalem in the land then named israel. note: the name israel appears 21 times in this letter. the group contained people who spoke one of the following languages: aramaic hebrew or greek 2 holy spirit was revealed on pentacost 3 story of stephen, his trial speech and execution 4 paul traveled and taught in many places throughout the land called israel and beyond for example galatia 16.6 5 later also thesolonica corinth and ephesus 6 the trial of paul ends the letter which should not be included
this summary should replace the two parts called "luke and acts" because according to tradition the author was luke who was not apostle so only include apostolic not include these so just a summary of the second part. in fact the stories parallel to luke are preserved in other books so this summary is enuf. the end.
oral tradition teaches luke wrote it and that generates many problems. firstly luke is only mentioned by name in col. 4.14 and never once is that name written in this section nor in the gospel of luke. in contrast to paul, we never find "i luke am writing". g .
because we know that luke wrote it, therefore it should not even be in the group of holy books because only "apostolic" parts were decided to include and luke was not one of the apostles. this part and the part named "luke" [first letter to theo.] should not be included.
it should suffice to summarize the contents of the epistle instead of including the entire section and every word. this second letter to theo. called "acts" should be titled 2 theopilus and rejected as above.
summary
this letter describes the "spread" of the idea of the new covenant beyond jerusalem throughout the land then named "israel". l
one 1 "to theophilus. jesus went up in a cloud" and tells that followers of jesus organized in jerusalem in the land then named israel. note: the name israel appears 21 times in this letter. the group contained people who spoke one of the following languages: aramaic hebrew or greek 2 holy spirit was revealed on pentacost 3 story of stephen, his trial speech and execution 4 paul traveled and taught in many places throughout the land called israel and beyond for example galatia 16.6 5 later also thesolonica corinth and ephesus 6 the trial of paul ends the letter which should not be included
this summary should replace the two parts called "luke and acts" because according to tradition the author was luke who was not apostle so only include apostolic not include these so just a summary of the second part. in fact the stories parallel to luke are preserved in other books so this summary is enuf. the end.
Monday, May 7, 2018
jesus "coming" was described by jewish rabbis in jewish talmud
EVEN the books of rabbis which are hostile towards jesus, still agree with christian faith in certain details therefore the rabbis should not be ARGUING about those details instead they could COULD teach "the truth of the jewish tradition" but then the students would grasp "who is the jewish messiah which the jewish tradition truly described" so rabbis argue but the trick is revealed.
"the gig is up."
admittedly the jew has a struggle trusting a book "outside of rabbis sources" but the truth is "even the rabbis book" DESCRIBE the time of coming "jewish mesia" meaning the messia described by jewish tradition is the one hoped for and desired.
this post will not detail the description of messia himself altho details also match both faiths.
TOPIC: the year of messia: even according to the rabbis who hated jesus they wrote in their talmud the year.
** t.b. sanhedrin 97a "2000 YEARS until law and then 2000 years OF LAW=tora followed by messia." defined year so 2000 years from moses is messia... note this was a teaching "from"elija" according to talmud itself so as we know he was the announcer of messia this does fit jesus... only the jesus haters continued "that year passed" 97b see below, so i ask elija was false prophet?
also **YOMA 39b "forty years before the destruction of jerusalem the red thread did not change to white" teaching the year which offerings failed... guess why 40? the teacher secretly believed in jesus and even talmud said respect "rabbis taught"=rh31.2 the destruction in 70 ad minus 40= 30 the time of jesus precisely and these two teachings match like previous faith of 2000. the context is 2000 until tora and 2000 with tora so not only "time limit" for law based on context but also describes messia at that year who does that match?
similarly sanhedrin 97b "the dates passed" the tradition described "came already" even jesus haters admit the year.
"the gig is up."
admittedly the jew has a struggle trusting a book "outside of rabbis sources" but the truth is "even the rabbis book" DESCRIBE the time of coming "jewish mesia" meaning the messia described by jewish tradition is the one hoped for and desired.
this post will not detail the description of messia himself altho details also match both faiths.
