a NEW defense for some flaws in the book genesis

 today i thought of a way to present the claim, admittedly inconclusive, yet still MORE LIKELY, that can defend the book genesis from some issues. challenges.

when we read the book of genesis we often ASSUME that the book and the word "the earth" in first verse refers to "our planet named Earth" despite the spelling LOWER CASE not the name of the planet only dirt. the context seems to refer to the "exposing/surfacing" of the land/dirt=earth described on the third day as the beginning, meaning the first THREE three days are called the "beginning" of the week of creation.

this assumption causes our prejudice to try and match the story to our planet... and to interpret the bible based on those PRECONCEPTIONS the way evil moshe rambam corrupted many verses based on his preconception that God has no body... claiming as his basis a verse that never specified that god lacked a body but simply trying to bend toward his muslim neighbors in egypt... that is corruption. we must be different.

however, what if we remove the prejudice? those "challenges" transform into HINTS that the book refers to a DIFFERENT planet.

for example we know the order by digging of life on this planet as geology published first fish and later trees. as childrne we are INJECTED with the idea that genesis is good and true and accurate and most kids even swallow and believe the order of that book and never even NOTICE that the order in geology differs. the simple conclusion is GOD knew the correct order therefore either "geology is false" reject the science books or the book of genesis and ts authors were SEPARATE from the God who knew the correct order.

today i offer a new solution as a MORE LIKELY possibility to defend genesis as true, despite my personal faith that the authors were seperate from god and that book genesis is separate from god and therefore we must nnot MIX genesis with the holy books in the bible the way we should not inject pagan christmas into christianity using the veil of "jesus birth" similarly it would make the bible filthy to mix the lie and misleading contents of book genesis among the holy prophecys for example jeremia and isaiah. despite my personal faith i still offer middle ground as a possible defense.

for the purpose of harmony.

we know the order of life on our planet and we see the bible order differs even SPECIFYING day numbers... the third day treee before the fifth day fish yet we know tree were after fish... leading several rabbis to tell me "the truth is geology is correct but the bible is ALSO true because the fifth day was before the third day".... a healthy ming will not be fooled by such rabbis. they admit the contents in the bible are misleading and ignore the content of day numbers.

instead of rejecting geology as sheldon in the series big bang theory, i offer middle ground.

the different order is a HINT that the book is describing a different planet on which the first human was made from dirt... will that is hard to believe... God could make a human from dirt or from a dnosaur or from water or from nothing but are any of those "likely"??

god himself never said aany prophecy "god spake unto moses i created man from the dirt" and the rabbis teach not to accept this and many other details in genesis despite ALSO claiming it is the foundation of their faith so a healthy mind and logic prevets belieing both.

anyway the order is a hint that it refers to a different planet, simply REMOVE the assumption this it describes our planet and no conflict instead a hint that the book tells the correct story of a different plamnet where there trees were before fish in contrast to this palnet where the first trees were after fish. admittedly one hint alone would only be a hint and better to reject the book of genesis as above however cobined with other hints....

the STRONGEST hint is the story of "four rivers", admittedly jewish scholars published a very gentle criticism that the story of the four rivers is "less than accurate" too gentle... but that is only assuming that the story refers to our planet !! remove that assumption and prejudice... and the problem transforms into a hint that the book is describing a DIFFERENT planet where one river DID branch into four rivers all from same source and the names... of river on our planet are the same as those four rivers while we all see that the those four names do not have one river as a source but as books and maps and josephus preserve the four rivers with those name are not from one source river but we know some flow southward from a northern source the same name as euphrates and tigris flow southward from a north mountain, in contrast to the other two probably the blue nile in ethiopia and the white nile from lake victoria that attach into the nile near city khartoum.

the same names are for four rivers if we assume the same planet then as the bible scholars criticise the content is "less than accurate" but if we remove the prejudice... stop assukmng it is the SAME planet then ths problem transforms into a hint a strong hint that these four names are not the same four rivers... instead EIGHT rivers the four on that planet branch from one and our planet mimicd the names for four different rivers on our planet. again this alonse despite being a strong hint describing rivers is only a hint but this strong hint combined with the order describe a different planet and there the descriptionn of rivers was true describing that second other planet not describing our planet where those four names refer to rivers with separate sources two flowing northward from distant sources and as above two flowing southward. in contrast to the description in genesis describing different rivers with same name or our names mimic the names in the story about the other rivers.

combined with the hint of the order and the long lives hundreds of years even enoch lived over 300 years and other other slonger and even after the flood noah pronounced "naw-ay" as preserved in greek letters lived 300 years after the flood that would be "surprising" on our planet maybe "unbelievable" even after the flood and other s also lived hundreds of years after the flood... long life is only surprising if we ASSUME it describes OUR planet where lives are short.

even the claims of the apologist of the "ice dome" do not help for hundreds of year life after the flood, despite matching the idea of the hebrew word "rko" still even after the flood when the ice dome "meletd down" still noah aand others lived hundreds of years but if we CANCEL our preconception that it describes our planet then instead of unbeleivable fantasy we have another hint... and combined with the strong hint describing the planet of four rivers those rivers were on a planet with four rivers that TRULY DID branch from one and their life dffered from our planet.

abraham traveld from ur... the same name as a place in mesopotamia but based on these hints TOGETHER we have a basis that more likely than "wrongly describing" our planet the book referd to a different planet and abrams TRAVEL was not on land... but inter-planetary

!!

