this year the nfc experienced a tie.
nfc has four 4 divisions. the teams with most wins in each division get 4 of the seven playoff spots. WAIT... seven? how will they compete? the best win record skips called "bye" ergo in nfc eagles 14 wins more than any other division champion. the remaining 6 play each other. 3 remain so i would predict the top two of each division minus one but that was wrong instead based on gathering.
phil. eagles e, minn. vikings n, tam. buc. south and s.f. 49 w.
who are the next 3? dal. cowboys 12 wins e, was more than any other. grabbed fifth.
n.y. giants 9 wins TIED the win record of other divisions. det. lions 9 w, n, se. seahawks 9w w.
giants had a tie and less losses this is called "win lose tie average" best percentage. only seven losses but the other two each had 8 losses ergo giants grabbed sixth place. one place remains=with a tie 9w.
the rule is "common" those two played each other in this case seahawks already beat lions. so se.se. grab the seventh and lions get eliminated with all the rest even second place of south.
eagles can relax kuz most wins. se.se. play 49 in same division if so i predict giants and cowboys would be the same due to same division... wrong. if not same division then i want matching.
cowboys with 12 wins play buc top of south. i dont know why? so they have an objective system.
the weakest must face the strongest which i oppose. they pair 2,7 3,6 4,5 the sports term is seed but that just means position or place. the application this time was 7 se.se. to strongest!
7 se. se. to 49 called 2.
not cowboys 12w not the strongest so play the 49 not due to same division but due to 49=13 w. that is not an even match... and i dont mean "fairness" i mean for the audience... is that fun for a team with the extreme more win record to play the extreme lose record? perhaps we can defend nfc policy, that the one with more wins should be safer in position and "earned" less risk the way the top of 4 divisions earned rest called bye, but the game needs to be exciting with even pros.
in this case even if eagles w14 earn rest the remaining six should be paired.
by grouping wins: vikings w13=49=13, cowboys w12, giants w9 buc w8 se w9
49=13w is nearest vikings 13 w that would be a "stressful" balanced game between the top of each division, in this case best of north and best of west, with a matching pair of wins.
south champion competes with ? not e. they earned rest. cowboys 12 w could pair with the division champion buc... which is what they did in their system but again 8w is far frrom 12w. buc was only best in division due to lame competition where 8 wins sufficed nobody else won many.
who is near cowboys=12w. i protest them pairing for competing cowboys 12w buc.8w. that is not a balanced competition for the best with best.
i want the champions to play each other the division champion of north with 13w with a matching division champion but that might not be balanced for example this year when the south div. champion only 8 wins. i want a win ranking if not for the first four so each division gets represented but for the competition once the seven places were identified.
eagles 14 w rest. the two with 13w should compete in this years results vikings against 49.
for me: vikings 13 against giants 9 giants is too weak to be exciting for me to watch
next cowboys 12 not buc with only 8 wins but the winner of the tie as above: giants had less losses.
2 competitions for 4 teams the weakest pair then remain se.se. w9 against buc 8w would be balanced.
se,49 when 49 is more likely to win is that exciting? not for me they are far.
buc, cowboys when buc only 8 wins is far. i want buc 8w with the nearest which would be the weakest of the tie as above se. below giants with less losses. similarly vikings giants is far vikings 13 wins far from giants 9w.
if they would approve top of each division then pair the skilled together: viking compete 49, cowboy compete giants due to less losses then 2 remain the weak with weak. if they win then they can face the winner... but which winner will face the eagles at 14w? the winner of the strongest pair in this case the winner of 13 will have won 14 matching the eagles 14w.
if so the winner of two strongest faces the strongest and the two winners of the weaked four compete against each other.
but my system is also flawed because in the end the "leader of the weak" will face the leader of the strong who already beat the stronger ones what excitiement would be tat the division championship final.
we must do it their way so the weaker ones SHOULD be the ones eliminated... and 2,7 is likely to expell 7 but again they are too far... and the pair 4,5 is balanced not likely to eliminate which for me would be the exciting game but will ruin the division chanpionship as above... if the winner must face the winner of the strongest. where is the compromise between the systems?
i suggest due to four divisions and all must be represented then pairing 1,5 2,6 3,7 4,8 in that case the lions would not have been eliminated and four games likely to eliminate the weaker... for example 49 is considered 2, 49v. se. their 2,7 is 49=2 which should compete giants 9 with less losses if w14 rested if not then giants less losses compete w14 eagles and 2,6 coincided. if lions eliminated but buc represented is absurd but need div champion so if w14 redt then lions out and 49 giants... DESPITE gap 13,9 same gap still it is strong competing strong kuz giant less losses not weakest 7.
also even if se.. 49 coincided this time due to 3 6 a theory that diffrrs and other years can differ, still vikings 3 lions instead of giants who less losses should compete 1 eagles.
the result would be the winners of that advance and get paired so the three strongest must win other teams to continue and advance. letting the top rest is silly because they are the strongest. we can combine the elements of 2,7 with preventing far by pairing not 2,7 with a large gap in rank and wins as above but only a 3 step gap.
in contrast to their pair 13,9 13,49vikings considered 3 lions not giants less losses with stronger 9, not weaker 9. 13 vikings considered 3. lions tied. 4th game 12w with buc div champion coincided.
the likely result will be 1-4 but the gap smaller and a weak could win and eliminate a strong that would be interesting. if 7 would beat 3 it would be strong enough to face the survivors.
if we combine that flawed sytem of 2,7 weak together with players kneeling... not "kneel to honor" but to separate... from honoring the CAUSE of their wealth wih huge capitalist contracts which is hard to overlook but i am willing to overlook if the best played the best but the combination is repulsive i would not even watch 4,5 balanced ever since the players add "their publicity" unequal for opinion in contrast to any sign trying to use that publicity we dont say free speech for nonplayer sign equaly players no opinion in publicity if kneel cant play kuz not justified to violate equality with unequal "free speech" beyond speech or social platforms extended nto sports. they could accuse white cops on facebook but sports must be topic not a "misuse of publicity" same as a nonplayer cant get on camera with the pros with ANY sign equaly the players must be limited to the game same as nonplayers. their only option should be not play... lets see how many "idealistic protesters" would sarifce their HUGE GIANT capitalist contract?
analysis shows that the games are poorly planned and even 4,5 is in a system that lacks equality same as i cant and anybody cant use the sport publicity for a sign if they misuse the publicity to protest they should be banned from which ever game they kneel at and less games less percent of the contract money... will even one be sincere enough to kneel and not play and lose the percentage of the contract? lets see!!!
No comments:
Post a Comment