TOPIC: the year of messia: even according to the rabbis who hated jesus they wrote in their talmud the year.
** t.b. sanhedrin 97a "2000 YEARS until law and then 2000 years OF LAW=tora followed by messia." defined year so 2000 years from moses is messia... note this was a teaching "from"elija" according to talmud itself so as we know he was the announcer of messia this does fit jesus... only the jesus haters continued "that year passed" 97b see below, so i ask elija was false prophet?
also **YOMA 39b "forty years before the destruction of jerusalem the red thread did not change to white" teaching the year which offerings failed... guess why 40? the teacher secretly believed in jesus and even talmud said respect "rabbis taught"=rh31.2 the destruction in 70 ad minus 40= 30 the time of jesus precisely and these two teachings match like previous faith of 2000. the context is 2000 until tora and 2000 with tora so not only "time limit" for law based on context but also describes messia at that year who does that match?
similarly sanhedrin 97b "the dates passed" the tradition described "came already" even jesus haters admit the year.
Tuesday, May 1, 2018
which book is holy and pure?
we all know that the letters of paul for example "romans" are apostolic and christians consider them divinely inspired and pure and holy... but who decided that about the jewish parts?
did jesus ever say "exodus" is a good book?
we know that the selection "which to include in the list" was based on "what is pure and holy" for example the epistles of paul but what about the jewish part? can we trust rabbis? to select or include "only holy" such as exodus? why would we trust the jewish leaders?
why should we trust what "the rabbis before the era of jesus" decided to include for study in the septuagint?
in the era of the new church there was a split between "church fathers" whether to accept the jewish tradition in septuagint with many books or to reject "esther, judith" and others.
athanasius, around year 350AD, famous for being the bishop of alexandria rejected the septuagint list such as ester tobit and others. he did not trust that list and neither did jerome when writing the vulgate so why should we accept exodus and other septuagint books? trusting rabbis??
in contrast to the ASSEMBLERS of the septuagint who included a broader list... when jerome wrote the vulgate he did not accept the list from the jewish tradition of the septuagint... so why do we trust the jewish part for example exodus? just because jerome distinguished not to trust tobit but trust exodus why?
we must re-examine the books which jews preserved for study. are they pure and holy? just because jerome included in vulgate? is exodus "pure and holy" altho it was included in vulgate that was trusting jewish rabbis... did jesus ever say "exodus" is a good book?
some think it is evidence if a "book was quoted from"... note the word book... in truth only those words were good did jesus say which "book" he quoted from? if exodus has that phrase we do not know that the book exodus was the source nor that the "whole" book is pure and holy.
as one debater challenged me "how do you know either way" i respond the same phrase how do you know it is pure and worth including with romans. at least romans is apostolic... we must examine the jewish part not just accept tradition the same way the vulgate did not accept the septuagint list from the jews.
that claim has several flaws. firstly jesus never said "book named exodus" was good he only selected one detail from "some source" unnamed, to discuss.
also the dominoes would keep falling... for example jude did quote "enoch" deos that mean "accepting jude as apostolic" who included a quote from enoch testified that the whole enoch is pure?
if so do we include enoch? what if enoch quoted a book? would we include that too?
those separate books were not written by apostles and the selection of the new testament part was CAREFUL distinguishing based on what is pure but who decided what would be in the septuagint? the jewish leaders... and we know we cannot trust them. would you?
so if exodus claimed god commanded offerings while jeremia brought a message "thus said the lord of israel i did not command" truly in jeremia 7 then not only is the jewish choice a problem but jeremia is warning us not to accept certain ideas and then we know that those books are not pure nor true... so if we should select carefully as above only accept the books from god then... a book which is not true such as exodus cannot be from god nor from moses nor from any prophet.
exodus and leviticus are not pure it would be a mistake to COPY the trust for the letters from paul onto the books which jewish leaders selected. why would we trust rabbis.
similarly genesis said "your name will not be jacob" we know that is false... from what follows in the same book and other books in later eras so it ust be not from god who would know his name would be called jacob. god would say "also israel" but the author of genesis lied that cannot be from god.
