biblical neighbors

when the bible "took the risk" of mentioning neighboring kingdoms, allowing us to inspect, without the assumption nor PRESUPPOSITION that the bible is "wisdom" nor "holy" nor "true" simply to inspect.

sometimes the bible mentions a name that matches. nebukadnezer in bible matched babylon history... there were several.

what about in genesis. religion insists genesis is true that "kadarlomer of elam was ally with shinar" against sodom but before we accept, as religion blindly insists and threatens "blasphemy" to doubters... we can search for that name. the bible claimed NINE names and the STRONG one was kadarlomer.

when we find that name... the religious biased liars celebrate "we told you so" ignoring the details.

a bible website boasts "we found the name we always told you the bible was true" what did they find at the netbible website? "discovered tablet enumerates among the enemies of Khammu-rabi, Kudur-Lagamar (border is kudur in akkadian, not "servant" of Lagamar) and Eri-Aku" names similar to the names in the bible... but in the tablet kudur was ENEMY of babylon called shinar.

elam and shinar were claimed to be allies in the false bible while we know from that same tablet babylon were "enemies". hamrabi was babylon and fought ancient iran. we know of wars between elam and babylon on the era of that name hamurabi 1790 bc and his son not allies as the false bible wrote about shinar and elam using the same names so now that we know the truth we can delete the false names wich are in the wrong era anyway kuz that kudur was in the era of hamrabi which was 1790 bc long before abraham who "visited paro" a title the egyptians  STARTED TO USE IN 1500bc. the egyptians used other titles but not pharo before the 18 dynasty.  so even if we "accept" abram's relative got captured it could not be the same name three centuries apart. so either abraham was "ancient" with kudur era... still bible false claiming allies when babylon battled elam... so no defense for book and false about pharo he did not visit pharo or he was in the era of pharo and not in the era of kudur centuries apart. either way genesis is false and written by people separate from god who knew that elam battled babylon not allies and god knew whne abraham lived but the writers of genesis were separate from god so we can know that genesis is not a holy book nor even true.