fourth republican in a row!

hilary clinton received 3 million more votes than trump... wikipedia emphasizes this in the "data box" and i will tell you all "why they emphasize this irrelevant idea..." in truth there is no "real" vote called popular vote instead each state has its minority rejected.
there is no tallying separate states together because they are separate states. the emphasis on the fake "popular vote " is only just because... the fourth time in a row the dem's lost as a result of the system. SORE LOSERS.
recently a comedian pointed this out... trump lost the popular vote... as if that was real... but there are 50 states not one alone!
logically if most of each state vote "the same" then that would also be most of the total, however the country is not one "state" of california but 50 states and each one has its minority rejected.
so if california has 11 million people and most vote hilary that is worth 55 votes of electors because the people are voting "the direction that their state electors should vote" not directly for president but instead for the direction fo each states electors... only the losers want direct- because they are sore losers and i will explain why they are unjust. simply blinded by wanting to win.
there is no "popular vote" at all and no total of all states it should not even be totalled because it si not relevant....
***only because the fourth time in a row the republican won that is why the sore loser democ-rats tally up the total all the states to whine... as the comedian mentioned recently 2 years too late... yet if we look at california hilary got "most" of the 11 million 7>4 million- by how many?
three million and surprise tallying the total of separate states has "3 million more" as the sore losers point out.... unjustly and the problem is:  those were the 3,000,000 which did help to WIN state which she won and USED UP those 3 million to win the state... and got 55 for the state that used it up so cannot count those 3 million a scond time as if she deserves presidency.
when trump won the majority of more states that balanced the 55  because "separate states cannot be combined ... and the 3 million "more" that people whine about were the ones used to "win the 55 electors" of california once they used for that and did get 55 and cannot be used AGAIN for the presidency...
the only reason people whine is because this is the 4th time in a row that this rule caused dem's to lose the presidency. we would not even hear any fuss if the dem's were not sore losers.
dem are SORE LOSERS to the point of breaking the legal premise of 1824 just blinded by the desire to win.
so they combine separate states which should not be combined.
instead each state has a majority and the 3 million "more" were not truly "clinton" instead earned her california's electors. that majority did cause a win- she did win that state because of 3 million more and that is used up. you cannot count them again.
so when the dems are sore losers whining "why is republican prsident when we have more..." there is no such tally of combining states it is only a trick by sore losers because a democrat never won that way...
MOST IMPORTANTLY-  the first time the electoral college caused a president with less voters- was before the democrat party existed that fateful year all FOUR candidates were the same political party and the popular vote was not enough to win because they were DIFFERENT SEPARATE states and the "legal premise" was "not to combine" the separate states but the majority of each state and that was not at the expense of the democrat party- which had not existed yet instead all 4 were the same one political-party so it was not to benefit one more than another andnot for "republican party" to beat "whig" or anybody.
MOST IMPORTANTLY after the PREMISE was established, now it would be bad and unjust to complain that republican party is different-  to complain that the next 4 should be by popular total just because the democrat lost- yet... the dem's unjustly complain-
as one comedian joked... using comedy to serve political rage-
in essence the trick is totalling separate states... hilary had more- yet truly those 3 million did win her something- gave her the 55 electors of california- so they were counted as a win- now it is unjust to mention them again just because trump won ten more states!
cannot use them a second time for the total... just because dem's ares sore losers "a certain comedian  joked" recently riling up political rage for the simple people who do not know about the 1824 legal premise so far away in the past.
saying "trump lost the popular vote" only shows hate and riles because there are fifty separate states so there is no such thing as "popular vote" so why is the number even calculated? only because the losers are sore-losers!
truly once the premise was established when the 4 were the SAME political-party there should not even be any such complaint and truly it is disguisting that people are saying "republicans should be different" just because hilary lost... that is unjust once the premise was established. they should not even complain- but they do- because they are SORE LOSERS for the 4th time in a row the electoral tipped against the democrats because trump won much more states.