Tuesday, January 24, 2023

wanda's wedding

wanda's wedding, historical fiction
yay post 900 HUNDREDS such accomplished.
ONE
1949 december, israel, acre
the wedding was wonderful! one woman named wanda wobson was wearing the color that she had always dreamed for her wedding, bright greenish yellow. her parents' pressure had been huge to wear white same as every wedding but wanda wanted her favorite color and demanded "on my special day i can't be society's slave".
wanda had met her husband harold harrison in december 1947 in the same city then called "acre, palestine". his parents called him his jewish name aaron but the british document showed his name harold. his family had fled violence in russia which was also tragicly common in the countries by russia. 
often the religion caused conflict because the orthodox church separate from catholic and protestant blamed the jews for their part in jesus death... which they wanted and needed for forgiveness of sin, but also wanted to blame jews. similarly polish pogroms perpetrated by catholic church... they would not "forgive" the jews until the popes announcement in the 1960's despite the desire that jesus die for their sins since that was benefit in their faith they should thank the jews for their part in the romans killing jesus which atoned sins but accused "deicide" despite not exactly a god... they weekly announce "one god the father with three persons" which is a "mystery" but one god nonetheless since nobody killed "one god the father" jews only shouting that the romans should kill jesus but not the father in heaven, and then the romans killed jesus not god the father it was not truly deicide but for catholics three in one is close enough to be deicide but if jesus death was benefit then the jews part was a part of the benefit and even jesus while on the cross said "forgive them" but catholics refused to submit to their own books and even to jesus for many centuries. despite their own book and these three factors the catholic desire to hate jews was stronger than their holy book and even the foundation of their faith that christ died for their sins.
 these violence events caused death and damage to jews in russia and the region so a man named peter was a refugee fleeing the deadly pogroms and escaped russia into a boat in the black sea. he had bribed a sailor to exchange places so he would work at the sailor's position on the boat and do his jobs until the port in greece.
peter paid the sailor and went aboard the deck of the ship wearing the sailor uniform given to him by the one he bribed. for saving his life as a refugee he lied and showed the sailors paper which lacked a picture and was allowed on board for the job. peter worked hard and obeyed the captain's commands and crew commands too. he frequently made the motion of the cross the way the sailor had taught him so they would not suspect he was from a jewish family.
the slow journey went to port after port many ports along the west coast of the black sea but peter stayed on and worked. obviously much cargo was unloaded and loaded on the ship at each port. the ship passed between a narrow strait and reached the nile sea called mediteranean which is greek for med=middle between terra=land between the lands. every sea is med-terra like the adriatic sea and north sea and baltic sea so the name was the local greek name.
when the boat arrived in a greek port peter carried cargo off from the ship ashore... but undressed in the shack. he had stuffed a long sleep gown into a bag he carried so he put on the long robe. he added the cloth turban and walked out asking "mosk? mosk?" which nobody understood.
the weekly wages he had earned were with him so he had purchased a ticket to the ancient land of king solomon then named israel, but at the time of the trip named palestine due to the roman control and the name stayed for centuries. as the sun set he kneeled and pretended to pray to alla despite his rejection of any religious book. he looked like a muslim in the gown and prayed five times a day.
