we know the time between nebucadnezer and cyrus. nebucadnezer was king 586 bc see chart below and king for 24 more years until nearer to jesus time, 562 bc.
586 bc destroy temple and exile see source below, and return of jews by cyrus in 538 bc [in first year] 48 years. "god should know 48" and religions claim "prophecy proves god", yet when we test a prophecy with a time, WE TEST A PROPHECY containing A TIME, we see no god. this proves no god because god would tell a prophet 48. the prophecy claimed more until return, 70 years is false.
cyrus was dead by 529 bc, see chart, long before 70 years. god would know the future, not seventy years yet god 70 in chronicles 36.20-21 and the book claims fulfilled, there and ezra 1.1-4 [page 398 of niv] so also we know the book of jew and christian is false.
we can know "no god" by testing prophecy because god would know less than 70 years and tell a prophet the correct number, so by finding a prophecy with a time, jeremia 52.27 and cronicles 36.20-21 and since cyrus sent them back before 530 and jew tradition announces 537 bc only fifty 50 years this proves judea christian faith and book is a lie and also "no god who knows" that the return was less than 70.
586 before christ exile 2 cron. 36.20-21 with nebucadnezer known to be that year
+50
538 before christ return with cyrus
+9
529 bc cyrus dead
516 time frame of "god" seventy years, long after jew returned by cyrus
CONCLUSION we test a prophecy with a time because "no time is worth zero trash" and we see god does not exist based on prophecy of jewish and christian faith.
if i said "a woman or obama-colored man or woman will be president" of USA and then Mrs. Clinton lost in 2008, i can say "I did not say a time" wait until "the end of times" that is worth zero garbage so revelation 1.1-4 says soon and near. which begs the question, what idiot in year 300 decides to include revelation in a book that said "soon"- ?? jesus christ ! 300 years after jesus know "not soon" and that soon is false.
other prophecies lack time frame, so "garbage like me predicting a woman president."
jona said 40 days and not true, so rabbis defend "a prophecy for punishment" differs from a good prophecy a bad can be cancelled and not areal "test". in contrast return is good and can be tested even sin will not cancel a good prophecy and here it was less exile proving no god and jewish and christian religions based on lies.
Monday, April 17, 2017
Tuesday, March 28, 2017
discussing "genesis"
we are surrounded by religion even SOAKED and enveloped. what is the first book of the bible? christianity and modern judaism agree that the first "book" is not the book of moses but the book of genesis it is consideredd a book.
i was once told differently but that lie has been revealed by modern judaism even rabbinate of israel agrees to christianity genesis is a book so now we discuss the book which one? the one named genesis
what is in the book?
before reading every word from beginning to end we should see a dsummary christians summarize as the creation story and stories about four key people."
this sumary is very bad because it causes prejudice and reveals bias.
based on the text itself there are only two main characters; abraham with 12 pages of 48 orr a quarter and josef with 22 pages of 48 almost have so together most of the book is about two. saying a bist about isac is silly that is the bias that isac is important yet the book itself makes josef and abraham the important ones WORTH discussing.
the christian book helps to notice the PROBLEMS which we might not have noticed in genesis.
for example they say the story of adam's creation as described in chapter 2 is "day 6" in conflict with the book itself jesus christ !! which says adam was made on "the day heaven and earth" were created one day for all three challenges the first chapter which said adam wasnot the day of sky and earth but sky day 2 and dirt day 3 and adam not either! neither christ! the order of creation conflicts what scientists have discovered even if the y could stretch a day into millions of years the order is bad.
in fact one rabbi said the long life of 900 years in genesis is truly short while the day in genesis is truly long opposites of the book and of each other! if a jeww wrote genesis it was a bad choice to write about abraham because the father of israelites is the one named israel hence "sons of israel" means israel is the father going before him is too early and more than a page on grandpa abe is ridiculous.
the roots of the israelite are preserved in the end of the book joshua and can replace this book whose main story of josef is A HATE STORY of murderous hate. this theme is also repeated in shorter stories and such a bad book cannot be holy it certainly is not goidly of god is merciful in fact the letter romans has wrath so even the new testament is not from a merciful god either.
i was once told differently but that lie has been revealed by modern judaism even rabbinate of israel agrees to christianity genesis is a book so now we discuss the book which one? the one named genesis
what is in the book?
before reading every word from beginning to end we should see a dsummary christians summarize as the creation story and stories about four key people."
this sumary is very bad because it causes prejudice and reveals bias.