if you believe "god only tells true" then the book genesis MUST BE not from god nor from moses nor any prophet... we cannot include it just because the jews study it because we only accept the pure holy parts.
the same reason that the vulgate did not accept every book in the septuagint is the same reason we should not accept the jewish part of the septuagint even if part was included in the vulgate because we see it is not from god because the books telling about moses and offerings conflicts jeremia chapter seven "about COMMAND. did not command. so we should not include those books but republish only with the specific quotes "the two will become one" as the section called former covenant [old testament].
did jesus ever say "exodus" is a good book?
we know that the selection "which to include in the list" was based on "what is pure and holy" for example the epistles of paul but what about the jewish part? can we trust rabbis? to select or include "only holy" such as exodus? why would we trust the jewish leaders?
why should we trust what "the rabbis before the era of jesus" decided to include for study in the septuagint?
in the era of the new church there was a split between "church fathers" whether to accept the jewish tradition in septuagint with many books or to reject "esther, judith" and others.
athanasius, around year 350AD, famous for being the bishop of alexandria rejected the septuagint list such as ester tobit and others. he did not trust that list and neither did jerome when writing the vulgate so why should we accept exodus and other septuagint books? trusting rabbis??
in contrast to the ASSEMBLERS of the septuagint who included a broader list... when jerome wrote the vulgate he did not accept the list from the jewish tradition of the septuagint... so why do we trust the jewish part for example exodus? just because jerome distinguished not to trust tobit but trust exodus why?
we must re-examine the books which jews preserved for study. are they pure and holy? just because jerome included in vulgate? is exodus "pure and holy" altho it was included in vulgate that was trusting jewish rabbis... did jesus ever say "exodus" is a good book?
some think it is evidence if a "book was quoted from"... note the word book... in truth only those words were good did jesus say which "book" he quoted from? if exodus has that phrase we do not know that the book exodus was the source nor that the "whole" book is pure and holy.
as one debater challenged me "how do you know either way" i respond the same phrase how do you know it is pure and worth including with romans. at least romans is apostolic... we must examine the jewish part not just accept tradition the same way the vulgate did not accept the septuagint list from the jews.
that claim has several flaws. firstly jesus never said "book named exodus" was good he only selected one detail from "some source" unnamed, to discuss.
also the dominoes would keep falling... for example jude did quote "enoch" deos that mean "accepting jude as apostolic" who included a quote from enoch testified that the whole enoch is pure?
if so do we include enoch? what if enoch quoted a book? would we include that too?
those separate books were not written by apostles and the selection of the new testament part was CAREFUL distinguishing based on what is pure but who decided what would be in the septuagint? the jewish leaders... and we know we cannot trust them. would you?
so if exodus claimed god commanded offerings while jeremia brought a message "thus said the lord of israel i did not command" truly in jeremia 7 then not only is the jewish choice a problem but jeremia is warning us not to accept certain ideas and then we know that those books are not pure nor true... so if we should select carefully as above only accept the books from god then... a book which is not true such as exodus cannot be from god nor from moses nor from any prophet.
exodus and leviticus are not pure it would be a mistake to COPY the trust for the letters from paul onto the books which jewish leaders selected. why would we trust rabbis.
similarly genesis said "your name will not be jacob" we know that is false... from what follows in the same book and other books in later eras so it ust be not from god who would know his name would be called jacob. god would say "also israel" but the author of genesis lied that cannot be from god.
if you believe "god only tells true" then the book genesis MUST BE not from god nor from moses nor any prophet... we cannot include it just because the jews study it because we only accept the pure holy parts.
the same reason that the vulgate did not accept every book in the septuagint is the same reason we should not accept the jewish part of the septuagint even if part was included in the vulgate because we see it is not from god because the books telling about moses and offerings conflicts jeremia chapter seven "about COMMAND. did not command. so we should not include those books but republish only with the specific quotes "the two will become one" as the section called former covenant [old testament].
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)