Thursday, June 13, 2019
cities grow as we build
conurbation megalopilos
cities that grew and built in the space between them until the built areas are near each other are called megalopilos
the process of connecting the cities is called conurbation
the largest "islands" on our planet
Because of the British desire to claim that they are "in control of a continent and sub-continent," they decided in a problematic way, and refutable that the border between name "island and continent" is the size of the island of Australia which served their boasting. This can be revealed in the examination of reality and the suspicious decision to invent an idea "subcontinent."
The error can be disproved by analyzing the largest islands, revealing that only because of the desire to boast and in conflict with the description of reality- jesus Christ !! so is there any island so large that its area is more than five hundred thousand square kilometers? Because there are five fingers and if that big may need separate category than island. To a super-isle. There are only a few islands at this size of half a million square km. Since it is surrounded by water it seems that it is isle, but so big, maybe not exactly an island and there are only a few islands that size.
The term "island" belongs to "land surrounded by water," and for that reason one book was forced to say in integrity on page 116 that the term for "a continent." althoe they mean Australia and refute the two places where the same book said greenland is the "largest isle" still the truth is that they did not specify Australia and did say the term includes any "continent" surrounded by water hence we must not distinguish because it includes a continent hence the Ural continent even though the British wanted to boast for themselves=the British, still truth is that the Ural continent in which the Ural Mountains, in reality is surrounded by water and therefore also a much larger island than Greenland or Australia. So it is not to be distinguished nor to "split hairs" in a manner that claims many "continents" nor accept the problematic system that was transmitted to us by boasters who twisted the data for the purpose of their boasting instead we must describe the reality even if the facts differ.
the term "isle" refers to the island of Ural. far from that, Australia and Greenland are definitely island and not continent. Like BAFIN not being a continent but an island.
logic requires to group proportionally to the isles of our planet. Since there are a few giant islands in the same frame as bafin 512,000, Madagascar Island 590,000, Borneo 737,000, New Guinea 771,900 "as opposed to Granland, which is more than twice the size of them, for that reason the boundary between categories is different because the amount of area is more than double that the 772,000 if times 2 only 1,544 thousand. Greenland must be another category that is far from the size of the "islets" less than 800 thousand square km area such as this group of great islands, according to reality, a separate framework. But not a continent. Relative to the reality of the group in the same framework. when we compare those islets none are double the smaller islet in group in contrast to Greenland, more than twice the size of these big ones, and therefore deserves a separate category.
Similarly, the Australian area is far from the amount of the southern island area [note that is accustomed to a bad name Antarctica is a bad name that only is based on the opposite of the Arctic which is itself bad bkuz not a continent and more worthy of reading the name of self on the essence itself that is southern and not a result of the other place that is also problematic because More than 13 million square miles. And since Australia's space is much less, the reason for this is far from continent and exposed to the attempt to distort to boast as a recall that in reality does not deserve the same frame but as a simple granaland these medium islands unlike the great islands surrounded by the Ural and Amazon water. The separation of Europe is also in the primitive and incorrect Greece that Asia is connected to and exposed to the British's grift in size analysis.
It's too much to prolong the fact that there are smaller islands than half a million Khmer, and some of them like a mountain surrounded by water and some coral called "atoll " But what is important is that the Ural island in reality is surrounded by water and as a "no continent/" is called an island and therefore is the largest island, and the island of Amazon, which also is surrounded by water. And in the same framework that there is no group where one island and these two are far from the extent of the southern island, it is far from the reality to separate Europe that is connected and the land continues in a connection as well as a river area that is in reality connected and even after the digging of a trench has no deep sea that separates as the river does not only separate shallow water that was artificially excavated. A thin on the slim neck as if separated because it is connected and the British word "continent" was allowed to continue continuo-Yu.
In light of all that is meant to distinguish three frameworks from reality.
Large Island frame: Ural, which includes both sides of the Ural Mountains and the Nile mountain region that is connected except for a shallow canal. And a large island of Amazon that is connected to the Mississippi region and cannot be separated because it is connected by a narrow neck.
And even the southern island is not big enough to be considered a large island in the framework of a large that is far from the half of the island growing Amazon 42 million in Kemer that includes a river region and the Mississippi as it recalls that the it is connected with a narrow neck as a recall and should not be separated only because it is rather narrow and better to acknowledge the reality that is surrounded by water, and for this reason, the southern island is far from half the area only 13 When it is cooked.
