random rocks or divine maker?

in nature we see random shapes of rock eroded or cracked randomly. if we would find a smooth rock we interpret something caused it, flowing water in river caused smooth, caused not random yet still NOT  planned. we would believe something like water CAUSED  it despite not seeing the cause yet still based on the equation of known smooth rocks in rivers yet still not planned.

if we see a rock shaped like a tool, we interpret someone changed the random rock to usefully shaped... a maker... a human maker. the emphasis in ancient history is INDUSTRY  meaning they MADE tool shapes indicated a plan not claimed "stone age used stone as a tool" but claimed "INDUSTRY" meaning made stone tools.

an intelligence planned. religion points to random and claimed baselessly "look at the order it must be planned" similar to the tool but... they point at randomness and subjectively claimed order.

when we see a clock we know factory assembled clocks so even when we don't see the assembly we believe it is the same as the clocks we know... built by a maker... and a human made a GOOD watch... the hand for second is planned connected for sixty to move a minute hand and 60 of those units match the rate of the hand for hours that is human maker.

now imagine a "wise creator" could plan the rate of spin to coincide with the circled path of moon and around sun? 

imagine a planet that would spin at a rate that thirty complete spins matched one orbit of moon around and one orbit around sun matched 360 complete spins that would show planned and intelligent maker probably a human maker just stronger.

we dont see in nature "even the quality of a human made clock" just randomness... when even a human can plan better.

we see random spin and the spin is not a rate to match circled sun 365 complete nor 360 instead 365 spins and part of a spin. moon 29 spins  and part of spin.

if a creator planned to command festivals or holy days he could prepare a planet with a spin rate that matched the time of moon amd sun circles. we see randomness not a clock so we can't equate to maker as many religious people use deception deceptively.

if we claim "the spin rate doesn't match moon rate," religion CAN answer "mystery and gods ways are mysterious and the human mind is too weak" as they lazily "explain away anything" but we can attach that same claim for the origins. "why does earth move unless god pushed it to spin?= mystery. not a maker.

why does earth move unless god pushed it to orbit around sun?=mystery. same as those religious teachers "sidestep" using mystery. catholic trinity 3=1 is a "mystery" so we can equally attach that to any proof, "how could life begin without birth unless god created" answer "that is a mystery".

how could a planet of rock and water "materialise from nothing emptiness, unless god created and he is maker?" answer: "your own answer mystery" and... what about the assumption from "nothing" we should not include that unknown in the question. we dont know IF it "materialised from nothing emptiness" only religion claimed that "circular baseless idea". we need a god if from nothing so we believe from nothing but we dont know the history if from nothing or from existing matter or energy... just "your answer=mystery" as i will exhibit.

a billion catholic dont complain why is trinity 3 and also one. in fact only the Christian book avoided more than one god for Christianity with TWO options but the teachers and people have more than one and still dont complain about the conflict "only one god and besides for one also another divine" as i read in messianic jewish Christian book. the trinity is a mystery, they say but if  mystery is satisfying for humans then apply it more as above. mystery we cannot accept a book claimed created that cannot be verified.

about spin, we can say if he planned to command festivals and if strong "omnipotent" he can plan the system to identify time... but instead we see... not even human  quality but only randomness in nature, in general but more importantly spin of days as above so we can be certain no wise creator... if god existed or contributed it was not the planet spin and orbit. the creation was random as we see without maker nor creator so book is false.

if i lived on a planet that spun at the rate matched the moon cycle and sun cycle accurately then i would imagine a maker... the same maker as a clock!! human but stronger.

still not strong enough to help nor save but if we imagine a strong god powerful enough to save... then when anyone shot a gun,tthe excuse of "free will" failed since their act of murder completed, and a merciful good would save the victim and punish the shooter unless the shooter was justified we find either the book is wrong about a strong and also powerful and also merciful is wrong and false. the alternatives are a cruel god, and the book still false or a merciful weak god, stronger than human and too weak to stop a bullet because if he could stop the murder and does not then he is part of the crime... same as we must "save someone drowning" with mercy and not abandon an injured human same if god could save but doesn't that is a part of the crime and of harm and shared guilt. if we don't help we are cruel but must be merciful same if god is strong and merciful as book claimed so either way the book is wrong and "wishful wishes" hoping for a merciful god and granted credit when someone was saved when he doesn't "do that mission" of saving body. either weak or not merciful either way the book is wrong about describing the maker who did not act like a maker as above.

