the dem's continue to be sore losers

when an abolitionist criticised slavery in southern states- which  the north never forbade- a democrat congressperson deciede he would be the "judge to punish" the words which bothered him and hit the abolitinist.
the truth is southern states were allowe slavery and even the new territories had a compromise since 1820 that southern coulkd have slavery so why seceded? i thought to preserve slavery but that was protected...
the secession was when the REPUBLICAN won the presidency and the dem's refused to accept that so they seceded from the uniion. jesus christ !!
now when we consider that the people had already voted to join the union then that is :"not represebnting the people" to secedde and only being sore losers for losing the el;ections in our decade whne mrs. clintonm lost she continued the dem's style and attacked trump for months after the election same as a sore loser childs.
finally kavanough was affirmed "despite" the one nominating was trump... the democ-rats respected the process? no they want to impeach kavn. the same sore losers who caused the cibil war which wasnot about slavery the south was alloewed slavery... even the territoies were allowed slavery but the pronlem was a republicn won the oresidency and the dem's lost and that is what sore losers do...
schumer would secedde just so trump is not his president if not for the fact that new york is in the north....the evidence shows that democrat party continues to do devastating harm to the country.
time for loyalists to stop supporting the democ-rat senators.
and following the 1820 compromise i propose a law for texas senators!
southenr stateswith amny christians should be authorized to punish doctors and mothers who do abortions while northern states are authorized not to punish same as the missouri compromise in 1820 why not?
and the claim "her body her choice' is the fetus truly her body?? only attached yet before the pregnancy "her body was complete" before the fetus was added it is not only the fetus body but certainlly only attacjhed but not her body she can decied about tattoos on her body and the kidneys she was born with but the fetuxs is not her body... that is a trick... even if a woman is raped the fetus doesnot deserve the death penalty for the crime of the impregnator are the "inconveniennces in the future" an excuse to kill a fetus? certainly no justification same as after birth. too bad if you will be poor it inot "her body" of the mother the daughter is ;"her body of the fetus"! the fetus is certainly not "her body" of mother as we all know mom's body was complete before the pregnancy. even if abortion is not murder it is some crime. like the punishment of "organ harvesting" but more severe.