Thursday, March 25, 2021
star trek episode spock's brain
Saturday, March 13, 2021
star trek 5800's
star trek the 5900's
Thursday, March 11, 2021
my summary of "Turnabout Intruder" TOS star trek
intro: around 3 days after Kirk dueld and kild c.green... and flew away from the lava planet, "stardate 5928.5".
Enterprise flew orbiting a ringed planet. Mccoy and Spock beamd down with Kirk.
they visit Janice Lester who lay in bed. Surgeon, Doctor Arthur Coleman=dc was nursing her illness.
unexpectedly, Spock's tricorder detected faint life-form readings. she grabd kirk's arm so he stayd with her, while the other 3, go to investigate. Kirk talkd with her until he examind a device. she presd the remote-control so it trapd Kirk. she energeticly walkd to it, while smiling at the success of her trick. she stood beside him. it swapd their conciousness. now she is impostor captain=i.c', but he is in her body that the device weakend. ic' can fulfill her dream to be captain of a star ship. so ic' started to strangle her, to kill kirk. luckily for kirk, the others return so ic' stopd.
McCoy reported to ic' that all the mission staff died. he debated with dr. c' which treatment for her. ic' lifted her and they beam up.
a medical team pushed a bed to bring her to sickbay as ic' had orderd. there, ic' and Dr. C discuss her [the body containing kirk's conciousness]. despite dc's previous aid, to indirectly allow ic' to murder "Kirk," [delay mccoy's return], he refuses to actively kill her=Kirk.
McCoy came to treat his new patient. ic' orderd him to allow dr.c' to continue nursing her. McCoy intensley protested [his treatment differd and his patient now.] she awoke ergo nurse Chapel, an enterprise nurse, injected a sedative as dC directed.
ic' orderd Sulu to go to a hospital on Benecia. when Spock argued about the course, ic' showd anger, and went to Kirk's quarters.
there, "he" filed his nails, [hinting janice continued her habit], while mccoy askd to nurse HIS new patient, insted of dc' who has a bad record. ic' insisted dc' will continue. McCoy claimd that the captain is "under influence" ergo demanded a mental exam for "erratic" thinking. the bridge cald the captain.
In sickbay, she awoke and they argued. she demanded mccoy come and claimd a mind swap. Dr. Coleman told Nurse Chapel that she had paranoia for six months. He told Kirk, "You are insane, Dr. Lester." she lookd at her own face in a mirror and showd confusion.
later, she awoke and talkd with Chapel, who gave her a glass cup with juice. when chapel left she broke the cup and used its glass to cut the restraints.
McCoy spoke with Spock about the captain's odd behavior. the captain is under some influence of mental illness. ic' enterd the room. she ran along a corridor. before she coud talk with mccoy [not 2], ic' hit her, to mccoy's horror, and orderd her to isolation.
Spock enterd the room, escorted by one of the two door gards. she told Spock about the "life-entity" swap and askd for a vulcan mind meld. Spock saw the truth. the gard blockd the exit. Spock performd Vulcan nerv pinch, as Gard calld for help.
after McCoy examind ic', they hear by intercom that she escaped. ic' arrived where Spock also nerv pinchd the gard in the corridor by the door. spock surrenderd to ic' who broadcasted a call for a "court martial of Spock" for mutiny.
The judges gatherd. Scott questiond Spock, who claimd that by mind-meld he knows about the swap. Scott demands concrete proof . McCoy testifyd that his exams show ic' is mentally healthy. spock requested ic' bring her as a witness. she came and claimd the swap. ic' ridiculed that idea and accused Spock of mutiny, as ic's emotion intensified.
finally the judges consulted before the vote. McCoy and Scott agree that ic' showd hysteria.
if they vote spock innocent, then ic' will claim "you joind the mutiny".
ic' was recording this conversation, and accused them of joining the mutiny. ic' orderd the death penalty to all the mutineers. Chekov and Sulu protest "the death penalty is forbidden" [except one different law]. ic' angrily orders McCoy, Scott and Spock imprisond. ic' orderd a group execution.
while flying, Sulu and Chekov moved their hands away from their controls. luckily for kirk, the transfer started weakening. ic' ran to DC in a lab to tell him. he repeated "i wont kill her." He gives ic' a lethal hypospray. they hurry to kill "her with kirk" before the swap will wear off...
ic' switched off the cell's force field. before ic' can inject her, with "lethal hypospray" the swap effect wore off and ended. captain kirk, now kirk as before, holds the hypospray and does not kill her. she cryd. people talkd. ent' flew away to the next adventure.
