the orthodox rabbi m. feinstien wrote that he supported the feath penalty in u.s. which violated jew tradition that stealing deserved DEATH but u.s. death penalty differed.
this film shows the RISK. if a pair entered a home to steal and ONE killed. the one who did not kill could make a bargain to testify against the murderer OR as in the case of the film lawyer negro could get the murderer to blame his innocent accomplice. the negro lawyer is an accessory to killing the non murderer. he coulda made that bargain to blame the true murderer but he was a negro lawyer.
this possibility shows the flaw in the u.s. system not just the victims complained but the system itself that ignored testimony yet needs it?? annd can possibly have the murderer blame his accomplice so feinstien is wrong in the u.s. system. not kuz the film occurred but kuz it showed the possibility.
we can easily comprehend why the writers let the boss and assistants of the negro lawyer die, while spared the negro lawyer, to show only black lives matter.
if i would write these opinions on a wikipedia talk page anout ghe folm comtent... how would i be treated? free speech? only some have protected speech the rest get deleted and banned... despite accuracy.
No comments:
Post a Comment