god made man from "dirt of the ground"? maybe if you ar in pre-school you believe that

logic we observe "born from ma" so logic proves  ma from ma  continuing mother before... endlessly.
if so why not "ancient human skeletons" before the first mammals? some say animals birthed humans to explain this fact.
but today i heard the transmisson with the true source. it is hard to accept.
some humans (as i wrote before) were brought and i wrote the source already "awxlan" as those who knew preserved the name in aukland and oakland.
++
however also true other humans were birthed by "grown" beings and this idea is easier to think about if you already saw the video "fifth element" when the hand of the burnt body is regrowing the important lady--so here is what happened on this planet called earth: as observed by the being who sent me the message today.
a powerful being i will call him "al" grabbed a certain scoop of DIRT because inside that dirt was the burnt CELLS of a burnt human. this fact indicates that humans had existed before the dirt was scooped and explains why no human skeletons before scorpions because all burnt even bone of humans which existed before he was burnt.
al grew the cell into a man because that cell had chromosomes as you know x+y. from some cells he separated the x twice to grow a female xx... now some of these details do coincide with some details in the bad book of genesis however that book is bad and despite these details matching do not justify preserving the bad book not even as interpreting the dirt as "dirt with burnt" human cells in the silicate dirt. nor pretending dirt and ashes are interchangeable in hebrew nor the idea "first" human in rabbinic writings which ridiculously add water and mud in conflict with the bird story intalmud this was dirt and wrong. we should reject all that. and not accept Genesis because mixes these true details with bad false ideas so book not worth preserving.
this story should replace that bad book genesis and the bad story which mixes true details of "cutting" as cutting from the cells of man 2 x to make the xx from whom humans descended family i must emphasize not "only" from these grown but also brought from awxlaan as i wrote earlier this and that are also true as observed by the beings which sent these messages to me. even religious jews admit "not dirt" literally while religion would require saying "dirt" is true so even they admit bad book but  instead certain dirt the one with the burnt cells of a dead man and truth men existed before that story so the word "genesis" false not beginning because humans existed until burnt and ffrom the burnt al regrew  male cells xy and from the cells cut out x twice and grew female xx so replace bad book of genesis not worth preserving  with this true story and not preserve bad story in genesis nor bad book genesis.