Thursday, May 28, 2020

wich books

which book? to respect? only the word of god but not "all" the books that religions claim are word of god in the book bible. we can and should discern.
some of the books, which the religions publish and gave to us, are more obviously "not from god", since books with errors are not from god ergo no need to "assume we must defend" for example if god knew the future he would say the correct number of years "in egypt" in both books GENESIS and EXODUS, yet the numbers in book exodus for "generation of levi" as well as josepus and rabbis all preserve the jews rejected both the numbers in genesis and exodus so those two books are certainly not from god kuz god woulda known. no need to start respecting any book not from god.
book JOSHUA also obvious lie saying "not with sword" surrounded with battles before and after. i accept that one phrase and reject most of the book but a book mixed is certainly not from god. the way they gave it to us is certainly not from god so we must not accept book joshua either.
at the end of book judges reveald that sinners succeed for a long time, not only matching book ecclisiastes but worse challenging the idea repeated six times until then that sufferrinig was for sin so book obviously and certainly not from god. the book ecclesiastes showed that sinners "succceed long" so unless you reject ecl. while relijis people assume ecl. is "good book" then psalms and most of the book judges is wrong so obviously errors not from god. only respect gods word but not those books that certainly are not from god. they are not gods words kuz god woulda known.
another obvious lie is the year numbers in books KINGS and CHRONICLES cronicles kuz we know the time between mesa [2kings 4] and nebucadnezer, god woulda known so error not from god so books not from  god no need to respect, the books kings and cronicles that are obviously not from god.
if a book said "do not murder" with bad ideas is the whole book good? the same book said "do kill the sinner" despite sinner did not kill that is self contradictory so leviticus obviously not from god either. or the plagues in numbers against ecclesastes as above. deuteronomy has bodily hits and if we assume god "is merciful" he would give a diffferent punishment than pain. if pain is merciful and i must be merciful to you then invite me to burn your skin but you wont... hyppocrite you know mercy is not pain, so those are obviousy not from god. what remains samuel? god later rejected saul... yet god would be strong enuf to remove him... yet that book has god powerless to expel saul after prophet rejected, so that book called SAMUEL obviously cant be from god ether.
all the books the relijis say are good cannot be from god. some more obvious. maybe isaia? he said in past tense "god did not want" blood if we reject leviticus as above we have no reason to doubt isaia. in fact jeremia matches isaia so those two witnesses support each other. unless they reject jeremia as one rabbi lied to me yet he reads from it publicly he only lied to try and trick me... judaism only continues kuz rabbis struggle against truth and speak tricky deceptions which i reveal for you. christians must reject the bad books that rabbis gave to them and separate isiaa with jeremia from the ther books that people humans wrongly claimd are word of god kuz only word of god needs respect not books that are bviously not from god kuz h=god woulda known.

No comments:

Post a Comment