the map for the game that i enjoyed, :) not angry, but did not know enuf to refute until now.... has several flaws... that OPPOSE conflict each other.
the bias to UNJUSTLY protect moscow, and from BOTH sides, caused the map to put "moscow" wrongly far from axis..
flaw 1: moscow is truly north from from krymsk, (not sochi 39e) both on the north edge of the black sea.
marking it north east of the sea is not only inaccurately wrong, but unjustly moves it EAST away from nazi. in this wrong position it would be NEARER the axis troops by south amur river region which leads to the next flaw the unjust distancing from that side. a tank would need "three steps" by the line borders which is wrong if "for the game" moscow is where they put it.
the bias to UNJUSTLY protect moscow, and from BOTH sides, caused the map to put "moscow" wrongly far from axis..
flaw 1: moscow is truly north from from krymsk, (not sochi 39e) both on the north edge of the black sea.
marking it north east of the sea is not only inaccurately wrong, but unjustly moves it EAST away from nazi. in this wrong position it would be NEARER the axis troops by south amur river region which leads to the next flaw the unjust distancing from that side. a tank would need "three steps" by the line borders which is wrong if "for the game" moscow is where they put it.
flaw 2, the land west from moscow is not north from caucus mountains named caucus. as above.
flaw 3, by the game itself australia area 7.6 million square kilometer is one region which can be supported by the desert emptiness same as siberia. the entire ussr INCLUDING nazi occupied east is LESS than aust times three "3a." ussr 22.4<22.8 msk minus deducting the western area nazi, not soviet. yet they unjustly distance moscow [as above despite inaccurately wrongly too far EAST! in conflict] with lines requiring 3 steps unjustly "too far" for a tank.
flaw 3, by the game itself australia area 7.6 million square kilometer is one region which can be supported by the desert emptiness same as siberia. the entire ussr INCLUDING nazi occupied east is LESS than aust times three "3a." ussr 22.4<22.8 msk minus deducting the western area nazi, not soviet. yet they unjustly distance moscow [as above despite inaccurately wrongly too far EAST! in conflict] with lines requiring 3 steps unjustly "too far" for a tank.
contrast the option of CORRECT accuracy. two steps from south amur to moscow as follows:
magnify the black sea so moscow is north of it and krymsk, as above for allowing one zone west symbolizing the soviet counter-offensive, between moscow in giant muskva river region including moscow on its west edge, and nazi occupied ussr. from moscow west: one zone dneper rr soviet. a second axis zone vistula rr nazi, total two zones between main rr and moscow due to industry development in conrast to west canadaa and australia. so west from moscow a magnified zone "dneper rr". [between main rr 2 zones: nazi occupied vistula rr, and soviet dneper rr.].
magnify the black sea so moscow is north of it and krymsk, as above for allowing one zone west symbolizing the soviet counter-offensive, between moscow in giant muskva river region including moscow on its west edge, and nazi occupied ussr. from moscow west: one zone dneper rr soviet. a second axis zone vistula rr nazi, total two zones between main rr and moscow due to industry development in conrast to west canadaa and australia. so west from moscow a magnified zone "dneper rr". [between main rr 2 zones: nazi occupied vistula rr, and soviet dneper rr.].
bsides one magnified only 3 australia sized zones. one including moscow, as above moscow on its west edge with ONE zone to distance nazis. a second zone ob rr by amur river west. and the remainder one north amur rr including kamchatka peninsula. why not between? to fix the unjust distance between axis troops in south amur rr. as above area of soviet less than 3 australia-s when complete. far less after nazi conquered west. so that is area fixing 4 zones total dneper muscva ob north amur rr-s.
or even BETTER considering moscow zone large "no ob" only two is accurate and the remainder was the conquerd nazi vistula rr. what about length?
the length is by the NORTH of the sphere so less length around in contrast to less north as the fat part of a ball or sphere.
or even BETTER considering moscow zone large "no ob" only two is accurate and the remainder was the conquerd nazi vistula rr. what about length?
the length is by the NORTH of the sphere so less length around in contrast to less north as the fat part of a ball or sphere.
according to game itself the lines of borders ARE a tank in nan rr can go from coast to tigris gulf in two steps. this is around 5850 kilometers despite the fat part of the ball yet three zones tigris rr by caspian sea, ganges rr and nan rr in game-map drawn with lines that a tank can go. logic would add lines but by the game itself a tank CAN go two steps and considering the length from amur river to moscow is LESS than 5800km... hundreds of kilometer less due to the north part of sphere, as i will explain, and measured, the second step could reach moscow.
the TRUTH is manchu WAS industrialized and could build five tanks [using 25]. its first turn could be amphibious from japan and manchu conquering north amur. then 5 tanks ready for next turn... WITHIN range of moscow as follows: from yakeshi 120 e, "5290 km" same two steps, as via india to tigris river region and tigris gulf... second step reaches moscow. an accurate would allow, on second turn having captured north amur, the new tanks built in industrialized manchuria=south amur rr are within range to blitz moscow first step the captured north amur and second step muscva rr due to LENGTH 5300 kilometer length.
when we contrast we see the unjust protection of moscow ignoring that manchu wa struly industrial and unjustly three steps west from amur river when second step is 5300 kilometer within range... if so moscow is doomed... imagine a game where u.s. was nutral and soviet accurate.
