when adopt

a christian trick is to say matthew was written inj 90 so near to jesus however the important issue is when adopted. eusibius is considered ancient he was acive in 320 AD
http://www.ntcanon.org/Eusebius.shtml died 340 over 300 years after jesus so if he has 4 gospels that is not original!
another trick is to group "scriptural" ith "quoted from"  "accepted; true; scriptural; or quoted from " yet hebrews is a disputed book and some claim polycarp "quoted" from it it is still disputed who said scriptural? silence is not a reason to include. p has similar ideas to peter and 1 john but he also quoted from hebrews which as eusebius pointed out is disputed like apocalypse called now revelation with the word apocolypse bishop ignatius never has peter and john's letters because original christians did not read those "existing" texts written in 90 yet ignored from 90-130 ad and even until eusibius in 340 AD so the book is not truly christian but a new faith claiming other books which 200 hundred! years of bishops ignored or rejected see previous post for revelation. also deutero paul trick not truly paul and if so not from apostle. only apostolic should be in and ignatius did not refer to any of pauls existing since 54 AD letters! except for similar wording but never referring this is pauls idea. that is not original followers of christ but a new faith believing in other books and the one quote is not realy a quote from luke but indicates a different source swapped out REPLACED by 4 gospels by the new faith a different religion with a different tradition and adding books.
did jesus die? yes if so not god.