is Dawkins truly a leader of athiesm?

 
2, for example, the "leader" who uses an organization to honor atheists, wrote about himself: both "an atheist like i am"  p. 34, as well as "i am agnostic" p. 74 in the SAME book... that shows his tricks trying to pretend he is in two groups.... different ideas... just to sell his book. he also admits that he has a doubt he is "not certain that God is not real" p. 74 so that is not an atheist idea... revealing his lie on page 34 as a lie, and undoing his "book title" that God is false since that book is NOT claiming God is false.
THREE
3, he has a section to argue "christians are wrong about the topic killing a fetus"  a fetus is "a clump of cells" misleading people it is like dry skin... while in fact that "clump of cells" even before it has arms is special cells as an entire whole human called "stem cells" a whole entire human... i say this not to BLAME any mother but to uncover his tricks. we once discussed together if  a court showed punish abortion doctors or not. he even blames all christians for the few who killed abortion doctors. i am certain you would never do such actions. yet he uses his book to blame all.
FOUR
4, he writes about the "tragedy" that a college student left college due to his faith as if faith prevents people studying in college... where most students are christian !
FIVE
5, he also has a section where he claims "when famous scientists mention God they are still atheists" which is bizarre considering those authors even Darwin and Hawkings and einstein made the effort to ADD the idea of God into their books... to show they were not denying God... this dawkins is in "denial" he cannot bear that some geniuses believed in God. he bothers to quote that darwin believed "God breathed life" into animals , not just humans in chapter one of genesis. einstein added the name God into his books... to show something. even Hawkings added into his book "the mind off God" to show something but this dawkins cannot bear that brilliant minds disagree with him so claims "that is no proof but they are all atheists", like somebody in pain and denial. he himself is not "certain" as above. so he should not call believers "delusional". mocking all christians and even some  famous scientists such as Nueton, einstein hawkings and even darwin himself was not claiming "evolution replaced God" as some think darwin's idea serves. the fact is darwin was explaining the "diversity" of various creatures. Did God make every species of bird which we find today existing since creation, or did God "breathe life into some" which evolved into many forms. that was the issue for darwin.  the fact that dawkins needs to use such tricks shows that he himself knows he is wrong but only wants to SELL his book to people who will not notice such blatant flaws.