the apocrypha category
did you notice? when Jesus said something "similar" to book genesis he was truly rejecting that book.
when we read the bible we have MANY preconceptions for example "these books are from god". instead of inspecting IF from god? or not. the first preconception is harmful, not only as an assumption but worse causing "therefore no contradictions" which causes "after we assume from god therefore no contradiction therefore "apparent conflicts MUST be twisted away from the simple message that appears." caused the alteration of meaning.
the same logic "no contradiction from god" could be the opposite direction that one of the books is not from god because "no contradiction from god" so one source or both not from god.
only the preconception caused claims like "dont exclude a book" ignoring the step of inclusion the human inclusion can be an error. in fact, if a message and its opposite are included in the same book such as exodus or the same volume such as psalms with ecclesiastes then neither is any message because opposite also "true".
how to respond? judaism easily corrupts from simple meaning based on conflicts but luckily christianity has a spiritual METHOD. guided by a "recognized" christian pastor who i checked "others respect" but i doubted... i said we can both do the spiritual method and see if god tells us BOTH the same solution we both "fasted from food"... and i said you tell me your message from god first... he said he ate because no doubt... my message "from god" having obeyed "the recognized guy" direction would be considered heresy... lies are preserved by calling the truth heresy to scare and silence people.
so back to inspecting.
INSPECTION
in mathew chapter 19 verse four. they asked him about divorce and said "the two are one" similar to genesis... but only if you dont notice. he never mentioned the book by name... in fact the quote preserved the REAL source which differs from the book called genesis. so the only remnant is the quote but he truly rejected the "book genesis" firstly by "not naming it as his source for something similar" if he referd to it as the liars claim... and for the book genesis not matching the "true quote" that jesus quoted from a different book that humans failed to preserve but replaced and wronly "included". sadly the book matthew itself has a similar flaw so i only "got verification" only recieved information from holy spirit for that one quote not the whole book of matthew, and certainly reject book genesis.
gospel john remains due to recognizing the error to "wrongly include mathew" most not holy as claimed by humans.
we can inspect. "duo" that word is a good quote but not from book genesis which differs lacks word two duo. jesus quoted, was quoting a different book not preserved.
faced with my complaint "no book name" some would be tempted to lie that the word "beginning" in the previous verse is a book name... but we all know they only lie as a reply to my claim while truly the translators knew and wrote differently the claim book name is false due to the greek "the creator at the beginning made" not the name of a book which differs so truly jesus was REJECTING genesis by quoting differently "from the bad book named book genesis" that humans "wrongly included" despite jesus specifying the real and different source which humans failed to preserve.
similarly in book judges the book seems to "emphasize by repetition" that they sinned therefore the enemy came each time repeated until... the end of the book chapter 18 they sinned and lasted for generations... if true that rejects the idea of the first chapters 17 chapters... which is true?
a book that contains both is by the acceted logic ""no contradiction from god" therefore book not from god and human erred when included book genesis and book judges.
which do "i want subjectively" either one.... it does not affect me... just truth is important. but the answer in ecclesiastes is that the lesson of the last story is true "the wicked lengthen" not lose life so the ideas in book judges and psalms and proverbs that oppose this "message" and gods grace... are not from god so those books not from god.
similarly which day was jesus crucified?
i did an expirement. i quoted gospel john to one christian and said do you think he was crucified at the time of the passover.... hoping they would remember matthew... but either they did and chose to lie or they simply agreed with the quote in john... either way the lady's faith was that jesus died at the time of the passover.
i continued my experiment asking a pastor...
this time quoting matthew by name "matthew said jesus ate the passover at the passover time before he was arrested. so i ask is that what you believe"... hoping he believed same as the lady or was aware of the conflict... as a pastor he must have been aware! but he simply agreed with matthew he was crucified a day later!
the ABSURDITY is when messianic jews published a "blended" story from the four gopsels in one book... i bothered to check how they handled this and ABSURDLY they include both versions a few pages apart: at the time of the passover jesus was crucified, died for three days also ate the passover at the time and was crucified the following day... could the authors not notice they wrote he was crucified twice? that is ABSURD in the hebrew version.
