the same speed is not the same

we observe the motion of the earth "spin" relative to the north pole the direction is what we call counter-clockwise as explained and certainly not clockwise spin
think of night. the room is dark and we stand facing a candle i can turn my right arm away from the candle so it is dark=that is what we call clockwise or we can move my right arm nearer to the candle called counterclockwise and continue the same motion until it is dark on the other side.
as we move my right arm nearer to the candle the arm sees the candle moving "rightward" and as i continue to spin in the same movement now the same right arm is moving away from the candle in the same movement called counterclockwise. so eventualy my right arm is dark facing away from the candle... and obviously my eyes see the candle moving rightward when my arm moves as described. at that time when the arm reaches the point where it is dark a point west of the arm is still lit by the shine of the candle and that defines the spin of our planet relative to the north pole as counterclockwise
i could have spun the earth in the opposite direction but we observe the spin is as described above whcih leads to two questions
i predict that the motion of the moon is the same motion as the spin described that means that at one point in the month we see the side of the moon which is lit and we know that the relative position is the earth is between the moon and sun so at night when we face away from the candle source called sun we see the moon side which faces the sun while later what we call a half month later we face at night away from the sun and not see the moon because the moon is not there it is in the position relative to the sun between the sun and this planert we call earth our planet so the questionis does the mooon orbit the earth frm those points to points in the same deined spin as the earths spin? i predict the samemotion called counterclockwise and we can test this by observing which side is light later if the motion is the same as the earths observed spin as above then as we face the side of the moon that is less olight we will see the left side of the mooon light before the right side light... if the order would be reversed we would know the motion is the opposite motion relative to the north pole called clockwise.
similarly we should ask regarding our planets orbit... at a point in th eyear we cann choose the point when at night we face away from the candle and we certain dertain stars perhaps three 3 stars in a short straight line called orions belt and then later what we call half year later at night we face away from the sun and face different stars... the ones opposite from the row of 3... is the motion to that point the same as the earhs spin as above countyerclockwise and if so all 3 motions are the same or is the motion the other way around the orbit...
we observe the moons motion is "right sid e light lite after we face the dark side so we know the relative motion of th emooon si counterclockwiseorbit around the earth and not clockwise and similarly i predict that the motion rlative to the borth pole of our planet orbit around the sun is the same motion counterclockwise and not clockwise.
finally w can define the difference in relative speed of the moon motion...
the moon alone moves in orbit around our planet as above counterclockwise moving the distance of the orbit length at a steady rate of o length in time we call around 29.5 days each divided into 24 hours so around 720 hours each orbit length while relative to the sun... the speed rate changes as the earth moves in orbit counterclockwise around the sun and the moon is moving counterclockwiese around the earth the mooon appears faster passing our planet relative to the sun and then later swings around our planet between our planet and the earth which we observe we face the dark side of the mooon and then the lit right side of th emoon whihc is observed as counter clockwise the speed around the sun is less as it moves in the opposite direction of our planets orbit yet the relative motion of the moon around the sun is much greater... yet less than the relative motion around the sun earlier in th emonth... when the moon moved around the earth faster than our planets relative motion around thesun while the second part of th emonth as the lit right sid of th emoon is observable the relative speed of th emmoon is less as it moves around the sun while moving at the same rate o/720 as above in th edirection opposite oif the motion of our planet orbitting the sun.
]and this has been revealed to me at night while we face away from the sun by an alien life who observed from above the northppole and observed for a month as the relative speed of th emoon around the earyth was stead y and therefpre th espped of the moons orbit around the sun was SLOWER half the month and FASTER the other half of the month. while moving at obviously the same rate.

how many books from god?