based on the text itself there are only two main characters; abraham with 12 pages of 48 orr a quarter and josef with 22 pages of 48 almost have so together most of the book is about two. saying a bist about isac is silly that is the bias that isac is important yet the book itself makes josef and abraham the important ones WORTH discussing.
the christian book helps to notice the PROBLEMS which we might not have noticed in genesis.
for example they say the story of adam's creation as described in chapter 2 is "day 6" in conflict with the book itself jesus christ !! which says adam was made on "the day heaven and earth" were created one day for all three challenges the first chapter which said adam wasnot the day of sky and earth but sky day 2 and dirt day 3 and adam not either! neither christ! the order of creation conflicts what scientists have discovered even if the y could stretch a day into millions of years the order is bad.
in fact one rabbi said the long life of 900 years in genesis is truly short while the day in genesis is truly long opposites of the book and of each other! if a jeww wrote genesis it was a bad choice to write about abraham because the father of israelites is the one named israel hence "sons of israel" means israel is the father going before him is too early and more than a page on grandpa abe is ridiculous.
the roots of the israelite are preserved in the end of the book joshua and can replace this book whose main story of josef is A HATE STORY of murderous hate. this theme is also repeated in shorter stories and such a bad book cannot be holy it certainly is not goidly of god is merciful in fact the letter romans has wrath so even the new testament is not from a merciful god either.
why do religious people lie, SO MUCH?
we know why religious people are motivated to lie- it is for the purpose of their faith that motivates them to say stuff. sometimes we can catch the lie and others are harder to notice so instead we must approach different they must claim with support so we caqn catch the lies or else it is as if they did not speak. an unsupported claim is like silence and can be refuted the same.
a jewish book i read recently claims over 66% of scientists believe in god.
this lie of course serves the purpose of making religion less gross.
over 66 percent? jesus christ !!
luckily it had a footnote or we could dismiss the baseless claim as"just another" religious trick.
the rabbi wrote of "scientists in general" claiming over two thirds are theists.
on page 49 of rabbi book the footnote as ignorant of academic tyle has only title and author.
we know that LESS THAN HALF are theists of any kind from that same source Ecklunde, revealing the lie. MOST scientists EVEN westerners enveloped by christianity, are not theists since
QUOTE "Nearly 50 percent of them are religious. Many others are “spiritual entrepreneurs,” seeking creative ways to work with the tensions between science and faith outside the constraints of traditional religion. " much more than half are FREE of religion and the word "nearly" could be 46% not 49% displaying a bias but even after her tricky "nearly", still most deny god and did not find god in nature.
I accuse the rabbi of lying about ecklund and hiding the agnostic group who deny god with certainty because we cannot asses imaginary god yet are not atheists.
those who believe in god may or might not be religious and consider the poll only asked 1700 souirce of number and quote
http://www.elainehowardecklund.com/books/science-vs-religion/
consider the millions of chinese scientists not soaked SOAKED in christianity the way westerners
CONSIDER WESTERNERS WERE TOLD AS A CHILD THERE IS SANTA CLAUS AND GOD
and at that young age when kids believe BOTH the faith was inserted and can linger obviously and NO WONDER THE FAITH LINGERED IT WAS INSERTED NOT DISCOVERED.
so they have lied and will lie but they lie SO MUCH makes me feel sick.
a jewish book i read recently claims over 66% of scientists believe in god.
this lie of course serves the purpose of making religion less gross.
over 66 percent? jesus christ !!
luckily it had a footnote or we could dismiss the baseless claim as"just another" religious trick.
the rabbi wrote of "scientists in general" claiming over two thirds are theists.
on page 49 of rabbi book the footnote as ignorant of academic tyle has only title and author.
we know that LESS THAN HALF are theists of any kind from that same source Ecklunde, revealing the lie. MOST scientists EVEN westerners enveloped by christianity, are not theists since
QUOTE "Nearly 50 percent of them are religious. Many others are “spiritual entrepreneurs,” seeking creative ways to work with the tensions between science and faith outside the constraints of traditional religion. " much more than half are FREE of religion and the word "nearly" could be 46% not 49% displaying a bias but even after her tricky "nearly", still most deny god and did not find god in nature.
I accuse the rabbi of lying about ecklund and hiding the agnostic group who deny god with certainty because we cannot asses imaginary god yet are not atheists.
those who believe in god may or might not be religious and consider the poll only asked 1700 souirce of number and quote
http://www.elainehowardecklund.com/books/science-vs-religion/
consider the millions of chinese scientists not soaked SOAKED in christianity the way westerners
CONSIDER WESTERNERS WERE TOLD AS A CHILD THERE IS SANTA CLAUS AND GOD
and at that young age when kids believe BOTH the faith was inserted and can linger obviously and NO WONDER THE FAITH LINGERED IT WAS INSERTED NOT DISCOVERED.
so they have lied and will lie but they lie SO MUCH makes me feel sick.