if we have wishful wishes i wish for a weak merciful god rather than a strong cruel god but either way one of those description is falso and the random world never had a wise creator. 

if so how was earth formed? we can attach the same LAZY religious answer of mystery quoted above for random spin of planet... apply that to unknown history. the end of guessing the beginning. 

nfl FINAL games nfc afc

nfl FINAL games nfc afc

four teams remain in N.F.C.to compete as i will contrast.

after a game for a.f.c. [second group but earlier in day] n.y. giants the winner who overcame vikings 13w, will compete against the best of the best who rested "bye". we see the ones who won more games are less likely to get eliminated both resting and later playing the weakest of the four winners that is: nyg 9+1=10w. consider the positions: eagles 14 wins best record of all four divisions, e, n, s, w, 13,8,13w is not competing the balanced winner s.f. 49 that had 13w and by defeating seatle seahawks while p.e. rested now 14w with 14w! that would be balanced but... pe earned the privilege to compete against weaker giants 9+1 win less likely for pe to get eliminated. still possible same as giants "surprised" eliminated mn. vikings top of nfc n 13w but n.y.g. 9w won so now 10w so possible also p.e. but still 10w far from 14w.

update as expected: this years Philadelphia Eagles BURIED the New York Giants 38-7. p.e. will face the WINNERS of the other games which is balanced:  d. cowboys 12w+1 who eliminated t.b. buc. the top of nfc s, will compete against the winner s.f. 49 top of nfc w, 13+1 wins, after overcoming se.se as expected weakest of the seven. in contrast to that 49 game this 49 with d.c. seems a balanced exciting game. the one worth watching kuz 49 13+1w=14 near d.c. 12+1w=13 w.

update 49 won and played eagles who eliminated 49 for NFC champion. in super bowl they will play kansas city chief... the top of afc each top eliminated the ones with less wins. surprise? the others barely had a chance due to 2,7 system.

the winners of this phase maybe nyg with 49? i do not gamble, will compete for "nfc championship"

that is a major game which will be the champion of nfc division.

update: San Francisco 49ers eliminated Dallas Cowboys 19-12. as expected the team with more wins was not eliminated.

the nfc part is "not over" as e.s.p.n. wrongly wrote [before the 49 p.pe. game], despite the directional divisions eliminated nfc n and nfc s eliminated.  still the top of nfc e won eliminating giants, and the top of nfc w 49 won so for the nfc division that is the next game. the top of nfc e against top of nfc w while the others had a chance but as expected were eliminated. 

__a.f.c. briefly 

prepare soon in afternoon of today, january 21 is the game between k.c. chiefs the best of the best in a.f.c. who rested "bye", competing against jax. jag. who overcame l.a.c. update: as expected Kansas City Chiefs topping the Jacksonville Jaguars 27-20

LATER: 4 teams will compete on the chinese new year: their calculation succeeded this time coinciding with moon cycle in nature, on correct date matching nature in contrast to jew rabbi despite short month in lunar, too long, missed the day when china succeeded but back to nfl which includes nfc and afc:

buffalo who defeated miami in a "seasaw" of scoring, competing against cin. ben. a division champion in a.f.c.

update: Cincinnati Bengals eliminated Buffalo Bills 27-10.

the next phase will be nfc champ against the afc champ called super bowl. bowl like a stadium shape.

the best players in each division will be selected for a pro bowl in february, date 2, a week before nba all star.

how to wear livery and fat

 a kid asked me what is livery? in a book about wearing livery.

i told him when you smear the mashed liver on you hands they are livery.

a kid got caught in his sisters room. she demanded what are you doing in my room. the kid stammered to hide the truth, "i uh was looking um for your uh... diary uh"

she exclaimed "gross!"

my ma is so fat....
my car started feeling spacious, ever since the first time she exited
she would be the best goalie, even without practice. 

what can we call an old cow that stopped milk?

an udder failure.

if my horse also got too old to work that is the udder problem 

alice under ground, easier reading part three

alice under ground, easier reading part 3 note: same as peter pan had a great story mixed into rough reading which a skilled author edited, i will do the same for this wonderful but problematic story.

