when people hear about the suffering in palestine, i wonder if they are aware of the DIFFERENT goals and groups of freedom fighters.
when people say " #freePalestine " i wonder WHICH goal they intended to support.were they supporting the groups who want a muslim state there, in west bank such as hamas group and its allies, perhaps? or? or the groups fighting for a secular #palestine state. which of them do they support? or either one as long as jews lose land and lives?
when they say "peace now" meaning isreal should give land, do they care to which? do they support even one of the goals?
with which should israel negotiate "land for peace"?
do they think if either one of those groups gets a state, the other will STOP fighting for their version?
i suspect more likely such supporters of "palestine" are not even aware of the differing groups above nor details.
the issue is not "sincere interest" instead it is only an opportunity to dress their anti israel as pro palestine, not realy thinking about which group nor which goals. furthermore...
i doubt they are even aware or bothered to ask, to know that the arab governor in p.a. government (that exists) has been denying those arabs the "luxury of voting" for government, among other oppressions, for many years. in other words the arab governor prevented elections for many years, that is the AUTHENTIC apartheid preventing voting, it was by abbas the arab leader, but that is not what the supporters are trying to change nor complaining.
the issue is not truly "care" about those arabs voting no fuss about abbas. the only apartheid they complain is, is not that lack of voting, decided by the "duly elected" arab governor named abbas, indicating those arabs HAD the right to vote and israel did not prevent arab voting in the past.
instead when abbas term ENDED abbas prevented elections but that prevention is not the apartheid of no voting that those protesters or pro palestine intend nor even care about... only they found an opportunity to dress their anti israel as pro palestine, to jab at jews whether accurate or not , without any interest in details.
most of the supporters do not really want the arabs there to have those arab elections. for them the only aparthrid WORTH mentioning is to jab at jews who did not make the above decision.
thecword apartheid DID refer to voting but not the mentioned problem if votinv, only to jab at jews whether accurate or not.
worse than the oft mentioned apartheid is
when they see a picture of an arab child bleeding, i do not doubt they feel compassion and anger, but do they bother to ask the details what happened the moments before? did israel shoot or someone else? and uf israel shot what caused israel to shoot? or did they find an opportunity to dress their anti israel in a new name regardless of details?
i DARE the supporters to OPENLY choose one of the goals from among the 3 options above, abbas verse other in election? pro secular palestine or pro muslim palestine... and then those supporters will find themselves either arguing with themselves about the goal , or find themselves agreeeing "no difference as long as jews lose land and more lives as above".
the monthly stats, are presented that it does not seem "fair" that less jews died each month, their desire is a disguise that they want to see more.... not any real compassion but the disguised wish for the opposite of compassion. prove me wrong? in actions?
No comments:
Post a Comment