vietnam

vietnam
remember the protests?
Altho I am convinced that the states acted correctly by sending soldiers to battle in vietnam, many then would not agree with me. we can use that issue to test a biblical idea.
There is an idea in bible to "kill" those who oppose the "ruler" such as joshua or king see source below, that is not only bad because "not every crime deserves death as a punishment" but more importantly shows how bad the bible is... joshua 1.18 death... death? he was not even a king imagine i say "god speaks to me and said to me you all must obey moses and obey me and if you do not obey me god wants me to kill you"... cuz god said so...
that is not only "self serving" revealing my selfi serving claim in general and not just bad killing but combined self-sering murder. this shows as demonstrated by the issue above, shows how bad the book is and how bad the rabbis are for preserving such a bad book and then claiming if a non-king certainly a "king" the opposer of any whim such as first kings 2.24.
***recognize it is bad.
CHRISTIANS should stop trusting rabbis about which "pre-jesus era books" to consider 'holy' or worthy to preserve. such self serving murder is  NOT HOLY not godly.
 luckily deuteronomy never about king, disobeying the king "deserves" death altho has the same issue of killing crimes that are not justice because even equal balanced punishment for murder... would only be appropriate "measure for measure" for somebody who kills a person's body would deserve to equaly be killed... not justice for other crimes which did not kill a person so not justly punished to kill somebody who did not kill. a person.
if i murder an animal i am not an animal so not eqial punishment. even murder has a flaw that then the judge commits that SAME ACTION which he claims deserves death for so the cycle cannot begin and no death penalty for killing and certainly not for other different crimes which did not kill a person justice must be not killing the criminal because he did not kill a person... and simialrly bad bible for cliaiming rebel against king or joshua revealed bad.
imagine in the issue of vietnam the president said " i was chosen leader and i decide to send soldiers to "nam" according to the "holy" bible hose who oppose like protesters should be killed for disobeying the ruler... showing how bad the bible is...
*** when will we recognize how bad it is and edit and relinquish that bad book.

Alternate Ending Lord Rings

We all know about the video series LORD OF THE RINGS. I want to offer an alternate happy ending.
in contrast to the suspense of frodo NOT throwing the ring into the lava, which is better than simply "Let's do this thing" and tossing it... as the hero... yet frodo is shown "failing at the key moment" which sucks... so a different better suspense could be: frodo and sam walk "together" to the edge of the brij and frodo hesitates... and then "teamwork" sam guides frodo's hand forward and with encouraging words they are stronger than the magic until frodo destroys the ring.
(remove the bad part greedy until golum bites his finger off... frodo failed at the critical moment in their bad story) make him a real hero with teamwork.
2 also when the lava of the magical place destroys the ring, the destruction should FIRST affect the magical "eye" first, it could flicker with suspense UNTIL... while on the sturdy tower it acts like a "super-nova" burning all the orcs and life in the fort, burnt into bones. Then contracts into a dying flame and finally a blast of shock wave which shatters the tower and surrounding structure downward each shatters into a pile (instead of the destruction of the ring causing the "tower" to crumble while eye intact?? the destruction of the ring should first weaken the magical eye and last crumble the structures with no new valley but instead crumbled piles.
around these two details is good for example "frodo and sam rest on the high part during the eruption, is good. the flying save them is good until one more thing to change similar to avengers 2011 "thor" when they crown the king decree "as king i order your families to choose "leaders for each thousand to administer you."
also need to fix a loose end... who is manager of the shire? that should be shown but is not. perhaps they establish the first ten years presidency in middle earth. why not?

