social media censorship

when Facebook was becoming popular my  pal joked, "what should you call someone who is using Facebook? a  face booger.

turns out those many suckers submit to community censorship not correctly censored slander accusation that u.s. law forbids but instead limiting words that cant injure... inverted 3 u.s. values, slanderous libel, free speech and communist censorship called community like communism. stop being a facebooger.... twitter  censor is a problem too LOGOUT and not reenter, stop submitting to fascist intolerance of fascist facebook.

alice under WATER

 Alice worked on a ship. she remembered her wonderful experience underground. 13 years had passed since she had awoken from that dream and she was age 20.

she told a sailor man, "i fear the boat will sink and even if i will swim, i will soon be too tired to continue but drown." he replied, "relax i am at sea ten years and i have not drowned." as if that proved the danger in future.

she assembled a tool. she used glass attached to science until the tool was ready. Alice held it up so the sun shone on her kneck,  through the glass . it had the effect she desired so she could continue breathing air and also get oxygen under water by sucking water and breaking it into gas and air (hydrogen and oxygen). 

alice jumped up over the wood railing and dove into the sea. she sucked water in her neck and she felt like she was breathing. she could stop fearing drowning.

she felt that swimming seemed much easier. she couldn't feel whether she was kicking her right leg or her left? she looked at her legs and saw a gray tail like a dolphin. not only could she breathe like a tuna fish but also she could propel herself easily like a dolphin or mermaid. she looked at her sailor shirt and saw she was not a lady anymore but a merman...  so he felt his face to feel man beard. the skin was smooth so he knew he was a merboy. he named himself allix, alex. however that sounded too much like alice. instead he prefered raydara raibern.

later alice would use this ability  to swim deep down where alex had a dangerous adventure and accomplished an important mission. 

she jumped leaping  up out from the sea like a dolphin and landed on the ship. she asked her sailor pal to show her his photos. she commented "your niece is adorable" but he corrected her, "dis is di picture of my daughter. denise is di niece"

to be continued...

poem: i know christ, by pastor tal

Intro: this poem was inspired by "Kingdom Come" Song by Hillsong, album united

that song began with the important lesson that "the opportunity for US to reach the divine, shows your love now to us" a continuing involved relationship from past that never stopped and will never leave.

song: i know by pastor tal

___

I know Your love came with Jesus

it will not ever leave

the only way to you is faith

for all who do believe

we will still have your gift of life

after our bodies die

your grace is great a gift not earned

your spirit is nearby

In us, dwells your Holy spirit

its symbol was a bird

when it came down upon jesus

who taught your Holy word

your holy spirit is our guide

teaches your lesson: true

we ask for guidance in our lives

We live mainly for you.

story of abraham two more

 in another story of abraham the main part is a prophecy that he will have a son. the rest is a filler.

when rabbis told me the story they ALTERED IT FROM the bible.

in the bible first lord appeared to abraham. next abraham "ran to greet them" and third asked permission god do not pass the rabbis said he was talking to the one who appeared but he should ask permission before running to meet his guests. they tried to trick me instead when running to meet them he said to them "masters" not jehova please do not pass meaning stay here. who bowed the verb is plural so not abraham bowing as rabbi and niv lied to me.

the two verbs of seeing equate that the appearance of god was the three visitors. the order indicates that he "saw" god not more than saw so he was not "interrupting god to welcome guests" as rabbis lied in fact the showing of god was in the form of three persons who plural they bowed.

they asked where is your wife and one said you will have a son by sara. sara laughed saying i and my master are old... i guess if i was/were a lady i would cringe at that word master. she was smiling at the absurdity. and so it was a son was born. note: that should be connected immediately but between the prediction and isac was born, things unrelated to abraham are told and abraham does some uneventful stuff that are fillers without substance, do i mean boring? no, i mean without the "ingredients of story" i was not feeling bored when i studied them because i was forced to by religion but still the contents are empty... far from a chase where a guy is running from cops dodging and hiding stuff happens and suspense these four chapters have almost nothing happening the bit in abrahams life could be said in ten words... which do not even deserve repeating some stories due to not in abrahamstory or too lengthy around the issue, badly diluting and distracting from the point... obviously only to stretch a story long enough to fill the time around the bonfire.