after a short trip of around 8 days he came to acre, palestine. he continued the muslim act by joining the muslim community in acre which was pronounced akka in arabic. he was offered a bride as common in that era and the muslim culture so he wed her in a muslim ceremony with the qadi.
peter had a daughter by his wife and she was palestinian by birth. when she reached age 14, peter arranged his daughter's marriage to a jew from europe. he prefered a jew due to his own true secret family. he used the muslim authority granted to father for arrange her wedding as he desired. their daughter, peter's granddaughter, was a jewish palestinian due to her father. she changed her name to wanda and when she met hari in 1947, they started a relationship.
a year after the name was "renewed returned refreshed israel" they wed in 1949. when the government changed from british to mixed israeli jew with israeli arab in parliament called knesset, wanda's ma rejected islam, that was in 1948. she begged her relatives to stay in the same city but they obeyed the arab leaders by leaving the british borders that had been established in the 1920's between british palestine and egypt when egypt was granted independence. similarly the border was set when jordan became independent only jew land needed to wait many years all the 1930's and until 1948 before its independence. just long enough that the jews had nowhere to flee from the nazis. harold claimed that britain had chosen not to  enforce the german disarmement agreement but allowed, so he complained,  the nazi to build a vast air force... this would lead to the 2 thinhs brits wanted, glory: a guaranteed british glorious victory and less jews would try come to british palestine because the nazis would obey hitlers well known published book that jews are germs and no crime to kill harmful germs.
when the cease fire was established in june 1949 she again sent a telegram to call her relatives back to her city, the war ended that month, but they wrote that they would not return. the new governemnt did the same as austria and other governments and annuled the ownership of abandoned homes which was justified as government and even more justified when the "ex-owner" did not come when he was able when hostilities ended in 1949. 
in 1952, one cousin wrote that he would come, but she replied that they missed their chance in 1949 once hostilities ended they had no excuse "to flee a war zone" and had not returned using that excuse. by 1952, she explained it was too late and certainly later was even later than too late.
hari asked his marriage mom why she left islam?
she explained that the quran said that the bible of moses was good and the teaching of jesus was light therefore she felt a conflict when the teachers claimed the christian book was corrupt... that violated her commitment to quran and surely alla knew if it was corrupt yet long after the christian version was published the quran wrote it is good so she believed the quran and that the teachers were deceiving her. so she left the lying teachers of islam and went to the light of the book of jesus as she had always believed due to the quran.
she noticed that the stories were parallel yet different. when muslims say "jesus never said he was god" they mean in THEIR OWN quran the quote was not included but the christian bible has conflicting sources on this issue.
jesus did say he and the father are one... semmingly claiming diviniy and the jews understood that and were furious. she herself was between the two faiths considering jesus spoke often in parable he only meant symbolicly they are one same as usualy spoke parables and symbolic "eat my body" meaning faith.
hari challenged her why she did not go to the catholic church if she believed in the new testament.
