Saturday, September 8, 2018

fixing biblical hebrew

assume the contents of the bible are good.
one detail preserved in the bible is the lettter "I" preserved in a manner that shows the true pronunciation was like the vowel sound in "bEAd" for example the letter "I" written for feminine and other uses where the name place is spelled both with the letter "I" and the letter" ' " called yowd.
pniel is spelled both with yowd and with " I "  preserving the sound altho most of those books are not worth preserving for many reasons see other posts.
we may split the sounds into vowels like "ay" and consinents like "b"
a good system to arrange the order of the vowels- which do not appear in the written bibles but were preserved in "leningrad" codex and other ancient writings from yemen- can be from simple dot to multi-dot.
the first in this order is one single dot.
hebrew uses two such symbols so they are in one group and the order will be by position
FIRST one single dot near the TOP of the letter is a vowel. in this context of bible we DO have a preservation in josephus the only word he preserved using the greek letter omicron which is vowel sound in "sOft" from the choices of omicron and omega he preserved omicron so only modern hebrew is omega sound like "bOAt" not the tradition and not the bible and i know that rabbis teach... both of the rabbis sounds are wrong and refuted by evidence.
we know the ancient greek sound from colliers encyclopedia [1960's] preserving the ancient sounds of greek characters. and josephus preserved the sound with omicron that is the evidence and anything else including omega which he could use but did not is not real hebrew.
admittedly modern hebrew is different from the biblical hebrew in many ways including vowels.
other marks symbols have the SAME SOUND and this should get fixed as below we can identify: the letter "vav" is added with that single dot near the top of the letter then the letter is silent and the sound is vowel "sOft" as above because the dot is over letter. also the hebrew word for boat is marked with a symbol like "a plus with colon" since it is the first letter of the word pronunciation is same sound which is NOT the vowel of "bOAT" for the word boat but is the pronunciation of the vowel in "sOft". this refutes at least 2 details of how rabbis teach  also if the words are worth preserving then we SHOULD simplify ONE symbol for this sound and remove the silent "I" which is silent anyway. similarly the hebrew word for boat could be marked with the dot above and we should fix such and never need to see the other symbols from this sound group because they are the same sound especialy when read quickly. it only makes more symbols to learn which is against the jewish tradition to "teach briefly" so have one symbol allows teaching less total symbols. i will not preserve what is known to be wrong and hopefully the rabbis will FIX the many errors related to this evidence.
SECOND one single dot under the letter. sound like vowel in "bEAd" or "bEE".evidence shows that the shape of vav shaped " I" and a dot near center is same sound and perhaps also the same sound for the diagonal 3 as preserved by some jews. maybe. but now we are in the group of one dot.
so one dot over is in biblical contaxt like the vowel in "sOft" that is tradition and below a different sound "ee" as explained and this is second in group because of next group.
group 2
THIRD a pair of dots under the letter. which? i prefer colon shape 3. considering it means "only the letter" with zero=no vowel- this should not even appear. same as the last letter in the word has no vowel mark also the first letter for example "ntanya" no need for a vowel with the first letter we hear the letter fine. so a "nu" with a colon below it is only the sound of the letter "n' with zero vowel just sound with the letter which follows like "nta" or english block. the first vowel needs no vowel nor mark. and we should not even see nor need to learn this symbol except the bad decision to publish with it needs to learn and that it means "null" as above and this should be fixed.
FOURTH a pair of dots but instead of vertical pair like colon shape as above ":" this pair is a horizontal pair.
this has been preserved in the only ancient word which josephus preserved the sound is vowel in "hEld" and i know that both moder hebrew and as well as rabbis differ but this is PRESERVED and this is the tradition for the bible. sad that rabbis refuse to fix known errors so i publish to fix. so when you go to israel and speak hebreww know modern hebrew differs- except this one israelis say it so fast that the teaching book groups the horizontal pair like "hEld" yay!
FIFTH after a group of single dots [over or under] and 2 pairs [horizontal or like colon ":" but both under the letter] the next group is three dots.
which? a diagonal of 3 dots is fifth. what sound deos it preserve? that is in doubt.  perhaps it is the vowel of "bOOt" or as some jews preserve it same as the vowel of a single dot under the letter and considering this sound already has a mark perhaps it is a different sound yet we know that there are extra letters so it seems best to simplify never use the diagganl 3 and since it is in doubt whether it is same as "ee" or same as "oo" be passive and not preserve something in doubt so only in modern hebrew the vowel in "bOOt" which cannot be used in newspapers with no dots! so they use "I" which in modern hebrew is the vowel of "bOOt" however we are trying to preservee thae tradition so we must simplify and and make it null because the jews did nt preserve this and jospehus only preserved one word.
SICTH the next symbol in this group is shaped "three dots grouped like electric outlets" or the two horizontal of the 3 have a third centered under them. the sound is the same as the line [refuting my previous order but i  admit my mistake and have fixed and so should others] traditionally biblical hebrew had a sound for words with  this symbol as the vowel in "pA" or the a in "father" almost lost in english unless we will change the word "amen" to the vowel in "pA". the same vowel sound as the vowel in "bOb" and ancient texts preserve that such words never had the 3-dot symbol but were read the sound of "pA" as explained so after we know that the sound is preserved in the following we group we should FIX and simplify never even seeing the "3-dot" neither this "added symbol which changed the traditional reading as proven from ancient texts nor the diagonal 3 dots which evidenc leaves conflict. so this group should be removed never see a 3 dot symbol for the resons explained this must be fixed because it changed the traditional way of reading the ancient words.
seventh he last symbol is pronounced with "open" mouth like the vowel in "pA" or the a in "father'' this sound is almost lost from english yet it is the most common sound in traditional hebrew. so i need to preserve it.
the rabbi named solomon rashi preserved that the word with a different symbol is "open" mouth same a sthe a in "father and this matches modern hebrew and to simplify we should remove the other "undifferent" symbol  so when we see the "plus" we identify it as solomon preserved in year 1050 as open mouth like a in "father" which is almost lost in english because we only sound apple or bay for the latter a.
to make learniung diffficult jews at least 1000 years ago added a colon to the "_" symbol and this is useful in signifying fast but not needed and altho logic would say "plus shape + with colon shape:" should be a fast  a of "father that is not how the vowels are grouped and since both types of + symbols are extar not needed we must fix and simplify the one like "sOft" as above mark with single dot  as above and the one like "_" mark with that symbol "_" to simplify and fix.
in the end we have four sounds and the fifth is in conflict so we do not know which manner to preserve and can remove all 3-dot symbol and only replace the electric socket shaped symbol with the traditinal vowel "_" as in tradition.
so 4 SOUNDS and no need to preserve THIRTEEN symbiols for just 4 ort 5 sounds.
next fix name of letters but no time!

No comments:

Post a Comment