Monday, March 20, 2017
why westerners keep losing and will lose
I recently watched the video "eye in the sky." it is a drama showing the emotions and hesitations in military operations.
the video describes very well the cause of westerners continual failures and describes why westerners are doomed to defeat concerning terrorists.
if only! we could only MOVE our callousness involved in ignoring our OWN baby's intense pain in circumcision, jesus christ !! not even to cancel the callousness, but move it to being callous when stopping terrorists... that would be two important changes in one.
i imagine watching this video IF as a believer in jihad... definitely categorize as comedy. not drama but a laugh a minute.
we westerners are doomed.
the video describes very well the cause of westerners continual failures and describes why westerners are doomed to defeat concerning terrorists.
if only! we could only MOVE our callousness involved in ignoring our OWN baby's intense pain in circumcision, jesus christ !! not even to cancel the callousness, but move it to being callous when stopping terrorists... that would be two important changes in one.
i imagine watching this video IF as a believer in jihad... definitely categorize as comedy. not drama but a laugh a minute.
we westerners are doomed.
Friday, March 10, 2017
when adopt
a christian trick is to say matthew was written inj 90 so near to jesus however the important issue is when adopted. eusibius is considered ancient he was acive in 320 AD
http://www.ntcanon.org/Eusebius.shtml died 340 over 300 years after jesus so if he has 4 gospels that is not original!
another trick is to group "scriptural" ith "quoted from" "accepted; true; scriptural; or quoted from " yet hebrews is a disputed book and some claim polycarp "quoted" from it it is still disputed who said scriptural? silence is not a reason to include. p has similar ideas to peter and 1 john but he also quoted from hebrews which as eusebius pointed out is disputed like apocalypse called now revelation with the word apocolypse bishop ignatius never has peter and john's letters because original christians did not read those "existing" texts written in 90 yet ignored from 90-130 ad and even until eusibius in 340 AD so the book is not truly christian but a new faith claiming other books which 200 hundred! years of bishops ignored or rejected see previous post for revelation. also deutero paul trick not truly paul and if so not from apostle. only apostolic should be in and ignatius did not refer to any of pauls existing since 54 AD letters! except for similar wording but never referring this is pauls idea. that is not original followers of christ but a new faith believing in other books and the one quote is not realy a quote from luke but indicates a different source swapped out REPLACED by 4 gospels by the new faith a different religion with a different tradition and adding books.
did jesus die? yes if so not god.
http://www.ntcanon.org/Eusebius.shtml died 340 over 300 years after jesus so if he has 4 gospels that is not original!
another trick is to group "scriptural" ith "quoted from" "accepted; true; scriptural; or quoted from " yet hebrews is a disputed book and some claim polycarp "quoted" from it it is still disputed who said scriptural? silence is not a reason to include. p has similar ideas to peter and 1 john but he also quoted from hebrews which as eusebius pointed out is disputed like apocalypse called now revelation with the word apocolypse bishop ignatius never has peter and john's letters because original christians did not read those "existing" texts written in 90 yet ignored from 90-130 ad and even until eusibius in 340 AD so the book is not truly christian but a new faith claiming other books which 200 hundred! years of bishops ignored or rejected see previous post for revelation. also deutero paul trick not truly paul and if so not from apostle. only apostolic should be in and ignatius did not refer to any of pauls existing since 54 AD letters! except for similar wording but never referring this is pauls idea. that is not original followers of christ but a new faith believing in other books and the one quote is not realy a quote from luke but indicates a different source swapped out REPLACED by 4 gospels by the new faith a different religion with a different tradition and adding books.
did jesus die? yes if so not god.
unique day in nature
In Britian, in london, on the date march 17, next week, the length of sun-period called day will be the same as the night, in contrast to the day before it and after it each different by 4 minutes. yes we were told that event is called equinox and it "is" on march 21 but it is not.
by the date 21 march it will be a quarter hour wrong and a half hour more than night.
https://www.timeanddate.com/sun/uk/london
what about south america?
this natural event in Buenos Aires, Argentina: of the equal daylength is march 24. same as australia/canberra. note: these in the southern hemisphere suntime not getting longer but shorter. the opposite of spring in the north as we can see in london.
in new delhi india, this event is on the day identified by the date march 16 and same in north america new york city.