she had studied the new testament and knew that biblical peter was married and that bishops must have one wife, in book timothy, not that peter appointed bishops as leader but the community chose someone with one wife, therefore the so-called bishops of catholic were not real bishops fue to without one wife and if any fake bishop appointed pope no real bishop existed so the appointment of pope was a fraud therefore when the fraud pope appointed by non bishops who did not have one wife, and was not married himself, he was not truly the pope with the pope authority to appoint bishops as catholics claim. so the pope was not appointed by a true bishop who could not appoint a pope who was "based on peter" while peter was married in contrast to the pope not matching its own basis of peter... the biblical peter. similarly the appointments by the unappointed pope, were not real cardinal kuz  not by a true pope so they were not true bishops neither by appointment of pope nor the biblical rule of one wife in paul's letter to timothy which catholics consider holy but ignore.
for these reasons she left islam despite its billion "talkers" who say i am muslim, (oops not "believers" we only hear words and see not teach wife to cover face) who were not troubled by that conflict, or were too scared of their neighbors... she had been scared too even under the british until the liberal israel government. 
when she left islam she did not accept catholic due to the pope problem not being married to one wife. 
hari challenged her to do the common baptism of christianity but she had her answer for that too based on her holy book, the holy bible said one baptism. was that water? if so then the verse on corinthians (oops not colosians) all were baptised by spirit is false because one baptism not more. the fact that baptism is by spirit revealed the lie of those who claim baptism is "always water" but there not water so not every... in fact water was before jesus just a custom of john the baptist not the new faith which truly had baptism of spirit and truly one baptism, no other as one in ephesians, which she believed holy apostolic until her coworker gave a paper from bible college about deuteropaul books.
she did not fit in with the protestants either who teach water baptism despite not obligation, nor necessity same as those on the cross not baptised yet still her neighbors encouraged... but she felt that added beyond the one baptism as above.
hari was impressed by her consistency but did not accept any god. he said "i cannot reach any conclusion so it cannot affect my faith nor actions".
TWO
1950 january, acre israel. wanda was noticeably pregnant, around 17 weeks but hari did not want the responsibility of a child so he urged his wife to abort the fetus. she beleieved in christianity which taught "sanctity of life" she cannot end the life of the fetus. he tried to pursuade her "it is in your body so you can eject it if you want" she argued even if she wanted that is not realy her body since the baby is a mix of his genetic stuff. they knew that in the 1940's too. hari realized he was wrong the fetus was not her body. hari demanded a divorce... guess what? jesus taught you cannot divorce. 
in desperation he tried to find a solution, despite fetus not her body but part him, he said "your body is a SLAVE to the fetus so "that choice you have for your body." wanda answered that is still not an excuse to kill it kuz only can eject it, to free herself she must have arrangements so it will not die but abortion kills it. hari was very angry at religion but his buddy said dont you believe if i broke your window that would be bad. hari agreed that is harm and bad damage. so the pal continued from the fetus perspective you are harming the fetus even a small injury is damage same as evil damage to break a window so worse if it would stop living.
so hari simply traveled to haifa. in haifa he could not find work and was expelled from his apartment home. the same night criminals who happened to speak aabic stole his shoes and stabbed this kofir the denier of muhamed and that was the end of harold harrison. had harold went to hell? how can we know? 
the end. 