Medium Island Southern Island frame, because the only 13 million Khmer is far from the previous frame and clear Australia only 7.7 million Khmer and Greenland 2.2 million Khmer are relatively mediocre for the islands of the planet that are far from the size of the larger as recalling and the biggest island apart from those larger than half of the Greenland area and therefore deserves a massage A separate Martha as recalls C, B, M, B are the most growing among the ordinary islands which are almost countless. And two types that are listed.
The error can be disproved by analyzing the largest islands, revealing that only because of the desire to boast and in conflict with the description of reality- jesus Christ !! so is there any island so large that its area is more than five hundred thousand square kilometers? Because there are five fingers and if that big may need separate category than island. To a super-isle. There are only a few islands at this size of half a million square km. Since it is surrounded by water it seems that it is isle, but so big, maybe not exactly an island and there are only a few islands that size.
The term "island" belongs to "land surrounded by water," and for that reason one book was forced to say in integrity on page 116 that the term for "a continent." althoe they mean Australia and refute the two places where the same book said greenland is the "largest isle" still the truth is that they did not specify Australia and did say the term includes any "continent" surrounded by water hence we must not distinguish because it includes a continent hence the Ural continent even though the British wanted to boast for themselves=the British, still truth is that the Ural continent in which the Ural Mountains, in reality is surrounded by water and therefore also a much larger island than Greenland or Australia. So it is not to be distinguished nor to "split hairs" in a manner that claims many "continents" nor accept the problematic system that was transmitted to us by boasters who twisted the data for the purpose of their boasting instead we must describe the reality even if the facts differ.
the term "isle" refers to the island of Ural. far from that, Australia and Greenland are definitely island and not continent. Like BAFIN not being a continent but an island.
logic requires to group proportionally to the isles of our planet. Since there are a few giant islands in the same frame as bafin 512,000, Madagascar Island 590,000, Borneo 737,000, New Guinea 771,900 "as opposed to Granland, which is more than twice the size of them, for that reason the boundary between categories is different because the amount of area is more than double that the 772,000 if times 2 only 1,544 thousand. Greenland must be another category that is far from the size of the "islets" less than 800 thousand square km area such as this group of great islands, according to reality, a separate framework. But not a continent. Relative to the reality of the group in the same framework. when we compare those islets none are double the smaller islet in group in contrast to Greenland, more than twice the size of these big ones, and therefore deserves a separate category.
Similarly, the Australian area is far from the amount of the southern island area [note that is accustomed to a bad name Antarctica is a bad name that only is based on the opposite of the Arctic which is itself bad bkuz not a continent and more worthy of reading the name of self on the essence itself that is southern and not a result of the other place that is also problematic because More than 13 million square miles. And since Australia's space is much less, the reason for this is far from continent and exposed to the attempt to distort to boast as a recall that in reality does not deserve the same frame but as a simple granaland these medium islands unlike the great islands surrounded by the Ural and Amazon water. The separation of Europe is also in the primitive and incorrect Greece that Asia is connected to and exposed to the British's grift in size analysis.
It's too much to prolong the fact that there are smaller islands than half a million Khmer, and some of them like a mountain surrounded by water and some coral called "atoll " But what is important is that the Ural island in reality is surrounded by water and as a "no continent/" is called an island and therefore is the largest island, and the island of Amazon, which also is surrounded by water. And in the same framework that there is no group where one island and these two are far from the extent of the southern island, it is far from the reality to separate Europe that is connected and the land continues in a connection as well as a river area that is in reality connected and even after the digging of a trench has no deep sea that separates as the river does not only separate shallow water that was artificially excavated. A thin on the slim neck as if separated because it is connected and the British word "continent" was allowed to continue continuo-Yu.
In light of all that is meant to distinguish three frameworks from reality.
Large Island frame: Ural, which includes both sides of the Ural Mountains and the Nile mountain region that is connected except for a shallow canal. And a large island of Amazon that is connected to the Mississippi region and cannot be separated because it is connected by a narrow neck.
And even the southern island is not big enough to be considered a large island in the framework of a large that is far from the half of the island growing Amazon 42 million in Kemer that includes a river region and the Mississippi as it recalls that the it is connected with a narrow neck as a recall and should not be separated only because it is rather narrow and better to acknowledge the reality that is surrounded by water, and for this reason, the southern island is far from half the area only 13 When it is cooked.