so which do i want? either one i would and can accept... but which was true? the spiritual solution taught that i must publish only john is correct at the time of the passover not ate passover but books matthew and mark and luke not holy because "a lie is not from god" so not from god only FEAR and threats of heresy hide this. the catholics would torture me if i wrote this luckily catholics are weak so god via holy spirit sent me to warn you which book is from god john do not insut john by saying he ate the passover before arrested... while three "gospels" are not holy nor psalms nor proverbs nor judges all these books and more "the inclusion was an error" preserved by fear of violent rabbis and catholics all these books are in the category of "apocrypha" same as martin luther of protestant labeld some catholic books at the time people would say "99 percent" say these books are from god but he led protestants to label apocrypha and today the preconception of protestants is je was correct to "exclude" claiming wrong to include and i bring the same message for other books to purify the group... except that my message was by fasting and prayer as guided by a recognized pastr who others respect despite that he ate that day!
other examples book jeremia is mostly holy with gods messages and word from god we must not insult in contrats to most of the prophets for example samuel and the "twelve" and others not holy so only IF WORD OF GOD DO NOT INSULT but book genesis in category apocrypha same as many other books. enuf for now.
BOTTOM LINE
i emphasize these issues dont "affect me personnaly" if jews were in egypt four hundred thirty years or less... i could accept either one but which is the true one?
what will i read instead of the apocrypha books genesis and exodus and more?
the regular book despite not holy is at least good quality and better than a book "seeming to be true but containing lies mixed in among good "must not murder".
i am impressed and worthy to praise the creativity of "dodgeson" who hid his name behind carol for his amazing ideas... i could not generate such a story nor long neck nor shrinking nor the fish face nor the cow-turtle even after knowing mermaid and gryphon of lady attached to fish and lion attached to eagle i never "generated the similar" pattern of a human legs with fish FACE instead of tail nor other animal blend... and he does not pretend to telling history as the book genesis misleads hiding lies in the disguise of "recorded history" which is very severe and i must warn you to prevent errors at least before they burn me for repeating the same thing luther did labeling some "accepted" books as apocrypha which simply means out so that is what i recommend reading instead of bad book genesis and others.
before i forget! beginners are taught "holy spirit PREVENTED errors" while scholars know to admit the book contains errors "scribal errors" and "imprecise" because not prevent errors...
so any time they show you a verse reply "just keep in mind that wording might have been a scribal error"
or that doctrine was based on a verse that might have been a scribal error.
did you notice? when Jesus said something "similar" to book genesis he was truly rejecting that book.
when we read the bible we have MANY preconceptions for example "these books are from god". instead of inspecting IF from god? or not. the first preconception is harmful, not only as an assumption but worse causing "therefore no contradictions" which causes "after we assume from god therefore no contradiction therefore "apparent conflicts MUST be twisted away from the simple message that appears." caused the alteration of meaning.
the same logic "no contradiction from god" could be the opposite direction that one of the books is not from god because "no contradiction from god" so one source or both not from god.
only the preconception caused claims like "dont exclude a book" ignoring the step of inclusion the human inclusion can be an error. in fact, if a message and its opposite are included in the same book such as exodus or the same volume such as psalms with ecclesiastes then neither is any message because opposite also "true".
how to respond? judaism easily corrupts from simple meaning based on conflicts but luckily christianity has a spiritual METHOD. guided by a "recognized" christian pastor who i checked "others respect" but i doubted... i said we can both do the spiritual method and see if god tells us BOTH the same solution we both "fasted from food"... and i said you tell me your message from god first... he said he ate because no doubt... my message "from god" having obeyed "the recognized guy" direction would be considered heresy... lies are preserved by calling the truth heresy to scare and silence people.
so back to inspecting.
INSPECTION
in mathew chapter 19 verse four. they asked him about divorce and said "the two are one" similar to genesis... but only if you dont notice. he never mentioned the book by name... in fact the quote preserved the REAL source which differs from the book called genesis. so the only remnant is the quote but he truly rejected the "book genesis" firstly by "not naming it as his source for something similar" if he referd to it as the liars claim... and for the book genesis not matching the "true quote" that jesus quoted from a different book that humans failed to preserve but replaced and wronly "included". sadly the book matthew itself has a similar flaw so i only "got verification" only recieved information from holy spirit for that one quote not the whole book of matthew, and certainly reject book genesis.
gospel john remains due to recognizing the error to "wrongly include mathew" most not holy as claimed by humans.
we can inspect. "duo" that word is a good quote but not from book genesis which differs lacks word two duo. jesus quoted, was quoting a different book not preserved.