top videos 1988, 1989

1. Batman 1989, $251M
Batman battled crime. this time he faced the dangerous and deadly Joker.
2. Indiana Jones 1989, $197M see success list
3. Rain Man 1988, $179M Drama
in l.a. a man heard that his brother got the inheritance, a fortune. he traveled with the heir, hoping to get from the fortune.
4. Who Framed Roger Rabbit 1988, $156M
a cartoon rabbit was suspected of murder. it asked a detective to hide itself because it got "framed". (their summary was awful, if *accused the accuser must prove not the defendant) how will they stop the evil plot to dissolve toon town?
5. Lethal Weapon 2 1989, $147M
2 men followed diplomats who are misusing their immunity for real crimes.
6. Look Who's Talking 1989, $140M
a single lady birthed the child of a married man. a cab driver romanced her. the newborn baby's thoughts can be heard as it went on an adventure.
next 131m<140m

analyzing the responses to suffering

analyzing the responses to suffering
as usual fox news "bothered" to bring both sides. i mean in the past they gave voice to those who criticized dnc democrats and also gave voice to family guy that used its comedy to poke at some fox news people... fox hosted family guy... which poked at bob dole republican and used comedy for "associations of evil to rnc names" several times not to both sides just the rnc, and even including a fox news guy who the family guy people hated for his different opinions and mentioned by name in family guy while fox hosted both family guy and that news guy.
similarly in hurricane ian when the people in florida suffered deaths and damage fox bothered to bring BOTH sides and we can see which responses were humane and which responses were the delay of aid while emphasizing "using people sufferings to attack political rivals" the way fascists had done.
fox started with the president response as expected in any crisis what does the leader respond? this time biden dnc "predicted the future" this "might be a substantial loss of life" instead of focusing on now, he predicted the future why would he do that? we will see his cruel agenda. following the dnc tradition of dnc truman atom bomb worse than poison gas on whole families and in general fdr dnc "strategy" of sending soldiers into danger when the same soldiers could be used differently but president is commander in chief and when c in c is dnc we see he preferrd to ignore risks and send his citizens into danger in the wrong order no sanctity of life neither his own citizens nor japanese families. and this dnc tradition continues as biden dnc predicted the future and used fear mongering not about facts and current suffering but the future...
if we know that the governor of florida is rnc then we understand biden dnc poke.. he wants to distract from "something" by emphasizing fear and the best way to baselelssly cause fear is "fear the future death sounds scary" and this "maybe substantial death" look at those words of gobldy gook what the bleep is "substantial death" when we talk about death
???
what kind of description is substantial just vague deception to shift blame of death to rnc in florida. instead of responding about now suffering he used the danger not only for a fear mongering prediction which is the future not known but worse biden dnc politiciesd used suffering and death to hint an accusation at the rnc governor. not enough deaths now... "possibly in future substantial deaths" we see the emphasis on the future instead of SHOWING empathy now... serving teh political purpose make the rival rnc look bad by using suffering and future predictions.
in contrast we see the humane emphasis at fox news despite bringing both sides the president dnc horrifying fear mongering response also the other side the humane side peole are suffering nature harming their homes, i add people wanna live in pleasant environments the furniture and furnishings and decorations and the feeling of home... destroyed by fast winds 150 miles per hour winds! damaging homes fox news focused n the damage and the suffering that is humane...
NOW WE can comprehend what biden dnc was distracting from dont think about the suffering and the need for assistance to rebuild, money should not go for humane showing empathy and help in damage instead money should go for the climate change agenda instead and delay the aid and focus on the scary death and the future instead.
governor of florida is rnc then we know HOW people voted... the majority of  VOTERS voted rnc.  now we comprehend biden dnc knows WHO VOTED FOR THE RNC those are the VOTERS who elected rnc so when he can, biden dnc wants to punish them for electing desantis and other rnc instead of dnc so let them suffer longer and longer and distract the public with scary death if not now "maybe" the scary death toll will rise. so those are the two sides.
talking about scary death is for what we NOT notice as fox news reporter pointed out and emphasized "we are not seeing assistance nor aid" and we are "waiting for biden to send aid" that is the humane response SHOWING empathy and mercy caring about their suffering they need help, that is the humane side and biden could hsend aid but instead we see the other side biden dnc DELAYED sending aid? AS ABOVE WE KNOW HOW VOTERS VOTED IF RNC GOT ELECTED IF I CAN I WILL LET EM SUFFER LONGER.