very different in :
Yamoussoukro, Cote d'Ivoire (Ivory Coast) this event is march 2 over a week ago.
https://www.timeanddate.com/sun/cote-divoire/yamoussoukro
fascinating.
by the date 21 march it will be a quarter hour wrong and a half hour more than night.
https://www.timeanddate.com/sun/uk/london
what about south america?
this natural event in Buenos Aires, Argentina: of the equal daylength is march 24. same as australia/canberra. note: these in the southern hemisphere suntime not getting longer but shorter. the opposite of spring in the north as we can see in london.
in new delhi india, this event is on the day identified by the date march 16 and same in north america new york city.
very different in :
Yamoussoukro, Cote d'Ivoire (Ivory Coast) this event is march 2 over a week ago.
https://www.timeanddate.com/sun/cote-divoire/yamoussoukro
fascinating.
pleasure era eschatology and pleasure
a significant difference between the religious studies of christians to jews is the study of the era of pleasure.
christians study eschatology, based mainly on the book revelation which in greek is called apocalypse=wrath or light [my opinion always wrath even in luke].
what is our generation's response when i say "i will reveal the future: just like now fruit grows on a tree to eat, so in the future the meat of the chicken leg will.
a vegetarian might reply: meat without killing? I wish but be realistic
animatarian would say get real! it will not happen nor need to happen.
healthy skepticism. good until it is in a religious book. the jewish faith predicts "bread will grow on trees" silly? not for jws! the holy book said so therefore it is faith.
the jewish do not study about the changed world despite a famous rabbi moshe wrote about the changed world and also small hints in isaia
in contrast, christians study the "end" called eschatology and troubles and debate the order.
I must point out that:
***Eusebius around 300 AD wrote that the book "revelation" [which as mentioned begins with the greek word] apocalypse (used in modern english for great destruction ) is a DISPUTED BOOK and earlier bishops did not even mention it. which matches=would be expected if the book was not studied nor recognized.
evidence for atheism is that the liars were not stopped from tricks who in an effort to defend the addition of a disputed book into the bible, say silence of ignatius is unknown, what a dirty god-forsaken trick.
he did not read it and as eusebius wrote, it is a disputed book not holy nor prophecy from god, but merely a guess about the future.
in fact even the prophecies never say "when" so wait a thousand years maybe by chance a few details will happen, and then KEEP WAITING because no "time" for the prediction. compare this: one day US will have a woman president. keep waiting!
so studying a disputed book and things related, may be fun because it is imaginary like STAR TREK 23 century, but seriously be realistic: it is just a guess and a silly guess to claim "different" or pleasure. note: isaia never said "when" which year. so it is silly to study the era of pleasure.
***Even the bible said elsewhere "that which was, it will be".
christians study eschatology, based mainly on the book revelation which in greek is called apocalypse=wrath or light [my opinion always wrath even in luke].
what is our generation's response when i say "i will reveal the future: just like now fruit grows on a tree to eat, so in the future the meat of the chicken leg will.
a vegetarian might reply: meat without killing? I wish but be realistic
animatarian would say get real! it will not happen nor need to happen.
healthy skepticism. good until it is in a religious book. the jewish faith predicts "bread will grow on trees" silly? not for jws! the holy book said so therefore it is faith.
the jewish do not study about the changed world despite a famous rabbi moshe wrote about the changed world and also small hints in isaia
in contrast, christians study the "end" called eschatology and troubles and debate the order.
I must point out that:
***Eusebius around 300 AD wrote that the book "revelation" [which as mentioned begins with the greek word] apocalypse (used in modern english for great destruction ) is a DISPUTED BOOK and earlier bishops did not even mention it. which matches=would be expected if the book was not studied nor recognized.
evidence for atheism is that the liars were not stopped from tricks who in an effort to defend the addition of a disputed book into the bible, say silence of ignatius is unknown, what a dirty god-forsaken trick.
he did not read it and as eusebius wrote, it is a disputed book not holy nor prophecy from god, but merely a guess about the future.
in fact even the prophecies never say "when" so wait a thousand years maybe by chance a few details will happen, and then KEEP WAITING because no "time" for the prediction. compare this: one day US will have a woman president. keep waiting!
so studying a disputed book and things related, may be fun because it is imaginary like STAR TREK 23 century, but seriously be realistic: it is just a guess and a silly guess to claim "different" or pleasure. note: isaia never said "when" which year. so it is silly to study the era of pleasure.
***Even the bible said elsewhere "that which was, it will be".
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)