Medium Island Southern Island frame, because the only 13 million Khmer is far from the previous frame and clear Australia only 7.7 million Khmer and Greenland 2.2 million Khmer are relatively mediocre for the islands of the planet that are far from the size of the larger as recalling and the biggest island apart from those larger than half of the Greenland area and therefore deserves a massage A separate Martha as recalls C, B, M, B are the most growing among the ordinary islands which are almost countless. And two types that are listed.
Friday, June 7, 2019
math refutes "fact" distance to sun
some claim length to sun 149,598 km average to sun yet refuted by angle so only for astronomical unit translation.
"The average distance to the moon is 382,500 kilometers." nasa. so recalculate and list options.
382.5=238,000m rounded but calculate with 237,700 miles.
greatest possible angle 89.85 too much angle [greater than known 89.8d], still must be less than 90.8m.m. so length not greater than 87.3mm based on angle.
other tests even less distance despite more than 89.8 angle:
89.81 angle 72m.m.
angle 89.82, 76, 89.83: 80, 89.84: 85
also first attempt not greater than 137.5mk
calculating with 384k to moon? find book was bad.
91mm is too much because that angle is 89.85 and know less 89.8 must be less than 89.84 as above 85m.m. 89.844: not more than 87.3m.m. far from claim 93mm and chk if 93mm angle? 89.89 greater so what did they round? 89.86 too much. or 91mm as above.
my point hard to think for yourself and yes the moon findings challenge the venus findings for the sun by halleys prediction.
"The average distance to the moon is 382,500 kilometers." nasa. so recalculate and list options.
382.5=238,000m rounded but calculate with 237,700 miles.
greatest possible angle 89.85 too much angle [greater than known 89.8d], still must be less than 90.8m.m. so length not greater than 87.3mm based on angle.
other tests even less distance despite more than 89.8 angle:
89.81 angle 72m.m.
angle 89.82, 76, 89.83: 80, 89.84: 85
also first attempt not greater than 137.5mk
calculating with 384k to moon? find book was bad.
91mm is too much because that angle is 89.85 and know less 89.8 must be less than 89.84 as above 85m.m. 89.844: not more than 87.3m.m. far from claim 93mm and chk if 93mm angle? 89.89 greater so what did they round? 89.86 too much. or 91mm as above.
my point hard to think for yourself and yes the moon findings challenge the venus findings for the sun by halleys prediction.
our planet description
Intro: see explanation in previous posts.
Title: OUR PLANET
Name: Earth
Area: 197 million square miles [based on estimated radius] (510 million square km.)
Sea area: 139.6 million square miles (362 million square km)
land area: 57 million square miles (148 million square km)
circumferences: mid between poles of spin 24,900 miles (40,000 km) so RADIUS there 3963 miles (6378k), around axis/poles of spin 24,800 miles (39,900 km) so radius there 3950 miles (6357k) c/pi
Land, in size order, giant islands [3]
Ural 33 million square miles MSM (85 million square km, MSK) and not including nile land
Ural: 21msm (54msk), Nile: 12msm (31msk)
Names from Greek [outdated except for school exams]: africa, asia, europe
Amazon, area 16msm (41msk).
names: north and south america
South island, 5.5msm (14msk)
name: antarctica
Medium Islands [2 between 5msm and 0.3msm]
Australia 3msm (7.7msk)
Greenland 0.8msm (2.2msk)
sea area [surface] 139.6 million square miles (362 million square km).
names: Arctic, Atlantic, Indian, Pacific
area as above because connected with wide connections; jesus Christ !! not only narrow connections.
found flaw? see previous post for details and then judge for yourself.
link
https://thinkforyourselfn8.blogspot.com/2019/06/surface-area-of-earth.html
there.
Title: OUR PLANET
Name: Earth
Area: 197 million square miles [based on estimated radius] (510 million square km.)
Sea area: 139.6 million square miles (362 million square km)
land area: 57 million square miles (148 million square km)
circumferences: mid between poles of spin 24,900 miles (40,000 km) so RADIUS there 3963 miles (6378k), around axis/poles of spin 24,800 miles (39,900 km) so radius there 3950 miles (6357k) c/pi
Land, in size order, giant islands [3]
Ural 33 million square miles MSM (85 million square km, MSK) and not including nile land
Ural: 21msm (54msk), Nile: 12msm (31msk)
Names from Greek [outdated except for school exams]: africa, asia, europe
Amazon, area 16msm (41msk).
names: north and south america
South island, 5.5msm (14msk)
name: antarctica
Medium Islands [2 between 5msm and 0.3msm]
Australia 3msm (7.7msk)
Greenland 0.8msm (2.2msk)
sea area [surface] 139.6 million square miles (362 million square km).
names: Arctic, Atlantic, Indian, Pacific
area as above because connected with wide connections; jesus Christ !! not only narrow connections.
found flaw? see previous post for details and then judge for yourself.
link
https://thinkforyourselfn8.blogspot.com/2019/06/surface-area-of-earth.html
there.