this seems fantasy too... yet based on the hints it is MORE LIKELY that the book described a different panet and the source of abram was different the water flood deluge was there the long lives and four rivers were there but when he arrived on this planet the "third rock from the sun" the names were mimicd for major rivers on our planet those that the book was not describing but other rivers on a different palnet.

the land of canan was occupied by locals who he interacted with perhaps the early humans that evolved on this planet, not from "dirt" as the bible describes but evolving as we know and observed from skeletons... and abram came and interacted with them and PURCHASED Land paying for it. then on this planet abrams descendants lived shorter than abram's  ancestors due to this planet being different... yet still longer than the natives due to his genetic source of longevity. the number of years between abram and solomon would still be a problem... but het we can claim that abram traveld from ur meaning the planet that genesis described the one where the FOUR RIVERS did branch from one that planet had the long life due to its difference in characteristics and the content was true about that planet and the rivers there and from there abram came to this planet an unknown number of year before king solomon and those problems of longevity both after noah and before noah are hints that the book was describing a diffferent planet with diffferent rivers as above. so based on all these hints abraham was an alien from the planet that the bible book genesis described not our planet where the rivers, those with the same name  differ from the biblical description.

nuf for now.

time zones entering the new year

 NOW dawn in east coast of u.s. and washington d.c. is the START of the new year on the PLANET as the FIRST time zone starts the new year in tongo islands 7 degrees east from the artificial line called 180 degrees of circle from the brits. the SAME time zone in new zealand starts the new year NOW, this hour.

if you drink champagne then starting now you have your first excuse to celebrate the new year entering on the PLANET as the artificial number for the year changes and adds. the next time zone will be the east coast of russia in one hour... [in around ten minutes from this posting] so bottom's up [of the champagne glass].

because russia is not on the FAT part of the planet it WRAPS around the thin top of the orb for SEVEN time zones and contains ten time zones which leads to the inaccurate boast "russia is so LARGE" that it covers ten time zones... this

*** neither describes great length as above, due to it being on the top of the orb, 

***nor is really ten but as above seven time zones with 3 added in small bumps.

it does extend from 170w to 30e totalling 160 degrees of sphere almost half the globe but as above at the top of the orb not truly long in contrast to 160 degrees in the fat part of the orb.

anyway as each time zone counts from 11:59 to 12:00 the new year enters that time zone in the fllowing order as the YEAR NUMBER adds grows and increases.

first in new zealand near the artificial international date line and the islands north east from n.z. as above.

next the EAST coast of russia i refer to PEVEK  despite russia extending east of the artificial date line, the whole peninsula is one time zone. the boasters could claim it extends to the tonga isles time zone claing 8 or eleven time zones which do not show length at that part of the orb.

by the time the post is ready pevek will start new year. already passed.

next is the time zone for magadan north from tokyo. around one hour after this post

next is vladivostok the famous port north west from tokyo. in almost two hours.

next is yakuz made famous by the game "risk" the same time zone as tokyo they advance the year number the same time one hour BEFORE the small oblast region irkuzk.

after irkuzk zone the next two zones are tomsk and small omsk which serves the purpose of fake addition of time zone despite obviously known that "north of it, same degrees of sphere, has less time zones."

next, india starts the new year half hour after omsk, which is 2.5 hours before giant moscow.

another city ufa is in the zone west from omsk and reaches the first hour of new year 2 hours before moscow.

one hour before moscow, the zone with samara starts the new year as the year number changes.

next is moscow WITH the baltic states for example minsk. so at 23:00 in jerusalem they enter the new year followed by jerusalem, in the countrystate israel... which arab states are finally recognizing. even trump haters must admit that acheevment they spread different fear tactics to convince people trump will prevent future elections... a hiint of the plan biden harris are thinking of implementing. but back to time zones.

america starts many hours later and the west coast fresno california starts the new year eleven hours after moscow. nuf for now.

my commentary on book hebrews, pronounce greek and more

   Hebrews [letter sent to], a commentary by a trained pastor, by n. tal

about the author: N. Tal teaches many topics. His major training was the christian evangelical tradition, which civilization worldwide, in many countries, embraces as a direction for life and faith as well as for interpretation and application of ancient texts. 

Although educated in a jewish family, and in the ultra-orthodox jewish schools, mr. tal searched and studied many religions, while dwelling in Israel, the holy land,  and compared them until choosing from the worlds popular religions,  the most precise and refined match: as above. Althoe born in u.s., he moved to Israel kuz his family ancestry is rooted in the jews of israel and judea until recent generations in u.s. In israel, a country where various ethnicities, cultures and faiths co-exist, with the occasional tragedy of bombs on busses... we all know which religion teaches that method, he made effort to "taste" several versions of christianity and judaism which deductively pointed back to evangelical. 

The guidance team at a certain church trained him via lessons and guidance until they decided he was worthy of the title "pastor". after that, same as with judaism, he relied on his authority and on their opinion that "he is worthy to teach" indicating they saw he correctly imterprets,  for branching away from the  system of his trainers, in a few details, while the frame is the evangelical as above. This had also occurred when ultra-orthodox rabbis approved him to be a rabbi for teaching, then he/i branched away in certain details. 

He started teaching religious books at the young age 14, around the year 1990, when rabbis decided he was worthy of teaching reliably, because he correctly understood the jewish books... which led him away from the ultra-orthodox customs and practices which sometimes differ from the contents of the traditional books. First tutoring 8th grade students and later teaching groups of students who requested to hear him teach. When they enjoyed his summaries and comments they requested more lessons after enjoying the sample lessons that attracted students in u.s. 