Tuesday, March 9, 2021
is good different than evil? a star trek episode Savage Curtain
5906 is around ten days after 5840, preceding episode. note: now announced again "five year mission" despite date 5900 and considering 5900-1500=4400, and author theory of one per day: not match if so 5*365<2000 yet story truly containd "five years" ergo each is less than a day and as a fan proved each around 3 hours kuz around seven per earth day .
story: on date 5906, Enterprise was scanning a planet. its surface was molten lava. the lights on the bridge flickerd, due to power from the surface that scand the ent'. the crew saw a glow that transformd into Abraham Lincoln.
Captain Kirk and crew wore fancier uniforms with decorations such as a shiny strip, to welcome the "former president" as he claimd, with Presidential honors. the planet changed. solid land emerged from under the lava, it has plants and people and air.
In the transporter room, security officers stood ready with phasers set to "heavy stun." Scott beamd Lincoln aboard. music sounded with drums. Doctor McCoy scand l' and told Kirk that he is human. Kirk led Lincoln for a brief tour of the vehicle. next l' spoke with Lieutenant Uhura and then with Spock.
kirk met with the head crew to talk about this impostor, which is probably a trap. meanwhile, l' talkd more with Uhura. Spock noted that the trap was illogical. considering we saw their power, to interfere with the systems. if their goal was to kill them or destroy the ship, they already could. Kirk declares that their mission IS to seek civilizations, and now is an opportunity for that.
Kirk beamd down with Lincoln and Spock. the crew find the devices, most importantly the phasers stayed on the transporter pads.
on land of planet Excalbia, Surak [a being in the form of vulcan] greeted them. Kirk stated they won't cooperate with the charade. then, a boulder transforms alive. its hands are lobster-like claws. the being explaind that they study visitors to learn other "philosophies". now the purpose is to compare good and evil. kirk must battle the ones "considered evil" in human philosophy. the four combatants are: the human Colonel Green, a deceitful and genocidal leader during 21st century. another human Genghis Khan the ancient conqueror. a klingon [a being in the form of the founder of the Klingon Empire], and a Tiburonian. these are considered evil in human philosophy. however the human lincoln is considered "good" in western human philosophy as well as the vulcan named surak who had successfully negotiated ending the "final" war on Vulcan. these 2 will help the K&S represent "good".
Green advised Kirk that all eight should join to battle the natives, [um rock beings?] Kirk replyd that he knows that Green usually attakd during negotiations, when unexpected. indeed, while green talkd with kirk, g' walkd causing kirk to turn his back toward g's henchmen. during the dialog, Green's henchmen attakd. the four "good" wrestled with the four "evil" conquerors.
first, khan [fur shawl] heaved a stone. when kirk turned to look, green punched kirk. the 4 pairs started wrestling.
kirk wrestled with green [red shirt].
klingon attacked lincoln.
t' [long hair] first quikly overpowerd surak, next t' started wrestling spock.
lin', crouching, threw klingon over his head and down to the ground, before he heaved kl' aside.
g' gripd kirk who jabd an elbow into g'. when g' pushed kirk down, k' kickd him using both feet.
after kl' fled, l' advanced and wrestled khan until l' swung khan away. finally, team evil retreated.
[note: other summary did not detail this battle. the many fans who could easily summarize the battle, did not, nor the previous wrestling, so i must type and summarize despite my weak memory, i needed to improve yesterdays version too, now fixd].
vegetarian and atomic bombs
vegetarian and atomic bombs
have you ever heard about the vegetarian who attacked the workers [human] in a beef factory? we would not want to connect with cruel vegetarians. even by association.
if the "good guys" perform violent actions, then what is the difference? why are they good? an episode in "star trek" [season three in 1969] deals with this issue so i introduce 2 ideas:
1, we know that rules, such as "red lights" at intersection, do have exceptions. ambulances in action "violate" as an exception, and this exception indicate that the "ends" do justify the "means" even the "same action" that violates the "law to stop at right lights." the law, which has a purpose to share the area of the intersection among many drivers going different directions, has an exception... everyone must stop except ambulances, to show that the ends do justify the means. using the ends to justify the means is "not evil" as my ma lied to me, unless the goal is evil. such as using the ambulance to selfishly get to the sport event faster than others insted of its purpose which is to quikly go to ill people and "move them"=ambulate, to the hospital.
that red light excepton teaches that the same action, forbidden to me, is justifyd by the end goal. the only doubt is the "price." but the idea "ends justify means" is not wrong.
if someone is dying then that justifies exceptions in rules even for a doubt maybe the ambulance was called for somebody dying... or a prank.
the good guys use "weapons and force" for rescue missions, to save other people, for a different goal "ends" than the evil people. the goal does justify the violence while those who use violence to control others are by that definition evil.
for example in the following debate about vegitarian, the lady trying to prevent dialog was the evil one by trying to control other people.