not only was he delaying aid and assistance bby not sending rushed aid he is distracting people by making future predictions... it served the political purpose to say "your cars are warming the planet and making storms worse" the emphasis of dnc campaign, and SPENDING instead of SHOWING empathy now for the suffering and caring enough to send aid immediately and asistance to rebuild... we return to the idea of warming, while fox brought both sides mainstream media was quoted but also the other side "it is very bad causing suffering "fourth worst" that fact indicated the pattern "intensity is not increasing" the past had three powerful storms more intense and more powerful and instead now less intense despite added emissions from MILLIONS of truck engines since then. so that refuted the idea of intensifying. these is no pattern of each year a stronger storm instead te strong storm is less than the past which is why biden had to speak of the future and whhat "may be" not the now when it is less intense than the three stronger ones.
and not sending aid for rebuilding.
so biden dnc speaking of scary death not only distracted from his punishing voters but also showed the politicization of people suffering by dnc  to make rnc look bad as if not rescuing despite truly rescue efforts.
not only to distract from the cruel lack of aid which fox reported as news "we dont see aid" that is news NOW despite seeing the damage and suffering instead of helping the suffering with merciful action biden jabbed the political rival rnc emphasizing scary death to make the rival rnc look bad. but before we show the other side of the death we ned to comprehemd that he did that as a distraction from something "more evil" which is the cold hearted delay not sending aid as presidents have done in the past. trump sent aid to new orleans so biden is even worse than trump by biden dnc delaying aid... in fact trump rnc might not be as bad as people claimed considering helping the flooding etc. in new orleans in that tragic flooding in his watch done by the weather.
now we return to the accusation against rnc governor... the accusation is about the future not even now! one side is to blame the governor for bad management people are dying what is the other side? fox again presented both sides "helicopters are flying rescue missions the roads are damaged but peole were instructed to stay off the roads for rescuers" the emphasis is on the resuce efforts so dont accuse rnc governor for nature deaths when he is arranging rescue activities. in contrast to the cold hearted delaying of aid done by dnc biden. those are the two sides.
again fox brought both sides about climate change the mainstrearm news talks about "cliamte change" meaning human influenced warming... and fox did not hide their opinion instead they brought both fox quoted them and also the other side when cnn tried to get a scientist to say the storm was intensified by climmate change the scientist did not agree. hmm who is ignoring science? is "denying climate change ignoring science? the scientists did not agree".
as we see the fact is not a patten of intensifying but the opposite  less severe than three stronger storms and the fact is rescue effrts are being done but instead sending aid by biden dnc is delayed to punish voters who voted for rival rnc as we see by who got elected. he used the suffering for the future "may be many deaths" as if rnc in not doing enough when in fact he is aranging the management of rescue efforts... despite the delay in aid from biden dnc with his continued tradition of cold hearted ignoring suffering it is more impottant for him to falsely accuse the political rival rnc in florida than to act humane by rushing aid to the people to rebuild their homes and businesses.
the mainstream used the suffering to emphasize the political agenda of over emphasizing climate change as if until not climate was "not change stable?" as "sheldon the genius" said in comedy big bang "change is not ealy change when something has always been changing" then change is consstent continuing the pattern not a real "change in the pattern". in fact if the stron storm is weaker we see not intensufying from the three stronger storms which is why biden cant talk about now he prefers to make prediction about death for fear mongering whch peole wont notice due to his emphasis to blamernc for the deaths falsely while he is arranging rescue activities. the opposite of dnc sending covid positive to "isolation with old people" meaning those with higher risk of flu death lets give them the risk of lung infection... which is merely continuing the dnc "tradition" of non-sanctity of life risk the elderly people despite the family cares about them... dont limit harm to fetus despite life and undoubtedly different dna than mother not fetus is not "her body" and undoubtedly a human life.
the ephasis on climate change is not only politicization but distracted from the humane response showing empathy and sending aid which biden dnc delayed that is teh two sides one side delayed aid despite suffering and distracts from his cruelty by talking about something else something scary deaths, not now now is less severe than past so the prediction with doubt... about may be big deaths because now not worse than previous storms so he must use future doubt to make it seem worse than it is, when we know the intesntity was less than three strong storms in the past so truly a relative lessening in intensity and make the rival rnc look bad falsely because only the future possibilty not now when rescue operations are performed.
