is the book joshua reliable?

if we assume the book of jeremia is good, then its message corrects the tradition of sacrifices. since genesis claimed god enjoyed the sacrifices of noah and able=hebel, if so god fixed that tradition by saying in isaia i did not want sacrifices and blood and in addition to other problems in genesis see post about genesis.
similarly the books exodus, leviticus, numbers, deuteronomy, all claim god commanded sacrifice yet god sent a message to fix these tradition and correct the error "god didnot command so instead you eat" source jeremia 7 even the religions say jeremia is a good prophet so accept his fix.
 after we identify the removal of the books ascribed to moses, 26 or 29-5,we analyze joshua.
JOSHUA
before reading the whole thing and getting a shock at the end of the book, trust my experience to skip to the end.
in the end of joshua in the story of the israelite nation- we see:
the word no "not with your sword" NOW YOU TELL ME ?? jesus christ !!
we would have studied numerous lies that seem to say they killed with sword, when joshua taught that this is false according to the book itself. this is an internal contradiction and the book is not reliable. one convenient detail is in joshua 5 where joshua claims they circumcised in preparation for the passover because GET THIS moses did not enforce circumcision WOW SO IT ISNOT AS IMPORTANT AS THE RELIGIOUS JEWS CLAIM. EVEN MOSES DID NOT ENFORCE circumcision so joshua cut them with a sword in preparation for a sacrifice.
 that is worth keeping to save us from the liars claiming: circumcision is exagerated as important when in fact even their book says it can be resisted and was not important to do when moses was in charge.
similarly to preserve, after removing the books which lie that god commanded sacrifice, or wanted them yet sent a message to fix that tradition, no story remains for the source of the israelites so when rejecting joshua as a book that says both "no sword with stories of wars" as an unreliable book we must rescue out
***these two sections 1 in preparation for the passover sacrifice joshua did circumcise with a sword maybe genitals maybe not genitals,  and cut because moses was loose about circumcision and did not enforce it.
2 the story of the roots of the israelite nation in chapter 24 needs to be moved to the beginning and the story of circumcision inserted in appropriate spot in a new book with only these two sections. and until THEY the religious  leaders=they make this change and they will not fix nor change as they repeatedly publish,  we who prefer honesty can and should avoid this book and the book-volume which contains this and other "bad" books as defined in previous posts. it suffices this post to preserve the roots of the israelite: jacob who is israel and his sons went to egypt and later exited to came to the land and lived on both sides of the jordan river.. they circumcised with a sword because when moses ruled them, they did not circumcise and now, as preparation for a sacrifice they circumcised themselves. this error was corrected later when god said: I didnot command sacrifices. the hornets chased away the inhabitants and you took empty houses not with your sword and not with your arrows." end book but it is short so attach to a good book=not those 5 books ascribed to moses as mentioned but the next book judges- assuming it is good but see next post!