so that summarized that lengthy burden and rejected several erors added by the two religions as above for example in chapter 18, the next story seems to have abraham doubting god's "judgement" and other bad messages so that does not deserve repeating nor study.

the last story i will bother with also needed replacement to censor out the ideas considered wrong by tradition. not "my morality" but tradition. also what about god commanding "abraham sacrifice yourself to death to show obedience" that is harder than spare yourself being forced to kill someone else due to fear. a REAL TEST would be abraham stab your own heart and if he did revive him. but god knew abarahm was only willing to hurt OTHERS but would not kill himself dead he wanted to live so the story is about killing someone else, which is easier than killing self... and if "overcoming your love for son" was hard still due to fear of god anger that is almost no choice: "i had to kill him or i would die" from god wrath for rebelling. worse it violated the rules in tradition.

most of chapters 18, 19, 20, 21, could simply tell the point and focus on abraham but... even abraham is too early considering his sons were not "the nation of abraham" nor israel so even abraham should not be mentioned at all except by name not ten chapters without "events in abrahams life" the only events war and fire were not involving abraham. in abraham life no drama either.

finally abraham life had some drama after long chapters without drama in his life. this drama worth repeating but with a bad message which i must replace. why do i think it is bad? not because a guy told me "god should not ask for human sacrifice" that i defended god planned to stop him... despite it was an angel of the merciful jehova that stopped him not god himself nor elohim if he planned he would personaly say stop. the problem is something else the religion of god teaches that murder is so evil that we must give our OWN lives to death instead of killing another human so abraham sinned by agreeing to kill he violated the rule to give his life so i will replace the story with the good message and lesson so you know to avoid bad book genesis.

also i note genesis 20,17 has a message that is bad and does not match the story so i warn do not read such a bad story in bad book genesis. what is so bad? that would distract from a MORE IMPORTANT MESSAGE THAT FOLLOWS HERE SO PLEASE DONT GET DISTRACTED WITH THE PRESUPPOSITION that the book or story is worth defending only if assume it is holy have bias to defend but only humans claimed it is holy, jesus NEVER SAID BY NAME it was a good book and my inspection showed it was not holy therefore not from god therefore not warrant defense unles wrongly presuppose trusting humans who claimed it was holy. so we focus on the important story called "tying".

STORY: "God said to Abraham [calling], “Abraham!”. he replied, “Here I am.” God said, “Take your son, your only son [note the word here has the hebrew word only "ihid" in contrast to describing god "is one" a different word not this word used here only... rabbis tried to lie that the word was not biblical hebrew, so could not use ihid. i trusted them until noticing here it is biblical hebrew... the word is different "ahd" one used by one from many so we can notice book deuteronomy is not the religion of the prophets nor is book genesis with plural verbs for god they appeared they led" we can be certain that the inclusion of books genesis and deuteronomy with holy books was not only wrong but insults the holy prophecies and makes the book impure like mixing poison into flour the mixture is rat poison.], whom you loved [past tense], Isaac. go to the land Moriah. "offer" [command grammar] a burnt offering on a mountain I will show you.”

Abraham said to god, "my master i would obey anything else but i cannot kill anybody just because you commanded" God replied, "now i see that you fear me and deserve praise for risking my anger to kill you, to avoid the sin of killing, that is worthy of praise." so this replaced the bad story where abraham almost did the evil of sin of murder only stopped by an angel. the new testament deals with part of the problem by adding abraham believed that isac would be revivved... but that is stil the evil sin of murder which religion teaches must avoid even at the loss of his own life in their bad story anraham "feared god" anger and felt his own life was more precious than others in case he himself got punished so better someone else should die not me that is "religiously wrong" instead abraham must say according to religious obligation not "my morality" but religious obligated "over my dead body" i will die myself before murdering. the story SHOULD teach that in a book of teaching so this replaced and warned about the bad book of genesis that we see is not worthy of study nor preservation beyond the criticism here.

thor 2020 summary

 despite people SEEM "cool" if they "dare" to insult stuff... that is as shallow as family guy like people who said "this film was total cr-p" without bothering to say if the flaw was a certain detail or they felt bored, subjectively despite quality, or merely to seem cool and get likes... like most shallow/humans.

the truth is this story was VERY good and in some ways better than marvel version of thor.

this was not a marvel movie so it MUST have been based on some original thor legend updated to a modern car world with new additions by the writer.

in this thor world gods can only be killed by gods. ODIN was a god for whom wednsday name honord but despite his god powers he can get killed so not competition with a greek god. in fact loki did kill odin.