THE STORY
once, many years ago, a group of guests sat by a table. the host and hostess served chicken to each plate. one guest, a young teenage girl protested "dont give me meat." i replied "what is your reason?" the hostess... probably based on past experience of people arguing, interfered and said "dont talk about that". the teen obeyed. i was stubborn. i askd the teen "do you want to say your opinion?"--"yes"-- if so ignore the bossy lady who wants to control you."
the one trying to hide opinions... despite good intentions: to prevent an argument, was evil for controlling other people.
what is the rest of the debate?
veg': meat is gross.--me: please explain--v:it is simply gross--me: you mean the taste is gross for you?--no! that is not what i mean--please explain--"it is gross kuz it was alive".--me: but this meat was cookd by the hostess so it is not gross.--that is not what i mean--me: it seems you lack any good reason to be vegetarian...
all this time the hostess was rudely interrupting, many times repeatedly, trying to stop the dialog. interrupting is rude and bad and and in this case also bossy and controlling so i ignored the bossy hostess.
the teen continued "i do have a reason"--"ignore the bossy lady and say what it is... i gave you a chance to explain yourself but you dont have any reasoning."--i give up! you cruel meat-eaters would never understand"--me: you mention cruel. are you caling the hostess cruel? [strategy pit them against each other]. hostess "i am not cruel" teen: no i dont mean she is cruel just YOU.
me: you probably refer to the PAIN of the animal.--v: exactly.--me: when we BITE this chicken does it feel pain?--v: stop ridiculing me!, hostess LOUDLY "enough! how many times do i have to tell you?" me to hostess "she said she WANTS to say her opinion so stop rudely interrupting." hostess fled to kitchen.
host said "you hurt her feelings". i ignored both and presd the teen "i gave you a chance to explain your opinion but you dont HAVE any reason. if no pain not cruel."--v: the processing is cruel.--me: does that forbid the product?" silence. i continud "if not then you can eat the meat, AFTER the process, kuz you are not inflicting pain."
the teen "whatever, i will try some." so the teen ate the chicken. surprise! that actually occurd.
in this story a veg would claim "the meat-eater is cruel" unless it is a lion, while in fact the bite does not inflict pain. the "indirect" is AFTER the cruelty and does not even CAUSE the actions performed by the meat killers. those who kill the chicken believe the action is not evil despite the harm, to the chickens body and life... because the action is FOR A GOAL the "ends" food do justify the means killing the animal.
so the same action "killing a pet dog or killing a chicken" depends on the goals. what? you would eat your dog? well if your pet found you dead, it would eat you....
so now the trek episode.
kirk and spock went to a planet and wrestled with some people known for their evil.
at the end: the space-alien askd kirk "you both used violence so what is the dfference between good and evil?" kirk explained the goal was different. "we were rescuing" when we used force but the violence performed to control others and take personal gain is the evil. so that is the difference.
when u.s. invaded iraq was it the same action as iraq "invading" kuwait? one difference was that u.s. was "not annexing" the land. and pland to exit and later did exit.
people claim evil u.s. started "every major war". assuming vietnam is considered major... still, north vietnam... long forgotten, attacked south vietnam who begd its ally for help. u.s. "saved them" by performing violence for a different goal than the violence of the north vietnam: to take the land and control the people under communism with no choices of leaders only one political group. no options.
what about world war 2? was that a major war? certainly... did the u.s. start it? truth is u.s. was nutral for two years. yet "quora" hosts questions that contain accusations "why did u.s. start every major war in the 1900's" is quora a source for information? now we know certainly not a qualified source. why not? before asking why we must ask if? "did u.s. start etc.?" nope. u.s. was nutral in BOTH of the major wars in the 1900's. u.s. ENDED the war by dropping an atom bomb on japan... when one was NOT enough to end the war... we all saw in action... the day after the bomb, still emperor of japan refused to end the war so needed more atomic bombs... only after soviets violated a treaty and invaded the "south amur river region: called manchu... then japanese emperor surrendered, nobody else in japanese military could surrender... even if they wanted to kuz the emperor was the shintto god. and even if the navy wanted to surrender stilll must obey emperor.
after saw one atomic bomb was not enough to end the war so needed a second and needed soviets to violate a treaty... the "means" seemd evil "violating a treaty" but still the "exception" like the exception of the red-light rule, was for the "ends the end goal" to stop the war when people shot at each other... usualy bad to violate a treaty but at the time people were shooting at each other therefore the ends did justify the means of violating a treaty to save both: the lives of those that the japs shot at, as well as the jap soldiers who did not die in battle... as they wanted for their shinto ideas.
Monday, March 1, 2021
summary antiquity of jew with exciting plagues
introduction for summary antiquity: the title is "jew antiquity" ergo must brif before the story of that nation named "children of israel".
PART one
jews believed that God made plants and animals on the dirt. naw-ay, a descendant of adam, SAVED his family from the water flood. abraham was His descendant [5+6 must be briefer] and dweld in CANAAN.
