chromosomes against evolution

we know that dogs and wolves have 78 chromosomes same as jackals. but some wolves have 76 chromosomes.

we know how they reproduce half from each parent combined.

therefore we can be certain this species of 78 (same family but really all one species based on chromosomes despite external features, those identify subspecies) had parents 78 and therefore parents infinitely 78 each gave half.

certainly same total 78 because we know how they reproduce so parents infinite but not same ancestors as human 46. not common ancestor.

we can see the circular reasoning of evolution lie and the baselessness like saying "ants are plants. ants can grow two ways, cell reproduction like plants or growing tall like plants. since cell reproduction like plants is less random, it must have bren like plants therefore ants are plants" that is the pattern for evidence of evolution baselessly. the same elements.

offer 2 options both evolution pick one of the evolution and claimed that is evidence evolution.  it is as baseless as saying drinkjng water is illegal because it is a crime therefore it is illegal." but baseless.

hard to believe this but notice the elements,  whales dogs and humans have similar bone structure. either EVOLVED separately or EVOLVED from common ancestor.

since less random if common ancestor that is "evidence" of evolution. the same baseless circular as crime. also BOTH options were evolution. we can replace the word as a test.

"whales dogs and humans have similar bone structure. either created separately or created from common ancestor.

since less random if common ancestor that is "evidence" of creator." 

notice the same sentence and pattern as evolution. pattern is identical and can loop baselessly for anything. but the faith of evolution claimed that  as evidence!!

instead we can be certain due to reproduction that dog parents 78 and parents infinite were 78 therefore NOT common ancestor of human and whale not 78. 

humans we know 46 c. in 23 pairs each like a lina bean total  far from human in each sperm or egg. therefore must have had parents infinite 46 c. 

we can imagine a single cell bacteria with 46 c. growing into humans with 46 but bacteria don't have real nucleus.

some claim the ancestor of humans had 48 and chromosomes FUSED explained 46.

only if blind faith.

if we analyze the possibilities from known twins. an egg and sperm 24 total 48 ape pithicus gets pregnant. chromosomes fuse to 46 either by interfered or random without god no problem yet we can even assume most of the silliness.

the cell 46 grows into twins... like paternal twins same egg. now we have two human 46 to reproduce. tada?? they would both be same gender only male with female cells can reproduce not two eggs nor two sperm... we will have faith must have occurred?? but every human male has many sperm together sperm only attach to egg not sperm to sperm for total 46.

so the two can't be twins. we would be forced to have faith that the fuse was not god despite alteration that needs a cause and have faith that it happened at least twice because we need egg and sperm parents. the need of two in one event was imagined as twins but they would be identical not egg to sperm.

the two events of fusing would need to occur, despite randomly near enough for the two human parents to meet.

if the random fuse, chromosomes 48 to 46,   was in east coast ape born male human 46c, and random fuse egg type far inland from coast they wouldn't meet to reproduce unless miraculously the chromosome fusion occurred at least TWICE two events near enough for the parent 46 to meet and reproduce so the simpler less unlikely miracle is one creation event because less likely many randoms... with desired results the same preference used in the above common ancestor ckaim less random indicated common ancestor similarly this possibility less random in less events and not randomly far anywhere in australia and asia but randomly fused 46, and miraculously near enough for egg type 46 to meet with sperm type 46 against random so we see for such a miracle, need "more faith against random" than faith that god changed dirt into man.

certainly dog not common ancestor despite   "the forelimbs of whales, humans, birds, and dogs" bone structure less random if common but can't be common as above for both reasons a, the parent infonite of dog known certainly 78 c. so not common ancestor of human 46 c.

the argument of less random prevent the faith in separate fusing events of chromosomes more than once but conveniently near not random places. need two for egg 46 and sperm 46. twins with one fuse event would be identical copies not egg type with sperm type. having faith that the fuse events must have happened randomly but not random locations as above is as miraculous as a wizard change dirt into human. in addition to nature and biology , not rejected biology but sometimes biology and dometimes magic so the preferred less ranfom principle in the false claims of common ancestor can be applied to challenge the faith in random fused chromosomes events but nearby.

well that was "under harsh sun" with u.v. rays in a certain sunny place? but u.v. doesn't change chromosomes.  we know how reproduce. 

 the same faith in fusion miracle is miracle of virgin birth, not conflict biology nor reject biology but also besides biology sometimes   magical virgin births, besides nature biology birth. not denied because some biology is true. the ssme faith as fused chromosomes in more events and not planned nor in random places.

if a miracle of such fusion is believable, even when considering the story required,  then certainly less random miracles of virgin birth and changed dirt to man.