save baby from knife circumcision

 Too risky sounds like "statistically most will" have problems and rarely death. but what if risk is small but larger than benefits.

i recently spoke to a lady with religious bias trying to convince a european student that he missed his chance to get circumcision. she would save her kid from the risk but concluded "when you get cancer you will see i was right" pretty scary but if true doctors would recommend the urgency to avoid whatever cancer.

instead doctors WEIGHED the benefits against the risks at the time of cutting.

if something has more risk it is too risky, but sounds harsh so said that not enough to justify.

the deceivers responded 2010 is too old as if they changed since then, bluffing, but not claiming "they actually changed" kuz would get caught lying. so they use distraction to ignore doctors so all that is left is the non doctor. older claims of benefit are even older than their "too old".

doctors who just happened to understand HEALTH issues concluded that not justified in gently words, even less recommend than a tooth brush that doctors DO recommend.