Around the year 2000 he taught a sample lesson to a group of adults in israel, who arranged more group lessons to hear his summaries of religious texts. both students and rabbis and later pastors too, agreed he was worthy to teach... more important than "attracting" many students from various countries is the fact that leaders approved him... until he "dared to emphasize" certain sources that grated on their familiar faiths. however, such controversial conclusions will not be included here due to the focus on the contents of the book hebrews

He has taught his unique "conclusions" which are simply emphasis on certain sources, to many adults, who often prefer their familiar teachings over the book contents,  for example a certain quote in book ephesians, that grates on the familiar faith of leaders in both christians and messianic-jews who cant bear to accept that quote. their rejection of that message, a quotation from book ephesians, led some of those leaders to expel him from several organizations and churches to prevent their students hearing the emphasis on that "troublesome" quote from ephesians. This has effectively prevented the spread of such emphasis to more students. 

in one instance of a "seemingly contradictory pair" of verses tal seekd guidance from a pastor of the evangelical tradition to seek a spiritual solution... which the pastor taught. when tal performd that method, and when the conclusion was not acceptable to the pastor, tal pointed out "you guided me in that spiritual method which you claimed is proper". however, such controversial conclusions will not be included here due to the focus on the contents of the book hebrews.

  intro: the bible book/letter of hebrews was not included in the ancient christian  lists of bible books. three lists that  agreed to include letters from Paul also agreed not to include hebrews. althoe that indicates that the book is not a priority, still we must consider that those lists were for the nations. in other words, the lists were for gentiles and that is the reason they agreed not to include the book whose audience was for hebrews. instead listing messages by paul who WAS sent to the nations. 

later generations included the book that was for hebrew audience.  so that could explain the reason a message to hebrews was not included in those christian lists. 

i claim Jesus himself wrote and authored the book hebrews about himself, based on the hints he spoke in the gospels that "he came for the jew first" and as indicated by the event when jesus hesitated before teaching the samaritan woman.  so he probably wrote a message to hebrews, and this is it. for modesty wrote about himself as if he were not the author, not writing "me". others claim luke wrote it but luke was not sent to the hebrews in the way paul was sent to the nations. also the first verse indicates that a jew wrote it so it was probably written by yesua jesus himself not by luke or any gentile.

___

chapter 1:1  Πολυμερῶς καὶ πολυτρόπως πάλαι ὁ θεὸς λαλήσας τοῖς πατράσιν ἐν τοῖς προφήταις.

 synonyms:

Πολυμερῶς καὶ πολυτρόπως,  At various times and in various manners,

πάλαι ὁ θεὸς, God, in time past, 

λαλήσας τοῖς πατράσιν, spoke to our fore-fathers

ἐν τοῖς προφήταις, by prophets.

vowels: 

greek has more vowels than english and the ANCIENT sounds were preserved in encyclopedia.

in contrast to english a called "ay" like bay, lane drain, that has two sounds one same as its name and another sounds like back, bad the first of these sounds is a different letter in greek.

the vowel sound in "bob, odd, pa, father, card" one same sound is the greek letter a=α

the vowel sound in "bay, day, babe, paid" one same sound, is the greek e=ε for example θεὸς, using the 5th  letter. i was surprised that the ancient hebrews pronounced the name of "noah" with the sound of this vowel "ay" as preserved in josephus and as explained by one of the doctors in University of haifa. see endnote of this section.

the vowel sound in "bed, bet" is the greek seventh  letter with several shapes. internet shape is a stretched n=ή with that sound. the shape in encyclopedia differs but it is 7th letter and the symbol for its sound specified "bed, bet, egg", differs from the same shape in english dictionary symbol for a different sound.

the vowel sound "bit, it bib" is the greek i, 9th letter, for example kai meaning and "ko+i" the same sound as "bib, it , bit".

the vowel sound in "boat, both, bode, sofa" is the greek 15th letter o in this verse "poly" differs from english "poly" sound but the letter indicates this sound "pole".

the vowel sound in "due, dude, do, too" one same sound is greek 20th letter υ. in this verse "lu=loo". same sound as loot.

the vowel sound "all, ball, saw, soft" one same sound is the greek 24th letter. josephus preserved that the original jews used this sound in the biblical name "noah" originally pronounced "by us naw-ay". i have searched and found that several groups of jews all have differing sounds and none preserve the original except me and only for biblical reading for biblical hebrew but not for modern hebrew pronunciation which differs. 

this concludes the vowels however greeks did have the sound of "h" we know greeks had words for sun "helio" the name itself "hellenism" yet i was foold by rabbi liars that greeks have no sound for h and no letter h... i faild to notince until letters that hyrdro etc. are greek and the symbol ' two points toward the right is the sound h that greeks did have. they said the misleading trick no "letter  to prove no sound" to fool me when the greeks must have had the sound for hellenism ! and hydrogen etc. so i must make effort to distinguish that greek had sound in words such as "helles, hram" despite using a symbol but no "character" letter. such deception is disgusting and rabbis use deception very frequently so we must avoid them even when they speak half-truths it is deception. 

