the religion named science

after criticism of ancient religion in preceding post i also critical of the religion  named science which has been acting like evil religion. 

 people use "ridiculed" method if anyone dared to doubt the global warming  "humans caused" you "can't deny science"

yet science used the same as blind religion, if you dont understand it say it and accept it regardless. if a science book claimed the universe or matter in universe is a finite time that is history not science... despite the benefits of peer review that experts inspect each other, the benefit ABSENT in religion and in religious books... nobody DARES to fix even known "scribal errors" nobody inspected the content!

an error will stay preserved without fixing so religion is harmful yet blind faith in science books is just as absurd.

i cant disprove global warming i can only exhibit that the "heat is not trapped" each night and other facts that challenged the emotional "concerned scientists"

when science should be separated from emotion. 

when astrophysics claimed the galaxies are moving apart... that has big problems we  need permission to doubt the blind faith of the religion called science DESPITE its advantages and reliability over ancient religions. 

when science claimed the matter in universe is around 14 billion years age how did they get that. not that religion is better but  how? i asked a physicist who explained the academic blind faith when they can SEE it is false but choose blind faith.

galaxies are moving apart in a way that space seemed to expand between them like "surface of a sphere" they extrapolated from the separation that last year they were nearer therefore a finite time they were near each other so further  past perhaps one inch of volume. i challenged this part in a preceding post too.

the same astrophysics book also claimed andromeda galaxy is moving NEARER to earth based on blue shift in contrast to the fact that galaxies are moving apart based on red shift... but that means not a central outward motion from one  center which is the assumption for calculated age.

if as they claimed central then all move parallel with angles but that conflicted observations of blue shift indicating not apart and not as magazine said "paint dots on the surface of an expanding balloon" that explanation conflicted observation not even one would move toward another if their description  was not false.

we know from observation that is real science that their description is false. 

if two are moving nearer they must not claim moving out from a center to extrapolate the nearness in the past. simply admit it is a mystery why some move apart and some move together.

consider the equation rt=d rate times time totals distance. if rate is finite less than speed of light called c, as modern science claimed,  matter cant move faster than c, then r<c. also time if they claimed apart indicates the past nearness of 14b. also finite then we can compute distance between the opposite galaxies. simply choose a past moment in past yesterday and multiply rt since r<c for matter and t at a moment in past is finite then the total distance is LESS than 14c from center and opposite galaxies from center not more than, but certainly less than 28 billion light years distance at that past time so the volume between edges of matter would be computable but... only if truth is they move apart which they know is false... at least one is not moving apart not moving away from the same assumed center as those estimating the speed of apart that started 14b years ago. that is also blind faith despite knowing the exception as above. the theory can be identified as false just as easily as the earth center failed to explain some of the nearby planets... they knew it was not an explanation but the religious book psalms said "the earth stands" not move therefore sun must move around earth despite the failure to explain some of the planets called regression... now we smile smugly at their foolishness while we REPEAT the same foolishness... we know not all move apart  yet calculate as if all were moving apart and had been together... not only is that presumption in doubt we have enough data to know it is the "wrong explanation" but nobody can deny science... even whrn failed to explain observation which should be based on observation by its own rules.

they  know the claim of apart is false yet use it to ridicule the religions that claim thousands of years age... like at jew weddings... that is allowing personal desire to influence the result and ignore the fact that the same book of astrophysics said for beginners at least one is not apart if so their description is certainly false not to defend six thousand but because the religion called science has the same danger of blind faith as ancient religion. even when they could notice not all apart so cant imagine nearer until center the model is already known to be false yet the scientists are just as blind as blind religion in their emotional will to mock the false thousand, they claim billions but the model is certainly false. they could see not one center of big bang so neither method the religious 10^3 nor 14x10^9 is a valid explanation for the universe. so admit mystery... until AFTER  a suggestion succeeded. 

the issue was only emphasised to mock religion not due to real science such claimed about past is history and false history as above.