ancient books preserve more ancient

books from ancient PRESERVE the description of the  ORIGINAL bible

when we compare matthew 5.31 to matthew 4.4 we can prove that the book deuteronomy had not yet been written in the time of jesus and not even in the time when book matthew was written= after jesus.

jesus quotes a book WRITTEN ge-grap-ti  a book which does have that quote... but only ten times in the entire gospel of matthew. did jesus say the NAME of the book?

that book which he quoted did have the idea of mathew 4.4 but did it have the idea of writing a divorce?

we see in matthew 5.31 that the book he quoted from was a different book which did not have "written divorce by writing" this  MUST be a book not the book called deuteronomy which differs that it has written both so that book named deuteronomy was  WRITTEN after matthew was written.

did jesus say both ideas were written? certainly not.

part of the evidence is that divorce was "not written" but that is a distraction the real evidence is the DESCRIPTION the ten quotes describe the original book which was not preserved and which differed from the book which the rabbis wrote.

my point is we only assumed it was deuteronomy because we TRUSTED  rabbis but we all know that rabbis did not earn our trust...

jesus quoted some book which did have the ten ideas which he quoted with the word "grap"  with other ideas which are not worth quoting... and that book was not preserved only its description 

in contrast to other ideas in the oral law spoken but not yet written until later written in the book called deuteronomy.

***we can describe the original book has "not test god" and the 9 others but not "divorce by writing" so that is a book different from deuteronomy and we can date that d. was written later containing oral laws yet that was certainly not the book from which jesus quoted from.

for more details

books from ancient PRESERVE the description of the  ORIGINAL bible

for example john 6.31

written bread from above gave to eat yet did not say which book? we have a book with that  IDEA  biut not those words.

 book exodius has IDEA bread from above but not the quote. and never said  WHICH BOOK.

the book matthew includes  MANY ideas from the jewish bible yet only ten have the word "WRITTEN" which PRESERVES  the descriptionof the  ORIGINAL book quoted from

mat 2.5 preserved that at the time mathew as written the words of mica were WRITTEN.

jesus said written for mathew 4.4 but did not say WRITTEN IN WHICH NOOK we match a book with same idea but was that the book source? hesus did not say.

ge-grap-ti is the word for written

mathew 4 has several "written" but after that none until chapter 11.

in contrast chapoter 5 said "heard" these are things not written but "heard" so we know he is not quoting a book which contains both... but a different book which contains what is WRITTEN... not the the jewish deuteronomy but a different one 

mat 5.31 reh write a divorce compare not grap so a book with both not yet written that book duter has both WRITTEN must not be the source.

sahara desert SHRINKing

facts: now in year 2018 the AREA of sahara desert is 9.2 million square kilometers which is more than the area of australia 7.6 msk.
what was the area in previous decades?
in 1984 its area was 9.982 million km^2 larger than china, so we see a long term trend of shrinking altho it probably swells and shrinks each decade the fact is in the LONG TERM  long term we see a trend of shrinking to smaller than china.
this is supported by the report in 2012 when the sahara was "3.6 million square miles (9.4 million square kilometers)" we see that from 1980's to 2012 shrinking by almost 600,000 square kilometers and continued shrinking since then 2012 until now by a further 200,000 square kilometers.
last year 2017 was a surprising snow in the sahara in the country algeria so water was moved to the sahara.
i recall in the 1980s when people first panicked about FLOODING they were buzzing about the tragedy of global warming.... america would be covered in water floods... yet we must consider facts
we know hot things expand and cold contracts well consider the temperature of the ocean on coast of west america is in april the same as in the winter 50 degrees f. as glaciers move ice into the ocean it cools the ocean so the water will contract and NOT FLOOD the coasts.
water is being moved to antarctica which has  experienced in the last few years INCREASED snowfall... consider the arabian desert is ARID around 10 cm of rainfall in contrast to antarctica more 16.6 cm and NOT ARID  not dry so not a true desert because more rainfall as snow and not dry.
as water moves to poles and sahara less fear of flooding oceans and glacires "calving" means ICE moves into water cooling... you can all see the pictures of glaciers  i ask are they "melted water"? certainly not the ice cools the ocean contract the volume so no fear of flooding and water to sahara less chance of flooding and in fact the long term is sahara desert has been shrinking we can project that in 40 more years the sahara will be 9.2-0.8 msk smaller around 8.6 msk or the shrinking could accelaerate as we saw rare snow in salgeria last year... if the governments of mali and mauritania and libya would work together they could actively shrink the sahara desdrt and change its edges into land to grow food crops algeria now grows only 1% trees and almost all desert and "dry" or dryer... unemployment there is high in 2000 at 30%.
 only 75 thousand sk fields in a vast country 2.3 msk. for over 30 million people thery could be shrinking the desert and adding fields for wheat but that is not a priority for a religious government sunni musklims fast ramadan so a month of less eating means ...
also libya is almost all arid desert  barely 0.2% trees.
only the coast has rain for whea from a total of 1.8 msk. this seems reckless and bad pririties but the priority of a muslim government is to enforce islam not to feed the populkace.
similar mali and chad almost all desert except near rivers... could fight desert... and arabian desert second largest desert in world probably these countries import most food for example saudi arabia
.