  note: regarding the biblical name noah, despite the 8 letter in the hebrew letters, greek did not use its 8 letter, t,  insted josephus preserved the sound that ancient hebrews spoke and heard. this differs from the sound that rabbis taught me for biblical hebrew and differs from modern hebrew and from several jewish customs that i made effort to compare and ask around. in "original" ancient hebrew the 8th hebrew letter was "only vowel" same as the first and "other hebrew letters in the same group" maybe h is an exception or maybe all four the same named aleph, hey, het, ayin same sound with perhaps one exception. hebrew a is only vowel sound with each of various vowels. hebrew h is only vowel sound at end of word as last letter and same at start of word for example truly "ab-el" despite no proof from josephus, whether first or last letter. when within the word maybe exception adding h but more likely y same only added vowel sound or possibly silent same as aleph within the word "laymar". the 8th letter in contrast to the sound that rabbis taught me was always "only vowel" as josephus preserved the ancient pronunciation with the vowel he preserved which is the sound in "lane drain". similarly the hebrew letter ayin the 16 letter is only vowel sound same as first and 8th aleph and het as rabbi david radak preserved by grouping.

  sounds: 

Πολυμερῶς=pole+oo+may+raws=po+loo+may+raws

καὶ=ko+i [as above sounds in pa and it]

πολυτρόπως=pole+oo+tro+paws

πάλαι=pa+la+i [sound pa=pop, it]

ὁ =oh

θεὸς =tay+ose

λαλήσας =la+les+as [not english "as" but sound russian da same as bob]

τοῖς =toe+is

πατράσιν =pot+ros+in

ἐν =ayn

τοῖς =toe+is

προφήταις=pro+pet+a+is

details: Πολυμερῶς=πολυμερῶς, pole-oo-may-raws, as explained above. now i add clarification: the first vowel is the sound of "toe, sofa, owe" which differs from the english parallel poly-polygon, polymer. in this word the sound is "pole". a second greek letter is also translated with the english o due to the few vowels in english only five vowels a,e,i,o,u while english o has two sounds one as above pole and the other "top" in contrast greek has two shapes in the set translated with o but their sound differs. the second in this set has the sound "soft saw raw" so in this word the final vowel is like "raw". the symbol to preserve that sound "saw," the letter o with a line differs from the same english symbol for a different sound.

the second vowel sometimes shaped as "y" differs from english poly. the sound is like "boot, due" but leaning toward french "du" which preserves the greek roots of latin, so this word "loo".

the third vowel has the sound "ay" same sound as "bay, day" which differs from the english letter e in the word bed. similarly english also differs for "th" the word theology sounds differ in contrast to greek has the vowel symbol letter in theos with the sound "ay" as in day or bay. "may" in this word and "tay" in the following word: θεὸς, its first letter sounds like the first letter in the word "top" t with an added breath, hence the added letter h in translations yet differs from the english sound "th" due to the "h" changing the t to a new sound, in contrast greek does not lose the t sound. its vowel is the sound "ay" so "tay" which differs from the english vowel e.

a different shape or symbol or letter has the sound of english "e" in the word λαλήσας, la-les-as, the first vowel is the sound of the vowel "cot" same as "pa or father" as preserved in russian "da", but the second vowel sounds same as the vowel in "met or let" hence "les" that differs from the sound with the same transliteration in polymeros. another difference is that when preserving the greek sound the e with a line differs from english same symbol. that e with a line in english is the sound when the e is paired with another vowel the sound in bee but when preserving greek that sae symbol is the sound in "bed". we know english has two sounds for e, the sound in bee and the sound for bed however greek has two letters translated with the letter e, but not with those sounds, one for the sound bed and the other with sound "ay" which in english we write "a" for eample "ace, lace bay".  greek lacks sound of "bee". another difference is that english has a unique sound for letter a in addition to "bay" for example "bat, at" but greek lacks that sound as above. also the letter i in english has two sounds "I" same as "eye or like" which greek likes even "kai" sounds different, in contrast the greek i has the sound of english i in the word "bit or bib".

another vowel "o" is used in english for two letters in greek. one greek letter preserves the sound same as the sound "toe, sofa, owe" but the other is the sound "soft saw fault".

now we can say this word "pole-oo-may-raw-s", Πολυμερῶς

2, and=καὶ=ί=ko-i, in various manners, πολυτρόπως pole+oo+tropaws.

note: sound of kai like the vowel in pop and russian "da"  same as "card" as heard in some regions and in dictionaries, plus sound "bit" ko-i.

in time past, πάλαι , pa-la-i sound: like russian da and english pa same sound as pop and fath-er+bit

 ὁ θεὸς λαλήσας τοῖς , God spoke, oh tay+ohs la+les+os toe+is, the symbol tay like "top" has a small breath added in contrast to quicker word "stop".

to fathers, πατράσ ιν=pot+ros+in, [root: πατήρ, pot+eh+r] note: the symbol e with line for sounding greek ē differs from dictionary symbol instead the sound in greek is same as in "bed egg bet". 

by, ἐν ayn 

to prophets, προφήταις , [root προφήτης], pro+pet+a+is, sound first p is sound "spin" like english but faster than second p adding breath same as "pin" source greek in encyclopedia. this differs from english when the letter h replaces the sound p with a different sound instead the p sound remains but a quick breath is added like the "sound pin that slightly differ from spin." 

  practice: 1:1  πολυμερῶς καὶ πολυτρόπως πάλαι ὁ θεὸς λαλήσας τοῖς πατράσιν ἐν τοῖς προφήταις

PURPORT 

purport: God  sent messages via prophets to our forefathers. god was active not ignoring human suffering not abandoning humans to religious leaders who often speak deception. We need these messages because our lives are filled by events that stimulate frustration and even anger. we need guidance to react properly because we see the tragic reactions when people respond to events that "differ from their hope" they perform actions or speak words which SPREAD the suffering and misery. how can we reach internal peace?