Thursday, June 6, 2019
ocean surface?
a certain book has some "facts" that are certainly wrong.
146 million square miles. yet as previously calculated the surface area is much less. only 139.6 m.s.m
the book refutes its own total claiming "total surface area"510,100,000" composed of 378 m. sk and 149 m.s.k yet that total is far from 510 million. 378+149=527 so certainly wrong.
even based on its own wrong radius "6378.4" if so such a sphere would be 511 m.s.k. not 510 as above. the book claims sea is 360 msk called four names... despite the water CONTIN-ues… then lists each area totaling far more than 360 msk.
so I fix the problem by warning you about the bad book of "fcts" and recalculated in the previous post.
surface area: around 196.7 million square miles.
sea surface 71% of that is 139.6 million square miles of surface area which is SEA.
196-139=57 m.sm. are continents and islands.
the largest island has the ural mountains and its area including both sides of ural mountains because the land continues is in previous post with explanation.
https://thinkforyourselfn8.blogspot.com/2019/06/surface-area-of-earth.html
there
146 million square miles. yet as previously calculated the surface area is much less. only 139.6 m.s.m
the book refutes its own total claiming "total surface area"510,100,000" composed of 378 m. sk and 149 m.s.k yet that total is far from 510 million. 378+149=527 so certainly wrong.
even based on its own wrong radius "6378.4" if so such a sphere would be 511 m.s.k. not 510 as above. the book claims sea is 360 msk called four names... despite the water CONTIN-ues… then lists each area totaling far more than 360 msk.
so I fix the problem by warning you about the bad book of "fcts" and recalculated in the previous post.
surface area: around 196.7 million square miles.
sea surface 71% of that is 139.6 million square miles of surface area which is SEA.
196-139=57 m.sm. are continents and islands.
the largest island has the ural mountains and its area including both sides of ural mountains because the land continues is in previous post with explanation.
https://thinkforyourselfn8.blogspot.com/2019/06/surface-area-of-earth.html
there
distance to sun
we see the sun, it appears larger than other stars, but what is the distance to the sun?
usually we unroll a ribbon to find the length but we cannot physic-ly measure to the sun and we can barely go and measure 8 kilometers up a tall mountain so we can use the triangle formulas.
if we know the distance to the moon at the time when the moon is "right angle 90 degrees" from our planet earth then that is the base of a right triangle so if we know two angles and the length of the base we can calculate the length with triangle formula.
to know the distance to the sun first we must find a right angle. we see the moon changes in cycles from full disk bright to less and return to full disk. when the moon is half bright we know that we are aligned so the sunlight hits the face of the moon and we see from the side so that is 90 degrees called right triangle the we can calculate with sin or cosin or tangent.
next for finding the distance to sun we need the length to the moon which they found. over 2000 years ago hipparchus found the length around year 150 bc. story: "observing the Moon from two cities a known distance apart, Hipparchus used a little geometry to compute its distance to within 7% of today’s modern value " first he used this triangular method to measure the angle of the triangle to the moon with length between two cities. the distance to moon averages to around 384.4 thousand kilometers or 384.4 million meters known from the two cities and angles. that side of triangle called base of the triangle together with the two angles: angle a= 90 degrees when we face side of moon half bright with the angular degrees of the second angle 89.8 degrees almost 90, [they estimated 87 degrees in ancient times pretty close], indicates far.
another story following the instructions of halley [edmund lived around 1700] he predicted when venus would pass between earth and sun and how to compute and they did hence discovering "French astronomer Jerome Lalande collected all the data and computed the first accurate distance to the Sun: 153 million kilometers, good to within three percent of the true value" but a bit more than the distance we know now,
knowing the two angles of the triangle 90 [from side called right angle] and 89.8 we can calculate the length of the sides "Side a = 384 units therefore: Side b = 110,007.4 and Side c = 110,008.1" very far 110 million kilometers. good estimate but using halley calculation was more precise and we discovered even further from sun.
now the idea of meter itself is troublesome but once we know 110 million kilometer and 153 million kilometer and 149.6 million kilometer we can estimate based on the speed of light that light needs eight minutes and nineteen seconds to reach earth from the sun. As of 2012, 1 AU = 149,597,870,700 meters exactly. so 149.6m.km.
we call that one unit and we can use that to say that planets nearer to the sun than us, are less than one a.u. while the further ones are more than one au.
list: from sun to each planet, in AU.
