the christian old testament

when christians publish bible they include the old testament of the jewish religion.
is this the correct path?
corinthians 3 said jesus is the foundation it does not mean that no foundation can be laid unless jesus laid it as one book tried to claim:  truth: "For no one can lay any foundation other than the one already laid, which is Jesus Christ." that means jesus is the foundation but others may be a source.
did jesus quote from the jewish bible?
we are told "yes" but that is a trick compare mt 19 "the two will be one" that differs and is not a quote from the jewish old testament .
not only does the septuagint have the word two, which jesus quotes, but more important than claiming jesus DID  quote sept. is the fact jesus did not quote the jewish one. so he has a word that is different from the jewish one. similarly paul quotes "live by faith" differ from the jewish bible live by "his" faith.
a researcher quotes romans 1.17 to claim "ambiguous because paul used sept"  on page 11 with a chart showing several examples where paul is quoting sept and not quoting the jewish bible. or they are quoting a book not preserved.
1cor 2.16,
what is unique in romans and matthew is they specify they are "quoting" specifying "as it is written" and the quote is not the hebrew jewish text... so we know they are using a different source.
a true follower of jesus would not include the jewish version of jamnia but would suffice with the quotes included in the new testament AS they are quoted and not as the rabbis printed the books.
is having the jewish version convenient for evangelizing? that is no excuse because the holy spirit through paul and jesus they may have used the septuagint or a different source which was only preserved in these quotes.
in conclusion stop printing the jewish version because  jesus and paul quoted from a different source.
*another researcher wrote on page 32 note 46 the letter called epistle peter was written "after peter's death" a liar claimed from peter. if so not from the apostle but worse from a liar.  not from peter who had died.
if this is true save more paper and do not include a lie that peter wrote because after peter died not tru;ly [eter and not truly apostolic but written by a liar who lied he was peter.
researchers also divide the letters of paul into "pastoral" only seven are "undisputed" as a researcher writing about tesol. on page 149 tes differs from the "undisputed" letters only seven 7 are undisputed according to researchers and these are opinoins taught in christian bible colleges not blasphemy to ignore but to teach. if so we are not only saving paper but making a book with fewer inpurities by leaving out the lie of peter and the deuter-paul and the diffferent version used by the jews.