after my FIRST most important warning, NOT TO TRUST rabbis of jews who transmitted before and until the birth of jesus, which books were holy for them... and we must not accept nor TRUST RABBIS that the books before jesus birth were true... we know that only truth is from God therefore books genesis and others are not from God nor holy just kuz catholics "accepted from rabbis"...
Jesus himself mentioned by name jeremia however "did jesus ever mention by name book genesis?" simon never said so you are out. the quote "the two will become one" differs from book genesis and was from a different source than the "five books" that rabbis claim are from moses.
now that we know that warning what about the books of the new testament? are they all holy? some gospels were "rejected" due to flaws... yet those same flaws can cause doubts in the four that we print.... and since "only truth is from god" therefore some of those gospels are not from God who knew the correct date of crucifixion but which?
after reading matthew in the order printed i read book john and in chapter 19 gasp... the day differs so i had a doubt WHICH day was true?
in terms of HUMAN mind the support of mark and luke with matthew=matityahu seemed to lean to that date, that jesus ate the passover at its time "the time of the passover" and the following morning was judged by pilate. i could accept that with no problem if it were true?
if so also tthe teaching of fire of punishment i COULD accept despite differ from book duteronomy kuz as above those five were not holy but fire COULD be a teaching of jesus.
in matthew chapter five and luke a different warning besides theo corroboration of the fire teaching with greek word pyrus.
still i had doubt that paul supported the version "according to john" in john 19:14 that AFTER pilate judged was "the time of the passover offering" so which should i accept?
i rayed to the holy spirit the "guide" to teach which day was the true day?
i COULD accept either one whichever was true...
but which?
after doing the SPIRITUAL method for studying for a solution the holy spirit taught me which version was true and accurate because God does know which day but the human authors were separate from God... so i publish for you the message:
only the book of John is the hly true version the day in john is true however the day in matthew=maattyahu and its source which evolved into mark and luke has an error THEREFORE since an error cannot be from god those versions are not holy nor reliable.
indeed those books claims about fire judgement is not true nor holy BECAUSE errors are not from God only truth is from God therefore those three mathew mark and luke are separate from God and not holy nor true.
instead only john is holy and true with the correct day not error but the day in those three is error therefore separate from God and not holy nor true nor pure and that includes the teaching of fire also "not only a parble" but a mistake error therefore separate from god insted only john is true in 3:15-16 the directions aare "life" or not-life just a loss meaning the soul also dies and to save from "loss" faith not to save frrom "fire" as some think and claim based on unreliable mathew and luke.
therefore we must notice the difffference and be warned how the holy spirit sent me to guide you awy from those three and toward john with johns day and directions not to accept the idea of fire nor the day in mathew for crucifixion.
we caan summarize the book john except the full section of crucifixion and "loss" in shorter chaters and reprint PURE without the books listed above that due to "only truth from God" those books are not holy as listed above: only jeremia and isaia are from god but we must not MIX the books genesis, exodus, leviticus, numbers, and duteronomy which due to errors are known to be "seprate" from God as some accept trusting the rabbis for transmission but we must not TRUST rabbis nor MIX with holy jeremia those books genesis etc. nor the versions in matthew mark luke only pure less books not mix due to God sending a warning thruogh me to guide you because the holy spirit is the guide which book is the holy and not to mix with the holy as above. the same as we would not include any section of quran with holy john or crinthian or jeremia wemust keep pure without genesis and matthew etc. as above.
Jesus himself mentioned by name jeremia however "did jesus ever mention by name book genesis?" simon never said so you are out. the quote "the two will become one" differs from book genesis and was from a different source than the "five books" that rabbis claim are from moses.
now that we know that warning what about the books of the new testament? are they all holy? some gospels were "rejected" due to flaws... yet those same flaws can cause doubts in the four that we print.... and since "only truth is from god" therefore some of those gospels are not from God who knew the correct date of crucifixion but which?
after reading matthew in the order printed i read book john and in chapter 19 gasp... the day differs so i had a doubt WHICH day was true?
in terms of HUMAN mind the support of mark and luke with matthew=matityahu seemed to lean to that date, that jesus ate the passover at its time "the time of the passover" and the following morning was judged by pilate. i could accept that with no problem if it were true?
if so also tthe teaching of fire of punishment i COULD accept despite differ from book duteronomy kuz as above those five were not holy but fire COULD be a teaching of jesus.
in matthew chapter five and luke a different warning besides theo corroboration of the fire teaching with greek word pyrus.
still i had doubt that paul supported the version "according to john" in john 19:14 that AFTER pilate judged was "the time of the passover offering" so which should i accept?
i rayed to the holy spirit the "guide" to teach which day was the true day?
i COULD accept either one whichever was true...
but which?
after doing the SPIRITUAL method for studying for a solution the holy spirit taught me which version was true and accurate because God does know which day but the human authors were separate from God... so i publish for you the message:
only the book of John is the hly true version the day in john is true however the day in matthew=maattyahu and its source which evolved into mark and luke has an error THEREFORE since an error cannot be from god those versions are not holy nor reliable.
indeed those books claims about fire judgement is not true nor holy BECAUSE errors are not from God only truth is from God therefore those three mathew mark and luke are separate from God and not holy nor true.
instead only john is holy and true with the correct day not error but the day in those three is error therefore separate from God and not holy nor true nor pure and that includes the teaching of fire also "not only a parble" but a mistake error therefore separate from god insted only john is true in 3:15-16 the directions aare "life" or not-life just a loss meaning the soul also dies and to save from "loss" faith not to save frrom "fire" as some think and claim based on unreliable mathew and luke.
therefore we must notice the difffference and be warned how the holy spirit sent me to guide you awy from those three and toward john with johns day and directions not to accept the idea of fire nor the day in mathew for crucifixion.
we caan summarize the book john except the full section of crucifixion and "loss" in shorter chaters and reprint PURE without the books listed above that due to "only truth from God" those books are not holy as listed above: only jeremia and isaia are from god but we must not MIX the books genesis, exodus, leviticus, numbers, and duteronomy which due to errors are known to be "seprate" from God as some accept trusting the rabbis for transmission but we must not TRUST rabbis nor MIX with holy jeremia those books genesis etc. nor the versions in matthew mark luke only pure less books not mix due to God sending a warning thruogh me to guide you because the holy spirit is the guide which book is the holy and not to mix with the holy as above. the same as we would not include any section of quran with holy john or crinthian or jeremia wemust keep pure without genesis and matthew etc. as above.
after transmitting the message from Holy Sppirit about john holy but mathew and genesis differ from jeremia i provide a link to an early warning:
there.
No comments:
Post a Comment