christian history problems

 analyzing a christian lesson chart

from 4200bc until 537bc and the years between.

christian history problems

for the purpose of "bible background" christian college tried to identify dating system. they used double talk "biblical history" as if positive good due to relation to bible while admitting different from history only influenced by bias of religion... yet still not matching their own holy book.

a christian calculated years in bible from nebucadnezer earlier and earlier claiming 3174 before nebucadnazer until the six days of creation. rabbis accepted and started counting 586bc=3174+586+2000 calling year 2000=5760 but later christians reject that. they claim 2000+4200 creation earlier than christian and rabbi total, but why kuz millions? then not thousands.

i quote counting "back" from solomon earlier

quote: "solomon 971bc" vague did they mean death lived until 971bc? meaning started king kuz died 931 after 40 years. based on that david ruled 40 if trust book samuel starting king "1011bc until 971 bc" and solomon "971 bc" until 931 bc. saul 42 years around 1050 bc

what about births? book ruth counted from the juda-ite in moses generation SIX generations until david. people wed around age 15 in ancient world so child between 16-20. 6*20=120 unless they like abraham fathered at age 100 like abraham but even bible never claimed that and even abraham questioned birth at age 100 as unbelievable. 

if exodus "1450bc" as christian chart then 1450-120=1330bc but same course wrote "in egypt 400 years" from "1806-1406" not leave in 1450 on the same paper gasp. they know nothing will fit.

choosing later to bridge to david 1406 is closer but still 1406-120=1286 unless ruth is "missing generations". still the word "holid" seems like literal father not ancestor.

also book matthew counted six generations so some christians claim "every one of those six is true plus more for the poetic groups of fourteen" but then the total would be not fourteen. what about "holy books being inspired by god to prevent error".

instead we can count from solomon 931bc as above seven generations 140+931=1071 bc moses. also note ruth wrote "fathered david but mathew wrote king david" the cause to write about david was being a king so why not wrote king? unless the reason to write about david was as a warrior and not king so the author hinted he was david not a king not like matthew. mathew thought david was king due to book samuel but he was wrong as even book ruth did not say king and book samuel has two versions how saul died because separate from god who knew how he died.

on the same page christians wrote both: "entered egypt 1876 and left 1450" total 426 not 430 and also the other version 1806-1406 400 also less than 430. also the years of levi generations are less than 400 so rabbis wrote 210 gasp. christians can copy their true but skpped here too. but the same page has both versions and neither matches the holy book 430.

they claim from abraham to flood 2400-2166=234 years but septuagint which jesus quoted from has much more years between flood until abraham.

similarly from creation until flood "4200bc until 2400bc" 1800 years neither genesis 1600 nor septuagint 2600 gasp.

according to genesis abarham prophesied "they will serve them and suffer 400 years" connected to slave but if slave less as rabbis taught then abrahma and genesis false prophets. a rabbi tried to trick me the total of slave and not their land but that does not defend book exodus in egypt 430. if 430 true then 400 false prophet and if total is 400 then further from 430.

only if we admit 430 true and therefore teach "426" if so genesis false prophet due to truly 430 therefore without book genesis no conflict to exodus and no flood in 2400 bc, less problems. but they wrote 426 does not match 430 nor the generation of levi. and on the smae paper also 400 in egyot both totals rejected 430... which is chalenged by years of levi but they could claim "true and missing skipping". either way the book exodus can cause errors and even christians dont teach the same as exodus despite "in egypt 430".so we see the course is not only self contradictory bit rejected theor own book showing they knew the books are not "reliable" sources. and cant be with 3 different versions in bible.

finally if exodus 1450bc then 1450-480=970 bc but solomon FOURTH year needed to be 970 to match instead 971 started king due to 931 if so not match 480 either.

if christians believed their book they would say 931+40-4+480=1447 if so entered 1877 but instead they wrote "1876 and 1450" while on the same paper 1806 was 400 years challenging 1876 and 1877 they knew nnot 1877 but 1406+-480= 926 after solomon died in 931 as above so whether we start 931 or start 1876 we see a mess and that even christians know they cant accept their book so certainly healthy skiepticis will not accept ANY not even one of the conflicting versions. the historical TRUTH WAS jews were by jordan river from the first jew in 1800bc not 2166 as christians teach and stayed there not going into egypt but staying by jordan river until destruction of jerusalem in 586bc matching history nebucadnezer and chart "586". still the numbers in book kings are too many between mesa and nebuc and historians calculated the kings of babylon and mobite stel! 

in the lesson we can notice the christians STRUGGLE to teach varying versions showing they know even their religious scripture cannt be trusted similarly jews claim different numbers and if true then the numbers in the bible can cause error differentnumbers therefore we cannot accept any of the conflicting versions

between cyrus return several versions 66 years or 48 years see 2 cron 36,22from destruction in 586 so we must interpret "bad decrees can be cancelled" so less than 70 but stil 46 and 66 not match but conflict so we cannot accept either. 

even mesa historians debate i saw in britanica 834 but other wensite said the victory was before that even before 850bc so the earliest detail is nebucadnezer which means cannot verufy any of the earlier problematic books whether kings or chronicles that END with nebucadnazer nor samuel nor book exodus as above only six generations! instead solomon died 931 and seven generations earlier moses 931+40+140=1111bc moses and nahshon so the jews did not enter egypt to go out by moses and nahshon but stayed by jordan river until 1111 and until "586" from forever. we must admit biblical history is not only not history but cannot be oreseneted even by those biased to accept it as we see by analyzing their course lessons.