Some of the messages can guide us to use skill in our interactions for example the letters by Paul.

if you seek internal peace, and desire, despite dwelling among others who differ from yourself,  to interact with harmony, same as various instruments and differing sounds blend together in a pleasant harmony. we must avoid the two extremes when every instrument echoes the same tone, that is less beautiful than a blend, and in human interactions we must admit that differing opinions exist. yet when instruments try to blend sounds sometimes a sound that would be pleasant if alone gets combined with other sounds that do not belong together and that is not harmony. so we seek harmony despite the differences. when we interact with other people we will not "all agree" in one opinion, so how do we find harmony among the different combinations?

if we lacked food and water then our hunger would guide us to seek food. Society is arranged that basic needs, such as the animal needs common to humans are accessible so we can apply efforts to solving problems mentally and that leads to conflicts. how should we properly respond to conflicts?  when we lack internal peace, and we cant find harmony with the people we interact with, this can lead to misery inside. we have felt "agitation, or irritation" due to lack of harmony.

the method to solve arguments is "reliable quality sources" not by claims, nor "debate methods" that only win debates but sadly avoid "true conclusions" onnly presenting two sides. yet even applying the solution of "quality source" then we argue which is quality source? subjectively ridculing good sources to win a debate or subjectively claiming that a "strong" argument in the category of inconclusive "morelikely" is not strong, just to win a debate. Worse than one person suffering from misery when things are "done wrong", is the spreading of misery to others. we have all experienced the domino effect when a person feels negative emotion, the opposite of joy, that persons words and actions often spread misery to other people. worse than one person miserable is when the misery spreads to more people around them, "permeating any group" via words and actions until many people are miserable due to those words or actions. if this repeats the misery can even intensify. leading to angry arguments and emotional strain and suffering which although do not wound nor injure are far from inner peace. i emphasise a wound or injury is a measurable harm a real damage that is more important to avoid. still when people seek inner peace the stimuli in events ruin that goal so we must learn the skill to react.

each person can learn how to "react" to events so that "you" dear reader will not be the one spreading the misery to others. you can also learn how you can react when other people, admittedly beyond your control, are spreading the misery...  if you learn the art and the skill then you can react differently.

How can we acheive the goal: inner peace? we can control our reactions. Despite the fact that external causes and stimuli are often beyond our control, still our reactions are our choice and we can learn the skill or art to stay calm and avoid angry arguments with other people whether marriage partners or co-workers. i emphasize the connection between the verse about prophecy and the goal of inner peace by citing the example that jesus taught the importance of avoiding anger. s we must learn the skill not to react with anger... somehow. and as i will demostrate.

We know our nature is to seek friendship and social interaction instead of preferring isolation, not only for the need of functioning society but for our nature, yet these interactions often lead to anger when we deal with differing opinions about various issues. often the authority to decide is not our own, so we can separate from the decision process and when we think a different method is better and they reject our suggestion, we ought to consider that if they do not accept our suggestion, then we dont need to try and influence the decision, because it is beyond our control therefore calming our inner selves while avoiding angry arguments. in contrast when we have the authority to decide then we dont need to convince the other people and  in both cases calm our inner mind while avoiding angry arguments despite differing opinions. we can distinguuish between important issues such as health issues i mean health hazard and injury wounds and similar physical dangers,  in contrast to smaller issues such as the "prefferable manner" to prepare food. anything less important than health hazard is not worth arguing. good communication would be to suggest and then when the one doing the action rejects the suggestion realizing the oneperforming the action ha control and separating from the decision. another example if one spouse believes smoking meaning inhaling tobacco  smoke, is a health hazard while the other is addicted to smoking that health hazard is worth a discussion but without anger. When we feel anger we can recall the teaching of Jesus about avoiding anger. i hope other religions teach that too although i cannot think of such a source in the moses part nor in quran to switch from anger to dialog. the method is to consider if the issue is important such as a recognized health hazard or less important and therefore not worth our emotion. and as above considering if YOU dear reader have control or beyond our control. if a spouse continues such hazardous behavior, for example smoking, then the couple ought to live separately in different locations which does  cause greater expense in money yet we know that lung cancer is worse than extra rent payments. jesus taught not to divorce breaking a marriage sometimes live separately without freeing to another spouse until a spouse dies. anyway, most other issues are less important than health hazard, and we can calm ourselves by thinking "this is not important and we can let them choose because no harm, meaning health hazard, either way" and by this method calm ourselves inside while avoiding angry conflicts. those who have the books of paul and messages from jesus have an advantage over those faiths that reject the new testament, who only have moses book or  quran. anyway, when others act improperly we can choose to be the ones who do not spread misery. there are numerous possibilities so we need guidance from prophecy which loops back to verse one that God was active  to send messages for guidance.

