galaxy moving
today i read a book that asked the unknowable question? scientists agree on a "standard model" and believe that the galaxies are moving apart and therefore were near each other in the past, if so: what happened before the galaxys were moving apart?
the simple answer to the question is not in that book... but it appears on signs by bridges "bridge freezes, before road surfaces [+do]." surfaces is a noun in that phrase. the bridge contracts at a different rate than the road beyond the brdge.
the universe as a whole entity is simply similar to the metal composing a bridge.
so we can analyze the ideas.
1, when we look up at the stars at night we see that the many stars remain in the "same pattern" unchanged for many hours as they "move like a clock hand" which scientists know results from "facing different star patterns as WE spin" each night. the same patterns repeat night after night but the group changes monthly.
science expects us to believe them, that the universe is expanding. they write several hints that the space is expanding. in fact "respected scientists" dared to write that at one time matter moved faster than the speed of light... which violates a rule of science unless the universe itself is expanding and could expand faster than matter can move... however we DO observe that the stars are not "racing apart from each other near the speed of light" as scientists believe... and write, and expect us to trust them, the stars we observe are the ones in our galaxy... and "space is observably not expanding" between the stars of our own galaxy.
i saw a galaxy thru a telescope. they said i was looking at the nearest one m31. i knew m31 is moving toward us from a reliable book in astrophysics... this also challenges the idea of "expanding space". if we ever stuck stickers on a balloon and then inflated the balloon, then the stickers which were near each other would move apart as "space" expanded and they could not move near each other when the space and the balloon surface is expanding. yet m31 called andromeda is moving near us so the standard model is challenged.
so a more precise description is not the "univere" expanding but the galaxy motion. some galaxies move away from ours and others such as m31 move toward our own. the fancy term is blue shift. anyway it is so far away that despite milllions of bright stars in that galaxy it appears, through high quality amatuer telescopes, like a 'relatively small' cloud "less dark" than its background and far less bright than a visible dim star.
2, if we believe that galaxies are moving apart... can we predict that will continue? can we "reverse" the expansion back to infinite density?
i doubt that.
sure we can estimate the distance "was less" at specific past times... if the time is short, however "how far back" in the past dare we RESPONSIBLY and confidently extrapolate? not enough to claim infinite density in fact even the same book that claims "infinite density" admits the possibility of "oscilating".
in simple terms, not in the book, we can describe the universe like the metal in a bridge.
3. in simple terms, not in the book, we can describe the universe like the metal in a bridge.
when the temperature drops colder from 90 degrees fahrenheit to 10 degrees fahrenheit the metal in the bridge shrinks. and the bridge freezes "before" the surfaces of roads freeze. the contraction is a different rate. cold causes contraction of volume.
we see observe gaps built between segments of bridge [based on past damage] to allow for expansion and contraction of the bridge material... even when changes are less than 100 degrees fahrenheit.
the same thing will occur and has occurd with the galaxy motion.
now and only now we observe indications of some galaxies moving apart.
we can estimate that in the near past the galaxies now moving apart were nearer... and that in the near future they will contiinue to separate... until the heat lessens and the "cold causes contraction" as we observe and learnt to build bridges with gaps. the cold will cause contraction and the cold IS the cause. and was the cause of contraction that caused density and heat as i will explain.
the temperature now beyond our atmosphere is called 3 degrees kelvin around 300 degrees centigrade colder than freezing water into ice... when that heat "lessens enough" the cold will contract the space and the matter. the cold will cause [and had caused] the movement apart will reverse caused by the cold same aas we observe in small temperature changes.
the contraction will pull all the galaxies near each other... caused by cold contracting which we know is a fact by observation for material. this contraction will continue UNTIL density generates heat and we know... heat causes material to expand even a change of only a hundred degree fahrenheit causes expansion... and will resist the contraction and reverse it. when the heat increases enough the contraction will reverse... stop contracting and expand... and this already occurd... when the heat of the density of the contraction caused expansion as above reversing the contraction.
this model means we must not "extrapolate back in time" to infinite density, because that ignores the fact that heat causes expansion... the contraction reversed due to the cause called heat so the matter of the universe was never "squeezed into the volume of a two liter bottle or less."
4, in fact the estimated "volume" of matter as calculated by the same scientists tells us the smallest volume before the heat reversed the contraction... the volume when they claim matter moved faster than speed of light... moved further than one light year in seconds, far less time than a year, at that "illogical point" the matter was not "that close together" and expanding as indicated by "the need for it to separate too fast" as they claim, and due to the "heat causing expansion" as above.
so in simple terms the universe is like the metal in a bridge. the heat caused expansion meaning the galaxy motion was pushed apart and now the universe is cool so space is not expaanding as we observe in the stars within our galaxy and when it "loses more heat" and gets colder the contraction will pull the matter back near each other until... the heat caused by density with no other cause neither physical nor godly will push the galaxies apart as already happened.
___
5, THE MESSAGE for you:
i asked god how many times did the matter swell and shrink? he did not answer a number but did specify that in his omniscience that is what truly occurd. i do not get all the information, for which i ask (for), but i will convey the information that God sent me to teach: "the cause of the expansion was the increasing heat due to increasing density in contraction, and the cold will be the cause of contraction that will repeat."