A FAMINE caused ABRAM to go TO EGYPT temporarily. after assyrians defeated SODOMITES, ABRAM rescued his relative by defeating those ASSYRIANS. fire destroyed SODOM. abraham had descendants by concubines but fathered ISAAC by Sarra his WIFE, before she died.
ISAAC wed RiBKA, before his father died. ISAAC fathered ESAU AND JACOB, who fled from esau TO MESOPOTAMIA. [better to end book one before the new era
words? 92 for part one kuz must brif before the story of that nation named "children of israel".]
note: josephus claims almost 4000 years, between adam until isac died and this is not based on book genesis that has only a hundred years between births. josepus not only "historian who knew" but more importantly "preserved" the jews faith who "believed 200 years between each generation birth", which rabbis failed to preserve. this reveals that book genesis is not a reliable source and must be replaced. but by what? by this summary of antiquity.
PART TWO
Jakob [fathered sons starting the era of sons of jakob, children of israel and after that] returned and dweld in canan with his family. a prince abducted DINA. (end book one wrongly). note: now more detailed kuz about "jew nation" in title the children are these sons. still i must only BRIFLY summarize due to evil delay of ethics such as "honest weights" which jew leaders evilly delayed, until late in bible's third book, gasp, delayed in evil bible by almost a hundred chapters, demonstrating the sinister priority of the jewish leaders. such is very evil so i must prevent such a delay by summarizing the story. this delay is so severe that even ISOLATING isolating the religious laws still this law is delayed, after hundreds of laws that are ceremonies insted of moral. even studying the laws without story, will not reach it quickly and worse to delay by a hundred chapters by storys. or by offerings that jeremia said "god denied commanding," which reveals again the book "claimed" to be from moses are not from god nor holy. in fact a holy god would command "inspect and punish wrong measurements" first so i must fix.]
JOSEPH told DREAMS to brothers, who [advised him to actualize the dream by going] to egypt. JOSEPH went [willingly] TO EGYPT where he workd. CHASTITY OF JOSEPH. a lady accused JOSEPH so he IN PRISON. there he explained four dreams and pland for famine. DEATH OF JACOB AND JOSEPH.
EGYPTians AFFLICTed HEBREWS, MOSES fout ETHIOPIANS, MOSES FLED OUT From EGYPT INTO MIDIAN, MOSES saw THE BURNING BUSH AND found THE ROD, MOSES RETURNED TO EGYPT and went with aron TO PHARAOH, TEN PLAGUES hit EGYPTIANS, HEBREWS LEFT EGYPT, EGYPTIANS chased so God sent wind and split sea FOR THE HEBREWS ESCAPING but drowned EGYPTIANS. moses taught laws.[most importantly have honest measurements and deter those who unjustly get money].
note: before ending book 2, but after fixing the moral law as above, now i must fix the exciting plagues in 2, 14. TEN PLAGUES HIt EGYPTIANS. 110 words plus: this lengthiness 306 words which must replace the worse lengthiness that delayed the ethic of "accurate weights in business" in leviticus , meaning must inspect and even punish merchants who use weights that are not accurate. the evil bible lacks such a punishment, and even delayed the moral idea, so i must fix.
PLAGUES
Moses *foretold the Egyptian river will have blood. it did. egyptians prevented from drinking, but it was natural for Hebrews. king said "Hebrews leave". when plague ceased, he said "no go."
many frogs consumed the plants and fild the river. they spoild the water. the country was full of filthy slime, and stinky odor, as they were born, and as they died. they also spoiled the vessels in egyptian homes. frogs ruind food and drinks. many botherd egyptians in their beds causing more miseries.
king freed Hebrews t go. until frogs vanished. then retained the Hebrews, having granted that liberty due to fear not due to any good consideration.
many 3 "lice" caused the egyptians to perish with misery
king feard nation will be destroyed, so told Hebrews to depart. when the plague ceased, he require that they should leave their children *and wives in egypt, as pledges of their return.
then various pestilential 4 beasts fild egypt. the egyptians perished. any [animal] escaped destruction from them, it was 5 killed by illness which also harmd people.
Pharaoh said go but children stay so terrible 6boils on egyptian skin that consumed inward so many Egyptians perished.
next 7hail fell. "larger than that which falls in the northern regions." This hail broke trees. many 8locusts consumed all the plants which survived the hail. king said "leave your cattle" and go, so a thick 9darkness spread over the Egyptians, thickness of the air hinderd egyptians breathing for 3 days causing them to die in misery and terror.
after the passover lamb, TENTH an angel of God killed the first-born Egyptians at night
Pharaoh told Moses the Hebrews must go. Egyptians gave Hebrews gifts to cause depart quickly, and others for friendship they had. israelites exited EGYPT, EGYPTIANS chased. wind split sea FOR THE HEBREWS ESCAPING but drowned EGYPTIANS.
note: end book two in antq'