CONTINUITY: Alice SHRUNK short again. this time she was "3 inches" tall, last shrink was to ten inches and then growing to ten feet tall. she heard footsteps so she looked that way and saw the white rabbit. [end chapter 3 wonder but same chapter continued in under].

STORY: the white rabbit was walking slowly while looking anxiously all around. Al understood that it was searching for something that it dropped. it worriedly exclaimed, "oh my dear paws! oh my fur and whiskers! She'll decree death on me, as sure as ants are ants! Where did I drop it?" what is the meaning of it? al knew it refers to a thing, but which? She comprehended it meant the aroma cloth. She started helpfully hunting but it had vanished, same as everything else. 

She looked up toward the table but saw there was no glass table nor pool anymore. the rabbit noticed little Alice. in a quick angry tone, it said "Mary Ann! why are you here? Go home this moment, and bring my gloves and an aroma cloth as quick as you can run". 

"yes sir," Alice replied rapidly and ran obediently "in the direction which the rabbit had pointed". She came to the front of a small house. on its door hung a bright brass plate with the name W. Rabbit. She went in, and RUSHED upstairs, for fear she should meet the real Mary Ann who would expel her before she took gloves. she entered a tiny tidy room, with gloves on a table by the window. 

BUT, before she could grab the aroma cloth, +the effect of the aroma ended and; she swelled big until she was stuck in the tiny room with her head pressing against the ceiling. she stooped so her face bent down near the floor. she put one arm out of the window. she tucked her +toes into and up the chimney.

al felt trapped. She comforted herself that she had grown fully, therefore she would not grow older to be a wrinkly old lady. Presently she heard a voice outside so she started listening. "Mary Ann! Mary Ann!" called the voice, "fetch me my gloves, now!" She heard a quiet tapping of feet on the stairs. Alice knew it must be the rabbit coming. she trembled till the house shook . she was now "about a thousand times as large" as the rabbit. very soon, the rabbit came to the door. it +pulled it open. Alice's elbow prevented his entrance.

Alice correctly guessed that it will go to a window. she heard the rabbit under the window. she suddenly spread out her fingers, and snatched. she did not grab it but she scared it and heard a little shriek followed by the crash of breaking glass. she concluded that it had fallen into a glass cucumber-frame.

next she heard the rabbit angrily say, "Pat, Pat! come here." a voice that she had never heard before, replied respectfully, "I'm digging for apples, so i am here anyway, yir honour!" After that she heard rabbit's angry voice, "come and help me out of this!" 

very soon, rabbit resumed, "tell me, Pat, what is that coming out of the window?" Pat replied [after  the author miss an opportunity for dialog when the animals were wet, which he wrote about but without conversation, and then having too much dialog about stuff he himself called boring, now he finally has a bit of dialog about the events occurring, but i must make it easier to read], "it's an "arrum", yir honour!" that was how he pronounced arm. Rabbit responded, "An arm? an arm is not that size. it fills the whole window."

"it does, yer honour, but it IS an arm."

"go and take it away!" the rabbit ordered.

After a long silence, Alice heard, "do as I tell you, you coward!" so she again snatched toward their voices. This time she heard two short shrieks. She wondered what would happen next? After she waited to hear hints of what they were doing, she heard rumbling of little cart-wheels. many voices started talking together, but she could only hear parts: "where's the other ladder?" and "I had only one, Bil's got the other" and "put 'em up at this corner" and "no, tie 'em together first".