happy independence from king

to all my fellow citizens "happy independence from king day."
what is unique about a king and kingdom? the king has control "to rule his entire life and his son" will be the next king (because he "is royal blood" as the brits say even today.) this means the king and family DO NOT NEED the people to choose them. they will stay king the whole life and the son too... does not need the people so he can ignore their opinion and even IGNORE THEIR NEEDS. that is the manner powerful humans have ALWAYS acted when they had power.
that is a reason to rejoice on 4 july the removal of the selfish human ruler "dynasty" and most importantly replacement with "temporary rulers" which are temporary consider what that means... so think of ex-presidents clinton and bush past... obama they have no power anymore... they were never "getting power" for themselves in this system. they do not make decisions anymore. bush was never "the emperor" and has no control anymore.
trump knows what the "citizens want" and that motivates him to "do the ideas and direction thecitizens want' this motivation is to get the votes in the next election. one such issue which leads to the second point for this date is "keeping invaders out." can we ignore the differnce between "invaders" and "process -followers"? ONLY MERIT BASED only. not invaders which leads to the next important point for today: control.. consider the vast army the states have now and have already built and assembled.
IT IS POSSIBLE that when mexico disagrees and says "we do not want to stop invaders crossing the border, because then they will stay in mexico" so mexican presidents want them to go... out and into the states... it is possible a possibility for the vast army of the states to TAKE CONTROL of mexico land and while controlling both sides of the border build the wall and keep the invaders out by controlling that land because the mexican leaders resist...  yet.... UNITED STATES  does not use power that way to enslave the mexican rulers. to push the american opinion on them that is the difference between having power but not using it to "push opinion on others" in contrast to the tyrants such as kings who use power to control others. 'despite' the power not being a bully but finding other solutions.
consider that the states has so much power and does not steal canadas "millions of square kilometers" and not control mexico just "to get its way" that is something to be proud of not misusing authority and power to control and enslave others.
obviously "weakness" is bad not being able to control others is no "nobility" and nothing to be proud of while being STRONG well that DEPENDS and being strong to control others is bad like colonialism and this draws the picture of why we should all be PROUD to be an american with the ideas of the constitution and with all our complaints "at least" i know i am free... personal lives have personal choies. I can choose which jobs to search for and end my employment in afashion that does not damage the company the system allows such personal choices.
and pride... the states has power... and does not use it to take canadas vast land and does not bully mexico "despite" the argument and does not control the people meaning personal lives can choose for ourselves. power but not enslaving others that is a true source of pride. and ALSO remembering why kings and chinese "emperors" are bad they do not need our votes and can ignore our needs and always... as humans... have ignored the people and citizens saying "i take from you and do not care." that is a king and a chinese emperor or the unreplace-able communist party.
THIS day was the start of two opposites. the happy declaration for hope and its opposite the START OF BATTLE a painful war that lasted for many years  from 1776 into 1780's... and people fought suffered and died for a purpose which was so their families would "not be controlled by selfish kings" who ignore our needs. be proud and remember the details of the war like that song
so appropriate for this day [seee link below] so no need for me to write a new song about selfish kings just write the ideas and sing it. [atheists can stop before the ending but hey... most "states-ens" are christians anyway.
https://www.azlyrics.com/lyrics/leegreenwood/proudtobeanamerican.html

i do not fear islam only jihad

note: the word "phobia" is like sickness people who say "you have phobia" are  ATTACKING and they must stop attacking
***
TOMORO, a comparative rhyme
Israelis wrote songs about "tomorrow"
HOPE of undressing army uniforms
while on flags, muslims show a machine gun
Jihad uniforms for kids are the norms

praising "those who killed many deniers"
"that is the glorious muslim hero"
but i hope i can lock all my weapons
"tomorow" or... tomorow's tomorow.

i keep singing that song of tomorow
hoping tomorow, or its tomorow?
i wish next, or its next, why not the next?
or next or next when will end... this sorrow

endnote: when jews stop shooting back, tthey will die quickerand the gentilers cheer... until it is THEIR turn to convert... or die.

which side is "human rights"

some people think that the "left' or liberals are the ones who emphasize protecting human rights like refugees... but not every immigrant is a "refugee". wht about the "dignity" of the citizen.
consider when the democratic lawmaker named  "Maxine Waters encourages supporters to harass Trump administration officials" source CNN" is that emphasizing dignity???
the truth is lincoln was republican and he was the one who said "do not allow the south to secede and have slaves" the republicans are the good guys but the dems are "democ-rats.

ruling the hill. a short story

ruling the hill
Mom said "zak, go play with aran". aran [not his real name] was 6 years old but zak just 5. aran's hite (height) barely one meter tall but the 5 year old was even shorter than the brats his own age.
zak went and said "we should play inside where the air-conditioning cools the house."--you wait here until i will choose a game."
the older boy, named aran climbed up a steep hill and announced "we will play ruling the hill. i am on top of the hill, so i start as the ruler."
zak whined "you told me to wait down here why do you get to start at the top"?--just play--how?-- your job is to capture the mountain.
zak tried to climb the hill which was only 2 meters, but very steep, and found it was too steep to climb. but zak kept trying... again and again to crawl up the steep hill... until finally he neared the top and...  aran pushed his shoulders and zak fell down the hill onto the grass.
after several attempts zak "learned" that it was easier to fall down than to go up and announced "you win. now it is my turn to start at the top." then aran and zak argued because aran said "you can ONLY be at the top if you capture it" and zak retorted "you started at the top, you must be fair if you started at the top once then i get to start at the top once"
aran laughed so zak continued "if you let me start at the top then the third game you can start at the top." aran agreed to come down the hill and zak climbed up the hill.
aran walked away from the hill and then ran towards the steep hill and moving fast jump up the steep two meters. zak prepared to copy the strategy and push arans shoulders but aran grabbed zaks arm... and pulled zak down... throwing zak from the hill.  then when zak was on the ground aran climbed the hill and conquered it. now zak announced "you win now i will keep my word and you start on top."
aran stood ready as king of the mountain and zak ran away from the steep hill and then back towards it and now moving quickly it was much easier to run uphill and... as aran reached for zak shoulder... zak did the same method grabbing aran arm... and pulling with his arms and weight pulling down the hill,  aran hollered "that is not fair" zak pulled with his weight down same as he had learned while aran argued "you need to go up or it does not count" but if so aran's victory did not count either...
zak and aran tumbled down the hill and zak hurried to climb... but aran had a new trick grabbing zaks leg. zak jumped from the higher point of the hill tackling aran and while aran was flattened, zak climbed up the hill and announced "i am king, you get an "ef" for failing."
aran ran to zaks door and started crying "zak pushed me down the hill". soon zak's  mom shouted at zak "you pushed him down the hill that is bad" zak tried to defend himself "that was the game" and his parents like most parents said "no excuses you are punished for pushing aran down a hill" you can guess how zak felt that his parents refused to listen and refused to use their "ear" the organ for hearing.
so the next day when zak returned from school, and before his parents got home, he pulled the sheets away from their mattress and pulled the plastic cover back and then poured from the carton of orange juice. last he pulled the sheets back and covered it with the blanket... some justice for stubborn parents who blame him without knowing the whole story.
words used: ear the organ that detects sound