faced with my complaint "no book name" some would be tempted to lie that the word "beginning" in the previous verse is a book name... but we all know they only lie as a reply to my claim while truly the translators knew and wrote differently the claim book name is false due to the greek "the creator at the beginning made" not the name of a book which differs so truly jesus was REJECTING genesis by quoting differently "from the bad book named book genesis" that humans "wrongly included" despite jesus specifying the real and different source which humans failed to preserve.
similarly in book judges the book seems to "emphasize by repetition" that they sinned therefore the enemy came each time repeated until... the end of the book chapter 18 they sinned and lasted for generations... if true that rejects the idea of the first chapters 17 chapters... which is true?
a book that contains both is by the acceted logic ""no contradiction from god" therefore book not from god and human erred when included book genesis and book judges.
which do "i want subjectively" either one.... it does not affect me... just truth is important. but the answer in ecclesiastes is that the lesson of the last story is true "the wicked lengthen" not lose life so the ideas in book judges and psalms and proverbs that oppose this "message" and gods grace... are not from god so those books not from god.
similarly which day was jesus crucified?
i did an expirement. i quoted gospel john to one christian and said do you think he was crucified at the time of the passover.... hoping they would remember matthew... but either they did and chose to lie or they simply agreed with the quote in john... either way the lady's faith was that jesus died at the time of the passover.
i continued my experiment asking a pastor...
this time quoting matthew by name "matthew said jesus ate the passover at the passover time before he was arrested. so i ask is that what you believe"... hoping he believed same as the lady or was aware of the conflict... as a pastor he must have been aware! but he simply agreed with matthew he was crucified a day later!
the ABSURDITY is when messianic jews published a "blended" story from the four gopsels in one book... i bothered to check how they handled this and ABSURDLY they include both versions a few pages apart: at the time of the passover jesus was crucified, died for three days also ate the passover at the time and was crucified the following day... could the authors not notice they wrote he was crucified twice? that is ABSURD in the hebrew version.
so which do i want? either one i would and can accept... but which was true? the spiritual solution taught that i must publish only john is correct at the time of the passover not ate passover but books matthew and mark and luke not holy because "a lie is not from god" so not from god only FEAR and threats of heresy hide this. the catholics would torture me if i wrote this luckily catholics are weak so god via holy spirit sent me to warn you which book is from god john do not insut john by saying he ate the passover before arrested... while three "gospels" are not holy nor psalms nor proverbs nor judges all these books and more "the inclusion was an error" preserved by fear of violent rabbis and catholics all these books are in the category of "apocrypha" same as martin luther of protestant labeld some catholic books at the time people would say "99 percent" say these books are from god but he led protestants to label apocrypha and today the preconception of protestants is je was correct to "exclude" claiming wrong to include and i bring the same message for other books to purify the group... except that my message was by fasting and prayer as guided by a recognized pastr who others respect despite that he ate that day!
other examples book jeremia is mostly holy with gods messages and word from god we must not insult in contrats to most of the prophets for example samuel and the "twelve" and others not holy so only IF WORD OF GOD DO NOT INSULT but book genesis in category apocrypha same as many other books. enuf for now.
BOTTOM LINE
i emphasize these issues dont "affect me personnaly" if jews were in egypt four hundred thirty years or less... i could accept either one but which is the true one?
what will i read instead of the apocrypha books genesis and exodus and more?
the regular book despite not holy is at least good quality and better than a book "seeming to be true but containing lies mixed in among good "must not murder".
i am impressed and worthy to praise the creativity of "dodgeson" who hid his name behind carol for his amazing ideas... i could not generate such a story nor long neck nor shrinking nor the fish face nor the cow-turtle even after knowing mermaid and gryphon of lady attached to fish and lion attached to eagle i never "generated the similar" pattern of a human legs with fish FACE instead of tail nor other animal blend... and he does not pretend to telling history as the book genesis misleads hiding lies in the disguise of "recorded history" which is very severe and i must warn you to prevent errors at least before they burn me for repeating the same thing luther did labeling some "accepted" books as apocrypha which simply means out so that is what i recommend reading instead of bad book genesis and others.
before i forget! beginners are taught "holy spirit PREVENTED errors" while scholars know to admit the book contains errors "scribal errors" and "imprecise" because not prevent errors...
so any time they show you a verse reply "just keep in mind that wording might have been a scribal error"
or that doctrine was based on a verse that might have been a scribal error.
No comments:
Post a Comment