story of abraham two more

 in another story of abraham the main part is a prophecy that he will have a son. the rest is a filler.

when rabbis told me the story they ALTERED IT FROM the bible.

in the bible first lord appeared to abraham. next abraham "ran to greet them" and third asked permission god do not pass the rabbis said he was talking to the one who appeared but he should ask permission before running to meet his guests. they tried to trick me instead when running to meet them he said to them "masters" not jehova please do not pass meaning stay here. who bowed the verb is plural so not abraham bowing as rabbi and niv lied to me.

the two verbs of seeing equate that the appearance of god was the three visitors. the order indicates that he "saw" god not more than saw so he was not "interrupting god to welcome guests" as rabbis lied in fact the showing of god was in the form of three persons who plural they bowed.

they asked where is your wife and one said you will have a son by sara. sara laughed saying i and my master are old... i guess if i was/were a lady i would cringe at that word master. she was smiling at the absurdity. and so it was a son was born. note: that should be connected immediately but between the prediction and isac was born, things unrelated to abraham are told and abraham does some uneventful stuff that are fillers without substance, do i mean boring? no, i mean without the "ingredients of story" i was not feeling bored when i studied them because i was forced to by religion but still the contents are empty... far from a chase where a guy is running from cops dodging and hiding stuff happens and suspense these four chapters have almost nothing happening the bit in abrahams life could be said in ten words... which do not even deserve repeating some stories due to not in abrahamstory or too lengthy around the issue, badly diluting and distracting from the point... obviously only to stretch a story long enough to fill the time around the bonfire.

so that summarized that lengthy burden and rejected several erors added by the two religions as above for example in chapter 18, the next story seems to have abraham doubting god's "judgement" and other bad messages so that does not deserve repeating nor study.

the last story i will bother with also needed replacement to censor out the ideas considered wrong by tradition. not "my morality" but tradition. also what about god commanding "abraham sacrifice yourself to death to show obedience" that is harder than spare yourself being forced to kill someone else due to fear. a REAL TEST would be abraham stab your own heart and if he did revive him. but god knew abarahm was only willing to hurt OTHERS but would not kill himself dead he wanted to live so the story is about killing someone else, which is easier than killing self... and if "overcoming your love for son" was hard still due to fear of god anger that is almost no choice: "i had to kill him or i would die" from god wrath for rebelling. worse it violated the rules in tradition.

most of chapters 18, 19, 20, 21, could simply tell the point and focus on abraham but... even abraham is too early considering his sons were not "the nation of abraham" nor israel so even abraham should not be mentioned at all except by name not ten chapters without "events in abrahams life" the only events war and fire were not involving abraham. in abraham life no drama either.

finally abraham life had some drama after long chapters without drama in his life. this drama worth repeating but with a bad message which i must replace. why do i think it is bad? not because a guy told me "god should not ask for human sacrifice" that i defended god planned to stop him... despite it was an angel of the merciful jehova that stopped him not god himself nor elohim if he planned he would personaly say stop. the problem is something else the religion of god teaches that murder is so evil that we must give our OWN lives to death instead of killing another human so abraham sinned by agreeing to kill he violated the rule to give his life so i will replace the story with the good message and lesson so you know to avoid bad book genesis.

also i note genesis 20,17 has a message that is bad and does not match the story so i warn do not read such a bad story in bad book genesis. what is so bad? that would distract from a MORE IMPORTANT MESSAGE THAT FOLLOWS HERE SO PLEASE DONT GET DISTRACTED WITH THE PRESUPPOSITION that the book or story is worth defending only if assume it is holy have bias to defend but only humans claimed it is holy, jesus NEVER SAID BY NAME it was a good book and my inspection showed it was not holy therefore not from god therefore not warrant defense unles wrongly presuppose trusting humans who claimed it was holy. so we focus on the important story called "tying".

STORY: "God said to Abraham [calling], “Abraham!”. he replied, “Here I am.” God said, “Take your son, your only son [note the word here has the hebrew word only "ihid" in contrast to describing god "is one" a different word not this word used here only... rabbis tried to lie that the word was not biblical hebrew, so could not use ihid. i trusted them until noticing here it is biblical hebrew... the word is different "ahd" one used by one from many so we can notice book deuteronomy is not the religion of the prophets nor is book genesis with plural verbs for god they appeared they led" we can be certain that the inclusion of books genesis and deuteronomy with holy books was not only wrong but insults the holy prophecies and makes the book impure like mixing poison into flour the mixture is rat poison.], whom you loved [past tense], Isaac. go to the land Moriah. "offer" [command grammar] a burnt offering on a mountain I will show you.”

Abraham said to god, "my master i would obey anything else but i cannot kill anybody just because you commanded" God replied, "now i see that you fear me and deserve praise for risking my anger to kill you, to avoid the sin of killing, that is worthy of praise." so this replaced the bad story where abraham almost did the evil of sin of murder only stopped by an angel. the new testament deals with part of the problem by adding abraham believed that isac would be revivved... but that is stil the evil sin of murder which religion teaches must avoid even at the loss of his own life in their bad story anraham "feared god" anger and felt his own life was more precious than others in case he himself got punished so better someone else should die not me that is "religiously wrong" instead abraham must say according to religious obligation not "my morality" but religious obligated "over my dead body" i will die myself before murdering. the story SHOULD teach that in a book of teaching so this replaced and warned about the bad book of genesis that we see is not worthy of study nor preservation beyond the criticism here.