as expected fox critices the emphasis on climate change which dnc agenda is pushing... by showong the other side people are suffering have a humane reaction of showing empathy and emphasizing the rescue efforts and the desire of people to rebuild. instead of showing empathy for the sufering they use the suffering for political fear mongering about the future as above and for falsely blaming rnc rival for many deaths when truly rescue effrots are performed and since now not worse he needs to deceive people that it "may be more deaths" only a possibility but scary death distracts from the doubt and the certainty that the winds were ACTUALY less... DESPITE added truck emissions by millions of truck engines from millioons of gallons of fuel added since those past storms and since last hurricane season...despite that less intense... what about calling c02 the "evil greenhouse gas" that would mean both their and "your constant breathing" emits co2 the "evil green house gas". like how dare we breathe if co2 is bad. look at those athletes straining and gasping for air as they run... exhaling... omg maybe we should ban nfl then we would have less greenhouse gas than simple breathing and less misuse of public tv for opinion in general which i cant hold MY sign at the football game but the can kneel to insult the national symbol... cancelling nfl is a win win... no public insult and less co2. 
still, the truth is we need the water vapor and co2 to hold part of the heat and indeed EVERY evening heat does escape not trapped but some heat stays due to wate vapor and co2 which we need so we wont FREEZE LIKE MARS OR THE MOON.
so we have analyzed the two sides and seen that fox bothered to bring both sides which is great for analysis and news companies instea of one sided bias reporting that i see on another news that i stiopped watching in contrast fox brought both sides the humane side of caring and the DESIRE to help showing empathy and merciful assistance in emphasizing rescue efforts and the desire to send aid... which cold hearted dnc biden delayed... and the other side the non humane reply to use the suffering to distract people from the lack of aid and only to cause fear about the future using "maybe" and the unknown future for politics to falsely accuse the rival rnc and make them seem bad in theeyes of the simple people who here "scary death" and the emphasis on climate change which might noy be a priority compared to education of YOUR KIDS and grandchildren... and other issues... but using their suffering not as an oppurtunity to ACT merciful and show empathy but to EXTEND TEH SUFFERING by delaying aid and assistance to use the suffering for the emphasis on the expensive climate change agenda whic might not be a prioriy over other issues but due to suffering seems important sdespit ethe fact that it is not intensifying but truly LESS than previous major storms despite the added emissions since last year and precvious storms as above.
also the "potential limitation of pollution in u.s. " will have no effect when africa and china are polluting the sea and air unstoppable at ahuge rate the amount of plastic pouring out of china rivers into the sea has been measured and despite the chinese are sinking the world boat nobody can slow them down... and instead of focusing on the "plastic flowing from river to sea" in every country including china which pollutes much more the propaganda speaks of "use of plastic" obviously richer countries can afford "single use and throw products" but the issue is not the use but where it WENT and goes plastic cups are recyclable with that number and people are probably putting them in the "bins" same as plastic bottles in cintrast to africa and india and china's billions and billions despite not "reich enough to use single use" and throw so truly "less use" that is only a distraction from where it GOES the plastic used does go into china rivers and from them into the sea and while u.s. rivers also flush plasti out we know the rate of china pollution is more both in plastic and air pollution of gas emissions not only co2 but poison gasses from industry which nobody can slow down so as long as the "chinese drill a hole in their cabin in the boat" nobody can go in and stop them so the efforts to have less pollution elsewhere will have no difference when the air and water is getting poisoned anyway and nobody can "trespass" and slow down the china government nor the billions and billions of chinese and india and africa truly billions not just fear exageration as bad biden dnc but real billions and real flowing from rivers to sea that is a huge problem to emphasize not the "use of plastic cups" that have the recycle number on them and modernized countries such as u.s. do recycle or other modernized countries can "burn at high temperatures" enough heat to split the ch into water vapor in contrast to regular fires which are just filthy smoke. but we conclude with the two sides of the response to suffering in the hurricane euther the humane response added by fix the showing of empathy to suffering and the desire to hellp and rescue missins which sho acting merciful and the desire for aid from biden while the ugly truth that biden did delay it and the other side how dnc tried to use the suffering for political agaenda as above instead of acting humane and sending aid bt they hated desantis too much and they know WHO VOTED FOR THE RNC those are the VOTERS who elected rnc biden dnc wants to punish them for electing desantis and other rnc instead of dnc so let them suffer longer and longer and distract the public with scary death if not now "maybe" the scary death toll will rise. 
so those are the two sides.

