refute christianity and judaism? easy!

1 the refutation of western religions, such as christian and jewish, is as easy as predicting "there will be a woman president for US."
to demonstrate: in the year we call 2007, mrs. clinton competed with a man in the primaries of the democratic party group. a man announced "the US will have its first woman president". this prediction seemed to be easily tested, simply check the results of the primary election. when mrs. clinton lost the primary elections and obama won the primary [to face the republican representative] we would criticize that man as a false prophet. he would stubbornly respond "i never said when" so there is no way to test. when there is no way to test it becomes easier to lie and tempting to lie.
similarly in the christian new testament:
jesus did not say "include revelation to john" as a holy book. this is not in any gospel instead some humans decided that revelation was a book worth preserving. now if we NOTICE that the book revelation has the word "soon" in it, we see the error of those deciders. they knew by year 300 AD that "soon was a lie". was truth important?
if truth was important they would remove the revelation. yet they decided to teach that it was a holy book despite this lie and "soon" had long passed. we know by noting the "when" of the prophecy that the book lied and that the deciders included a lie and cannot be trusted to choose which books to reject [which they should have preserved but did not and now lost good books] and also cannot be trusted to include good books. at the time they knew revelation was a lie. we cannot trust those deciders about any book. [books may have been disputed yet these deciders who cannot be trusted included revelation and now we lack the evidence to show the other books are bad but we do know that the deciders cannot be trusted.
2 similarly in the jewish religion of the old testament. when we look at the prophet isaia, did the prophecy say when? some say "days are coming" if he was a true prophet, speaking 700 years before jesus and saying "days are coming" that is like soon, then by 600 years before jesus they were fulfilled already or possibly not fulfilled and known that isaiah was a false prophet yet the deciders included isaia revealing the poor judgement of the deciders.
worse still, we look at prophecies which do not define any time, are as much "prophetic" as the guy who said the woman president. missionaries quote "the virgin will have a child" a message in the jewish book,  but when? isaia never said. it may have been fulfilled 600 years before jesus because he never said when, or isaia possibly lied because nobody would catch him in those primitive days.
3 we look at the book of isaia first prophecy "your land is desolate" did he say "will be desolate"-? no. and he did not say when. this reveals several challenges. if the book is true=he prophesied in the time of certain kings, when jerusalem was not desolate yet, then each detail is a lie and the book is impure and contains lies. again we notice the bad judgement of the deciders, despite this the deciders included this impure book despite the fact that it contained lies and ambiguous claims, these examples reveal not only that isaia is a bad book of lies and not holy but more extensively: "the deciders cannot be trusted" to choose the good books whether to include good books the deciders cannot be trusted in their decision what to include, possibly erring to reject a good book which should have been preserved and was not preserved,  nor trusted to include good books. it is possible the same as isaiah, other impure books which also contained lies which at that time they knew were false, they included the same as the decision to include impure isaia.
4 if jeremia is a true prophet, as religious jews and christians agree, then jeremia brought a message from god to correct and fix an error regarding sacrifice. god of israel announced "eat your sacrifices because i did not command sacrifices" this would correct the belief in the book leviticus and exodus, which claimed the lie "god commanded sacrifice" by warning that is not true, books which claim i commanded sacrifice are not true and are impure with lies because god corrected the belief by sending a prophet to deny that claim and announce "I did not command" so at that point they knew books of exodus and leviticus were bad books with lies that cannot be trusted, are impure with at least one lie and perhaps more lies. not only has the problem to those books been demonstrated but also more extensively the poor judgement of the deciders who included both jeremia and leviticus when god warned not to believe books which lie god commanded sacrifice because that is not true [the books of exodus and leviticus lied according to god himself] such deciders cannot be trusted which book is good and the decision what they included is also a problem so the books with sacrifices as well as the other books by poor deciders are all in doubt which removes the reliability from the foundation books of judaism are revealed asbaseless.