around 360 million [but more] square kilometers of water surround our planet.
the average human responds to a map by seeing and accepting that the "atlantic ocean" touches the so-cald "mediteranean sea." when i dare to challenge that, they defend their personal faith and get emotional showing the weakness of the human mind.
luckily i am far from human.
i can easily think that the ocean [badly named] atlantic extends and includes the med sea same as the badly named indian ocean includes seas. feeling nervous? that means
you are human.
dont let that emotion blind the logic... the narrow connection might not separate the ocean. certainly the water in atlantic is not separate from the northern water. only the connection of pacific to northern water is narrow. if that limits the "pacific" then the name of the northern water should still be the same as "atlantic" kuz contin-uing sea. if the narrow separates "pacific" then same for mediteranean but see below.
so lets scrap the bad traditional names and start fresh based on fact.
the surface of our planet has much water called sea notice that word is singular kus land and sea. the water is not separated.
still narrow necks can be divided. as above.
we start by order of alphabet.
the long major river named amazon pours into the sea. so that part sea can be identified by that river same name. but amazon many letters so amz ocean near amazon sea or same name for both and for the land contin-uing from the land of amazon river.
this water extends south until coast of "antarctica" [as even world atlas site said despite accepting the bad southern ocean, oops.]
and north around the north point where spin of axis. no narrow neck to limit it. perhaps the narrow called strait of gibraltor limits it... so med not part of amz ocean... or not separate. either way is good. that is not the problem instead the problem is that sea should also be named for the major river poring into it the nile so same name nile sea.
kuz that would be objective based on the fact that a major river feeds it. tradition is not worth saving when it is flawd.
the area of the amz ocean is over 110 million square kilometers kuz the water is not separated neither north nor south. i cant even add kuz of the bad iho and i am aware 17 countrys said that their should be a southern ocean but not only bad kuz "no separation" but worse the nearest one is argentina that vetoed and they are nearest. how is it justce that brazil decides about water nearer to argentina.
the land mass a contin-uous land with nile river calld nile continent has sea on both sides. what should it be called. again no separation. maybe still amaz ocean. that could be good. or the major river brahmaputra could influence the name their bram sea and bram ocean extending to the southernmost tip of nile continent from their east is bram ocean extending to coast of land of south continent. and a strait line due south is the border between amz and bram oceans.
so the political country named south africa has two oceans one to east named bram ocean and reaching til southernmost tip and beside it the amz ocean and its west coast.
similarly argentina has water on both sides. so the southernmost tip od that contin-uous land has amz cean east and jjang ocean to west with a line due south separating and each of these extends to coast of the south continent badly named antarctica bad as explaind elsewhere.
what about the isle named australia? what is the name of the water on its coast. its east coast is called jjang kuz jjang river is a long major river feeding that ocean and same as west coast of amazon. similarly its north coast.
what about its west coast? the frail humans accept the brits bad decision not to change "indian" ocean as west coast of australia yet bad to name any shared water by any coyuntry and wordse most is far from india anyway. better by major river as above bram ocean so west coast of australia could be bram ocean.
now with bram on west coast but jjang on east coast what is the water by its south coast.
i say only ausies can decide that kuz both oceans go and any decision of number for "area" of oceans is ruind kuz the area of badly named pacific cntinues and is not separated from the water west from australia hence how can anybody say any number is area of water east from australia?
onlu australia can decide the name of the ocean to its south, and luckily they are further than argentina from the so-cald southern ocean which we must protest kuz no separation.
total: around but over 360 million square kilometers of water surround our planet.
some named amz ocean is east from amz river and its land mass. it extends north to north pole spin of axis and around it over 110 million square kilometers. also south to coast of antarctica as above.
some named bram ocean for the major river bramaputra.
third and last can be jjang ocean west from that land with amazon river.
the jjang ocean extends to coast of antarctica as above and the eastern coast of australia too perhaps southern coast too. i want australia parliament to vote on it. it extends northward until the narrow water that ends the jjang ocean kus beyond it has wider connection to amz ocean.
the land mass with nile river hence nile continent has water on both sides amz ocean to its west and bram ocean to its east. its area depends on the australian vote and no number can be accepted til then.
No comments:
Post a Comment