Monday, January 23, 2023

a hebrew poem about faith in jesus fulfilled prophecy

 אני אוהב אוֹתְךָ בְּכָל לִבִּי

על הברית שתורה שלך בלב
ישוע מת לשלם עבורי
החיה אותו ועל ימין יושב

רק בחסדך ולא במעשים
מתנה שהמאמין לא יאובד
טיהרת לבי חידשת אותי
אתה איתי ואני לא לבד
 
את צורכינו אנא לנו תתן
כמו סיפור אכילת לחמים
מַלְכוּתְךָ תתגלה גם בָּאָרֶץ
כִּי מלכותך לְעוֹלְמֵי עוֹלָמִים

גילית בישוע אַהֲבָתְךָ
לשלם עבורי ברחמים
אנא שלח לנו את יְשׁוּעָתְךָ
כִּי מלכותך לְעוֹלְמֵי עוֹלָמִים

did paul teach the divinity of jesus

most Christians claimed they believe in a trinity. both protestant and catholic claim they believe in a trinity meaning "one god three persons." so monotheism.
does that mean the analogy "a man worked as a judge. he stopped working as a judge and started working as a chef. this is the same person whether his title is chef or judge" but that is not the faith! jesus prayed not by my will but yours. they have separate wills.
origen specified jesus was less than god... that is not the same one nor a real god. undoubtedly origen knew gospel john where jesus said i and father are one but he also knew that as usual jesus spoke in symbols and parables... as he often did. he does not mean the "same one with different functions"  as described but a symbol as usual a parable.  
in fact paul specified several times that jesus is not the same as theo same as origen in Origen, First, 33–4 [I.3 despite knowing john chapter ten. 
when paul said "god raised jesus from the dead in romans, if truly dead they are not the same one because god raised him while he was dead. no need to separate body... as paul specified there and in cor. the spirit of god theo but jesus is lord not theo surely he knew john 10 but still taught not the same one. jesus spoke as usual in a symbol.
the "attractive hook" at the start of john seems to say both parts. if we replace the word "word" with jesus but that is neither the local meaning nor pauls faith.
the "word was with god" is separate not the same one... but which word? the word was god that is the letters with god. not as they claimed jesus was both with and god. that does not say which word god spoke? but he specified the word was god that was the word which was with god. the word became flesh. which word the word god became flesh. both paul and origen knew this and still distinguished not the same one.
the claim of divinity could be based on paul if he said jesus is theo the same word but instead it is baseless and differed frrom paul. so the trinity is not theo as most protestant and catholic claim that religion abandoned not only the teachings of paul but even their own book. only of someone distinguished theo from lord not divine and not theo are they trusting the word of god.
since jesus is less he is certainly not the same one nor a real god but less than god. if so hiw can his sacrifice drath pay for sins? because he is lord beyond any human even if son of god, believers are sons, but the son of god jesus was more, he was lord, so his death cleaned sins while still not god as paul and origen dared to write despite knowing john 10 still jesus words are same as usuual a symbol a nd parallel whereas precision is jesus is lord not theo.





Sunday, January 22, 2023

gender identity

 in this generation the people make ENORMOUS EFFORT  to blur gender as if chromosomes are not real. if i say xy chromosomes distinct they reply xxy... did they agree xy is male? they only argue about xxy so they have agreed xy is male dedpite words. even if we assume xxy is doubt still xy is male almost everyone can be identified by xy those with the smaller called y are male those xx can be identified is female. EVERY cell testified MILLIONS of witnesses which is male and which female.

but they argue equality means same, wrong equal respect differs from same.

"menstruation affected blood pressure" so the amount of blood pressure considered healthy differs from male to female. separate CHARTS due to REAL differences between male or female not same, not one chart and the contents of chart differ.

if i say menstruate the liars reply dont talk about personal... to hide the distinction but the fact is healthy females drip but healthy men dont drain uteral  blood.

the deceivers will argue "you are saying young girls are male" to play word games... but young girls are not mature they potentialy will menstruating if healthy.

so i rephrase the bodily structure for menstruating distinguished female, not the ouuter slots but the bodily structure for menstruation is the distinction even if not menstruate meaning not drip due to age older or younger.

the fact is menstruation often caused CRAMPS men do not get monthly menstrual cramps that differs and can affect army service. both male and female can be distracted by other bodily fluids..  although honestly wevknow fear releases them.. but females have added monthly menstrual cramps that can be dangerous in battle.

so due to word games and "call me him" the objective truth is bodily structure of menstruation distinguished gender and even has effect on blood pressure so the liars with "no menstruation structure" who say call me lady are still objectively male.