the catholic bible has 73 books and the catholics quote epistle letter of paul to timothy that "all" 73 are good  for studying etc.
yet the protestants removed books which traditionally and for hundreds of years were considered holy.
so the protestant bible has less than 73 books and FAMOUS PROTESTANT LEADER IN REFORMATION martin luther criticized the decision to include certain books for example
O’Hare P.F.  The Facts About Luther, 1916–1987 reprint ed., p. 202-203
1 “Ecclesiastes... is too much incoherent matter in it”+2“The book of Esther I toss into the Elbe [river]."+3"Jonah is so monstrous that it is absolutely incredible.” (as quoted in O’Hare, p. 202). these three  in addition to the ones protestants "print without" removed from the traditional printing until then 73-66=7+3 above.
similarly like paul wrote second cor. 3.14-15 about the "vail/veil" when reading moses=“We have no wish either to see or hear Moses” (Ibid, p. 202). same as holy spirit through apostle paul in epistle letter to corinthians.
+
you know god cannot make mistakes therefore such books as genesis and exodus and leviticus cannot be from god... and when jesus "quoted" as it is WRITTEN, he never referred to any NAME book "never said as "written in genesis" so we would not think those were good books instead he was not quoting from bad genesis but from a different good book which the rabbis did not preserve. this is most clear when jesus said "the two will be one flesh" different wording than the jewish old testament and also "worship and serve god" most clearly a different book [not the jewish ones] which the rabbis failed to preserve but replaced with bad books with errors, these examples reveal even quotes "which also appear in the jewish" he was quoting from a different good book not the jewish bad ones with errors.
similarly "love your god with FOUR all... not from jewish old testament  but a different good one which the rabbis failed to preserve and only jesus preserved the best bits... because the jewish books of old testament have mistakes... real mistakes  i do not mean "if we assume atheist is true than a book about god is a lie" but real mistakes and errors and cannot be from god.
not 36 but instead only five of old testament books are from god...
1 ruth, 2jeremia 3 isaia and two more... which ones do you think are the two?
if i could put this on the door of the protestant church as luther "put on the door" i would...

"star wars" confusion

my first confusion about star-wars was
1 "why is the story both long ago and also far away"
when i was a young nerd this question troubled me.
i mean think about it: we have fiction that could happen "now" most series on tv, and if we have a desire to separate either "far" away or "long ago" separates, so why attach them "both long ago and far away"?
what do you think?
1a i will not discuss but complain that the hebrew name for star wars is ruined "war of stars" with war singular wrong and star plural... just stupid and wrong translation, nothing to discuss...
only this year i thought of a solution... for first and i will write it at the bottom, what do you think?
2
were there 2 darth mal?
we all know how darth mal died... obi wan [OB1] as a student/padwan killed darth maul... it is famous in the star wars videos yet...
another version in series "rebels" has darth mal living until OB1 is old like white hair old... and at that different time and a different place killed d.m? does that mean 2 dart mal? or you heard or thought of a different solution?
if the videos are true "canon" then ob1 killed d.m when "future vader was a child" and killed d.m on the planet of amadela [actress portman i think?]  in the castle of amedela?
yet according to the series ob1 killed darth maul on the planet of luke skywalker when luke was young... then vader an adult... so could there be two darth mauls? or a different explanation...
my suggestion for long ago and far away...
if the wars [plural duh] of the empire would be "near" and "only distant time" then the absence of evidence in our solar system would refute the story...
similarly if the empire would be "only far away" and now then the light from that distant galaxy would still be moving from there... we could not see those stars yet and would not know now until the light moved those many parsecs or light-year lengths... the only way "we now know" the story is because the the empire happened long ago... more= long long ago and the light moved from far far away so we could now see what happened there= the way we observe stars now the way they "were" many years ago...
scientists believe galaxies are hundreds of parsecs away from us, and even fast light would take long long time so we can only know what happened far far away "now' if it happened long long ago... so both factors.

religions agree do not circumcise genitals

i wish there were a way to publish the fact that the books of religion actualy teach not to circumcise when learning this issue "people should learn" that the christian holy bible instructed a commandment "do not circumcise" in first cor. chapter 7. and even the jewish bible does not truly say the word "cut" in hebrew nor does it say, neither in genesis by abraham nor in leviticus "any body part where" to do the "circumcision" until defining in the book deuteronomy "circumcise the heart"... not a cut and not genital. like trying to wear a suit that does not fit... a custom was wrongly attached to the words which do not match the ceremony.  y