Mercury: 0.387 AU
Venus: 0.723 AU
Earth: 1.000 AU=one astronomical unit (AU) = 92,955,807 miles (149,597,871 km). since 149,597,870,700 meters at speed 299,792,458 meters each second, 499 seconds 19 seconds more than 8 minutes so around 500 light-seconds away.
Mars: 1.524 AU
Jupiter: 5.203 AU
Saturn: 9.582 AU
Uranus: 19.201 AU
Neptune: 30.047 AU
in summary mercury is nearly one third between e and sun. but venus is 2/3.
saturn is twice as far from earth as jupiter and u is twice as far from e as saturn.
saturn is around midway between e and u. and jupiter is around midway between e and s.
the Earth’s orbit isn’t perfectly round, we actually get about 3% closer and farther throughout the course of a year.
now that we built the system on the flawed foundation of meters and translated it to a.u. we can say why meter is bad.
the system of kilometer and centimeter is based on meters and ten which has a flaw we can only divide evenly in 2 or 5 but not 3 or 4 the whole reason we divided the day into 24 hours is to allow thirds in even parts and sam divided the year cycle as defined astronomicly into twelve months so we have even thirds. but a third of a meter is a problem and then "rounding" to the nearest meter is inaccurate.
also the decision that a certain length is called a meter iis stupid. what did they do? they calculated the circumference of the earth and cut it into millions of peices. why is that better than anything else? keep the traditional kings shoe. in fact the same shoe could be worn by many kings if the shoe is big enough and padding is inserted ! so better to use the "foot" of the king as measured in the "universal king shoe" which the king long ago put one and that "foot" can be divided into twelve inches the same system as twelve month division of the year.
usually we unroll a ribbon to find the length but we cannot physic-ly measure to the sun and we can barely go and measure 8 kilometers up a tall mountain so we can use the triangle formulas.
if we know the distance to the moon at the time when the moon is "right angle 90 degrees" from our planet earth then that is the base of a right triangle so if we know two angles and the length of the base we can calculate the length with triangle formula.
to know the distance to the sun first we must find a right angle. we see the moon changes in cycles from full disk bright to less and return to full disk. when the moon is half bright we know that we are aligned so the sunlight hits the face of the moon and we see from the side so that is 90 degrees called right triangle the we can calculate with sin or cosin or tangent.
next for finding the distance to sun we need the length to the moon which they found. over 2000 years ago hipparchus found the length around year 150 bc. story: "observing the Moon from two cities a known distance apart, Hipparchus used a little geometry to compute its distance to within 7% of today’s modern value " first he used this triangular method to measure the angle of the triangle to the moon with length between two cities. the distance to moon averages to around 384.4 thousand kilometers or 384.4 million meters known from the two cities and angles. that side of triangle called base of the triangle together with the two angles: angle a= 90 degrees when we face side of moon half bright with the angular degrees of the second angle 89.8 degrees almost 90, [they estimated 87 degrees in ancient times pretty close], indicates far.
another story following the instructions of halley [edmund lived around 1700] he predicted when venus would pass between earth and sun and how to compute and they did hence discovering "French astronomer Jerome Lalande collected all the data and computed the first accurate distance to the Sun: 153 million kilometers, good to within three percent of the true value" but a bit more than the distance we know now,
knowing the two angles of the triangle 90 [from side called right angle] and 89.8 we can calculate the length of the sides "Side a = 384 units therefore: Side b = 110,007.4 and Side c = 110,008.1" very far 110 million kilometers. good estimate but using halley calculation was more precise and we discovered even further from sun.
now the idea of meter itself is troublesome but once we know 110 million kilometer and 153 million kilometer and 149.6 million kilometer we can estimate based on the speed of light that light needs eight minutes and nineteen seconds to reach earth from the sun. As of 2012, 1 AU = 149,597,870,700 meters exactly. so 149.6m.km.
we call that one unit and we can use that to say that planets nearer to the sun than us, are less than one a.u. while the further ones are more than one au.
list: from sun to each planet, in AU.