Rabbit ordered, "Bil, grab that rope" Al understood that the ladders, even tied together, were lower than the roof so they had thrown a rope for bil to climb. She heard them arguing who would go down the chimney. the rabbit ordered, "Bill, go down" she heard a small animal scratching and scrambling in the chimney. [censored something to hide] +the ash caused it to sneeze. she heard the sneeze and a chorus: "up goes Bill!"

soon rabbit asked, "what happened to you? tell us all about it." a little feeble squeaking voice, ("that must be Bill's voice" thought Alice,) said I sneezed so hard that i flew up like a rocket!" [yay finally something special, carol said like a rocket] the other voices chorused, "so you did, old fellow!" she wondered what they would try next? somebody said, "you can't use your house with that monster inside so we must burn your house down." rabbit exclaimed, "oh dear dear! oh my fur and whiskers! +i love my home. instead we will make it leave. throw these rocks." which they threw through the window. 

one hit alice's face which hurt. the others were soft when they hit her face. they had changed into yellow cup cakes and orange cupcakes. she extended her long tong at an orange cake and pulled the "crumb" up on her huge tong. she swallowed and waited counting to ten. 1,2,3,4,5. she felt great delight that she was getting smaller. she could shift her stiff and painful position. between two and three minutes more, her height was, once more, three inches high.

She ran out of the house as quick as she could. she saw the group of small animals: guinea-pigs, white mice, squirrels, and a little lizard colored green. [in illustration the lizard was standing and leaned on a guinea pig. a pal was giving a glass of something from a bottle, probably brandy] They all rushed to chase her until she entered a dense forest. [end chapter 2 in under. but this chapter 4 continued in wonder].

to be continued in chapter 3.

korea war jet loss stats

at the start of the korean war north had 162 warplanes. south had around 20 for recon.

the u.s had an airforce called "feaf" 657 warplanes available.

source https://www.7af.pacaf.af.mil/About-Us/Fact-Sheets/Display/Article/408386/the-korean-air-war/

within a few days the bombers had bombed north's air bases and the few that remained were almost powerless.

despite defender air control north land forces advanced taking much land for several months.

the total of losses at cease fire time: communists lost 976 planes (including 792 MiG-15s), 1,327 tanks, and 89,920 vehicles. communists who control their propaganda claimed less losses.

feaf which was u.s. lost, total of years of war FEAF lost 1,466 planes out of a total of 1,986 UN aircraft destroyed: 816 by flak  meaning anti aircraft bombs shot upwards. 147 were lost in air-to-air combat. FEAF also had 1,841 casualties, including 1,180 dead.

the ratio  of 147:976 is around 1:6 commie's lost almost seven warplanes for each one they got. admittedly wikipedia, long considered unreliable in academic due to being controlled by edit wars has different numbers. i will not quote but say this time even absurd: more than the 1986 total. you cant lose more than 1986 of all u.n. warplanes so i will not quote wikipedia only warn that it differs and as college proffessors warn is not reliable it was never considered reliable due to edit wars and private company bias

this case is consistent with the instance that i already demonstrated makes america seem weak with false area of u.s. in contrast to britanicca its "source"

despite britanica saying the area of u.s. wikipedia "editirs" wrote a different number and to fool people it was repliable lied that the source was britanica. if i make a mistake i will fix it but in wikipedia a mistake cant be fixed due to edit wars and anybody can write or edit even me yikes!! so doubt if an expert wrote in contrast to real encyclopedias. which is why college professors warned our class not to use wikipedia.

not only is the number different which is "misquote" but worse the "source" was only listed to deceive readers who will not check... as if the lie had a reliable source. similarly the loss of warplanes is consistent with the private company policy to make u.s. seem weak more losses and less area. even when more losses is impossible.

in FICTION video top gun they claimed "in korean war the ratio was 12:1" this is part of the fiction but what was the correct ratio?

in air combat not counting flak the u.n. which included u.s. as part of u.n. lost 147. seven time that is 1030 near 976 so the true ratio was nearly 1:7 so the commies lost almost seven to each one lost in air combat. 

in terms of total losses commies destroyed 960 and lost 976 including nearly 800 mig 15. so almost balanced due to flak. commies claim only lost 350 but... we know they censor in those countries so no doubt to challenge the western number and counted crashed planes.

