included in holy bible

we were born into a world which already has certain books already printed and prepared. our parents place into our hands a book which they tell us is holy it even said so on the cover of the volume which leads to the question, is that the same thing which happened=did jesus hand to mark or matthew a book containing sixty holy books? certainly not.
the gospels never claimed that jesus listed which of pauls letters were good. which old testament books were good.
even when jesus quotes "as written" he never said the book by name. did jesus ever say genesis was a good book? never only he quoted "as it was written grapho" no name of any book was ever approved. and only around ten verses were worth quoting from whatever written source.
people decided and flawed humans decided which books to include in the holy bible what if they included a bad book among the ones truly inspired by god.
the new believer is told that he should believe stuff "because the book said so" soon he reads and asks if the book determines our belief then what about this detail? and is told we lied the book does not determine the belief instead  church leaders teach which words we should ignore.
when ephesians said "one god and one baptism" church leaders teach to ignore that part insisting two baptisms if " the books are inspired by god then they should determine our belief in one baptism not two... that would refute almost every church. well maybe it should start respecting god.
some documents were rejected and not included in the bible which leads to the question what if the ones included were bad decision to include among the good ones.
paul wrote leyyers the disciples were not handed  a book volume the way we were handed a holy bible containing many books. people decided what to include
regarding the new testament church leaders decided to include certain gospels and pauls letters and "whichever" books the rabbis included... that is risky we  know that we cannot trust rabbis who do you think selected and decided to  INCLUDE books in the jewish part of the bible?
so the selection to include in the bible is the topic. which to include? the list of books is called canon a word used in pauls letter epistle  for "measure" or boundary or rules . only these are good others are rejected which leads to the question the decision to inclde books which should be rejected too.
church leaders decided which to INCLUDE in the group of collection of texts.
later church leaders mention by name the gospel of mark we can compare this to jesus who never ever mentioned a book by name... when he quoted as it was written it seems to sometikes match the old testament yet there are differences between the wording of the jewish book and truly jesus never ever said he was quoting from genesis.
similarly in the writing of eusebius before he mentions the gospel of mark... which some are fooled is the first written gospel truly eusebius did quote from a written "the gospel" before mark wrote. that was a book which eusebius and he christians of his day thought was good adding marks which the bible today has not preserved replacing it with mark and 3 other gospels. which later christians decided to INCLUDE in the collection.
the early christians such as paul never listed a fixed number of gospels so later christians added and included many gospels and many letters attributed to paul just because pauls name is at the beginning.
any liar can write "paul an apostle" and silly ideas and they would include it because they see the name paul. people can make mistakes
which books are justly INCLUDED IN THE FORMER TESTAMENT?
if jesus said "the two will become one" is that evidence that all thirty books of the former testament is all good?  it is truly not even evidence for the book we call genesis because he did not mention the name genesis... we do not know which book he quoted from with that idea in fact we can identify a difference in wording between the jewish part which has different words... so not relying on genesis but certainly a different book which was not preserved we cannot know what was in it. we do know that it differed from the jewish part and we cannot trust the rabis which to include in the collection.
we can test that the book of genesis said "your name will not be jacob" this is clearly false from internal comparison and a book of truth may not contain genesis.
if jeremia is good he brought a message from god "i did not command offerings therefore you eat the meat of the offerings" we certainly cannot  INCLUDE both jeremia and exodus which claims that god did command if truly god sent a correction to "determine" the beliefs and fix the error of killing animals to burn them. we certainly cannot include both together that is silly rabbis and the book should determine what we believe so religious leaders say the "word no differs from the idea" of no... which words we can ignore... so "no other gods" differs from the word "no"...
the obvious solution is to only include the quote itself words jesus quoted "as written grapho" as the section of the "former covenant" on one page and proceed immediately to the gospels.