God did other stuff, including sending me to deliver several messaages, but did not cause any "big bang" nor start the expansion at infinite density. he himself taught that the heat caused the expansion which is easy to believe as we observe heat and cold effects. the heat and the cold are the causes. as above.
today i read a book that asked the unknowable question? scientists agree on a "standard model" and believe that the galaxies are moving apart and therefore were near each other in the past, if so: what happened before the galaxys were moving apart?
the simple answer to the question is not in that book... but it appears on signs by bridges "bridge freezes, before road surfaces [+do]." surfaces is a noun in that phrase. the bridge contracts at a different rate than the road beyond the brdge.
the universe as a whole entity is simply similar to the metal composing a bridge.
so we can analyze the ideas.
1, when we look up at the stars at night we see that the many stars remain in the "same pattern" unchanged for many hours as they "move like a clock hand" which scientists know results from "facing different star patterns as WE spin" each night. the same patterns repeat night after night but the group changes monthly.
science expects us to believe them, that the universe is expanding. they write several hints that the space is expanding. in fact "respected scientists" dared to write that at one time matter moved faster than the speed of light... which violates a rule of science unless the universe itself is expanding and could expand faster than matter can move... however we DO observe that the stars are not "racing apart from each other near the speed of light" as scientists believe... and write, and expect us to trust them, the stars we observe are the ones in our galaxy... and "space is observably not expanding" between the stars of our own galaxy.
i saw a galaxy thru a telescope. they said i was looking at the nearest one m31. i knew m31 is moving toward us from a reliable book in astrophysics... this also challenges the idea of "expanding space". if we ever stuck stickers on a balloon and then inflated the balloon, then the stickers which were near each other would move apart as "space" expanded and they could not move near each other when the space and the balloon surface is expanding. yet m31 called andromeda is moving near us so the standard model is challenged.
so a more precise description is not the "univere" expanding but the galaxy motion. some galaxies move away from ours and others such as m31 move toward our own. the fancy term is blue shift. anyway it is so far away that despite milllions of bright stars in that galaxy it appears, through high quality amatuer telescopes, like a 'relatively small' cloud "less dark" than its background and far less bright than a visible dim star.
2, if we believe that galaxies are moving apart... can we predict that will continue? can we "reverse" the expansion back to infinite density?
i doubt that.
sure we can estimate the distance "was less" at specific past times... if the time is short, however "how far back" in the past dare we RESPONSIBLY and confidently extrapolate? not enough to claim infinite density in fact even the same book that claims "infinite density" admits the possibility of "oscilating".
in simple terms, not in the book, we can describe the universe like the metal in a bridge.
3. in simple terms, not in the book, we can describe the universe like the metal in a bridge.
when the temperature drops colder from 90 degrees fahrenheit to 10 degrees fahrenheit the metal in the bridge shrinks. and the bridge freezes "before" the surfaces of roads freeze. the contraction is a different rate. cold causes contraction of volume.
we see observe gaps built between segments of bridge [based on past damage] to allow for expansion and contraction of the bridge material... even when changes are less than 100 degrees fahrenheit.
the same thing will occur and has occurd with the galaxy motion.
now and only now we observe indications of some galaxies moving apart.
we can estimate that in the near past the galaxies now moving apart were nearer... and that in the near future they will contiinue to separate... until the heat lessens and the "cold causes contraction" as we observe and learnt to build bridges with gaps. the cold will cause contraction and the cold IS the cause. and was the cause of contraction that caused density and heat as i will explain.
the temperature now beyond our atmosphere is called 3 degrees kelvin around 300 degrees centigrade colder than freezing water into ice... when that heat "lessens enough" the cold will contract the space and the matter. the cold will cause [and had caused] the movement apart will reverse caused by the cold same aas we observe in small temperature changes.
the contraction will pull all the galaxies near each other... caused by cold contracting which we know is a fact by observation for material. this contraction will continue UNTIL density generates heat and we know... heat causes material to expand even a change of only a hundred degree fahrenheit causes expansion... and will resist the contraction and reverse it. when the heat increases enough the contraction will reverse... stop contracting and expand... and this already occurd... when the heat of the density of the contraction caused expansion as above reversing the contraction.
this model means we must not "extrapolate back in time" to infinite density, because that ignores the fact that heat causes expansion... the contraction reversed due to the cause called heat so the matter of the universe was never "squeezed into the volume of a two liter bottle or less."
4, in fact the estimated "volume" of matter as calculated by the same scientists tells us the smallest volume before the heat reversed the contraction... the volume when they claim matter moved faster than speed of light... moved further than one light year in seconds, far less time than a year, at that "illogical point" the matter was not "that close together" and expanding as indicated by "the need for it to separate too fast" as they claim, and due to the "heat causing expansion" as above.
so in simple terms the universe is like the metal in a bridge. the heat caused expansion meaning the galaxy motion was pushed apart and now the universe is cool so space is not expaanding as we observe in the stars within our galaxy and when it "loses more heat" and gets colder the contraction will pull the matter back near each other until... the heat caused by density with no other cause neither physical nor godly will push the galaxies apart as already happened.
___
5, THE MESSAGE for you:
i asked god how many times did the matter swell and shrink? he did not answer a number but did specify that in his omniscience that is what truly occurd. i do not get all the information, for which i ask (for), but i will convey the information that God sent me to teach: "the cause of the expansion was the increasing heat due to increasing density in contraction, and the cold will be the cause of contraction that will repeat."
God did other stuff, including sending me to deliver several messaages, but did not cause any "big bang" nor start the expansion at infinite density. he himself taught that the heat caused the expansion which is easy to believe as we observe heat and cold effects. the heat and the cold are the causes. as above.
No comments:
Post a Comment