in nature we see random shapes of rock eroded or cracked randomly. if we would find a smooth rock we interpret something caused it, flowing water in river caused smooth, caused not random yet still NOT planned. we would believe something like water CAUSED it despite not seeing the cause yet still based on the equation of known smooth rocks in rivers yet still not planned.
if we see a rock shaped like a tool, we interpret someone changed the random rock to usefully shaped... a maker... a human maker. the emphasis in ancient history is INDUSTRY meaning they MADE tool shapes indicated a plan not claimed "stone age used stone as a tool" but claimed "INDUSTRY" meaning made stone tools.
an intelligence planned. religion points to random and claimed baselessly "look at the order it must be planned" similar to the tool but... they point at randomness and subjectively claimed order.
when we see a clock we know factory assembled clocks so even when we don't see the assembly we believe it is the same as the clocks we know... built by a maker... and a human made a GOOD watch... the hand for second is planned connected for sixty to move a minute hand and 60 of those units match the rate of the hand for hours that is human maker.
now imagine a "wise creator" could plan the rate of spin to coincide with the circled path of moon and around sun?
imagine a planet that would spin at a rate that thirty complete spins matched one orbit of moon around and one orbit around sun matched 360 complete spins that would show planned and intelligent maker probably a human maker just stronger.
we dont see in nature "even the quality of a human made clock" just randomness... when even a human can plan better.
we see random spin and the spin is not a rate to match circled sun 365 complete nor 360 instead 365 spins and part of a spin. moon 29 spins and part of spin.
if a creator planned to command festivals or holy days he could prepare a planet with a spin rate that matched the time of moon amd sun circles. we see randomness not a clock so we can't equate to maker as many religious people use deception deceptively.
if we claim "the spin rate doesn't match moon rate," religion CAN answer "mystery and gods ways are mysterious and the human mind is too weak" as they lazily "explain away anything" but we can attach that same claim for the origins. "why does earth move unless god pushed it to spin?= mystery. not a maker.
why does earth move unless god pushed it to orbit around sun?=mystery. same as those religious teachers "sidestep" using mystery. catholic trinity 3=1 is a "mystery" so we can equally attach that to any proof, "how could life begin without birth unless god created" answer "that is a mystery".
how could a planet of rock and water "materialise from nothing emptiness, unless god created and he is maker?" answer: "your own answer mystery" and... what about the assumption from "nothing" we should not include that unknown in the question. we dont know IF it "materialised from nothing emptiness" only religion claimed that "circular baseless idea". we need a god if from nothing so we believe from nothing but we dont know the history if from nothing or from existing matter or energy... just "your answer=mystery" as i will exhibit.
a billion catholic dont complain why is trinity 3 and also one. in fact only the Christian book avoided more than one god for Christianity with TWO options but the teachers and people have more than one and still dont complain about the conflict "only one god and besides for one also another divine" as i read in messianic jewish Christian book. the trinity is a mystery, they say but if mystery is satisfying for humans then apply it more as above. mystery we cannot accept a book claimed created that cannot be verified.
about spin, we can say if he planned to command festivals and if strong "omnipotent" he can plan the system to identify time... but instead we see... not even human quality but only randomness in nature, in general but more importantly spin of days as above so we can be certain no wise creator... if god existed or contributed it was not the planet spin and orbit. the creation was random as we see without maker nor creator so book is false.
if i lived on a planet that spun at the rate matched the moon cycle and sun cycle accurately then i would imagine a maker... the same maker as a clock!! human but stronger.
still not strong enough to help nor save but if we imagine a strong god powerful enough to save... then when anyone shot a gun,tthe excuse of "free will" failed since their act of murder completed, and a merciful good would save the victim and punish the shooter unless the shooter was justified we find either the book is wrong about a strong and also powerful and also merciful is wrong and false. the alternatives are a cruel god, and the book still false or a merciful weak god, stronger than human and too weak to stop a bullet because if he could stop the murder and does not then he is part of the crime... same as we must "save someone drowning" with mercy and not abandon an injured human same if god could save but doesn't that is a part of the crime and of harm and shared guilt. if we don't help we are cruel but must be merciful same if god is strong and merciful as book claimed so either way the book is wrong and "wishful wishes" hoping for a merciful god and granted credit when someone was saved when he doesn't "do that mission" of saving body. either weak or not merciful either way the book is wrong about describing the maker who did not act like a maker as above.
if we have wishful wishes i wish for a weak merciful god rather than a strong cruel god but either way one of those description is falso and the random world never had a wise creator.
if so how was earth formed? we can attach the same LAZY religious answer of mystery quoted above for random spin of planet... apply that to unknown history. the end of guessing the beginning.
No comments:
Post a Comment