the new improved old testament for christian

 tools: references

the first preserved QUOTE for the corrcted pure former covenant, is "Moses lifted up the snake in the wilderness" why? see intro later. note this quote not by name of book and despite similar to numbers no book name n quote differed. also no other quote in john from the five books wrongly attributed to moses, john the reliable one who "saw" n see intro. so only one from genesis to end kings. even mat 12 no name of source. luke has psalms but see marcion n wrong day.

concept "common source" quoted by later jew books that not source. second is "Jesus found a young donkey and sat on it, as it is written [Jhn 12:15 no book name just common source] “Do not be afraid, Daughter Zion; see, your king is coming, seated on a donkey’s colt.” third These things happened so that the scripture would be fulfilled: “Not one of his bones will be broken,”and, as another scripture says, “They will look on the one they have pierced.” note no book just a common source to psalms etc.

intro: hidden denials

certain books were added in 300's never included by originals.

iren 190

first: how to select the preserved part? from hebrews? eusebius preserved "disputed" also original lists: lacked hebrews marcion 140 heretic only ten paul.  catholic have n violate their timothy cant be catholic "with book but without one wife." similarly protestant have n violate their ephesians cant be protestant with book n two baptism. luckily eph is psudo so all "baptised spirit" 1 cor. 12 no problem. like john 1.33 n 1cor. 1,17 not send to baptise so marcion correct not include matthew. in john jesus never said baptise and only that reliable due to saw n date. similarly acts continued by luk wrong day n wrong david in acts 4 others have david, 22 or 34 etc.

marcion lacked james n hebrews but he heretic? even irenus agreed j+h out like canons n one of 2 out codex. 

hebrews was not included by marcion heresy but also not tatian 170 nor iren. 190, also codex n 2 canons not inlude h.

when peter was added in 300's canon not include hebrews nor james until later catholics added it.

laodicia 363 rejected rev. as "heresy" i agree soon cant be from god.

origen "wavers" in regard to James, 2 Peter, 2 John, and 3 Joh kuz not yet included. his student argued rejecting jude. eusebius not included hebrews so others lied he included but we were taught not. also luther when excluding catholic books "denies canonicity and the scriptural authority of hebrews" kuz not paul n conflicted paul same as eusebius n other disputed conflicted books. " his=luther Pauline  bias lead him to deny Biblical authority and the canonicity of the book of Hebrews".

part one blood

note: despite hebrews published together still original lists never had hebrews so the inclusion was human error.

also some claim "ephesians colos., 2 tes. psudo" so marci error to include.

tatian only gospels that he combined... note the blatant flaw: section 149 from jon 18 before lamb in holiness, despite after 136 did the passover. wrong day. marcion solved: only john who saw is trustworthy. see chart credit welch etc.

priority is from john for example "Moses lifted up the snake in the wilderness"  despite similar to numbers DIFFERED kuz other source "lifted up" not the quote in jew numbers. john lacks any hint to genesis book n lev. so next sources:

later others like peter 1 by eusebius who preserved james n hebrews disputed.

it is written: “Be you holy, because I am holy. 11,  1Pe 1:16 note: no book name so only this detail n similar quotes.

so first john: 

what about exodus story? preserved in acts 7 WITHOUT book name. even john 8 no book name nor theo!

luke 2.21, did it say they cut? only they named. jesus never taught to offer birds. did he? he obeyed jeremiah 7. also no theo n thys is gift.

similarly mat 8,4 no theo matching dt. 33 god never commanded sacrifice n even this "gift" kuz jew lev. not authentic.