world peace and world hunger
at beauty pageants the pretty lady always tries to get favor by mentioning world peace. too dumb to know the complexity and that some wars seem justified to the fighters.
the conflicts affect hunger and the war leaders control the resources for themselves and those loyal to them as demonstrated in the fictional mogidisho video black hawk down. sending food will not help the "undernourished" in a war zone where they cant distribute nor want to distribute it.
even the term undernourished is vague enough to exagerate the problem unjustly for example if the recommended daily amount of a certain vitamin is one gram then 80% or 90% is included in "truly undernourished" despite near and not a real danger nor tragedy.
worse is the "physical affect" described "stunted growth". why? firstly that relates to skeleton and calcium not to general nourishment. more importantly is the location! when an ethnicity two meter tall is "stunted" they only 1.8 meters they are still taller than eurasian humans!! that is not a tragedy.
finally the three worst "hunger" places are not defined by hunger! but as above by "undernourished" to include near and non danger hunger and inaccyrately swell the "apparent tragedy". worse those three places are all WAR zones as above sending food would not help anyway. and which side should outsiders take so one side should win quicker? other nations should not get involved and the conflit is the cause of the undernourish and stunted growth, in "central afrcan republic" where the ethnicity is far taller than eurasian like basketball players and stunted is still taller than well fed eurasians.
same for somalia and yemen which are war zones.
the less tragic hunger zones are also relatively few such as 25% of tiny sierra leon or islanad haiti that affects few people. using percentage is counterproductive because it is a "large percent of a small population" which is few people and not a severe tragedy only misleading numbers.
finally we have the idea of avengers endgame 2019, when thanos killed half the people, imagine the RELIEF in cebtral african republic, with families only 3 people the food was finally enough.
in the cities of china with ten million people each suddenly 5 million survivors had enough food! in western countries the demand for dairy dropped by half of the consumers so they LOWERED prices to sell the yogurt and milk before it rotted... until the "heroic avengers" reversed the "snap" then the hundreds of crowded cities in asia india china and southeast asia were again crowded and hungry... that is not a hero.
admittedly once they reversed the snap they did not care if he would steal the gems and will had stolen them once they did the future solution but consider the relief of thanos mass murder in most cities and even paris price relief! all ruined by saving lives and returning people to suffering and hunger in crowded cities as above.
clearly world hunger is affected by war zones and conflict which are places the rich outsiders "ought not" take sides to favor either side and interfering would be wrong... so the issue of hunger cannot be justly discussed in any of the war zones instead skip over the "undernourished" hungry in c.a.r. and yemen and somalia and find a hunger where the war and conflict and war leaders do not interfere with food but NONE REMAIN there isno hungry place... nad certainly not "world" hunger when most of eurasia area and both americas have plenty of food. and africa is not "food hungry" but a war zone as the song sang they are "rioting in africa" and if those tall people are stunted they are STILL TALLER than eurasian so that is not any real tragedy. consider this!
at beauty pageants the pretty lady always tries to get favor by mentioning world peace. too dumb to know the complexity and that some wars seem justified to the fighters.
the conflicts affect hunger and the war leaders control the resources for themselves and those loyal to them as demonstrated in the fictional mogidisho video black hawk down. sending food will not help the "undernourished" in a war zone where they cant distribute nor want to distribute it.
even the term undernourished is vague enough to exagerate the problem unjustly for example if the recommended daily amount of a certain vitamin is one gram then 80% or 90% is included in "truly undernourished" despite near and not a real danger nor tragedy.
worse is the "physical affect" described "stunted growth". why? firstly that relates to skeleton and calcium not to general nourishment. more importantly is the location! when an ethnicity two meter tall is "stunted" they only 1.8 meters they are still taller than eurasian humans!! that is not a tragedy.
finally the three worst "hunger" places are not defined by hunger! but as above by "undernourished" to include near and non danger hunger and inaccyrately swell the "apparent tragedy". worse those three places are all WAR zones as above sending food would not help anyway. and which side should outsiders take so one side should win quicker? other nations should not get involved and the conflit is the cause of the undernourish and stunted growth, in "central afrcan republic" where the ethnicity is far taller than eurasian like basketball players and stunted is still taller than well fed eurasians.
same for somalia and yemen which are war zones.
the less tragic hunger zones are also relatively few such as 25% of tiny sierra leon or islanad haiti that affects few people. using percentage is counterproductive because it is a "large percent of a small population" which is few people and not a severe tragedy only misleading numbers.
finally we have the idea of avengers endgame 2019, when thanos killed half the people, imagine the RELIEF in cebtral african republic, with families only 3 people the food was finally enough.
in the cities of china with ten million people each suddenly 5 million survivors had enough food! in western countries the demand for dairy dropped by half of the consumers so they LOWERED prices to sell the yogurt and milk before it rotted... until the "heroic avengers" reversed the "snap" then the hundreds of crowded cities in asia india china and southeast asia were again crowded and hungry... that is not a hero.
admittedly once they reversed the snap they did not care if he would steal the gems and will had stolen them once they did the future solution but consider the relief of thanos mass murder in most cities and even paris price relief! all ruined by saving lives and returning people to suffering and hunger in crowded cities as above.
clearly world hunger is affected by war zones and conflict which are places the rich outsiders "ought not" take sides to favor either side and interfering would be wrong... so the issue of hunger cannot be justly discussed in any of the war zones instead skip over the "undernourished" hungry in c.a.r. and yemen and somalia and find a hunger where the war and conflict and war leaders do not interfere with food but NONE REMAIN there isno hungry place... nad certainly not "world" hunger when most of eurasia area and both americas have plenty of food. and africa is not "food hungry" but a war zone as the song sang they are "rioting in africa" and if those tall people are stunted they are STILL TALLER than eurasian so that is not any real tragedy. consider this!
No comments:
Post a Comment