NOTE: the database chart "korwald" kor-ea +w-ar +air+loss   listed 4,000 PEOPLE not jets! the claim "according to their calculations, 4 thousand aircraft were lost, so you have quite underestimated the data" is false because that listed names of people, for example ONE bomber held many people. so only 900 jets were lost as above. 4000 people were lost "in their calculation" but not "4000 aircraft".

the bomber called b29 a, tail number 44-69682 was listed, with first name and SAME tail number for many people because many people are the crew of one bomber. that was ELEVEN crew. even smaller had 2 crew per plane. so 4000 people is not 4000 jets, but far less for the title topic "jet loss". 

most popular video 1986, 1987

most popular video 1986, 1987 top five. the top ones in 1986 were SO good that the three best of 1987 could not surpass them.

1. Top Gun 1986, $180M

the "top" warplane aviators became students at skill school and competed for best of top. a skilled pilot started a romance with a civilian instructor between flights. the skills got applied in a dangerous mission.

2. Crocodile Dundee 1986, $175M A reporter and a wildland hunter started experiencing each other's environment.

3. Three Men and a Baby 1987, $168M

Three bachelors find a baby who was left by the girlfriend of one of the guys. Another package caused a dangerous mission.

4. Fatal Attraction 1987, $157M 

A married man had a one night affair with a lady who became a threat to his family.

5. Beverly Hills Cop II 1987, $154M A cop joined cops in Beverly Hills, becoming an unofficial "b.h. cop" due to a shooting and crimes associated with it. editor's note the story was weak and relied on blackxploitation. by weak i dont mean "boring for me" but i refer to the lack of quality noted by both reviewers  and votes less than 50% and less than 60% respectively. its success must have been blackxploitation for people to "prove" they dont hate negroes. similarly: was the story in black pander 2018 the cause for the success? the story was weak but same as this the success wasnot earned by quality story but relied on blackxploitation which worked due to many "suckers" who need to prove "we are not lazy or cowards or racist." the pressure if you dont buy a ticket for a nefro star, you are a racist etc. had effect due to people who let themselves be manipulated, the weak minded herd who did not go because the story was good... analyze that! in fact some would be forced to lie that the story was good even if they felt it was weak due to threat racist that manipulated them... 

for example look at time magazine quote, taken down but preserved "Murphy exudes the kind of cheeky, cocky charm that has been missing from the screen since Cagney was a pup, snarling his way out of the ghetto." the issue of "emerge from ghetto" was revealed as the cause not the story nor the acting. that was from a good review. when others wrote "assumed that a movie will be a hit simply because it stars an enormously talented person." so they did not invest in its quality. even the stretch "enormously talented" indicates the threat of being called a racist. i cant say its bad or they will call me a racist but roger ebert found the compromise dont knock the negro while telling the truth about the movie, even if the actor was barely as talented as any actor for example pryor.

i did not succumb to manipulation that time. i was manipulated once to "prove i am not lazy" but i learnt not to get manipulated. if people say "prove you are not a chicken" the response is not to be manipulated. if you succumb to manipulation THEN you are the coward. "if i would let you manipulate me i would be a coward." lazy? i only prove to myself not prove to you. and dont even say anything to people who try to manipulate you by calling you racist. they are as SHALLOW as "family guy"  both a joke... barely a joke.

next 139<140<150 far less than 154m different category. similarly for categorizing largest islands and categories by relative size.

atomic bomb guilt, hiroshima

hiroshima atomic bomb guilt

was the u.s. use of the atomic bomb a "stain and guilt" on u.s. history?

before the issue of the USE we must clarify WHO is getting accused.

voter turnout was less than 60% only 56%. 44% did NOT SUPPORT either dnc or rnc so the "accusation" is certainly NOT at the voters who did not support the guy who used commander chief authority to nuke a wide area. 