2,  to be continued

molly part 6

 molly 6

  note: this section has some rare words so a list s provided for vocab below the story if you see a rare word you can check its meaning.

continuing from part 5 

https://thinkforyourselfn8.blogspot.com/2020/12/molly-part-5.html

Molly askd, "daryl, what are you working on?--i know that for you the main celebration is via songs is the  for you ergo i am trying to compose a poem for our new cycle celebration--that is so sweet, you show you care about things that are important to me." Daryl switjd off the music to explain "despite the fact that i differ. for me eating different than usual marks the diffference... [molly rolled her eyes] still i want our differences to be a harmony that blends peasantly together despite the differences--your actions show i am right that a song is the main thing--that would not be harmony" explaind daryl, "imagine four pianos all sounding the same key each time that is not harmony nor the art of cooperation. still since i know it is imprtant for you i will make effort for the things that are important to you and i hope you will flow with the things that are important to me." daryl concluded. molly commented "well that is a good method for dealing wth dfferences and feeling miserable--yep and i wont be the one SPREADING misery"  he explained. she then commanded "va" so he switjd on the music again. 

molly opend his closet and searched for a nice shirt to borrow. she found a blouse and started to accuse "is this CLAIRs's blouse--oof after i show you with actions that i am writing a poem for you, how can you vex me and  accuse me?--kuz that is what men do. as if you guys have a goal "sleep with the most ladys, all you can eat" like those buffes--gross, consider if a lady consents for a one-night fling, then that type of girl had been flinging with many before she met me, that is disgusting to think about. i even said a vow to only kiss the hesitant ones--but this blouse proves you had other girls sleep here--no! i left the tag on!--i ges so. also  i always take my blouses with me when i leave, so others woud too, unless the bra vanished under a couch cushion and she coud not find it"concluded molly as she searched and found the price tag, still attached to the new blouse. "thank you for buying me a blouse, i do like the lyt blue color and this vol for decoration" she added gracefully. her shoulder length jet blak hair hung down to the shoulders of the pale blue blouse with wavy fabric encircling the upper sleeve near her shoulders. then she waukd to the window and folded back the thik heavy fabric of the curtain. from the window she coud view the voe of dark water. along the narrow street below, the motion of a larj wyt van yankd her eye. she imagined a secret agent hiding in the back of the van. maybe an assassin hired by different countrys to kill spys.

she listend to daryl breathhe heavily as he strained to write a poem. which word described that?

vie? or vim or vis? they all related to strength and exertion.

daryl took a break from typing to compliment her unique eyes, "i love gazing into your eyes they are as dark brown as cola around the black pupil--and i enjoy your hair and your eyes and when we kiss i feel hypnotized" molly rymed. "hey you stole that from a hanna montana song," daryl said to give credit to the song. she askd if he woud want to own a pet. "i woud not hav time to care for it and what if it needed a vet" he explaind. sh agreed that pets shed hair and added that she does not like the way dogs wag their tails.

molly did like his hair style more than other guys he combed his dark brown hair to his ryt side. his brown eyes were boring and many red lines were visible on the wyt of his eyes which grosd her our but she had lied that she liked his eyes for the rym. his upper arms were lean and narrow but a bit muscular and the muscle often presd out from his shirt sleeves. his man nipples made small bumps in his shirt instead of "depressing" or receding under the pressure of the fabric. that was odd and unexpected kuz she HAD felt that his nipples were very soft and easily recessed so why would they bulge his shirts? but she liked seeing those little "chocolate chips" in a pair on his colorful shirts. beside the blouse in the closet hung soft cotton shirts with thik fabric each a different color one was a shade of red and several each diffferent shades of blue or shades of green. hmm she noticed no yellow nor white nor orinj. she knew he had pink sox. his pants were almost identical. many jeans and two slax one blak and a second dark blue that she never saw him wear. the music changed to the awful sound of a vox and she had the fortune that dayl skipd that song.

molly did not like that daryl's stomach was not smooth. a broad bowl seemed to hang around his belly button but men dont care about their weight the way she did. the one time she askd about his bmi he had said that he is within the range of healthy. in contrast molly spent much time each nyt before sleeping building stomach muscles. 

every nyt she squeezd her feet under a low vas, along the wall that supplys water to the vat for hot water and then she would apply  her vis with vim to acheev  fifty sit-ups and every other nyt she would add while lying on her bak, fifty leg lifts and a hundred knee folds which had evolved in one month to 250 knee folds. then she woud not have a swolled belly like daryl. she was annoyd that for him celebration meant food that woud swell his already swollen belly but as he said he was in the healthy range. she knew that despite limiting food her belly woud swell too... pregnancy woud stretch her belly and her skin would never return to her current length circumference. she knew that from a scene in gone with the wind.  daryl had a unibrow attaching over his two bloodshot eyes and she secretly liked that kuz she also naturaly had a unibrow that she plucked every nyt after exercise to give them shape.

"which shirt will you wear tonyt--i will decide based on my mood later" daryl replyd.

tbc

word list

 u va imp' continue playing music

 u van a large vehicle

 u vas a duct or tube

 u vat a large container

 u vet a pet doctor

 u vex to annoy

 u via through

 u vie to strive for superiority

 u vim exertion of strength

 u vis force and energy

 u voe a small bay or inlet

 u vol two spread wings which are joined

 u vow a solemn promise

 u vox an instrument producing tones like a human voice

molly part 5

after molly made lov with daryl, and daryl was asleep as common after male orgasm, molly shut her eyes and tried to sleep. but even after her orgasm she did not sleep. her mind was racing with thouts so she performd the sleep trick which teaches to breathe slowly and think the simple phrase no-o-o--thouts" repeatedly. time pasd as she did the trik but she did not doze. still she felt rested and lookd at the clok. it showd the time 11:47. since she had started the trik only six minits had passd.