Mercury: 0.387 AU
Venus: 0.723 AU
Earth: 1.000 AU=one astronomical unit (AU) = 92,955,807 miles (149,597,871 km). since 149,597,870,700 meters at speed 299,792,458 meters each second, 499 seconds 19 seconds more than 8 minutes so around 500 light-seconds away.
Mars: 1.524 AU
Jupiter: 5.203 AU
Saturn: 9.582 AU
Uranus: 19.201 AU
Neptune: 30.047 AU
in summary mercury is nearly one third between e and sun. but venus is 2/3.
saturn is twice as far from earth as jupiter and u is twice as far from e as saturn.
saturn is around midway between e and u. and jupiter is around midway between e and s.
the Earth’s orbit isn’t perfectly round, we actually get about 3% closer and farther throughout the course of a year.
now that we built the system on the flawed foundation of meters and translated it to a.u. we can say why meter is bad.
the system of kilometer and centimeter is based on meters and ten which has a flaw we can only divide evenly in 2 or 5 but not 3 or 4 the whole reason we divided the day into 24 hours is to allow thirds in even parts and sam divided the year cycle as defined astronomicly into twelve months so we have even thirds. but a third of a meter is a problem and then "rounding" to the nearest meter is inaccurate.
also the decision that a certain length is called a meter iis stupid. what did they do? they calculated the circumference of the earth and cut it into millions of peices. why is that better than anything else? keep the traditional kings shoe. in fact the same shoe could be worn by many kings if the shoe is big enough and padding is inserted ! so better to use the "foot" of the king as measured in the "universal king shoe" which the king long ago put one and that "foot" can be divided into twelve inches the same system as twelve month division of the year.
surface area of earth
to find surface area of earth we need to know the radius of the sphere [not including the height of mountains in radius] and since sea cover around 70 percent so also without oceans that is water so radius smaller and MUST use radius. still for my goal I will not subtract the uneven depth of the sea for the reason explained below.
if we know the circ. only based on radius then we cannot know radius based on circumference. I could claim any number "the radius of the earth must be five meters" because the circumference is 15 meters. how do I know the c? simple 5pi so five times three must be 15. despite the stupidity of the method one website makes that circular claim about the circumference of the earth.
if you use meters and don't mind that a third is 3.33 "repeating" then see below. however in time culture knew to divide in a manner that the parts would simply calculated for example the orbit which defines one year was split into 12 month and the day which is defined by the spin into 24 hours. deceivers try to hide this as if a day is defined by 24 hours. but you must be alert for deception.
the circumference of the earth is known. what about the surface area? we should estimate USING Radius 3956 because nasa estimated "Equatorial radius 3963 miles but Polar radius 3950 miles" we see not precisely a sphere so use mid for estimate. 3956 miles.
from radius we can calculate the surface area. we must not add the mountains to the radius because only small areas have the peaks of 8.8 kilometers high. so for the purpose of this article we will use sea level and include the depth of water in the radius, despite the fact that water covers 72% [based on a flawed book with many problems] and better without water, still for my goal this exception will be relavant.
based on radius the surface area must be 196.7 million square miles and simply "197msm".
the formula: "4pi radius squared." so 12.566 times radius squared totals 196.7 million square miles.
we know the surface of the earth is covered by seventy one percent water. water is "about 71% of the Earth’s surface, while the other 29% consists of continents and islands". universetoday dot com.
so 71% of that is 139.6 million square miles of surface area which is SEA.
196-139=57msm remain above sea level.
the sea surround all the land so the so-called-continents are truly islands and the way to distinguish is to add the true description "giant islands." classifying which group based on size is debatable so simply all are islands but some are giant.
Were I a brit I would want Australia to be a continent so I could brag "we control a continent and a subcontinent" but such bias would be bad. and that is what the bad brits did so we must recognize and reject considering smaller than even "south America" and smaller even than Brazil area.
the bad greeks decided that Greece was in Europe but across the water is separated by water so needs different name: to their east "asia" which is bad because the land CONTIN-ues. so the proper name should be ural continent. also before they dug the narrow shallow suez canal the surface connected to the nile region which if separate should be called nile continent but perhaps shallow does not truly separate so that island is around 33 m. square miles. the second largest island, with the long amazon river and shorter Mississippi river hence good name "amazon" is 16 million square miles. less than half can that be a continent? yet so large... and three times the next one: the southern continent 5.5msm so much less that it cannot be a continent. still we have five fingers on our hand so five is big enuf and certainly the amazon continent. some books say the largest island is Greenland but that is so mach larger than the "second largest" 0.3msm hence separate categories. even the southern continent is a problem as above. the fact is ural continent is truly surrounded by water so it is an island.
now for meters.
circ. is "40 million meters" then radius 6.366. then 4pi radius squared for surface of sphere.
r 6.366? but not perfect sphere so use middle between as above not 6378 too much!