the rnc opposed dnc wanting a replacement. a different guy not truman.  we cannot be certain that rnc would also use mass destruction as deceptive dnc lie baselessly... especially considering rnc idea sanctity of life and rnc president bush opposing wmd meaning POISON GAS CHEMICAL  weapons which were  used n found... rnc opposed wmd so only dnc truman and dnc voters caused such an evil weapon, the wide area atom bomb is worse than poison gas. considering rnc conservative direction, value life even fetus, plausible use only precision bombing of factory not wide area mass murder.

the gap was 20% of electors 100/500 represented voters voted  against truman and f.d.r. despite 80% is majority to win, the turnout was 56% of voters so 20%oppose plus 46% not support either, totals 66% 2/3 not support f.d.r. nor truman dnc who did not represent u.s. voters when truman ordered use wide area bomb. so before we even START the accusation debate we must identify that ONLY d.n.c. is a possible guilt but rnc opposed and 66% voters did not support dnc as above.

the dnc claims the goal to end the war justified any weapon. on other issues dnc itself accused that goal does not justify the method... so this is not a defense for anti-moral anti-ethical methods.

same as west DOES NOT cannot torture to get info, dnc cant use immoral wide area vast murder even for good intentions. the atom bomb did not cause the EMPOROR to surrender... does that mean need a second? or wrong to think it would cause surrender. it was wrong. we saw it did not sway him so nagasaki guilt is even worse.

either way the accusation of guilt is only at dnc truman who used vast murder worse than POISON GAS not rnc nor voters of sanctitu life even fetus... once this has been established, no need to debate simply blame dnc and dnc voters... in fact 17 of dnc supporters from 530 STOPPED supporting dnc in 1944. dnc LOST support even from dnc voters.

compare 1940 dnc 449 elector but lost 17 of those who had supported STOPPED  supported. the vast 432 is less by 17 even supporters stopped supporting dnc.

so the blame for the guilt of atom bomb is not an accusation against voters but only against DNC voters and truman.

the pattern is consistent the dnc consistently points at "the stain and guilt of American history" only to try and shift blame AWAY from dnc who THEMSELVES insisted on separation of negro schools called segregation.... and dnc insisted Slavery that was dnc not "American guilt" but dnc guilt. they only speak of American history to try and shift the dnc OWN guilt away from themselves... unjustly and worse to wrongly blame all americans when rnc opposed slavery and segregation and truman.

the pattern is "blame america for what we dnc did" slavery school separation segregated and vast atom bomb but the dnc and truman in dnc was the one who perpetrated those! 

so the reply is "truman was dnc" but rnc wanted precision bombing and bomb "sights" for aiming at the factory only.

we see this issue too is a dnc trick to try to shift blame from themselves same as school segregated who did those things including truman decision to order vast atom bomb. the 46% who opposed truman are not even ACCUSED  even before the debate if ending a war can use immoral torture or killing children who are compelled by adults and cannot be blamed even if they were soldiers which is possible in emperor system yet still debatable and EITHER way the accusation only accused dnc truman and dnc voters who wanted him t' as v.p. wanting to ignore "tradition" including "sanctity of life" but not the 44% non turnout meaning voters who did not support either including not truman.

furthermore EVEN  dnc supporters 449 stopped support by 17 gap to 432 electors indicating millions of dnc stopped supporting dnc and further from sinful and harmful dnc was the rnc not even included in accusation therefore...

the issue of atom bomb CAN be simplified "dnc is guilty same as segregation not all americans nor rnc" same as cannot blame protestant for catholic inquisition same can't blame rnc for devilish dnc truman and his dnc voters who reject the sanctity of life which is not only American fetus but IS the issue for a vast atom bomb debate for the life of the enemy who might not be guilty if he is a child forced to shoot compelled by adults.

the bottom line is dnc is the stain on American history and supporting dnc joined the dnc guilt for atom bomb mass murder and slavery... which lincoln rnc opposed. sanctity of life is a TRADITIONAL  concept those "against tradition such as antifa" join the atom bomb guilt because the issue is sanctity of life while anti opposed fascist "tradition" instead of distinguished which PARTS of fascism are harmful and only those worthy to oppose.