she climbd out from bed and showered in the hot water. the liquid medium that deliverd the seed from daryl was dripping ut but she knew that woud noy prevent the baby that woud replace the nebbor who had died. so she cleand her whole body ad last sprayed the area of the drip. she returned the same panty that was dark gray almost like coal and added one of her pads usual for monthly bleeding but this time to catch the drip.then she puld on her jeans which were very modest covering her entire legs which was helpful in the cold of winter... was it winter? the cold of december. that idea brout to mind a rhyme that she had read on some blog: 

"in the cold month of december 

i gaze at a fiery ember--on long nyts in january

i gaze at snow that's on each tree--on short days in february

i wish from school i woud be free."

a rym bout the months of winter season.

she imagind if she woud wear any dress her feet woud feel cold. anyway the shape of jeans was a perfect match to the shape of a female body in contrast to a male body that requires space between the stomach and the jeans for the hanging PARTS. men she reasond should be the ones wearing dresses and skirts kuz they have hanging parts. such a stupid culture where men cant wear a skirt. if they do people respond with ridicule and insults when skirts are best suited for men. and in the old das they woud insult lady for wearing pants despite pants logicly the BEST match to the female shape. stupid religion... then she added "i cant believe that millions of americans and europeans are christians".

after she dryd her feet and between each toe, she grabd some starch powder from a shelf in daryls shower room and sprinkled starch on her feet to absorb sweat. she criticized god "if a creator made humans then that was stupid to plan sweat both in heat to cool from heat and when the face KNOWS its cold still sweaty foot which cols it in the cold. that proves random evolution or a stupid creator. refuting the western idea of god... maybe a weak eastern god, on the level of a christian angel, ut only of there was no spirit god over him. 

more plausible fairys tryd to make a variety of humans each type with flaws or the truth randomness which only allowd the barely functioning to survive with numerous flaws. she recald that in school almost every girl in her class wore contact lenses for vision. that meant doctors coud do a trik, and "define" good vision in a way they woud require 100% of kids to buy lenses.. but the fact is they chose a definition cald 20/20 that some humans couds ee without lenses but for the OTHERS to see as good as those, most kids  natural lenses cant see, proving again randomness or a stupid god producing eyes that are "weaker" than other humans.

at this point she had finishd spreading starch like talc between her toes to absorb the sweat that stupidly came out even when her body shoud know the cold meant no sweat, and she cusd at the stupid god again. next she puld on her pink sox. daryl also bout a par of pink sox but in the winter nobody woud see them besides her.

in the warm mist of the shower room she did not need any shirt yet so she puld her wyt boots over hir pink sox before she strapd her bra. last she switjd on the fan to pul the mist away and went to borrow a shirt from daryls closet. 

she saw daryl had awoken, so she waved. "please bring me a mint" askd daryl.

so she went to his drawers pild the correct one open and saw a note taped on the metal square of mints "marry krismas, clair" she opend it and brout him the mint silently. "daryl askd "i thout you woud like the note?" molly just shook her head no. daryl added "i remember last year that you said real christians woud be the same as the original christians in the book f acts who did not emphasize any celebration for the brth of their savior therefore if you are not christian then logicly you COUD celebrate it--still i am also not catholic and you calld me clair--oops" daryl apologized.

an awakward silence then daryl added "well i will toss the note then. insted we can celebrate new year today--but today is the 21 of december so its too early--how can you forget molly? you said that the first of january is not the start of any cycle, therefore we shoud celebrate a week before--true-- so that woud be today on the day cald solstice... see i listen when you talk" concluded daryl. molly corected him "despite the fact that the nyts get longer until december 21 and the longest nyt is december 21 between the short days, still the new nature cycle, the birth of added lyt until less lyt and back to the new cycle of added lyt, usualy starts the day after the day THEY cal 21 so today is the last day of the year. "oops" replied daryl. molly tryd to comfort him, for trying to please her, "despite tmoro is the start of the new cycle, first day of the first month based on the natural event,  with the added lyt as defined by that idea, we coud be like chinese culture and add the last day of the year to the celebration of the new cycle--yup," agreed daryl.

then they taukd about the plans how they woud celebrate the new year that evening. molly wanted to choose songs so together they chose songs daryl sugested the song from phineas and ferb that they intended for january the civil year but relevant and apt for the cycle and molly faild to think of any other songs. she wanted daryl to hel p her write a song but daryl said that was work and maybe next year if they prepd a song a week in advance they coud acheev a song before the deadline.

daryl wanted a fancy dinner but molly wanted to swap the food part for just a song and daryl stubbornly insisted they coud do both and shoud "after all", reasond daryl, "you shoud not worry about your weit--thanx" replied mally relieved that he had not noticed that she had added 2 pounds since last winter.

daryl explaind that he already made reservations at a certain restrant and warnd her that the name of the reservation woud be clair, despite he knew her face he had swapd her name with the name in the story about clair claus the rebelious dauter of santa thatt he had read about in some blog.

but wat woud they do until the time of the dinner reservation?

daryl switjd on his thin computer to try and "hammer oyt" a new year song due to mollys insistence that a song was important fr celebration. molly took some paper from daryl to write more of her fictional novel. each workd silently for around and hour til mlly realized daryl shoud drink and shower.