largest islands and smallest continents

when we see the big picture and the scale there is a big problem. fifth largest area to fourth named baffin and mada. can be same "scale" because the increase in area is around 16% 1.16 and even 4<3 despite the large "jump" in area is still less than 16*2 at 27% more area and we must also consider it has a similar area island [the shared islands named  until now borneo and new guinea which i recommend "updating" the name of the "island" based on a major local river because different government share each] whereas the "largest" is so far out of the scale 840 thousand square miles =2131 thousand square kilometers is almost triple area that is a different scale... and altho some do say australia is too big to be an island that same issue applies to greenland it is so much larger area to be a different scale yet too small to be among the scale of continents and the same issue australia too with around 7 million square kilometers area is so much less than the smallest continents named antarctica and south america [with amazon river] aus. is a different scale than continents hence drawing the "line" between categories separating aus. from gr. is the same problem of separating between aus. from ant. so no justification to have many continents. unless to serve the boasting of ancient U.K "we control a continent."...   t
yet in truth aus. is so much smaller than the other continents even significantly smaller area than the 2 smallest ones barely half of the small ones. so aus. should be a different scale from continents and gre. a different scale than islands as above. so what would be better? admit not black and white and allow gray... i recommend based on the "big picture" of relative-areas to define based on relative area the following: 1 "contin-uous" continent "ural continent" for both sides of the ural mountains [named until now europe and asia] then narrowing land connecting 2 "nile continent" until now named africa which has major river nile. 3 mississippi continent where major river mis. is 4 amazon continent where amazon river is and fifth same scale antarctica. in contrast to australia significantly smaller so not same "scale" of continents and so it and greenland are "grey" exceptions like "super-islands" significantly bigger than the 3 largest islands by far as above yet significantly smaller than the 2 smallest continents. we should innovate our education to accurately describe the world as observable and by relative area. and also update names of shared islands and continents by physical features such as major rivers or mountains as demonstrated above for both continents and shared islands.   s

bob's toy a poem

Bob wanted me to buy a certain toy
i said i will check if the price is high
bob wanted me to promise i would buy
after he heard no he began to cry

"for yourself you got an expensive car"
"the car is for our family of four"
i said  to avoid another word-war
i feared in my core from the fight before

"he replied "you truly do not love me
i said that is not the meaning of love
loyalty and caring that is true luv
you have boots to protect you like a glove

i want the radio controlled toy car
much more than the boots which i got from you
he shouted. i replied if that is true
bad judgement showed me if your wisdom grew

also the money for rent is well spent
bob argued "what about moms fancy  jewels
"those were not necessary you are fools
"but for you to be born those are the rules"

in my heart i knew my son bob was right
marriage is the same as a whore for fun
pay the woman for s-ex to have a son
now things became clear same as the bright sun/son.

the harm of religions

one of the most dreadful problems related to RELIGIONS is that it prevents honest thinking. from harmless belief in whichever god, a thought that does not hurt anybody... to the horrible actions resulting from such belief... religion causes regular caring parents to attack their healthy child's genitals in the name of religion... christians who think about abraham circumcision [however see below] and jews and muslims dont they know? muslim group "muslims against circumcision of children"; based on quran not to alter the child's body and christian "holy bible first cor. 7" from holy spirit instructs a commandment "do not circumcise" and for jews abraham was before "the giving of the tora" meaning not required to do as specified in "mishna" [section passover psahim.]
now belief alone does not hurt anybody but it does lead to hurting children in circumcision.
also at the young age when kids  DO BELIEVE  santa claus is real and the tooth fairy we tell them to also believe god is real.  and stuff about god.... and they will believe same as santa [even  if deny then we adults shout at them "how dare you call me a liar"...  then when they are older we say in truth santa is not real... but the idea of god remains undoubted unverified for years age 20-30-40-70 all because the idea was inserted when they believed in santa claus... and the prejudice...
whenever we read any book we begin without prejudice we read and "evaluate" if we enjoy the book and are free to criticize the degree of quality... and often say a book is bad because of the story or other problems but religion prevents such honest thinking for religious books. this prejudice to claim it is true and good prevents honest thinking and causes making claims that do not match the story nor the wording in the book... since religion prevents honesty that is also bad.