i never knew the two sides of the abortion debate. all my attempts to talk about two sides people went hysterical.
now i decided i must use the internet to learn both sides.
the side pro choice had words.... that lacked any cause to act... at all... nor any cause to kill the fetus or even justify. words such as "parents rarely give a kid for adoption so an unwanted baby has no option for that" as if that justifies killing the fetus?? it is not "unable" just kuz "rare" even rare STILL still able and less evil than killing. claim after claim lacked "reasoning to justify" killing. or even allow not interfere.
one guy wrote "imagine YOU were in a situation like the lady. you discover somebody attached to you "needing your kidney to live" you did not want a stranger attached and using YOUR body... kidneys for their blood.... you would unplug the stranger to die" claims the book, wait does that make the action good proper or MORAL just kuz people are tempted by selfishness??
now i decided i must use the internet to learn both sides.
the side pro choice had words.... that lacked any cause to act... at all... nor any cause to kill the fetus or even justify. words such as "parents rarely give a kid for adoption so an unwanted baby has no option for that" as if that justifies killing the fetus?? it is not "unable" just kuz "rare" even rare STILL still able and less evil than killing. claim after claim lacked "reasoning to justify" killing. or even allow not interfere.
one guy wrote "imagine YOU were in a situation like the lady. you discover somebody attached to you "needing your kidney to live" you did not want a stranger attached and using YOUR body... kidneys for their blood.... you would unplug the stranger to die" claims the book, wait does that make the action good proper or MORAL just kuz people are tempted by selfishness??
the fetus is A SON/DAUGHTER in family their own child, not a stranger and inside not hooked on the outside.
or the argument "when does an acorn change into a tree" as a distraction to stop talking about a fetus well a fetus is neither a tree nor an acorn and i can cut a tree! a fetus is not a tree! just distracting from the fetus.
or the argument "in labs they toss fertilized eggs" as if that proves a fetus attached in ma is the same? that is a lazy comparison lacking "reasoning and justification" for the lab situation? none. maybe same... having doubt in that situation has no influence "in lady" the fetus is attached matbe attached is more important to save than trying to attach a separate fertilized... and still that claim lacks reasoning for fetus lacks justification. after hearing both sides we see that society "morality" led them to kill millions of human fetuses each year, in u.s. 1.2 million.... even more killing than savages did human sacrifice the only difference is more abortions than human sacrifices....
so Is abortion morally EVIL or harmful?
The topic abortion usually sparks strong emotions. rational dialog is almost
___Is abortion morally EVIL?
The topic abortion usually sparks strong emotions. rational dialog is almost impossible [in my experience, despite patient attempts and calm encouragement to present both sides]. on the list of "pro-choice" claims we can dismiss two [which are not the main ones anyway] very simply. one weak claim "abortion is safe for the mother" this does not mean safe for the fetus. many crimes such as kicking a pet dog are "safe for the mother" and also not justify the action. so we can dismiss that and similar "unrelated" claims. the other unrelated claim is: when we consider that abortion clinics do not LIMIT abortions to instances of rape, that fact indicates that they are not "employing the justification" about the "rape victim argument" which does not extend BEYOND rape victims. so that is not truly the justification for abortion in any instance besides rape victims, therefore that claim does not belong on the list. so we analyze the first three on the pro-choice list.
or the argument "when does an acorn change into a tree" as a distraction to stop talking about a fetus well a fetus is neither a tree nor an acorn and i can cut a tree! a fetus is not a tree! just distracting from the fetus.
or the argument "in labs they toss fertilized eggs" as if that proves a fetus attached in ma is the same? that is a lazy comparison lacking "reasoning and justification" for the lab situation? none. maybe same... having doubt in that situation has no influence "in lady" the fetus is attached matbe attached is more important to save than trying to attach a separate fertilized... and still that claim lacks reasoning for fetus lacks justification. after hearing both sides we see that society "morality" led them to kill millions of human fetuses each year, in u.s. 1.2 million.... even more killing than savages did human sacrifice the only difference is more abortions than human sacrifices....
so Is abortion morally EVIL or harmful?
The topic abortion usually sparks strong emotions. rational dialog is almost
___Is abortion morally EVIL?
The topic abortion usually sparks strong emotions. rational dialog is almost impossible [in my experience, despite patient attempts and calm encouragement to present both sides]. on the list of "pro-choice" claims we can dismiss two [which are not the main ones anyway] very simply. one weak claim "abortion is safe for the mother" this does not mean safe for the fetus. many crimes such as kicking a pet dog are "safe for the mother" and also not justify the action. so we can dismiss that and similar "unrelated" claims. the other unrelated claim is: when we consider that abortion clinics do not LIMIT abortions to instances of rape, that fact indicates that they are not "employing the justification" about the "rape victim argument" which does not extend BEYOND rape victims. so that is not truly the justification for abortion in any instance besides rape victims, therefore that claim does not belong on the list. so we analyze the first three on the pro-choice list.
No comments:
Post a Comment