the "oil" conspiracy of 1941

i recently watched the video "pearl harbor" in which the PROPAGANDA for the attack on pearl harbor was presented...
thanks to the video everybody heard that the CAUSE for the attack on the americans was "because they needed oil".... consider the details to see that is impossible.
firstly a war with america USES oil and attacking america will not  BRING OIL...
secondly japan could have bought oil from dutch consider that nazi had conquered netherlands in 1940 so the dutch, controlled by axis,  would sell the japanese from the  fields in the islands which gave 65 million barrels of oil in 1940... in fact even an attack on those islands would not have involved attacking american neutrality the way attacking the navy at hawaii... this issue is magnified by the need to use oil for fighting an additional navy... when capturing hawaii would not bring oil and only conquering nazi controlled dutch colony was relevant...
this reveals the lie and conspiracy.
 we can be ceratin that the attack on USD navy was not to to take oil nor even as revenge for stopping oil because you would need to RATION oil and use sparingly conserving not increase use... unless...
the real reason was DESPITE the issoe of oil when the navy could have focussed its many warplanes to assist bombing china and capturing north india  WHICH HAD OIL... instead the strategy was not to get oil but the true reason was revenge on the nazis...
the nazis were always humiliating the japanese and not only is that hurtful but specifically a culture with ninja and samurai gives  INCREDIBLE EMPHASIS on honor.
when the japanese saw that the nazis were consistently racist against their race too... they wanted a way that would accomplish revenge on nazis as well as bring samurai honor literal samurai honor of die fighting... these two kills were simply accomplished by attacking america for the purpose of achieveing "death in battle".... not to capture oil... not even revenge for oil  but to acheive the death in battle... gaurunteed by attacking america this was done  BEFORE  success in china for the reason of revenge on nazis who did not respect their ally japan... getting americca to shoot at them acheived both goals smoothly and could only be done after they had stockpiles and this goal was accomplished a pure siccess which was never western thinking of military control... is iit possible the issue was to take oil? attacking america did not bring oil... the opposite it used oil captured from ducth islands... the cover is revealed as for foreigners who think like westerners while the true reason was to accomplish both revenge on the nazis and the honorable deathi  n battle and this goal was successfully acheived.

illegal immmigrants

hard to believe... in 2017 alone over three hundred thousand illegal immigrants in 2017 according to msnbc. in addition to previous years 2014-2016 around 500,000 per year and those are the ones "caught" how many more are not yet detected?

herod judged jesus

we need a concise version of the stories. instead of fifty words and still not getting to herod it is enuf 27 words around half... 25/50 instead of so many words.  instead of translating every greek word what is the idea. example compare:
"They LED jesus to pilate. They accused: he subverts by opposing tax payment to Cesar. he claims to be the anointed king. pilate asked are you king?"
this is concise and tells the "idea" instead of each greek word just the idea... compare to the burdensome publications when they could take the IDEA and get to the point.
imagine a bible instead of 90 pages just 50 or 45 concisely telling the idea and "getting to the point".
so in luke 23 herod judged jesus... but instead of every greek word tell the idea concisely 50 words into the story and i am still far from herod GET TO THE POINT!