the religion named science

after criticism of ancient religion in preceding post i also critical of the religion  named science which has been acting like evil religion. 

 people use "ridiculed" method if anyone dared to doubt the global warming  "humans caused" you "can't deny science"

yet science used the same as blind religion, if you dont understand it say it and accept it regardless. if a science book claimed the universe or matter in universe is a finite time that is history not science... despite the benefits of peer review that experts inspect each other, the benefit ABSENT in religion and in religious books... nobody DARES to fix even known "scribal errors" nobody inspected the content!

an error will stay preserved without fixing so religion is harmful yet blind faith in science books is just as absurd.

i cant disprove global warming i can only exhibit that the "heat is not trapped" each night and other facts that challenged the emotional "concerned scientists"

when science should be separated from emotion. 

when astrophysics claimed the galaxies are moving apart... that has big problems we  need permission to doubt the blind faith of the religion called science DESPITE its advantages and reliability over ancient religions. 

when science claimed the matter in universe is around 14 billion years age how did they get that. not that religion is better but  how? i asked a physicist who explained the academic blind faith when they can SEE it is false but choose blind faith.

galaxies are moving apart in a way that space seemed to expand between them like "surface of a sphere" they extrapolated from the separation that last year they were nearer therefore a finite time they were near each other so further  past perhaps one inch of volume. i challenged this part in a preceding post too.

the same astrophysics book also claimed andromeda galaxy is moving NEARER to earth based on blue shift in contrast to the fact that galaxies are moving apart based on red shift... but that means not a central outward motion from one  center which is the assumption for calculated age.

if as they claimed central then all move parallel with angles but that conflicted observations of blue shift indicating not apart and not as magazine said "paint dots on the surface of an expanding balloon" that explanation conflicted observation not even one would move toward another if their description  was not false.

we know from observation that is real science that their description is false. 

if two are moving nearer they must not claim moving out from a center to extrapolate the nearness in the past. simply admit it is a mystery why some move apart and some move together.

consider the equation rt=d rate times time totals distance. if rate is finite less than speed of light called c, as modern science claimed,  matter cant move faster than c, then r<c. also time if they claimed apart indicates the past nearness of 14b. also finite then we can compute distance between the opposite galaxies. simply choose a past moment in past yesterday and multiply rt since r<c for matter and t at a moment in past is finite then the total distance is LESS than 14c from center and opposite galaxies from center not more than, but certainly less than 28 billion light years distance at that past time so the volume between edges of matter would be computable but... only if truth is they move apart which they know is false... at least one is not moving apart not moving away from the same assumed center as those estimating the speed of apart that started 14b years ago. that is also blind faith despite knowing the exception as above. the theory can be identified as false just as easily as the earth center failed to explain some of the nearby planets... they knew it was not an explanation but the religious book psalms said "the earth stands" not move therefore sun must move around earth despite the failure to explain some of the planets called regression... now we smile smugly at their foolishness while we REPEAT the same foolishness... we know not all move apart  yet calculate as if all were moving apart and had been together... not only is that presumption in doubt we have enough data to know it is the "wrong explanation" but nobody can deny science... even whrn failed to explain observation which should be based on observation by its own rules.

they  know the claim of apart is false yet use it to ridicule the religions that claim thousands of years age... like at jew weddings... that is allowing personal desire to influence the result and ignore the fact that the same book of astrophysics said for beginners at least one is not apart if so their description is certainly false not to defend six thousand but because the religion called science has the same danger of blind faith as ancient religion. even when they could notice not all apart so cant imagine nearer until center the model is already known to be false yet the scientists are just as blind as blind religion in their emotional will to mock the false thousand, they claim billions but the model is certainly false. they could see not one center of big bang so neither method the religious 10^3 nor 14x10^9 is a valid explanation for the universe. so admit mystery... until AFTER  a suggestion succeeded. 

the issue was only emphasised to mock religion not due to real science such claimed about past is history and false history as above.