SUMMARY: the official summary did not match the story of the movie and misinterpreted the plural "they" in the trailer so i will fix the theme: loki and thor came to earth. thor is weak without his hammer. this hammer is based on norse myth see https://www.britannica.com/topic/Mjollnir

the earth is "not invaded by aliens" instead loki one invader used his power to subjugate humans as his army. the other is too weak to invade. humans help thor who struggled against the army of humans under loki to reach his hammer. 

he surrendered the hammer to save a girl so loki stabbed him. like odin this can kill thro but... near his hammer, it gave strength so he healed and dueld loki... how did good win?

thor seperated loki from his weapon and blasted him dead with hammer zap. this freed the humans from slavery.

admittedly some stunts were off screen but the story was superb.

order of bible books

 the jew order differed from christian order and many of the differences the christians "improved" with grouping.

we will see by the contents of books that when luther selected some books and rejected some books that catholics included je did not PURIFY enough. so we must purify based on content and not trust rabbis of jews as i will explain.

jew first group five books claimed "by moses" in josephus about genesis "moses wrote and same in moses ramban and moses rambam. however the contents indicate a foreign religion due to plural verbs in genesis and sacrifices in the other four which cannot be the same religion as jeremia who specified god denied commanding sacrifice saying in chapter 7, see for yourself "you eat burnt offerings BECAUSE i did not command" that is the reason so those five are not from god but a fake like selling "sand in a box of corn flakes" whatever that crime is. we know from the contents that those books are a different religion than the faith of the prophets who brought prophecy "i did not want blood" past grammar and i did not command sacrifices so books that can cause error that he did are a foreign religion and can cause error so not reliable.

christians accepted those 5 five from rabbis but only humans said it was holy did jesus "say by name they are sources" no. his quotes often differ from the similar idea in jew book to show not from the jew book but some oher source and only the BITS quoted are worth preserving "with all your heart and soul and TWO more" that is not the jew book which was wriongly included due to bad rabbis and trusting rabbis.

we can't trust rabbis at all and certainly when the contents differ. so some translations add words "not only command" that is not the message and does not match "you eat" if also commaned.

second jew group:

joshua judges samuel kings in talmud four books

christian order is better because ruth is a story before david so before samuel is improvement. the jews wrongly call these prophet despite stories. also christian have chronicles by kings due to paralle better than jew not together but still...

the contents indicate the error to include them.

joshua has both "not by your sword" and wars and judges has wars but if war is true then "by sword" and contains lie impure or not sword is true and the majority is false i could accept either one but the truth is "not by sword" as the holy spirit sent me to teach so joshua and judges are impure.

also most of judges said "sin caused pain" but the ending refuted that they sinned and "long life" so sin does not cause subjugation. the theme was not only stories but an idea that conflicted ecclesiastes including both eccl. and judges in same group is absurd from doubt we should reject both but the truth is i was sent to teahc eccl is holy depite rabbi doubted and those that "do not match" are not holy including psalms that started wrong to show different religion than "the righteous lose due to righteousness" which is the correct faith and if they include ecl. should agree but also include the ones that do not match psalms and judges and job and proverbs all do not match as i wil list so only eccl. holy in contrast to rabbi doubted eccl. and christia acccepting from rabbis.

samuel was divided by the death of saul... the two stories of sauls death DIFFER if the student is FOOLED TO STOP due to the end of the "book" as artificialy divided he will not compare the twp versions it hid the problem but this book is separate from god whoknew which version is true so no source reliable for david etc.

the books kings and chronicles are only if we do not know history but historians calculated mesa mesha and neucdnazer so we know the years in those books are "false or exagerations" and can cause error and also SEPARATE FROM GOD who knew the correct years not exagerated that can cause error by literalists.

