purifying book duteronomy: editing for clarity with notes to explain the edits.
intro: "some" claim moses wrote book duteronomy, but even if author wrote "i spoke", doubt would exist and further doubt when the writer wrote moses name, matching when others write about moses, despite possibilities, still THAT that is the match. also the phrase "across the jordan" indicates ezra, inside wrote about the "other side" not moses about his own side. reminder moses never entered, remember? i will edit for clarity. i emphasize that i purify based on the methods in the oral law for example in talmud shabat, a method was taught and preserved which influences hundreds of phrases in the book we got, or for clarity to edit phrases that can cause the reader error or to think an idea that conflicts a source. i will edit and explain the changes to replace the misleading book which is not only subjectively ugly but even objectively very very bad quality as you will see demonstrated.
first half of chapter: 260/600 words
ONE, on day one of the eleventh month, by river Jordan, Moses explained: the journey is eleven days from mount Horeb to southern border, by the Mount Seir road, but now is the fortieth year. we defeated king Og and the Amorite king Sihon and went to mount Amorite. God said "travel UNTIL the great river EUPHRATES." [see note one]. god commanded "Go inherit the land from those killed by hornets. God swore to Jacob to give it to Jacob's children.” [see note two]. before we obeyed, I said to you israelites, “(10) God has increased you greatly. YOU choose leaders, for thousands, of hundreds, of fifties and of tens and as tribal officials, from each of your families.” You answered me, “What you propose is good.” [see note three]. those wise and respected men were ministers and judges. I ordered your judges, “Hear the disputes and judge justly [fair means justly], for two Israelites and between an Israelite and a foreigner dwelling among you. avoid favoring in judging between greater or lesser. Do not fear anyone because God will judge. Bring me any argument, too hard for you. [see note four]. we traveled from Horeb by the road of mount Amorite, all that vast and dreadful wilderness that you saw until we reached Kadesh Barnea and mount Amorite, which God is giving us. Go up and inherit [21] as God said. Do not fear. all of you came to me and said, “send men to spy the land and bring back a report about the road we will take and the towns.” I liked that idea.
NOTES
note one: Topic: journeying. i must purify "by", according to the story itself, they did not go 'by the sea coast'. even if describing the territory to enter, that is not only unclear, missing words, but also is in a different book and here badly written so i purify.
note 2, topic: inherit, but not from parents? [note: this referd to battles so we see the leaders "misused" god to pursuade people to enter dangerous battle and to "try to justify" murdering defenders. the same god who said you will not murder and who said "i will send hornets" in exodus so i purified this misleading section to preserve the hornets. admittedly my faith is that this story and book STARTED as "recognizable fiction of exciting battles" against kings og and sihon outside of their country. jews knew the stories were only fictional entertainment, until literalist used threats and hits to compel people to say "it happened." this book serves to delete the historical truth that the jews "had always been in that land between the jordan river and the sea coast" instead of entered from outside.]
note 3 topic: leaders; [Note: i must purify "I took" see verse ten! this book is so poorly written that we can be certain that the book was not authored by any "wise god" who would have carefuly chosen the words not to mislead nor cause errors for readers, but choosing for clarity and without this conflict "you chose i took i appointed".
which is true? josephus preserved the "nation chose" so i purified this too. we can be certain based on the bad misleading wording, here and elsewhere and which God bothered to correct by Jeremia, that not even any holy spirit guided these authors, therefore the book needs purification.]
note 4 judges, this is moses telling "all israel" what to expect from judges. stupid to tell the people unless he explained "dont blame me for when judges are unjust i told them not to favor." also note he is violating god who said "go" instead he stayed, not going for appointed judges. moses indeed sinned.
see 1,18 "before we traveled, at THAT time, i said ALL you should do. source 1,18. that is all of it. since this is true, we must not interpret ANY command "to do" after they traveled... but what about the source in oral law the ones in the tabernacle are the limit? this conflict again indicates the book is not from God since god would be careful not to contradict. in other words god would be careful therefore these books are certainly not from god. some start with supposition, it IS FROM GOD since no contradiction possible therefore twist the messages "all" is not all... but truly said all... and by the SAME logic since contradition not from god we can be certain these books are not from god so i purify. which one to purify? i could say all, this word excluded future ceremonies, but instead i truly increase the burden, DO festivals just without the animal offerings as denied in book jeremia you eat for truly did not command them. since not all i must purify by deleting the word all, and that sentence 18 which could lead to the error "all before traveling" excluding those commands in the tent which were specifically included by talmud shabat. +part 2, sentence 23 The idea was good in my opinion
intro: "some" claim moses wrote book duteronomy, but even if author wrote "i spoke", doubt would exist and further doubt when the writer wrote moses name, matching when others write about moses, despite possibilities, still THAT that is the match. also the phrase "across the jordan" indicates ezra, inside wrote about the "other side" not moses about his own side. reminder moses never entered, remember? i will edit for clarity. i emphasize that i purify based on the methods in the oral law for example in talmud shabat, a method was taught and preserved which influences hundreds of phrases in the book we got, or for clarity to edit phrases that can cause the reader error or to think an idea that conflicts a source. i will edit and explain the changes to replace the misleading book which is not only subjectively ugly but even objectively very very bad quality as you will see demonstrated.
