is the book judges reliable?

the book judges can be summarized as cycles "israel sinned was enslaved begged god for dorgiveness and rescued" followed by a long peace of forty or 80 years. until we get the surprising jolt in the book of kings the message of the book is that "the land" with the word "the" the one we are familiar with not only one city was calm for 40 or 80 years. okay.
before reading the whole book and then a getting a horrid jolt at the endthat these cycles are wrong trust my experience and SKIP to the end.
in the story of dan the people worship a statue and continue a long time which refutes the cycles summarised which fill almost the whole book of judges in fact this issue is the same as the issue in ecclesiastes kohelet the "evil" do succeed long and if so the stories which say theuyy wer enslaved for sin is a lie and they could have continued like dan and any enslavement is not as the book claims since this issue is a faith issue how to perceive the wicked issue 2 actually is reason to reject this bad book as an unholy lie. in fact the book itself reveals that dan didnot have a cycle and the earlier cycles could have been like dan without enslavement so the enslavement isnot punishment requiring re3pentance as the book claimed so lengthily. another problem is that whjat appears in the book is story after story with long eras of peace yet if this is true than tis conflicts the generation is chronicles as well as the number of years in the book kings. scholars say "not consecutive but parallel" the 40 years of peace in the six stories are the same 40 years and the tragedy preceding the 40 years were simultaneous in different places cool commentary? why is it absent from the book?? jesus christ !! only influence from the book of kings causes them to say not consecutive! they deny what appears in the book the message that appears in the book is not parallel stories in the samne era and instead of eduiting at the the same time  it seems to say one judeged THE NATION since the number of years conflicts othyer books perhaps we should accept judges and remove the conflicting book of kings with "only" 480 years?  okay no kings.
still the cycles in judges are error considering the end of the book the story of dan so this book based on its contents has been revealed as a bad book of unholy lies. next should be ruth and the christians fixed thios tradition by placing ruth between samuel and kingsbut since we define goid as not weak samuel which describes god as powerless to remove the king he rejected this is a hereticla book seeprevious post samuel for details. also kings has the number 490 which if we respect truth and honesty and if numbers have meaning them it conflicts judges as mentioned the religious need to corrupt one or the other source and some corrupt kings while others ciorrupt judges.
one more issue is the time span between nebucadnezer and mesa some religious get excited that the story of mesa strengthens the bible some religious jews and christians emphasize this yet actually mesa REVEALS another lie.
we know the time span between:
*** mesa and nebuchadnezer and that is different from the total years counted in both kings and chronicles. god would know the true number so these two books  kings and chronicles [counted as 4 by religion] are unholy lies not from god. after removing the relative-to-god heretical book of samuel and the inaccurate book of kings and chronicles what remains is:
 ruth which jews have in a location far from king david which is a bad decision and should be moved yet even ruth has errors revealed when compared to josephus and only what is common with josephus story of ruth common with ruth is supported mutually, not the numerous details unsupported in each text. now we can summarize:
1joshua- the end "not sword" reveals most content lie=bad book so reject but rescue a bit.
2judges the end refutes the cycles of most of the book=x
3samuel god weak issue 3 see previous post=x
4ruth only supported details not unsupported details, and fix the error that jews locate wrong.
5kings and 6chroniclesyears known to be false unreliable unless "numbers are not important" do not matter=x
honest people can and should reject such books as kings and chronicles because we know the total of years is false, so the books are unreliable/
josua x
judges x
samuel x
ruth
kings x
chronicles x
we can save a bit of ruth and attach it to the bits of josjua but the rest is problematic.
i recommend to keep isaia and jeremia who brought messages top correct previous trationsafter we identify not to acccept the tradition of the five "books of moses" and these five only bits of ruth and joshua are less problematic and useful in combating thoise religions who can still agre these quotes are from a good bokk yet challenge their faiths and help us to combat their lies so truth can win.