palestinian name and family

 the name palestinian, a different family

the arab nations connected themselves to ishmael in the festival of adha sacrifice when "abraham offered his son as a sacrifice". name? kuran doesn't say any name in that part of the story,  because quran relied on jew bible but later commentary interpreted as ismael. if so not from family of ham...
the name palestinian is similar to name philistines but were they same family?
if not same family, but arabs made war then that would be bad "occupation" the way they say about jews? we better check.
the name of nation plistim in josefus and genesis 10.6 is from
**family ham. so...
not same family as ismael from eber. and even quran said the book of moses was good and light so claiming it got corrupted violated quran itself. elsewhere quran said a problem they say things NOT in the book that is the problem but never that the book was a problem but as above the book is good and light so ismeal not same family as philistines  from ham.
ham dwelled in africa as book jubilee claimed and also in the land north east from jordan river as josephus preserved. and josephus specified plistim in "gaza" from family ham. in days of josefus plistim from ham were there, in gaza...
not the arabs who called themselves palestinian and stretch the word palestinian to say sounds like the ancient  philistine which was family ham... but were they ham? as above they themselves insisted on ismael as above by adha festival, not only jews claiming they differ but their own tradition separated, so not ham and not the dwellers named philistine just a stretch now to fool people.
some claim philistine came from isle of greece but they are from ham in gaza as josephus wrote.
solomon ruled until gaza maybe included? they expelled and extinct.

we should not split arpaksad name to kesed as the claim in genesis kasdim is source of abraham. but abraham family sem.
according to book genesis  israelites were from jacob and abraham, that jacob name changed... but we can't confirm that claim.
more likely israel was a name separate from jacob and... whatever unreliable lineage in bible.
better to detach israel from jacob. bible was just a claim to link to jacob by changing name, as if israel was the jacob who had a dream about land but even if true, still just a dream.
maybe book deuteronomy had a different version my father was aram like grammar lost way. if so family aram not kesed by wrongly breaking name arpaksad. so not from kasdim as abraham was but aram a different lineage than abraham.
still deuteronomy can't be confirmed either just serves as a challenge to book genesis because the grammar indicated my father was a lost aram different family than abraham from eber. not eber from arpaksad.
the interpretation a victim of aram doesn't match the word described the aram not cause form called transitive.
instead israel simply lived by jordan river, not came and not as genesis claimed from jacob who name changed not from abraham family eber because that is challenged by deuteronomy aram as above so israelite not from abraham as indicated in their own book deuteronomy which they believe is reliable but corrupted against the word in their own book. jacob is a different name so they claimed "change name same person" as above. but really same as solomon known in jerusalem was always there in past.