first half of chapter: 260/600 words
ONE, on day one of the eleventh month, by river Jordan, Moses explained: the journey is eleven days from mount Horeb to southern border, by the Mount Seir road, but now is the fortieth year. we defeated king Og and the Amorite king Sihon and went to mount Amorite. God said "travel UNTIL the great river EUPHRATES." [see note one]. god commanded "Go inherit the land from those killed by hornets. God swore to Jacob to give it to Jacob's children.” [see note two]. before we obeyed, I said to you israelites, “(10) God has increased you greatly. YOU choose leaders, for thousands, of hundreds, of fifties and of tens and as tribal officials, from each of your families.” You answered me, “What you propose is good.” [see note three]. those wise and respected men were ministers and judges. I ordered your judges, “Hear the disputes and judge justly [fair means justly], for two Israelites and between an Israelite and a foreigner dwelling among you. avoid favoring in judging between greater or lesser. Do not fear anyone because God will judge. Bring me any argument, too hard for you. [see note four]. we traveled from Horeb by the road of mount Amorite, all that vast and dreadful wilderness that you saw until we reached Kadesh Barnea and mount Amorite, which God is giving us. Go up and inherit [21] as God said. Do not fear. all of you came to me and said, “send men to spy the land and bring back a report about the road we will take and the towns.” I liked that idea.
NOTES
note one: Topic: journeying. i must purify "by", according to the story itself, they did not go 'by the sea coast'. even if describing the territory to enter, that is not only unclear, missing words, but also is in a different book and here badly written so i purify.
note 2, topic: inherit, but not from parents? [note: this referd to battles so we see the leaders "misused" god to pursuade people to enter dangerous battle and to "try to justify" murdering defenders. the same god who said you will not murder and who said "i will send hornets" in exodus so i purified this misleading section to preserve the hornets. admittedly my faith is that this story and book STARTED as "recognizable fiction of exciting battles" against kings og and sihon outside of their country. jews knew the stories were only fictional entertainment, until literalist used threats and hits to compel people to say "it happened." this book serves to delete the historical truth that the jews "had always been in that land between the jordan river and the sea coast" instead of entered from outside.]
note 3 topic: leaders; [Note: i must purify "I took" see verse ten! this book is so poorly written that we can be certain that the book was not authored by any "wise god" who would have carefuly chosen the words not to mislead nor cause errors for readers, but choosing for clarity and without this conflict "you chose i took i appointed".
which is true? josephus preserved the "nation chose" so i purified this too. we can be certain based on the bad misleading wording, here and elsewhere and which God bothered to correct by Jeremia, that not even any holy spirit guided these authors, therefore the book needs purification.]
note 4 judges, this is moses telling "all israel" what to expect from judges. stupid to tell the people unless he explained "dont blame me for when judges are unjust i told them not to favor." also note he is violating god who said "go" instead he stayed, not going for appointed judges. moses indeed sinned.
see 1,18 "before we traveled, at THAT time, i said ALL you should do. source 1,18. that is all of it. since this is true, we must not interpret ANY command "to do" after they traveled... but what about the source in oral law the ones in the tabernacle are the limit? this conflict again indicates the book is not from God since god would be careful not to contradict. in other words god would be careful therefore these books are certainly not from god. some start with supposition, it IS FROM GOD since no contradiction possible therefore twist the messages "all" is not all... but truly said all... and by the SAME logic since contradition not from god we can be certain these books are not from god so i purify. which one to purify? i could say all, this word excluded future ceremonies, but instead i truly increase the burden, DO festivals just without the animal offerings as denied in book jeremia you eat for truly did not command them. since not all i must purify by deleting the word all, and that sentence 18 which could lead to the error "all before traveling" excluding those commands in the tent which were specifically included by talmud shabat. +part 2, sentence 23 The idea was good in my opinion
No comments:
Post a Comment