More athe-agnos-tic misquotes and why they do it

 the opposition is not complaining about the death penalty, they could but dont. instead they try to make false sensations "for such a tiny common word" death penalty

with their "commentary picture" angry face shouting... when even those who follow the "literalist method" NEVER even in the past when they could, did it. i mean even those orthodox jews who teach and obey "not physicly eating pork nor rabbit" and not working on the holidays in leviticus by the rabbi calendar... even they teach the tradition never even in past did it because it is only to read... which matches the SAME book deuteronomy in a different chapter and rules of context, which could equally be applied to much more... but as literalists they distnguish between sections by tradition not by "contemporary make up as you go" in response to whatever marketing in that generation.
jesus the "teacher" set an example for the adulteress death penalty, in john chapter 8 and equally any other death penalty including chapter 24 that "seems like angry mob" and the list in leviticus 20 the true application of those sections. more on this later and
a better picture for a previous 

even quran gave option for anybody including muslim to join ilnasra christian without worry and even without violating quran

more and in john 8 did jesus throw a stone ? nope that isbthe application of adulteress and other death penalty, only to read to indicate not do and more severe than others but not the punishment and same indicated in sqme book in you mouth and heart to do, the doung sufficed reading with mouth noot actual action.