"honey woud you like a drink" molly offerd. "yea i better drink. i will order room service what can i get you?--oh i ate brunch at the cafe before you showerd." daryl cald the room service in their tower of dwellers and orderd a giant non-sugar cola with a ham and cheez sanwij.

tbc 

words for story

v

va continue playing music

van a large vehicle

vas a duct or tube

vat a large container

vet a pet doctor

vex to annoy

via through

vie to strive for superiority

vim exertion of strength

vis force and energy

voe a small bay or inlet

vol two spread wings which are joined

vow a solemn promise

vox an instrument producing tones like a human voice

W

[wa the cry of an infant

waa the cry of an infant v waaed like baaed]

wad a small bundle v

wag to move side to side repeatedly or up and down

wan weak and feeble or dim v to become

war hostile fighting with weapons

was had the specification (quality mentioned)

waw 'vav' a hebrew letter

wax the dull yellow solid made by bees rom esters and hydrocarbons

way a road for travel from place to place, an opening to pass

we the group including the one talking or writing

web an intricate structure like a weave, the woven fabric until removing from the loom, the tissue connecting fingers

wed took for a wife by ceremony

wee very small bit

wen a cyst which forms when a gland was blocked and it filled

wet with liquid or consisting of it, rainy weather

who tell me the person, the unknown person [the one who has five should wave]

why say the reason or cause

wig a head cover of hair

win to acheive victory

wis to have the knowledge

wit the ability to reason or remember

wiz someone very clever or skillful

 u woe intense suffering or grief, ruinous trouble >i. i feel such

wok a pan shaped like a huge bowl

won acheived victory

woo to seek affection

 u wop a tough italian

 u wot to know [I wot, but you wit]

 u wow i. i feel amazed or proud, a success, to excite enthusiastic approval

wry to twist out of shape >aj

wud 'boot' insane

wye the letter y, a y-shaped part

X

 u xi 'zye' a greek letter, a particle

xu 'soo' a money

Y

yak a large ox

yam a sweet potato, the edible root of various plants

yap a quick bark, to bark insistently, to talk insistently

yaw to stray from the course

 u yea i agree> a vote yes

yen a strong desire >to desire intensely, a money

 u yep i agree

 u yes i agree, i disagree to a negative you did not see my pen? yes, what you asked is true, i think what you said is true

 u yet until now, until a certain time, despite what was mentioned

yew an evergreen tree

yin the passive principle

yip to bark quickly and continuously

yod a hebrew letter

yon at that place, those there

 u you the one or ones spoken to [no yum]

 u yup i agree

book hebrews, my commentary and introduction to bible book hebrews

   hebrews

intro: the bible book of hebrews was not included in the ancient lists of bible books. three lists that  agreed to include letters from Paul also agreed not to include hebrews. althoe that indicates that the book is not a priority, still we must consider that those lists were for the nations. in other words, the lists were for gentiles and that is the reason they agreed not to include the book whose audience was for hebrews. instead listing messages by paul who was sent to the nations. 

later generations included the book that was for hebrew audience.  so that could explain the reason a message to hebrews was not included. 

i claim Jesus himself wrote it about himself, based on the hints he spoke in the gospels that "he came for the jew first" and as indicated by hesitated before teaching the samaritan woman.  so he probably wrote a message to hebrews, and this is it, but for modesty wrote about himself as if he were not the author, not writing "me". others claim luke wrote it but luke was not sent to the hebrews in the way paul was sent to the nations. also the first verse indicates that a jew wrote it so it was probably written by yesua jesus himself not by luke or any gentile.

chapter 1:1  Πολυμερῶς καὶ πολυτρόπως πάλαι ὁ θεὸς λαλήσας τοῖς πατράσιν ἐν τοῖς προφήταις

Πολυμερῶς καὶ πολυτρόπως, in various manners and times.

πάλαι ὁ θεὸς, in time past, πάλαι , palai, God

λαλήσας τοῖς πατράσιν, spoke to our fore-fathers

ἐν τοῖς προφήταις, by prophets.

translation:

at various times=Πολυμερῶς=πολυμερῶς=polymerōs, and=καὶ=ί=kai, in various manners, πολυτρόπως polytropōs 

in time past, πάλαι , palai 

theos, God, θεὸς, 

spake λαλήσας =λαλέω=laleō 

to fathers, πατράσιν , πατήρ, patēr 

by, ἐν en 

to prophets, προφήταις , προφήτης, prophētēs 

purport: God made an effort to send messages via prophets to our forefathers.

practice: 1:1  πολυμερῶς καὶ πολυτρόπως πάλαι ὁ θεὸς λαλήσας τοῖς πατράσιν ἐν τοῖς προφήταις

the natural new year

 today, in NATURE now, is a change in the cycle of the sun.

 until today the time for dark INCREASED adding dark. then the cycle from more light to less light ended. now today is the CHANGE in nature, adding light, a measurable bit of added light, changing the trend until now and starting like a BIRTH of added light as our group agreed to define, starting the cycle now as the first day of the new cycle called "tuesday, december 22," but in nature the first day of the first month in the natural solar cycle. from now the addition of light will grow. note: some years a day must be added between this event of added light until the previous meaning 366 days. this is balanced by the addition of a day in february but better to add it on the day itself so the first of the year is always DEFINED as the day of the occurrence in nature of this event as defined. in a two weeks will be the "latest sunrise," meaning more time between sunrises at dawns. however the "earliest sunset" passed already meaning "less time" between the natural events when the horizon-rising hides the sun at dusk. instead the time between horizon rise already changed to increase more time between so on the clock the sunsets are also later each day.