40,041 km so r 6373 hence 510.4m.kms. v,
r squared *4pi
fixing the bad book: in metric should say surface 509 msk as translated from miles. the books number does not metch "even" its own claimed radius ratio.
sea 361.5 but book wrong not total own 378 nor 361.5 but less. radius should be estimated as abve because not sphere.
circumference 40,005 or 40,075 not like bad book.
distance to sun 499 light-seconds and bad book off by 90 thousand kilometers.
if we know the circ. only based on radius then we cannot know radius based on circumference. I could claim any number "the radius of the earth must be five meters" because the circumference is 15 meters. how do I know the c? simple 5pi so five times three must be 15. despite the stupidity of the method one website makes that circular claim about the circumference of the earth.
if you use meters and don't mind that a third is 3.33 "repeating" then see below. however in time culture knew to divide in a manner that the parts would simply calculated for example the orbit which defines one year was split into 12 month and the day which is defined by the spin into 24 hours. deceivers try to hide this as if a day is defined by 24 hours. but you must be alert for deception.
the circumference of the earth is known. what about the surface area? we should estimate USING Radius 3956 because nasa estimated "Equatorial radius 3963 miles but Polar radius 3950 miles" we see not precisely a sphere so use mid for estimate. 3956 miles.
from radius we can calculate the surface area. we must not add the mountains to the radius because only small areas have the peaks of 8.8 kilometers high. so for the purpose of this article we will use sea level and include the depth of water in the radius, despite the fact that water covers 72% [based on a flawed book with many problems] and better without water, still for my goal this exception will be relavant.
based on radius the surface area must be 196.7 million square miles and simply "197msm".
the formula: "4pi radius squared." so 12.566 times radius squared totals 196.7 million square miles.
we know the surface of the earth is covered by seventy one percent water. water is "about 71% of the Earth’s surface, while the other 29% consists of continents and islands". universetoday dot com.
so 71% of that is 139.6 million square miles of surface area which is SEA.
196-139=57msm remain above sea level.
the sea surround all the land so the so-called-continents are truly islands and the way to distinguish is to add the true description "giant islands." classifying which group based on size is debatable so simply all are islands but some are giant.
Were I a brit I would want Australia to be a continent so I could brag "we control a continent and a subcontinent" but such bias would be bad. and that is what the bad brits did so we must recognize and reject considering smaller than even "south America" and smaller even than Brazil area.
the bad greeks decided that Greece was in Europe but across the water is separated by water so needs different name: to their east "asia" which is bad because the land CONTIN-ues. so the proper name should be ural continent. also before they dug the narrow shallow suez canal the surface connected to the nile region which if separate should be called nile continent but perhaps shallow does not truly separate so that island is around 33 m. square miles. the second largest island, with the long amazon river and shorter Mississippi river hence good name "amazon" is 16 million square miles. less than half can that be a continent? yet so large... and three times the next one: the southern continent 5.5msm so much less that it cannot be a continent. still we have five fingers on our hand so five is big enuf and certainly the amazon continent. some books say the largest island is Greenland but that is so mach larger than the "second largest" 0.3msm hence separate categories. even the southern continent is a problem as above. the fact is ural continent is truly surrounded by water so it is an island.
now for meters.
circ. is "40 million meters" then radius 6.366. then 4pi radius squared for surface of sphere.
r 6.366? but not perfect sphere so use middle between as above not 6378 too much!
40,041 km so r 6373 hence 510.4m.kms. v,
r squared *4pi
fixing the bad book: in metric should say surface 509 msk as translated from miles. the books number does not metch "even" its own claimed radius ratio.
sea 361.5 but book wrong not total own 378 nor 361.5 but less. radius should be estimated as abve because not sphere.
circumference 40,005 or 40,075 not like bad book.
distance to sun 499 light-seconds and bad book off by 90 thousand kilometers.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)