after the story about kings which can cause error and was wrong;ly included and should not have been included christians have more story that belong with story. however the books ezra nehemia and ester are problems... the book name is usualy due to the first word or name such as jeremia and nehemia but the book that started ezra was not preserved nd the book claimed to be ezra is not the book that is truly called ezra. also nehemia is not on the jew list so they lie it is included but still publish separate because not one book so it was wrong to includ eeither the only two that remain are ruth and ester... ruth i was sent to say is holy from god and isaiaj and jeeremia too which are mentioned by name in matthew 22 and matthew 27. ester maybe only story not holy. in fact it does not give god credit so probably onlu story not holy i was not taught that only to warn that the inclusion of books with sacrifice was wrong and that the story of kings from david to zedekia are impure and separate from god. 

so ester remains but only a story and the lengthiness is "fillers" without content maybe for suspense but too much and distract from theme.

the jews group the prophets isaiah jeremia and ezekiel only two of those holy but ezekiel has sacrific so foriegn faith not faith of israel prophets, this was grouped by time since they were the time of kings but they predict the future so so not belong with story of kings so christian improved moved prophet separate after ester.

NEXT CATEGORY

not story job? not a story? it is a story but it is ideas mostly and the contents do not match eccl. that the wicked succeed but most of the book said you suffer for your guilt and sins like judges so foreign faith not with eccl.

same the start of psalm to emphasize the faith of the author but cannot be with eccl. so remove both to prevent conflict until holy spirit taught only eccl. correct faith but not the conflicting books: proverbs psalms and job three more books that inclusion was wrong to trust rabbis we can know from the contents are a foreign faith not from god. in contrast to isaia and jeremia and ruth. so four holy remain.

song i was not taught so i dont know from doubt we cannot trust rabbis and claim holy baselessly did jesus ever say it was holy song?

the order differs: christian order job psalms proverbs that seems time order due to job money currency ksita ancient currency like jaconb around 1700bc long before psalms that mention david by OTHERS whose time was AFTER DAVID as indicated by mentioning david.

in contrast the jew order psalms first beore job does not match content of currency so christian improved order still the contents as above indicated that the decision of rabbis to include was wrong and we cant trust rabbis.

last section is prophets jeremia wrote lament so better with jeremia improving jew order. 

daniel is from god we can agree like eccl holy.

is lament holy? just written by prophet but not "so said god" it differs from daniel bringing god message so inclusion insulted the ones that are holy.

the twelve short ones i was not taught and christians count them twelve separate and the order certainly not chronological for example malaki has truma tax which ended by exile of 722 bc certainly before jeremia in time and jona also earlier but we cant trust rabbis to include them we must INSPECT which if any did jesus mention by name. and if not included then no point tto fix order.

timeline after nebucadnezer

 timeline after nebucadnezer

nebucadnezer and destruction of jerusalem 586 bc malaki before this due to "truma" before 722 bc exile

cyrus and return to israel "538" if so 586-538= 48 years exile not 66 nor 70 etc.

artashasta "444" if so both ezra and nehemia near 420bc 430 bc ezra his seventh year and nehemia 20th.not as christian chart wrongly separated and no source that book "nehemia" was included as jewish and even book ezra the first word was the name of the book but the jew book called ezra that is not the book of ezra which started with the name.

years

722 bc assyria exiled northern israel so malaki before with truma law

586 neb' etc.

550 daniel

538 cyrus and return persian rule isral until 331

444 art' so ezra 430 bc nehemia 420 bc both during art' same generation but no jew book kuz not preserve ezra but replaced with other book not start with ezra and no jew book nehemia.

331 greek rule until 143 

143 hasmonean "king" manage under neighbor until 63

63 bc roman until jesus after him who cares? he got emphasized despite ancient but 30ad until 1950 too old. even 1948 was a different world. too old for anything more than: egypt border by brit in 1920's jordan border by brit 1920's brt left so borders already existed not jordan nor egypt but they "invaded" but failed to capture cities and a few anti aircraft guns scared egyptian tanks. more than that is too old unless history school.