solve "channel" and fix ocean idea

the 2 letter solution... to what problem?
the name to identify places, specifically water-locations, has a bad problem. for example calling shared water by a country... any country, is bad because it is truly shared and must be shared
first of all the recent issue of the "channel" water between brit and france recently changed its name i always called it [what i saw on maps] "british channel" but that is bad because it must be shared not british... also the recent changing the name... is worse,  to a city makes 2 new problems despite not a government still city area is small hence it does not describe "huger water" and also relating it to french city is bad they control la menshe while the water is and must be shared. SOLUTION 2 LETTER
based on the major rivers that enter it: temz "thames" and sen "seine" in objective order of latin letters "st channel" not french nor british only the "st channel"  l
similarly other shared water bad to say and name the water "gulf of mexico" that relates to country and government so bad. must be shared so use 2 letters and not mississippi ALONE either because water is shared, so 2 letters "mr gulf" for mississippi and rio grande  mr gulf" not mexico alone but shared so mr gulf.
similalry in past i said link ocean to river same name is simpler but that only works for a shared river in many countries. we must add not "amazon" alone for ocean because share same issue as seine alone is bad,  instead must share and be shared so "as ocean" for amazon and seine ocean "as ocean" 2 letters for share
so *** as above "st channel"  and gulf "mr gulf" and "as ocean" and same for the largest ocean fix pacific to 2 letters, altho not country name now still not "pacif" but truly stormy  so instead the "cs ocean" for the long chang river but not alone instead chang and siak river "cs ocean"  also "nr sea" for rhone +nile rivers not "med" because every sea is "med  terra" between lands.
a serious problem we must fix "indian ocean" more urgent than atlantic [silliness] and false pacific this is more urgent because relates to government and country yet must be shared so "gt ocean" for ganges and tigris rivers 2 letters to share method choose large if  convenient and not in same country.  and if china ever controls siak choose other river to show water share
arctic is good for arctic ocean. but antarctic only based on reference so "south" [not australia in latin but] southern continent.
summary  the oceans from yukon river region as planet earth spins 1 "cs ocean" for chang and siak rivers to show shared 2 next ocean as spins and west "gt ocean" for ganges. tigris then "nr sea" for nile and rhone shared sea next "as ocean' for amazon seine like   "st channel" same river and this ocean joins the "cs ocean" in south
same pattern for others however there should be much fewer "seas" with any name because almost every sea is within an ocean and worse any sea does not identify a location for example if a boat said "help me, i am in caspian sea" that does not inform where to send help and certainly larger seas or worse seas which are not separate but are part of or within an ocean should be included in ocean without separate name so many reasons no "sea of japan" islands are surrounded by water and not separate besides name problem all part of pacific... if need to identify spot say pacific near city but what if not... we already use coordinates so no neeed for extra name of sea which is unclear anyway and just causes danger of using country name. and anyway ocean includes those waters
so less names of seas within "cs ocean" or "gt ocean" or "st ocean" or "mr gulf" and we need and already use coordinates anyway.
importantly **no country names ever. just two letter to show shared and no sea of "japan"  or any other country equally because must share so for those and other waters "cs ocean" includes
 we need to remove so that less names of sea near coast or near islands surrounded by oceans for example cs ocean for chang+siak rivers. note this idea replaces previous suggestion of "amazon ocean" by making 2 letters, not just amazion ocean because controller of amazon or mississippi or chang must each share water for any use so 2 letters like "st channel"