EVEN the books of rabbis which are hostile towards jesus, still agree with christian faith in certain details therefore the rabbis should not be ARGUING about those details instead they could COULD teach "the truth of the jewish tradition" but then the students would grasp "who is the jewish messiah which the jewish tradition truly described" so rabbis argue but the trick is revealed.
"the gig is up."
admittedly the jew has a struggle trusting a book "outside of rabbis sources" but the truth is "even the rabbis book" DESCRIBE the time of coming "jewish mesia" meaning the messia described by jewish tradition is the one hoped for and desired.
this post will not detail the description of messia himself altho details also match both faiths.
TOPIC: the year of messia: even according to the rabbis who hated jesus they wrote in their talmud the year.
** t.b. sanhedrin 97a "2000 YEARS until law and then 2000 years OF LAW=tora followed by messia." defined year so 2000 years from moses is messia... note this was a teaching "from"elija" according to talmud itself so as we know he was the announcer of messia this does fit jesus... only the jesus haters continued "that year passed" 97b see below, so i ask elija was false prophet?
also **YOMA 39b "forty years before the destruction of jerusalem the red thread did not change to white" teaching the year which offerings failed... guess why 40? the teacher secretly believed in jesus and even talmud said respect "rabbis taught"=rh31.2 the destruction in 70 ad minus 40= 30 the time of jesus precisely and these two teachings match like previous faith of 2000. the context is 2000 until tora and 2000 with tora so not only "time limit" for law based on context but also describes messia at that year who does that match?
similarly sanhedrin 97b "the dates passed" the tradition described "came already" even jesus haters admit the year.
No comments:
Post a Comment