tanks near amur river

have you ever? worked on a goal several hours of calculations and when the result was ridiculous, you felt it was wrong, so you tried to find out why and finally discovered the detail that caused all that time and effort wasted?
that is how i felt today.
a researcher assisted me to get to the document i desired about military equipment in russia. the document was in russian language but i know russian letters. i assumed it would be simple to start with the eastern part of russia which MUST HAVE LESS because i had studied that soviets had moved troops and tanks from the east to defend moscow. therefore by october=3 full months after the nazi invasion there would be a small amount in eastern russia...
so i started learning the regions which the document discusses:
REGIONS
when learning the geography of any country it is important to keep in mind directions.
if i travel from "long island" from "bay shore" and go west and continue west hour after hour more and more west which river will i get too?
the east river.
in russian EAST is vostok sounds like vladivostok.
west is ZAPAD... do not forget or you will repeat my costly error!
the document begins with "karel" where is that?
[yes this is one of the names used in the game axis and allies 1984]  karel is north of lake ladoga along the finland border. so i skipped i do not want to spedn time on that i want to reach my goal in east which should be first like the sunrise first in east .
next is leningrad also not east so i skipped to next "severo zapadni" do you remember how to say west in russian?
jesus christ...
i thought the word was A PLACE like leningrad and did a "search where..." somehow the search sent me to longitude 165 so east russia and similar searches led me to crazy results  zapadni in eastern russia well gues what ZAPAD means west...
I STARTED TOTALLING the tank divisions for my goal "number of tanks in amur river region" and the divisions grew and added almost 3000 three thousand tanks that is unbelievable...
soviets would not put so many in empty icy siberia and certainly would remove considering the 1941 treaty with japan [april 1941] and after the treaty when nazis attacked moscow in the end of june 1941, soviets TRULY did move troops to moscow from east unbelievable that so many tanks were in "zapad" unless zapad means west jesus christ all my efforts were adding the total tanks on the western 3 sections north+zapad meaning north of karel, plus zapad plus south+west too that is the large number.  why the heck did the internet trick me?
because an island in east russia has a "north-west cape" of the island oh man...
what a frustrating discovery. why searches sent me to longitude 137 and 145 is just to slow me down that is not zapad
soi after wasting around 8 hours what is the answer? for east we must look for vostok!
dalnevostos.
by october 1941 troops and tanks had been moved to defend mmoscow on moscva river.
more than ten air "divisions" 14 each with around 300 planes total 3000 planes of different types. that is surprising considering the peace treaty with japan and the need to send defense to moscow.
later i will compare november but not now.
tanks seven tank divisions ! besides four battalions 4*40=160 [no "brigades" there at that time] a tank division is also around 300 like the total of an air division. 2100+150 almost 2300 tanks in amur river region.
why?
to gaurd icy emptiness?? that is crazy especiall y considering the peace treaty with japan compounded by the suddenb suuccess of nazis in just two months taking so much near moscow even thin armor is "better" than only textile cloth uniform...
next i must compare to november and see if they moved stuff to defend moscow.
if a game were to describe the situation then it would need to show peices for thousands of tanks over 2000 and for thousands of planes in the amur river region. would they attack the japanese soldiers? stalin honored the treaty most of the five years of the treaty until US destroyed hiroshima with one powerful atomic bomb in august 1945=then treacherous soviets violated "not true to promise" towards japan attacked japanese troops near amur river on 9 august. since japan had not surrrendered yet on the day FOLLOWING the atomic bomb I would have surrendered on the 7 august ordered my soldiers cease-fire and fly in the generals. yet the emperor was not budged and no ceasefire so US destroyed nagasaki on august 9 and still japan did not surrender until september.
we know soviets captured until the border we call south korea so the soviets captured lots of territory from the amur river and south into the korean penisula until japan surrenderd on 2 september. if the USA had a third atom bomb and 2 destroyed cities did not budge the emperor we can see a third was needed.
in conclusion why the emperor did not surrender on august 7 is shocking to me. destruction did not budge the emperor and the surrender was not until september 1945, why? i can only state the facts the surrender was announced a week after the second atomic bomb and "only words" the japanese troops were not oredered to cease-fire nor surrender... the surrender was not arranged until almost a month later.