ancient books preserve more ancient

books from ancient PRESERVE the description of the  ORIGINAL bible

when we compare matthew 5.31 to matthew 4.4 we can prove that the book deuteronomy had not yet been written in the time of jesus and not even in the time when book matthew was written= after jesus.

jesus quotes a book WRITTEN ge-grap-ti  a book which does have that quote... but only ten times in the entire gospel of matthew. did jesus say the NAME of the book?

that book which he quoted did have the idea of mathew 4.4 but did it have the idea of writing a divorce?

we see in matthew 5.31 that the book he quoted from was a different book which did not have "written divorce by writing" this  MUST be a book not the book called deuteronomy which differs that it has written both so that book named deuteronomy was  WRITTEN after matthew was written.

did jesus say both ideas were written? certainly not.

part of the evidence is that divorce was "not written" but that is a distraction the real evidence is the DESCRIPTION the ten quotes describe the original book which was not preserved and which differed from the book which the rabbis wrote.

my point is we only assumed it was deuteronomy because we TRUSTED  rabbis but we all know that rabbis did not earn our trust...

jesus quoted some book which did have the ten ideas which he quoted with the word "grap"  with other ideas which are not worth quoting... and that book was not preserved only its description 

in contrast to other ideas in the oral law spoken but not yet written until later written in the book called deuteronomy.

***we can describe the original book has "not test god" and the 9 others but not "divorce by writing" so that is a book different from deuteronomy and we can date that d. was written later containing oral laws yet that was certainly not the book from which jesus quoted from.

for more details

books from ancient PRESERVE the description of the  ORIGINAL bible

for example john 6.31

written bread from above gave to eat yet did not say which book? we have a book with that  IDEA  biut not those words.

 book exodius has IDEA bread from above but not the quote. and never said  WHICH BOOK.

the book matthew includes  MANY ideas from the jewish bible yet only ten have the word "WRITTEN" which PRESERVES  the descriptionof the  ORIGINAL book quoted from

mat 2.5 preserved that at the time mathew as written the words of mica were WRITTEN.

jesus said written for mathew 4.4 but did not say WRITTEN IN WHICH NOOK we match a book with same idea but was that the book source? hesus did not say.

ge-grap-ti is the word for written

mathew 4 has several "written" but after that none until chapter 11.

in contrast chapoter 5 said "heard" these are things not written but "heard" so we know he is not quoting a book which contains both... but a different book which contains what is WRITTEN... not the the jewish deuteronomy but a different one 

mat 5.31 reh write a divorce compare not grap so a book with both not yet written that book duter has both WRITTEN must not be the source.