soviet potential from west: 3+8+1+1 kamchatka pen' and north. 13 total production potential due to empty ice and trees in nature but not industrialized east soviet by amur river and north amur river.
brits not 30 either kuz truly madagscar axis same as west nile continent is french axis like algeria and libya not only in potential for production but in battle french in west africa FIRED at u.s. [torch] and before that it brits INSTEAD odd shooting the nazi dominaters. frica does not provide ten to brits... that is unjust benefit to allies considering madagascar and north africa french axis...
only one for nile rr one long region reaching almost to south border of tanzania facing north madagascar with ONE pp=production potential due to desert and jungle by the border of orinj rr worth 2 total 3 from africa for brit not ten. the lines by tigris are accurate due to fat part of ball but total brit potential accuracy not 30 due to desert jungle and axis africa.
if u.s. were nutral in the game the allies were HOPELESS....
13 soviet +24 u.k 8+4+3+3+2=20+3 nile continent.
facing japan 26 [philipines nutral under u.s.] and truly not control fly isle called new guinea... outproduce brit and nazi accurately 30 due to industrialized european countries... and two in africa atlas mountain region extending including french but not to coast a second zone niger rr by coast due to australia-area-region and africa huger than ussr...
lets make a game like THAT and realize america saved the world from dictators .. in gratitude how about no TARRIF tax from u.s. but they have it and when trump made tarrif like they did it called "bad?" if bad then certainly european union should not have bad tarrifs... at least not to u.s. that saved them from nazi and hirohito.... make that game and see if the allies win when u.s. and philipine nutral even give four production potential of china to brit 28pp+13 facing 32+21 axis... lets play thet game.
logic dictates such a comparison and improvements to a fun game. and the lesson stop hating america folks.
source:
the TRUTH is manchu WAS industrialized and could build five tanks [using 25]. its first turn could be amphibious from japan and manchu conquering north amur. then 5 tanks ready for next turn... WITHIN range of moscow as follows: from yakeshi 120 e, "5290 km" same two steps, as via india to tigris river region and tigris gulf... second step reaches moscow. an accurate would allow, on second turn having captured north amur, the new tanks built in industrialized manchuria=south amur rr are within range to blitz moscow first step the captured north amur and second step muscva rr due to LENGTH 5300 kilometer length.
when we contrast we see the unjust protection of moscow ignoring that manchu wa struly industrial and unjustly three steps west from amur river when second step is 5300 kilometer within range... if so moscow is doomed... imagine a game where u.s. was nutral and soviet accurate.
soviet potential from west: 3+8+1+1 kamchatka pen' and north. 13 total production potential due to empty ice and trees in nature but not industrialized east soviet by amur river and north amur river.
brits not 30 either kuz truly madagscar axis same as west nile continent is french axis like algeria and libya not only in potential for production but in battle french in west africa FIRED at u.s. [torch] and before that it brits INSTEAD odd shooting the nazi dominaters. frica does not provide ten to brits... that is unjust benefit to allies considering madagascar and north africa french axis...
only one for nile rr one long region reaching almost to south border of tanzania facing north madagascar with ONE pp=production potential due to desert and jungle by the border of orinj rr worth 2 total 3 from africa for brit not ten. the lines by tigris are accurate due to fat part of ball but total brit potential accuracy not 30 due to desert jungle and axis africa.
if u.s. were nutral in the game the allies were HOPELESS....
13 soviet +24 u.k 8+4+3+3+2=20+3 nile continent.
facing japan 26 [philipines nutral under u.s.] and truly not control fly isle called new guinea... outproduce brit and nazi accurately 30 due to industrialized european countries... and two in africa atlas mountain region extending including french but not to coast a second zone niger rr by coast due to australia-area-region and africa huger than ussr...
lets make a game like THAT and realize america saved the world from dictators .. in gratitude how about no TARRIF tax from u.s. but they have it and when trump made tarrif like they did it called "bad?" if bad then certainly european union should not have bad tarrifs... at least not to u.s. that saved them from nazi and hirohito.... make that game and see if the allies win when u.s. and philipine nutral even give four production potential of china to brit 28pp+13 facing 32+21 axis... lets play thet game.
logic dictates such a comparison and improvements to a fun game. and the lesson stop hating america folks.
source:
thanks to site: distancesto dot com
considering ussr was 22 msk and that the west part was conquerd the remaining is less than 3 "australia" areas. so "2a" plus the industrilized gap, west kuz after moscow counteroffensive. total less than 3*aus' 7.6*3=22.8>22.4-nazi. tank can in two steps from amur to moscow:
moscow 37e north from? kerch 36.4, north from krymsk, not sochi 39e
hanoi 21n, 106e najaf 44e. basra 48e 5,800km 30/48 if same sphere more.
vlad' 131.5e 44n moscow 56/37.6 6300km but vlad east from manchu
only 500 km (murom 55/42)
yakeshi 120e/49 no need from vlad 44n thru manchu!
25/75 3200 km+2700=5900>5300 km (4787km north 60, sphere from 131e. )
south 55n "5290 km" same two steps second step reaches moscow.
on second turn having captured north amur the new tanks built in industrialized manchuria=south amur rr are within range to blitz moscow first step the captured north amur and second step muscva rr due to LENGTH 5300 kilometer length.
No comments:
Post a Comment